Blasted — Indigenous bills advancing through Montana legislature
Two bills that are priorities for the Legislature's American Indian Caucus are back in play after strategic moves by Sen. Jonathan Windy Boy, a Democrat from Box Elder, last Friday afternoon.
At the end of the Senate's floor session, Windy Boy motioned that the Montana Indian Child Welfare and Indian Education for All bills be pulled from the committees where they had previously been voted down and revived by the full chamber.
In Friday's Senate floor session, Windy Boy blasted both bills. For Montana Indian Child Welfare he stated 'It had 26 proponents and zero opponents, and it is a good bill'.
Sen. Dennis Lenz, a Republican from Billings and Chair of Senate Health, Welfare, and Human Safety committee that tabled the bill objected to the motion stating that the issue of MICWA is complex.
The Senate voted 29-21 in favor of the motion, the bill will now be heard for second reading by the Senate.
A blast motion simply allows a bill sponsor to pull a bill from its respective committee after it has been heard and is either voted down, tabled, or the committee chair refuses to take executive action on the bill. The blast requires a simple majority vote by the Senate.
As for the second bill, Windy Boy motioned for it to also be pulled from committee stating 'It had 15 proponents and one opponent, and I did have an amendment that would address that at one point and when the opponent spoke up they said they would support the bill afterwards.'
Sen. John Fuller, a Republican from Kalispell and Chair of the Education and Cultural Resources committee objected to the motion on the grounds that it would be a violation of procedural rulings.
It was another victory for Windy Boy with the Senate voting 26-24, advancing the bill to be heard for second reading along with the other.
It was a successful day for Windy Boy and his bills.
'It feels good,' said Windy Boy, 'It's good for the kiddos.'
Windy Boy joked 'I'll have to buy [Sen. Mike] Yakawich a Happy Meal for supporting both.'
On Monday, Feb 24, both bills were heard on the Senate floor for second reading.
The Montana Indian Child Welfare Act bill involved a very lengthy conversation.
Windy Boy reflected on a personal story of the death of his daughter and the ensuing crisis of finding a home for the seven children left behind after her passing.
Windy Boy and his wife took in all seven grandchildren and relayed what would have happened to the kids if he did not take them in. Explaining that if he did not step up and raise his grandchildren they may have been lost to the foster care system, opening the children up to being separated from one another and the possible severance from their culture.
Windy Boy stated that the cultural compacts within the MICWA bill will be able to address these issues.
Sen. Daniel Emrich, a Republican from Great Falls, encouraged a no vote on the bill on the grounds that the requirement in section one of the bill requires a cultural compact between the guardian and respective tribe of the Indigenous child as a 'serious constitutional concern'.
Windy Boy's answer to this was to refer to the Montana state Constitution article 10 section one subsection 2. 'The state constitution recognizes the unique cultural heritage of the tribes in Montana' said Windy Boy.
The bill was voted on by the Senate body and passed second reading 31-19 and will now be heard for third reading before going to the House.
Indian Education for All was heard for second reading immediately after and involved much less debate.
Windy Boy emphasized the accountability required by the bill, appealing to people's want to ensure government funding is used transparently. Simply put it is an accountability piece of legislation.
'So this basically is an accountability bill to make sure that if you get $1 and that dollar is supposed to be geared towards educating the students at the local school district, it's just to see 'show me what you're doing,'' Windy Boy said.
No one spoke out against the bill with it passing second reading 31-19 and will also be heard for third reading before advancing to the House.
After multiple bills being held up in committees related to Native issues, Montana American Indian Caucus Members look to use the blast motion for their bills to the senate floor, a rare situation, but members believe it is the best way to accomplish their agenda of strengthening Native issues
At a Wednesday meeting of Montana's American Indian Caucus, several members raised concerns about their bills being held up in committees and or being tabled or voted down. With Republicans holding a strong majority in both the Senate and the House, it is an uphill battle to get legislation through, prompting some new strategies by the caucus – who are mostly Democratic lawmakers.
During last Wednesday's meeting, caucus members concluded enough is enough.
Sen. Jonathan Windy Boy, a Democrat from Box Elder said he would have the votes to blast his bill in the Senate, citing the current dysfunction of the chamber.
Windy Boy's Montana Indian Child Welfare Act was tabled by a committee on Feb. 14, though he said other child welfare bills have advanced from the same committee.
The Indian Education for All bill, also from Windy Boy, made several changes to the program that Windy Boy argued created more accountability regarding the reporting of funding. His bill was tabled Jan. 30.
Following Windy Boy, Sen. Susan Webber, Blackfeet and a Democrat from Browning, also spoke to her Senate Bill 180, which aims to include the child's heritage in divorce proceedings. It was voted down Feb. 14, but Webber said she plans to blast it Feb. 25.
Sen. Shane Morigeau, D-Missoula and Salish and Kootenai, also threw his hat in the ring regarding his bill to recognize Indigenous Peoples Day in Montana and is 'On the Jonathan Windy Boy wagon' on blasting his bill as well. Morigeau is confident his bill 'Will not get rid of Columbus Day but will let people celebrate what they want.' Similar legislation has died in previous sessions.
The aforementioned dysfunction of the senate stems from what is known as the nine moderate Republicans. These nine have continually been a thorn in the side for the Republican majority.
When asked if this factors into Moderates being more open to working on key issues for Montana with Democrats, Windy Boy said 'I don't like to read too much into issues like that, but if it happens, no doubt that's probably what those Moderates are thinking.'
Multiple bills this session that have made it to the senate floor have been opposed by the more Conservative Republicans, yet the Moderates have sided with the Democrats on certain matters such as keeping Medicaid Expansion.
When asked about situations where individuals work across the aisle to support a bill they may not fully support in exchange for support on their own bill, Webber acknowledged 'That is a part of it and there is some of that going on.'
She added that for her bill in particular, she's been able to gain support by talking to and explaining it to others.
Morigeau addressed this strategy from a different lens, looking back on last session and explaining a bill to 'establish autism facilities grant program' that was voted down in committee. He then turned to a Republican and asked if they would carry the bill for him.
They did, and the bill was signed into law.
For Windy Boy, engaging with Moderates has been a productive experience bringing forth appreciation that they are open to listening to what he wants to accomplish, which he attributes to these Republicans being a reflection of their voter base that cares for Montana priorities.
Being open to learning from different perspectives from across Montana is an important skill needed to successfully transverse issues, something Windy Boy is well attuned to due to his many years at the Capitol.
'The way I see it is that they're more open minded on looking at that bigger picture, so they understand what the issue is about from our version, our angle,' Windy Boy said.
Currently, caucus members believe the issue of bills being held up in committees creates large setbacks for these lawmakers and that using the ability to blast bills will more than likely continue.
"I think so as of right now, because it is the only way we can really get our bills through,'Webber said.
Windy Boy has been a strong advocate for Indigenous issues for the entire 23 years that he has served the legislature and enjoys stepping up to the plate to cross the aisle and find common ground with Republicans.
Looking at it as an opportunity to address stereotypes inflicted on both sides. Even after he was told that doing so was a lost cause to which he ignored.
'I am the kind of guy that I just walk right up and start talking to them,' Windy Boy said.
He went on to say that people can often be mislabeled.
What I found out are people that are labeled as racist, people that are labeled as discriminatory, all of that,' Windy Boy said. 'My take from it is, they're uneducated, they don't understand me. But at the end of the day, after I turned around and educated them from my approach of what I'm talking about, they have kind of one of those 'Aha moments,' and so those ones there, who have been labeled as racist and discriminatory have become some of my strongest proponents.'
For Windy Boy's bills, they must now pass through the Senate and the House with the possibility that other Montana American Indian Caucus members may use the same strategy of blasting their bills through committee hold ups.
This story is co-published by Montana Free Press and ICT, a news partnership that covers the Montana American Indian Caucus during the state's 2025 legislative session
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Los Angeles Times
3 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump plays golf in Scotland while protesters take to the streets and decry his visit
EDINBURGH, Scotland — President Trump played golf Saturday at his course on Scotland's coast while protesters around the country took to the streets to decry his visit and accuse United Kingdom leaders of pandering to the unpopular American president. Trump and his son Eric played with the U.S. ambassador to Britain, Warren Stephens, near Turnberry, a historic course that the Trump family's company took over in 2014. Security was tight, and protesters kept at a distance were unseen by the group during Trump's round. He was dressed in black with a white 'USA' cap and was spotted driving a golf cart. The president appeared to play an opening nine holes, stop for lunch, then head out for nine more. By the middle of the afternoon, plainclothes security officials began leaving, suggesting Trump was done for the day. Hundreds of demonstrators gathered on the cobblestone and tree-lined street in front of the U.S. Consulate about 100 miles away in Edinburgh, Scotland's capital. Speakers told the crowd that Trump was not welcome and criticized British Prime Minister Keir Starmer for striking a recent trade deal to avoid stiff U.S. tariffs on goods imported from the U.K. Protests were planned in other cities as environmental activists, opponents of Israel's war with Hamas in Gaza and pro-Ukraine groups loosely formed a 'Stop Trump Coalition.' Anita Bhadani, an organizer, said the protests were 'kind of like a carnival of resistance.' June Osbourne, 52, a photographer and photo historian from Edinburgh, wore a red cloak and white hood, recalling 'The Handmaid's Tale.' Osbourne held up a picture of Trump with 'Resist' stamped over his face. 'I think there are far too many countries that are feeling the pressure of Trump and that they feel that they have to accept him, and we should not accept him here,' Osbourne said. The dual U.S.-British citizen said the Republican president was 'the worst thing that has happened to the world, the U.S., in decades.' Trump's late mother, Mary Anne MacLeod, was born on the Isle of Lewis in Scotland, and the president has suggested he feels at home in the country. But the protesters did their best to change that. 'I don't think I could just stand by and not do anything,' said Amy White, 15, of Edinburgh, who attended with her parents. She held a cardboard sign that said, 'We don't negotiate with fascists.' 'So many people here loathe him,' she said. 'We're not divided. We're not divided by religion, or race or political allegiance, we're just here together because we hate him.' Other demonstrators held signs of pictures with Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, as the fervor over files in the late child abuser's case has created a political crisis for the president. In the view of Mark Gorman, 63, of Edinburgh, 'The vast majority of Scots have this sort of feeling about Trump that, even though he has Scottish roots, he's a disgrace.' Gorman, who works in advertising, said he came out 'because I have deep disdain for Donald Trump and everything that he stands for.' A Scottish newspaper, the National, greeted Trump's arrival with a banner headline in its Friday edition that read, 'Convicted U.S. felon to arrive in Scotland.' Saturday's protests were not nearly as large as the throngs that demonstrated across Scotland when Trump played at Turnberry during his first term in 2018. But, as bagpipes played, people chanted, 'Trump out!' and raised dozens of homemade signs with such messages as 'No red carpet for dictators,' 'We don't want you here' and 'Stop Trump. Migrants welcome.' One dog had a sign attached that said 'No treats for tyrants.' Some on the far right took to social media to call for gatherings supporting Trump in places such as Glasgow. Trump also plans to talk trade with Starmer and Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president. But golf is a major focus. The family will also visit another Trump course near Aberdeen in northeastern Scotland, before returning to Washington on Tuesday. The Trumps will cut the ribbon and play a new, second course in that area, which officially opens to the public next month. Scottish First Minister John Swinney, who is also set to meet with Trump during the visit, announced that public money will go to staging the 2025 Nexo Championship, previously known previously as the Scottish Championship, at Trump's first course near Aberdeen next month. 'The Scottish government recognizes the importance and benefits of golf and golf events, including boosting tourism and our economy,' Swinney said. At a protest Saturday in Aberdeen, Scottish Parliament member Maggie Chapman told the crowd of hundreds: 'We stand in solidarity, not only against Trump but against everything he and his politics stand for.' The president has long lobbied for Turnberry to host the British Open, which it has not done since he took over ownership. In a social media post Saturday, Trump quoted the retired golfer Gary Player as saying Turnberry was among the 'Top Five Greatest Golf Courses' he had played in as a professional. The president, in the post, misspelled the city where his golf course is. Weissert writes for the Associated Press.


Chicago Tribune
3 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
The House is looking into the Epstein investigation. Here's what could happen next
WASHINGTON — A key House committee is looking into the investigation of the late Jeffrey Epstein for sex trafficking crimes, working to subpoena President Donald Trump's Department of Justice for files in the case as well as hold a deposition of Epstein's former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell. The Republican-led House Oversight and Government Reform Committee acted just before House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., sent lawmakers home early for a monthlong break from Washington. The committee's moves are evidence of the mounting pressure for disclosure in a case that Trump has unsuccessfully urged his supporters to move past. But they were also just the start of what can be a drawn out process. Here's what could happen next in the House inquiry as lawmakers seek answers in a case that has sparked rampant speculation since Epstein's death in 2019 and more recently caused many in the Trump administration to renege on promises for a complete accounting. Democrats, joined by three Republicans, were able to successfully initiate the subpoena from a subcommittee just as the House was leaving Washington for its August recess. But it was just the start of negotiations over the subpoena. The subcommittee agreed to redact the names and personal information of any victims, but besides that, their demand for information is quite broad, encompassing 'un-redacted Epstein files.' As the parameters of the subpoena are drafted, Democrats are demanding that it be fulfilled within 30 days from when it is served to Attorney General Pam Bondi. They have also proposed a list of document demands, including the prosecutorial decisions surrounding Epstein, documents related to his death, and communication from any president or executive official regarding the matter. Ultimately, Republicans who control the committee will have more power over the scope of the subpoena, but the fact that it was approved with a strong bipartisan vote gives it some heft. The committee chairman, Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., said he told the speaker that 'Republicans on the Oversight Committee were going to move to be more aggressive in trying to get transparency with the Epstein files. So, we did that, and I think that's what the American people want.' Comer has said that he is hoping that staff from the committee can interview Maxwell under oath on Aug. 11 at or near the federal prison in Florida where she is serving a lengthy sentence for child sex trafficking. In a congressional deposition, the subject typically has an attorney present to help them answer — or not answer — questions while maintaining their civil rights. Subjects also have the ability to decline to answer questions if it could be used against them in a criminal case, though in this instance that might not matter because Maxwell has already been convicted of many of the things she will likely be asked about. Maxwell has the ability to negotiate some of the terms of the deposition, and she already conducted 1 1/2 days of interviews with Justice Department officials this past week. Democrats, however, warn that Maxwell is not to be trusted. 'We should understand that this is a very complex witness and someone that has caused great harm and not a good person to a lot of people,' Rep. Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the oversight committee, told reporters this week. Committee Republicans also initiated a motion to subpoena a host of other people, including former President Bill Clinton, former Sen. Hillary Clinton as well as the former attorneys general dating back to Alberto Gonzales, who served under George W. Bush. It's not clear how this sweeping list of proposed subpoenas will actually play out, but Comer has said, 'We're going to move quickly on that.' Trump is no stranger to fighting against congressional investigations and subpoenas. And as with most subpoenas, the Justice Department can negotiate the terms of how it fulfills the subpoena. It can also make legal arguments against handing over certain information. Joshua A. Levy, who teaches on congressional investigations at Georgetown Law School and is a partner at Levy Firestone Muse, said that the results of the subpoena 'depend on whether the administration wants to work through the traditional accommodation process with the House and reach a resolution or if one or both sides becomes entrenched in its position.' If Congress is not satisfied with Bondi's response — or if she were to refuse to hand over any information — there are several ways lawmakers can try to enforce the subpoena. However, that would require a vote to hold Bondi in contempt of Congress. It's practically unheard of for one political party to vote to hold one of its own members in contempt of Congress, but the Epstein saga has also cut across political lines and driven a wedge in the GOP. Ultimately, the bipartisan vote to subpoena the files showed how political pressure is mounting on the Trump administration to disclose the files. Politics, policy and the law are all bound up together in this case, and many in Congress want to see a full accounting of the sex trafficking investigation. 'We can't allow individuals, especially those at the highest level of our government, to protect child sex traffickers,' said Rep. Summer Lee, D-Pa., a committee member. The Trump administration is already facing the potential for even more political tension. When Congress comes back to Washington in September, a bipartisan group of House lawmakers is working to advance to a full House vote a bill that aims to force the public release of the Epstein files.


Chicago Tribune
3 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump says Japan will invest $550 billion in US at his direction. It may not be a sure thing.
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump is bragging that Japan has given him, as part of a new trade framework, $550 billion to invest in the United States. It's an astonishing figure, but still subject to negotiation and perhaps not the sure thing he's portraying. 'Japan is putting up $550 billion in order to lower their tariffs a little bit,' Trump said Thursday. 'They put up, as you could call it, seed money. Let's call it seed money.' He said 90% of any profits from the money invested would go to the U.S. even if Japan had put up the funds. 'It's not a loan or anything, it's a signing bonus,' the Republican president said, on the trade framework that lowered his threatened tariff from 25% to 15%, including on autos. A White House official said the terms are being negotiated and nothing has been formalized in writing. The official, who insisted on anonymity to detail the terms of the talks, suggested the goal was for the $550 billion fund to make investments at Trump's direction. The sum is significant: It would represent more than 10% of Japan's entire gross domestic product. The Japan External Trade Organization estimates that direct investment into the U.S. economy topped $780 billion in 2023. It is unclear the degree to which the $550 billion could represent new investment or flow into existing investment plans. What the trade framework announced Tuesday has achieved is a major talking point for the Trump administration. The president has claimed to have brought trillions of dollars in new investment into the U.S., though the impact of those commitments have yet to appear in the economic data for jobs, construction spending or manufacturing output. The framework also enabled Trump to say other countries are agreeing to have their goods taxed, even if some of the cost of those taxes are ultimately passed along to U.S. consumers. On the $550 billion, Japan's Cabinet Office said it involves the credit facility of state-affiliated financial institutions, such as Japan Bank for International Cooperation. Further details would be decided based on the progress of the investment deals. Japanese trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa, upon returning to Japan, did not discuss the terms of the $550 billion investment. Akazawa said he believes a written joint statement is necessary, at least on working levels, to avoid differences. He is not thinking about a legally binding trade pact. The U.S. apparently released its version of the deal while Japanese officials were on their return flight home. 'If we find differences of understanding, we may have to point them out and say 'that's not what we discussed,'' Akazawa said. The U.S. administration said the fund would be invested in critical minerals, pharmaceuticals, computer chips and shipbuilding, among other industries. It has said Japan will also buy 100 airplanes from Boeing and rice from U.S. farmers as part of the framework, which Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said would be evaluated every three months. 'And if the president is unhappy, then they will boomerang back to the 25% tariff rates, both on cars and the rest of their products. And I can tell you that I think at 25, especially in cars, the Japanese economy doesn't work,' Bessent told Fox News' 'The Ingraham Angle.' Akazawa denied that Bessent's quarterly review was part of the negotiations. 'In my past eight trips to the United States during which I held talks with the president and the ministers,' Akazawa said. 'I have no recollection of discussing how we ensure the implementation of the latest agreement between Japan and the United States.' He said it would cause major disruptions to the economy and administrative processes if the rates first rise to 25% as scheduled on Aug. 1 and then drop to 15%. 'We definitely want to avoid that and I believe that is the understanding shared by the U.S. side,' he said. On buying U.S. rice, Japanese officials have said they have no plans to raise the current 770,000-ton 'minimum access' cap to import more from America. Agricultural Minister Shinjiro Koizumi said Japan will decide whether to increase U.S. rice imports and that Japan is not committed to a fixed quota. Trump's commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, has suggested that the Japanese agreement is putting pressure on other countries such as South Korea to strike deals with the U.S. Trump, who is traveling in Scotland, plans to meet on Sundayv with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to discuss trade. 'Whatever Donald Trump wants to build, the Japanese will finance it for him,' Lutnick said Thursday on CNBC. 'Pretty amazing.'