logo
Trade commission protects legacy steel giant from competitive imports

Trade commission protects legacy steel giant from competitive imports

Mail & Guardian04-05-2025
The International Trade Administration Commission of South Africa (Itac) has imposed a 9% tariff on imported hot-rolled steel to protect domestic producers, in particular the legacy steelmaker ArcelorMittal South Africa (Amsa).
The decision follows an application by the South African Iron and Steel Institute (Saisi) on behalf of Amsa for remedial action. The tariff applies to all countries except listed developing countries which collectively account for less than 10% of imports.
Itac announced the final determination on Friday, citing a 105% surge in steel imports between 2020 and 2023—almost half of which originated from China, 22% from the E.U and 6.7% from the U.S—as the
Saisi requested protection against a flood of imports, which Itac agreed to by imposing the annual 9% tariff on hot-rolled steel for the next three years.
Hot-rolled steel, which is processed above 972°C for strength and flexibility, is used in mining and earth-moving equipment, pipes, tubes and water tanks. Domestic merchants largely import this product due to pricing for machinery and construction equipment.
In its investigation, Itac found that 'unforeseen developments' such as global oversupply had harmed producers in the Southern African Customs Union (Sacu), which comprises South Africa, Namibia, Botswana, Lesotho and Eswatini.
While the commission acknowledged that overwhelming competition in itself is not inherently unfair, it concluded there is a clear 'causal link' between the surge in imports and
In its submission to the commission, the Botswana government reported that it had conducted a similar analysis between 2020 and 2024, which confirmed that imports had the same impact on its local industry.
Critics argue instead that Amsa's outdated production methods and high prices make it uncompetitive in the current global market, thus necessitating protective measures.
Once the continent's leading producer of steel products such as rods, bars and rails, Amsa has received three bailouts since 2024 amounting to R3-billion in an effort to stave off downsizing.
In addition to the new bailout, the department of trade, industry and competition (dtic) previously imposed a 9% tariff on long steel and a 52% anti-dumping duty on steel imports at the behest of Amsa.
Speaking to the Mail & Guardian, Itac commissioner Ayabonga Cawe said domestic production was in crisis and required urgent intervention. However, he added that local demand remains worryingly weak.
According to the Steel and Engineering Industries Federation of Southern Africa (Seifsa), the country's per capita steel consumption dropped by 37% — from 92 kilograms in 2013 to just 67 kilograms in 2024 — far below the global average of 230 kilograms.
'We need a hybrid production model that accommodates both traditional iron ore beneficiation and modern electric arc furnaces that use scrap metal,' Cawe said. 'India is scrambling to import scrap, while we sit with both scrap metal and iron ore. There has been an effort to turn the country into a construction site, and we have to be honest it is taking very long to kick off.'
National Employers' Association of South Africa chair Gerhard Papenfus said that the government's continued support for Amsa is 'just delaying the inevitable' and 'denying the reality' of the company's inability to compete.
'The bottom line is that the mill is uncompetitive and running on 50% production. That is why they want protection, lowered electricity prices and subsidies on iron ore,' said Papenfus, adding 'Everyone is paying to keep this old mill alive.'
Following its announcement to shut down operations at its Newcastle and Vereeniging plants —
Amsa maintains that it cannot delay the closures beyond August without further state support, including import duties on foreign steel and an end to subsidised scrap-based steelmaking.
In February, Gauteng Premier Panyaza Lesufi announced that a BRICS partner will take over steel production after Amsa's wind down in Vereeniging, already investing R2.5 million to preserve 100 jobs.
The International Development Corporation (IDC) and China's Hubei Iron and Steel Group (HBIS) signed a multi-phase R82.7-billion memorandum of understanding in September to establish a local low-cost iron and steel facility.
The latest Amsa bailout includes a six-month due diligence review by the IDC, which will determine whether to increase its 7% stake or exit entirely.
Asked about the review's objectives, IDC head of corporate affairs Tshepo Ramodibe told the M&G that the corporation 'can't pre-empt outcomes or the next course of action'.
'The due diligence will inform the nature and extent of our support to the business,' he said. 'Transitioning Amsa's processes to scrap-based steel production is one of the questions the review seeks to interrogate.'
The company,
Dtic spokesperson Yamkela Fanini added that Amsa remains the country's sole producer of hot-rolled and long steel products and that the
'While the government cannot dictate production technologies, decarbonisation and diversification are central to South Africa's industrial policy. This includes decarbonising steel production and promoting green methods for both flat and long steel,' Fanini said.
Cawe acknowledged a persistent misalignment between upstream and downstream players in the steel industry — something that the government's
While downstream manufacturers want to import cheaper and climate compliant steel to lower input costs, upstream producers such as Amsa want protection from international competition, creating uncertainty across the sector.
Despite Amsa's determination to remain a central player, downstream industries increasingly favour competitive imports.
In its report Seifsa said the metal industry, which accounts for 25.5% of the manufacturing sector, has not recovered since its 2007 peak. It contracted by 12.2% at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic and declined by a further 1.4% in 2024.
The federation states the industry has shed over 200 000 jobs since the global recession from employing 570 000 in 2008 to a little over 360 000 in 2025 and continues to see an annual 0.7% decline in fixed capital investment.
It warns that the prolonged weakness in production may become structural. Steel-related goods such as fabricated metals and machinery, accounting for 43% production, experienced a combined 15% decline in output last year.
'Post-Covid deterioration is most notable in capacity utilisation, with all steel subsectors operating below the optimal 85% level,' the federation said.
Seifsa also noted a R188-billion trade deficit on steel imports from China, while South Africa's steel exports to China amounted to just R43-billion.
On behalf of Amsa the steel institute argued that China's state-subsidised economy creates unfair advantages, flooding the global market and depressing domestic demand in emerging economies.
'Given the nature of the steel industry excess capacity in one region can potentially displace production in other regions, harming producers in those markets,' Saisi said in its submission to Itac.
However, the UK government, submitting as a concerned party, expressed doubts about the commission's claim that unforeseen global developments directly harmed local producers.
While the UK acknowledged that Chinese subsidies contribute to overcapacity, it said the commission failed to consider the full extent of local preference for cheaper foreign steel.
Japan's Mills Steel Corporation also questioned the scope of the investigation, arguing that the data window of 2020 to 2023 shows a misleading increase trend narrative, as imports had declined pre-pandemic and fluctuated during the post-pandemic recovery period.
The company argued Amsa
The commission stressed that the 9% tariff will remain in place for 200 days to allow domestic producers time to adjust.
It is yet to be seen if Amsa will improve its competitiveness and whether the country will ever rebuild its status as a construction hub given the government's continued support for the legacy steel giant.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Who will steer the R55bn marriage of MultiChoice and Canal+?
Who will steer the R55bn marriage of MultiChoice and Canal+?

Daily Maverick

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

Who will steer the R55bn marriage of MultiChoice and Canal+?

There's a new power couple in African media. After nearly five years of courting, Canal+ has finally put a ring on MultiChoice to form a pan-African content colossus with global ambitions. French media titan Canal+ has secured the final go-ahead to acquire MultiChoice in a landmark R55-billion deal. After years of quiet manoeuvring and regulatory hurdles, the merger is now a question of who controls what. The Competition Tribunal's conditional approval, granted late last week, closes the chapter on a five-year 'creeping takeover' and opens a new era in African broadcasting. Now it's a balancing act weighing foreign capital with national sovereignty on a digital scale with local content. Enter the media monarchy In return for its princely sum, Canal+, owned by the French conglomerate Vivendi, gets access to MultiChoice's 14.5 million Anglophone and Lusophone subscribers, the DStv powerhouse, sports juggernaut SuperSport, and a foothold in streaming via Showmax. MultiChoice, facing rising costs and subscriber declines, finds itself rescued by a suitor with deep pockets and pan-African ambition. Combined, the merged entity will serve more than 24 million subscribers across 50 countries — instantly becoming the largest pay-TV and streaming provider on the continent. However, if Canal+ was hoping for free access, South African regulators had other plans. The deal's approval came wrapped in layers of red tape — not as a deterrent, but as a deliberate design feature. Transformation goals Central to the regulatory conditions is the creation of LicenceCo, an independent company that will hold MultiChoice South Africa's broadcast licence. It will be majority-owned and controlled by historically disadvantaged South Africans and employees. Crucially, Canal+ has no control and no board seats. This structural firewall protects South Africa's legal requirements around media ownership, ensures transformation goals are met and serves as a template for foreign investment in other sensitive sectors. Phuthuma Nathi, the B-BBEE shareholder darling, increases its economic interest in LicenceCo to 27%, with a new employee trust added. The licence, and the local airwaves it governs, stay South African. The R30bn lobola The Competition Tribunal didn't just demand structural separation; it also extracted a commitment package valued at more than R30-billion. This includes: A three-year moratorium on retrenchments linked to the merger; Significant investment in local content production, sports broadcasting, SMME procurement and Corporate Social Investment programmes; Ongoing free-to-air broadcast access for key sporting events, safeguarding the public's ability to view major matches without a subscription; and Local skills development through Canal+'s 'University Programme', to train historically disadvantaged individuals in broadcasting and production. In a media environment where Netflix and Amazon Prime are increasingly dominant, this local-first approach is designed to future-proof South African media. Showmax, SuperSport and scale Behind the regulatory muscle lies a clear commercial imperative. MultiChoice has struggled in recent years, shedding 2.8 million linear subscribers and burning cash to prop up Showmax 2.0, its streaming reboot built on Comcast tech and bolstered by NBC Universal's 30% equity stake. Canal+ brings financial stability and scale. It also inherits Irdeto, MultiChoice's profitable cybersecurity unit, and Showmax's potential to become Africa's answer to global streamers. Vivendi, Canal+'s parent company, views this merger as critical to its own transformation and part of a plan to split into three listed entities, with Canal+ as its global growth engine. Listing Canal+ on the JSE within nine months of deal completion is a further nod to local inclusion, visibility, and capital market confidence. The shiny ring can't cover controversial holes While South Africa celebrates a structurally sound deal with tangible local benefits, not all observers are convinced. Critics warn that Canal+'s track record and the Bolloré Group's 30.4% stake in it come with baggage. Vivendi's past includes one of the largest corporate losses in history and regulatory infractions that still cast a shadow. Vincent Bolloré, the billionaire behind the curtain, faces corruption charges in France and has been accused of turning Canal+'s French media outlets into right-wing political mouthpieces. With Canal+ now embedded in South Africa's broadcasting ecosystem, some fear creeping influence over editorial independence, particularly if there are future attempts to deepen ownership or control beyond the current firewall. Marriage isn't buying a horse Mergers are easy to announce but hard to manage. However, the competition bodies have played their hand cleverly — extracting commitments, safeguarding jobs and setting a precedent for how global capital must behave when it enters South Africa's strategic sectors. The long-term test lies ahead. Can Showmax truly compete with Netflix? Can SuperSport keep its sports crown as global streamers outbid for rights? Will LicenceCo be a transformative force or a regulatory box-ticker? Will Canal+ respect the firewall, or try to chip away at it over time? The merged entity is now king of the hill in African broadcasting, but it's a kingdom that won't run on size alone. Trust, execution and transformation will be the currencies of success. DM

The Finance Ghost: The battle for MAS is over – now begins the war?
The Finance Ghost: The battle for MAS is over – now begins the war?

Daily Maverick

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

The Finance Ghost: The battle for MAS is over – now begins the war?

With Hyprop terminating its bid for MAS Real Estate, Prime Kapital has won the first skirmish. But the war is in its early stages… MAS Real Estate is the company that nobody expected to become the juiciest M&A story on the JSE this year. All the ingredients are here – big hitters on either side of the table and a board in the middle that is coming under increasing pressure by the day. And depending on the outcome of the extraordinary general meeting that has been scheduled for Wednesday, 27 August, at the request of a group of South African institutional investors, we could see an equally big hitter like Des de Beer landing up on the board as well. But why all this interest and opportunistic dealmaking activity? Why are such impressive sharks circling this particular boat? Blood in the water Although MAS isn't exactly a household name, it does have a market cap of R15.6-billion. Despite this significant size, MAS has been struggling to prepare for upcoming bond maturities, flagging weak support in the bond market for companies with MAS' risk profile. This led to the suspension of the MAS dividend in 2023 and subsequent panic selling by dividend-focused investors. Then, as various other strategies to strengthen the balance sheet came to fruition, investors with more of a net asset value (NAV) or total return focus (vs purely caring about the dividend yield) bought shares, leading to a recovery in the share price to levels seen before the panic selling. But here's the really important bit: the current share price still represents a substantial discount to NAV, which means that there's money to be made by getting control of the assets and managing the balance sheet in such a way that value can be unlocked over time. A lot of money. And in reality, the progress made by MAS towards being ready for bond refinancing or redemption activity is probably the major catalyst for the recent flurry of interest, as the best time to acquire control of a business is when it is still a recovery story rather than a bright and shiny object that everyone loves (and hence wants to be paid a fortune to part with). Either way, the substantial gap between the 52-week high of R24.65 and 52-week low of R15.76 tells quite a story, with plenty of opportunities for traders along the way. But aside from the short-term gains (and losses) on offer, the real story here is the battle between Prime Kapital and Hyprop, with both parties keen to get their hands on the MAS value unlock opportunity. Disclosure, dividends and liquidity – these are the tools of war In the world of corporate finance, parties bring different negotiating tactics to the table. At Prime Kapital for example, one of their key strengths in this fight is that they hold the keys to unlocking the capital that is currently tied up in the joint venture between MAS and Prime Kapital. With so much focus on the balance sheet at MAS and a desire to get back to paying dividends, that capital is a highly valuable bargaining chip. This joint venture has been a major bone of contention for institutional investors, with allegations that the board of MAS didn't disclose important elements of the joint venture agreement to the market. Simply put, investors have been caught by surprise that Prime Kapital holds quite so much influence over the broader MAS balance sheet and cashflow profile. This has led to the demand by investors for changes to the board, which would include the removal of a couple of directors and the appointment of several new independent directors. The 'white knight' for these investors is Hyprop, a JSE-listed Reit (real estate investment trust) that is well known to the local institutional investor community. Such is the support that Hyprop enjoys that it had no difficulties in raising more than R800-million in an accelerated bookbuild process, based on little more than a vague suggestion that it would have a go at acquiring MAS if it raised the money. But of course, R800-million is nowhere near enough to acquire control in a fund with a market cap of R15.6-billion, which brings us to the next negotiating point: liquidity of the shares. For Prime Kapital to acquire control of MAS, it needs to convince shareholders to accept a part-cash, part-shares deal. Although it is currently suggesting that it would put more cash on the table than Hyprop (which is a positive), the downside to its indicative offer is that the equity portion would take the form of an inward-listed preference share that is unlikely to have much liquidity at all. The actual terms of the preference shares do have some appealing features, but they will almost certainly require investors to take a long-term view of holding them until some kind of redemption event. In contrast, Hyprop shares are liquid and investors who swap their MAS exposure for shares in Hyprop would have no trouble in reducing that stake if required. The Hyprop offer is thus perceived as having a stronger equity portion, while the Prime Kapital indicative terms are stronger on the cash side. Understanding these levers is important, as it shows how we got to a place where Hyprop put in a bid that was terminated almost as quickly as it arrived. A highly unusual offer structure Offers to shareholders are usually open for a long time, as there's a process in which the board of the target company is given a chance to hire an independent expert and give the market a proper view on the transaction. Such offers are also usually open for acceptance even once important conditions have been met, allowing shareholders to accept an offer that they know is going ahead. And in most cases, those conditions are outside of the control of the offeror, i.e. they relate to regulatory approvals. The Hyprop offer followed none of these market norms. Before Hyprop decided to terminate the bid, the structure of the offer was that it would have been open for acceptance for only a few days from when it was announced. This doesn't give the board time to properly opine on the terms, nor does it give enough time for any of the important underlying conditions to be fulfilled. In other words, investors would have to accept the offer (via an irrevocable undertaking) and then wait and see how long it would take for conditions to be met. But there's more: one of the conditions was a demand by Hyprop to be given the same access to information as Prime Kapital, which of course ties in beautifully with the institutional investors and their valid concerns around disclosure shortcomings. Now, had there been no attempt to address those shortcomings, this would be fair. But the nuance here is that the MAS board had already released a detailed legal summary of the terms, so this demand by Hyprop implied that there were still significant disclosure issues. If true, that casts the MAS board in a very poor light. And if false, then it creates inappropriate optionality in the offer that prejudices shareholders who must give an irrevocable undertaking in the hope that Hyprop eventually chooses to go ahead with closing the offer, something that could take several months. As the demand by Hyprop wasn't going to be met by Prime Kapital (as this would've required detailed disclosure of documents by a party that is in no mood to cooperate with Hyprop's bid terms), Hyprop decided to walk away from this offer. Much as it may lay the blame at the door of poor disclosure, I still can't see how they could justify such an aggressive offer structure. Why was it necessary for the acceptance period to be just one week, particularly when the price implied by the offer was at a substantial discount to the current traded price of MAS? What's next? With Hyprop terminating its bid, Prime Kapital has won the first skirmish. But the war is in its early stages, as we are still talking about a substantial property fund that is trading at a juicy discount. Will Hyprop stay in this fight? Will another party enter the fray? There's no way of knowing. All we know is that Prime Kapital certainly isn't going anywhere, as it is a significant minority shareholder in MAS and holds great influence over its economics. We also know that the institutions won't just roll over, as they are pushing for changes to the board and answers about disclosure. It feels unlikely that this will just fizzle out. All eyes will now be on the extraordinary general meeting in August, followed by the responses of the (potentially new) board to the institutional investor questions. If nothing else, perhaps the lesson to learn here is that if you are going to attempt an offer with highly unusual terms, you are setting yourself up for an unpleasant outcome. Had Hyprop simply dialled back some of the terms to more reasonable levels, it wouldn't have given Prime Kapital so much ammunition to discredit its bid. DM

Daily Lotto results: Saturday, 26 July 2025
Daily Lotto results: Saturday, 26 July 2025

The Citizen

timea day ago

  • The Citizen

Daily Lotto results: Saturday, 26 July 2025

Tonight's jackpot is R600 000! Here are your winning Daily Lotto results for 26 July 2025. Get the Daily Lotto results as soon as they are drawn on The Citizen. Daily Lotto results for 26 July 2025: 14, 16, 21, 23, 29. The winning Daily Lotto numbers will appear below after the draw. Usually within 10 minutes of the draw. You might need to refresh the page to see the updated results. How to play Daily Lotto in SA? If you are buying a ticket in-store: Pick up a betslip in any lottery store. Choose five numbers between 1 and 36, or select a Quick Pick. Entries cost R3 each. You can play a max of R150, but you are allowed to play multiple boards. Select how many consecutive draws you wish to enter, up to a maximum of 10. Leave blank for a single draw. Take your betslip to the teller to pay for your ticket. Write your details on the back of your ticket in case you need to claim a prize. If you do not sign your ticket and you lose it, anyone can use it to claim the prize. If you are playing online: Set up a lottery account here and make a deposit to pay for tickets. Choose five numbers from 1 to 36 or select 'Quick Pick' to generate a random set. Repeat this on as many boards as you want to play. Decide whether to enter a single draw or multiple draws. Confirm and pay for your entry. What time is the Daily Lotto draw? The Daily Lotto draws take place shortly after 9:30pm every evening, and tickets can be purchased until 8:30p.m. Is there a winner every day? Yes. The jackpot prize money is guaranteed to be given away even if no one matches all five numbers. When this happens, the jackpot is split between everyone who matches two or more numbers. Visit and go to the How to Play Daily Lotto section to learn more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store