Musk's X refuses to hand over data in 'politically-motivated' French investigation
X's global government affairs account said the French investigation, which ramped up this month, is "politically-motivated" and designed to "restrict free speech."
"French authorities have launched a politically-motivated criminal investigation into X over the alleged manipulation of its algorithm and alleged "fraudulent data extraction," X said in a post on the social media platform. "X categorically denies these allegations."
French prosecutors started an investigation in January over allegations that the company's algorithm was being used for the purposes of foreign interference. The probe began after two complaints — one from a French member of parliament and another from a senior official at a public institution.
This month, the investigation was handed over to a key unit of France's national police. Prosecutors said the investigation would focus on investigating offences of tampering with automated data systems as well as the fraudulent extraction of data from these systems.
"French authorities have requested access to X's recommendation algorithm and real-time data about all user posts on the platform in order for several 'experts' to analyze the data and purportedly 'uncover the truth' about the operation of the X platform," X said.
Musk's social media platform also said it, "remains in the dark as to the specific allegations made" against it.
"However, based on what we know so far, X believes that this investigation is distorting French law in order to serve a political agenda and, ultimately, restrict free speech," X said.
"For these reasons, X has not acceded to the French authorities' demands, as we have a legal right to do. This is not a decision that X takes lightly. However, in this case, the facts speak for themselves."
CNBC has reached out to the Paris prosecutor's office for comment.
X took fire at two specific individuals. The company claimed the two "experts" who will review X's algorithm are David Chavalarias, director of the Paris Complex Systems Institute (ISC-PIF) and Maziyar Panahi, an AI platform leader at ISC-PIF.
X noted Chavalarias runs a campaign called "Escape X" which encourages users to leave the social media platform, and said Panahi "has previously participated in research projects with David Chavalarias that demonstrate open hostility towards X." Both researchers have indeed been named on a research paper related to X.
"The involvement of these individuals raises serious concerns about the impartiality, fairness, and political motivations of the investigation, to put it charitably. A predetermined outcome is not a fair one," X said.
CNBC has reached out to both Chavalarias and Panahi, and has yet to receive a comment on X's statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
From Phishing To 'Quishing': The Sneaky New QR Code Scam Targeting 26 Million Americans
When QR codes first hit the scene, they were a niche tool, employed by factories to track inventory or by museums to offer visitors unique interactive experiences. The pandemic made them more ubiquitous, and they can now be found everywhere from air travel to parking payments. QR codes make our lives easier in a number of ways, but unfortunately, they also seem poised to make it a lot harder. As their popularity has risen, scammers have started to eye them as their next target for exploitation. Don't Miss: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can Accredited Investors: Grab Pre-IPO Shares of the AI Company Powering Hasbro, Sephora & MGM— "As with many technological advances that start with good intentions, QR codes have increasingly become targets for malicious use. Because they are everywhere — from gas pumps and yard signs to television commercials — they're simultaneously useful and dangerous," BlueVoyant Senior Director of Proactive Cybersecurity Services Dustin Brewer told CNBC. Brewer told the network that hackers are using the codes to trick unsuspecting people into visiting malicious websites or giving away sensitive personal information. This type of scam is called "quishing." Quishing appeals to scammers because of how easy it is to execute. There are plenty of free QR code generators online, and all it takes is slapping one on a sticker at a parking meter or slipping a pre-printed letter into your mailbox to get things going. Trending: $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. "The crooks are relying on you being in a hurry and you needing to do something," University of Rochester electrical and computer engineering professor Gaurav Sharma told CNBC. As safeguards have been put into place to crack down on the number of traditional phishing e-mails going around, and as consumers wisen up to old-school text and phone scams, crooks have had to get creative with their tactics. And get creative, they are. NordVPN told CNBC that 73% of Americans scan QR codes without verifying their authenticity. This has led to upwards of 26 million people being directed to malicious sites. Part of the reason quishing scams are so successful is that we aren't yet well-versed in how to recognize them. A report published by the cybersecurity platform KeepNet found that only 36% of quishing scams have been accurately identified and reported."The cat and mouse game of security will continue and that people will figure out solutions and the crooks will either figure out a way around or look at other places where the grass is greener," Sharma told CNBC. Companies are working to fortify QR codes against intrusion, and to educate the public on how to spot potential scams that use the codes, but say there's still a long way to go. "QR codes weren't built with security in mind, they were built to make life easier, which also makes them perfect for scammers," Rob Lee, chief of research and chief of AI at SANS Institute, told CNBC. "We've seen this playbook before with phishing emails; now it just comes with a smiley pixelated square. It's not panic-worthy yet, but it's exactly the kind of low-effort, high-return tactic attackers love to scale." Read Next: Here's what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy. Image: Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article From Phishing To 'Quishing': The Sneaky New QR Code Scam Targeting 26 Million Americans originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
I ordered the cheapest breakfast combo at Denny's and IHOP. The food was similar, but the prices were not.
It turns out that, when it comes to breakfast, not all chains are created equally, especially if you're an early riser. In search of the best value and taste, I recently ordered the same affordable combo (two sausages, two pancakes, two eggs) at breakfast chains IHOP and Denny's. They've always seemed quite similar to me, but I found myself shocked when I paid dramatically different prices in each place for near-identical meals. I also learned a frustrating lesson about timing — it really is everything. I started at Denny's, where the pancakes were massive and the sausage links tiny I arrived at a Denny's in Queens, New York, at 7 a.m. on a weekday. I was the only customer aside from a small family. My order was the cheapest meal on the Denny's menu, which proved to be the Everyday Value Slam. It consists of two eggs cooked however you like, bacon or sausage, and a choice of two pancakes, two slices of French toast, or a biscuit and gravy. I chose pancakes, eggs over medium, and sausage. When my food arrived, I was immediately struck by two things: The pancakes were huge, and the sausages were not. Topped with whipped, airy butter, the pancakes were so big that they even had their own plate. They were fluffy and slightly spongy with more of a pleasant bready flavor than the sweetness I expected. I wish they'd come with a bit more butter, though. The sausages were quite small — I could easily have eaten both of them in one generous bite. They were tasty, with a good savory profile, albeit a bit too salty for me. As for the eggs, they were cooked perfectly, with a bit of browning on the whites but with the unbroken yolks still partially runny. I paid under $10 for my meal at Denny's — and that's with a 22% tip The Everyday Value Slam meal at Denny's was priced at $6.99. The tax was $0.62, and I tapped for a 22% tip for a total price of $9.28. I doubt I could've sourced the ingredients to make the breakfast at home for less than that. The satisfying meal felt so well-priced that I knew I would return to Denny's even if IHOP blew me away. The food at IHOP felt completely on par with Denny's, though the pancakes were smaller The day after I ate at the Denny's in Queens, I went to an IHOP in Long Island on a weekday morning. I got there at about 6:20 a.m. and was seated alongside four or five other tables of guests. Once again, I wanted the cheapest meal, the same one I'd had at Denny's: two pancakes, two eggs cooked over medium, and two sausages. Once served, I was surprised to find all of my food nestled onto one plate. At Denny's, the pancakes were large enough to merit their own. I was surprised that the pancakes at the International House of Pancakes were markedly smaller than the pair I'd been served the morning before. The good news was that the sausage links appeared to be at least 40% larger than those I'd received at Denny's. IHOP's pancakes were sweeter than those from Denny's and were served with twice as much fluffy butter. I appreciated the generous portion of butter, though I slightly preferred the taste of Denny's pancakes since I'm not much of a fan of sweet breakfast foods. That's a totally subjective thing — many people would surely hold the opposite opinion. The eggs at IHOP were also cooked perfectly over medium. The long, narrow sausage links didn't taste nearly as salty as the ones at Denny's. I was charged $15.20 for my IHOP breakfast — before tip Coming on the heels of my Denny's dining experience, I was genuinely shocked to be handed a $15 check covering two eggs, two pancakes, and two sausage links. I added $3 for a 20% tip, so the entire affair cost me $18.20. This means my meal at IHOP was almost twice as expensive as the breakfast from Denny's, despite the two being almost identical. In terms of value, Denny's was my clear winner — but my IHOP meal could've been half the price if I'd dined later In terms of food, the meals at IHOP and Denny's were very comparable and almost a perfect match. Price-wise? Not so much. The breakfast from Denny's was so cheap it almost felt like I was getting away with something — while the same meal at IHOP was so expensive (relatively speaking) that I almost felt like I was being swindled. My feelings were further complicated when I realized this meal is part of IHOP's House Faves deal, which runs on weekdays from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. With it, popular combos at the chain cost just $6 or $7. In fact, I ordered a meal almost identical to this one for $7 when reviewing the deals at this very location a few months ago. So, had I arrived 40 minutes later, I would've paid half the price for my IHOP breakfast. At certain times, I expect to pay a premium for food — the room-service cheeseburger at a five-star hotel, beer at a baseball game, or even popcorn at Disney World. In those instances with limited choices or added convenience, elevated costs feel acceptable to me. However, it's frustrating to know how much less the chain could've charged me if I'd eaten during what I'd argue are more popular dining hours. In terms of just taste and quality, I can't say I prefer one chain over the other. Denny's had smaller sausages but bigger pancakes. My eggs at both chains were cooked perfectly, and I enjoyed all that I ate. However, if I'm planning to get a basic breakfast before 7 a.m., my money will go much further at Denny's.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Warren Buffett Said Buying 'Distressed' Homes With 30-Year Mortgages And Renting Them Out Might Be The 'Most Attractive' Investment Available
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. If you remember 2008, chances are you also remember the fear. Home values were collapsing. Borrowers were defaulting. The phrase "underwater mortgage" was everywhere. But fast forward to 2012, and Warren Buffett was telling CNBC viewers something no one expected to hear: that housing—yes, housing—was one of the best investment opportunities available. Buy the House, Not the Hype— Buffett's Surprising Advice for Young Investors During CNBC's three-hour "Ask Warren" Squawk Box special, host Becky Quick asked Buffett a question aimed at everyday investors: "If you are a young individual investor at home and you have your choice between buying your first home or investing in stocks, where would you tell someone is the better bet?" Shop Top Mortgage Rates Your Path to Homeownership A quicker path to financial freedom Personalized rates in minutes Don't Miss: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can invest today for just $0.30/share. Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." Here's how you can earn passive income with just $100. Buffett didn't hesitate. "If I knew where I was going to want to live the next five or 10 years, I would buy a home and I'd finance it with a 30-year mortgage, and it's a terrific deal," he said. He didn't stop there. "If I was an investor that was a handy type, which I'm not, and I could buy a couple of them at distressed prices and find renters... it's a leveraged way of owning a very cheap asset now, and I think that's probably as attractive an investment as you can make now." At the time, homes really were cheap. Prices had bottomed out after the crash, mortgage rates hovered near 3.5%, and properties were sitting untouched, waiting for someone with courage—and a toolkit. Buffett made it clear he wasn't that guy. His daughter Susie once joked he couldn't even find the light switch in their house. He understood the math of real estate, not the manual labor. Still, his message was simple: if you had the skills and long-term vision, buying homes in 2012 was a rare opportunity. It's Not 2012 Anymore, and It's Definitely Not a Buyer's Market In 2025, Mortgage rates have climbed past 6.7%, according to Freddie Mac, making monthly payments significantly more expensive than they were a few years ago. Meanwhile, home prices remain elevated. Zillow reports that the typical U.S. home value in June was around $369,000—up 0.5% from the same time last year and still more than 30% above pre-pandemic levels. Sellers with sub-4% mortgage rates are hesitant to list, and many buyers are sitting out, unable or unwilling to purchase at current prices and borrowing costs. In short, it's a standoff. The kind where nothing moves. Buffett's advice worked in a world where homes were undervalued and financing was cheap. But what about now? For young investors, getting started in real estate is harder than ever. Finding a "very cheap asset" just isn't realistic in this market. Still, the idea behind his advice hasn't changed: real estate can be a strong, long-term investment—if you can get in and hold on. And while Buffett dismissed the landlord role for himself, that exact limitation is what new investment models are trying to solve. Skip the Wrench, Keep the Wealth? Today, platforms like Arrived Homes let people buy fractional shares in rental homes without dealing with tenants, maintenance, or paperwork, with as little as $100. The company handles everything from property management to repairs, so investors can own a piece of real estate without ever showing up with a screwdriver. It's not what Buffett described in 2012—but it does speak to the same problem he pointed out: owning homes one by one is "enormous" to manage. He saw the opportunity. He also saw the workload. In 2025, the math has changed, but the question is still on the table: If you could invest in real estate without the real-world hassle—would you? Buffett's answer might still be yes. Just don't hand him a wrench. See Next: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: Schedule your free call with a financial advisor to start your financial journey – no cost, no obligation. It's no wonder Jeff Bezos holds over $250 million in art — this beloved alternative asset has outpaced the S&P 500 since 1995, delivering an average annual return of 11.4%. This article Warren Buffett Said Buying 'Distressed' Homes With 30-Year Mortgages And Renting Them Out Might Be The 'Most Attractive' Investment Available originally appeared on
