logo
Air India crash expected soon: Govt's new demolition rules to target buildings & trees near airports spark debate; details here

Air India crash expected soon: Govt's new demolition rules to target buildings & trees near airports spark debate; details here

Time of India11-07-2025
With the Air India crash investigation report expected soon, attention has turned to the government's fresh regulatory steps aimed at improving airport safety. The Ministry of Civil Aviation has released a set of new draft rules to address long-standing concerns about obstructions like buildings and trees near airports.
The Aircraft (Demolition of Obstructions Caused by Buildings and Trees, etc.) Rules, 2025, were published on June 18, 2025, under the Bharatiya Vayuyan Adhiniyam, 2024, and are open to public comment for 21 days.
What's new in the proposed rules?
These new Draft Rules are set to replace the 1994 Rules, which allowed the Deputy or Joint Director General of Civil Aviation to order the removal of height violations. Under the older framework, aggrieved individuals could appeal the order, and non-compliance meant the District Collector could step in.
The 2025 Draft Rules propose faster and more enforceable actions. Officials will be authorised to issue notices, carry out daytime inspections, and order demolition of non-compliant structures. Property owners will have 60 days to submit structural documents, and action can be taken if safety norms are breached. Importantly, only those who comply will be eligible for compensation under Section 22 of the 2024 Act. Unauthorized structures built after the notification date won't qualify.
Concerns over due process and consultation time
While the rules aim to strengthen aviation safety, they have been criticised for not including procedural safeguards mandated by the Supreme Court in demolition-related matters. The short 21-day window for public feedback has also raised concerns about the reactive nature of the policy process.
Why proactive regulation is critical
The crash of the Air India flight in Ahmedabad has once again highlighted how aviation regulations are often reactive. A historical example—the US President's Commission on Aviation Security and Terrorism in 1990 criticised American aviation regulators for waiting for tragedies before acting. The same risk exists here.
Aviation rules must be grounded in research, account for technological developments, and include transparency through public consultation. As the upcoming crash report may reveal more gaps, this framework must be built with resilience and adaptability in mind.The draft rules are a step forward, but lasting change will need foresight, public trust, and evidence-based regulation beyond crisis response.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Probe agencies can't summon lawyers: AG; CJI says 'ED officers crossing all limits'
Probe agencies can't summon lawyers: AG; CJI says 'ED officers crossing all limits'

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Probe agencies can't summon lawyers: AG; CJI says 'ED officers crossing all limits'

Supreme Court (File photo) NEW DELHI: Admitting that ED erred in summoning senior advocates Arvind Datar and Pratap Venugopal for rendering legal opinions to clients in a laundering case, attorney general R Venkataramani Monday told Supreme Court that all probe agencies have been asked not to commit this mistake in future. 'We'll frame guidelines in this regard,' AG told a bench of CJI B R Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran while it was hearing a suo motu case regarding the summons, which were later withdrawn. 'ED officers are crossing all limits. They must know that under law, communication between a lawyer and his client is a privileged communication,' Gavai said. If a lawyer is involved in crime, law will take its own course: CJI However, if a lawyer is involved in a crime, law will take its own course,' CJI Gavai said. SC would take up petitions filed by various bar associations on July 29 to attempt to lay down comprehensive guidelines in this regard, he added. On the joint pleas of SCBA president Vikas Singh, SC Advocates-on-Record president Vipin Nair, senior advocates Mukul Rohatgi and Vijay Hansaria, the CJI-led bench said it would frame guidelines for agencies and bar them from summoning advocates for legal opinion or advice rendered to clients facing prosecution. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo While agreeing with AG, solicitor general Tushar Mehta pointed out another malady afflicting some in the legal professions. "It is equally wrong on the part of advocates, who appear for or advise a client, to create a planned narrative in favour of their client and against the probe agency through social media before and after filing of a petition in a court. Lawyers must stick to their duty of presenting the case before the court,' he said. Mehta said, "The communication between a lawyer and his client is no doubt privileged and which must be immune from investigation, But would a lawyer's action in creating a narrative for his client outside the court also enjoy the status of a privileged communication? Would it not amount to an attempt to influence the public and judiciary about a case?' CJI Gavai asked, 'Have you ever found a judgment or order of a court getting swayed or influenced by such narratives spun by lawyers outside the court? We go by facts and submissions in the courtroom and do not even watch or read what the lawyers speak outside the courtroom about the case.' Mehta said the issuance of summons to Datar was brought to the notice of the 'highest executive' and within six hours a circular was issued by the ED barring its officers from issuing summons to any advocate. Singh, Nair and Hansaria said issuance of summons to advocates by probe agencies would have a chilling effect on the independence of the legal profession.

Pentagon withdraws 700 Marines from LA after month-long deployment
Pentagon withdraws 700 Marines from LA after month-long deployment

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

Pentagon withdraws 700 Marines from LA after month-long deployment

The Pentagon on Monday announced the withdrawal of some 700 active-duty Marines from Los Angeles, ending a month-long deployment aimed at protecting federal property and personnel amid protests triggered by President Donald Trump's immigration enforcement Marines, sent in June against the objections of California Governor Gavin Newsom, were dispatched alongside nearly 4,000 National Guard troops to counter unrest tied to workplace immigration raids carried out by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The decision to send troops marked one of the Trump administration's most forceful uses of the military on domestic stability returning to Los Angeles, the Secretary has directed the redeployment of the 700 Marines whose presence sent a clear message: Lawlessness will not be tolerated,' Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said in a BACKS TRUMP'S MILITARY DEPLOYMENT The military deployment sparked fierce political debate over the federal government's use of military force in American cities. Despite court challenges, a federal appeals court upheld Trump's authority to control the California National Guard, further escalating tensions between the White House and state Marines' withdrawal follows last week's partial drawdown of National Guard forces, with about half of the 4,000 troops already removed from Los praised the Marines for their conduct during the deployment. 'Their rapid response, unwavering discipline, and unmistakable presence were instrumental in restoring order and upholding the rule of law,' he Trump has relied on the military as part of his crackdown on illegal immigration, vowing to deport millions and ramping up raids, including at California farms that had largely been spared during his first term. The administration has faced numerous lawsuits over its tactics.- EndsWith inputs from ReutersMust Watch

Scott Bessent urges Fed self-audit, questions $100 billion losses, expanding role
Scott Bessent urges Fed self-audit, questions $100 billion losses, expanding role

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

Scott Bessent urges Fed self-audit, questions $100 billion losses, expanding role

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Monday called for the Federal Reserve to launch an exhaustive internal review of its non-monetary operations, warning that the central bank's growing institutional sprawl risks undermining its independence and credibility in managing monetary an interview with CNBC, Bessent said the Fed's core monetary function is 'a jewel box' that must be protected from the consequences of 'mission creep' and expansive activities that fall outside its traditional independence is a cornerstone of continued US economic growth and stability,' Bessent said. 'However, this autonomy is threatened by persistent mandate creep into areas beyond its core mission, provoking justifiable criticism that unnecessarily casts a cloud over the Fed's valuable independence on monetary policy.'While reiterating that he had 'no knowledge or opinion on the legal basis' of the Federal Reserve's controversial multibillion-dollar renovation project at its Constitution Avenue headquarters, Bessent said such decisions warrant scrutiny, especially from an institution currently reporting annual operating losses exceeding $100 recent days, White House and administration officials have accused Powell of mismanaging a $2.5 billion renovation project at the Fed, adding to months of efforts by Trump try to rid himself of the politically independent central banker.'A review of the decision to undertake such a project by an institution reporting operating losses of more than $100 billion per year should be conducted,' Bessent called on Fed leadership to go beyond the regular review of its monetary policy framework and undertake a 'comprehensive institutional review across its entire mission.''It will go a long way towards strengthening the Fed's credibility with the American people on its core mission of guiding our nation's monetary policy,' Bessent comments come amid escalating tensions between the White House and the Federal Reserve. Last week, conflicting reports surfaced over whether President Donald Trump was planning to fire Fed Chair Jerome Powell. While some White House sources signalled that such a move was in motion, Trump later denied any immediate plans, reports last Wednesday said that he was 'highly unlikely' to fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, a public statement made less than 24 hours after suggesting in a private meeting that he was leaning in favour of dismissing the head of the nation's central later confirmed that in a White House meeting with about a dozen House Republicans he had discussed the 'concept' of dismissing Powell, long a target because of his refusal to lower interest rates as Trump wants.- Ends

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store