Dems at a crossroads as establishment plans 'Project 2029' while socialist candidate wins NYC mayoral primary
However, the rank-and-file Democrats who catapulted the party into disarray, losing the White House and Congress in 2024, are already laying post-Trump policy groundwork.
Neera Tanden, who served in the White House during the Clinton, Obama and Biden administrations and testified to Congress last week about her use of the autopen during former President Joe Biden's presidency, along with Biden's former national security advisor, Jake Sullivan, are on the advisory board for "Project 2029."
Andrei Cherny, a former Democratic speechwriter, state party leader and co-founder of a liberal policy journal, is organizing Democratic leaders to create a ready-to-implement agenda for the next Democratic presidential nominee, inspired by the conservative "Project 2025," which was created by the Heritage Foundation ahead of President Donald Trump's 2024 presidential win.
The Democrats' marquee legislative framework for their future nominee will be rolled out over the next two years in quarterly installments through Cherny's publication, "Democracy: A Journal of Ideas." The Democrats plan to turn it into a book, just like Project 2025. The details of "Project 2029" were first reported by The New York Times and have since been confirmed by Fox News Digital.
As The Times revealed the Democratic Party's political stage-setting for years to come, an intraparty reckoning is unfolding in real time following Mamdani's primary win last Tuesday. The institutional policy agenda has emerged during critical conjecture between the past and the future of the Democratic Party.
Mamdani's primary win ignited a progressive buzz reminiscent of "Squad" leader Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's 2018 Democratic primary upset, an excitement that has been on full display during 83-year-old Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders' "Fighting Oligarchy" tour this year.
Both progressive leaders and self-described Democratic socialists endorsed Mamdani ahead of last Tuesday's primary in New York City. Leading up to Election Day, Ocasio-Cortez's fellow "Squad" members, including Reps. Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar, also came out in support of the Mamdani movement.
His win shattered expectations and forced Cuomo, who resigned from his governorship in 2021 amid multiple scandals, to concede soon after the polls closed. While Cuomo remains in the race as an independent alongside incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, whose tenure has been plagued by his own scandals, Mamdani's win signaled a departure from the Democratic Party establishment.
Meanwhile, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) has faced its own reckoning this year after 25-year-old progressive David Hogg announced his multimillion-dollar plan to primary older incumbent Democrats he claimed were "asleep at the wheel."
Hogg, who campaigned for Mamdani in New York City, ultimately left his vice chair position at the DNC this year as questions remain about the trajectory of a party struggling to find its footing with Trump dominating American politics.
Central to the Democrats' division between its past and future is support for Israel.
Moderate New York Democrats have not outright endorsed Mamdani following his primary win last Tuesday. Party leaders, including Gov. Kathy Hochul, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, confirmed they spoke with Mamdani but have continued to hold their endorsements.
Aside from his socialist promises and anti-capitalist comments, much of establishment Democrats' discontent with Mamdani is rooted in accusations that he is antisemitic.
Rep. Laura Gillen, D-N.Y., said last week that Mamdani is "too extreme to lead New York City." She said he has demonstrated a "deeply disturbing pattern of unacceptable antisemitic comments, which stoke hate at a time when antisemitism is rising."
Another New York Democrat, Rep. Tom Suozzi said last week he still has "serious concerns" about Mamdani.
The crux of accusations that Mamdani is antisemitic stems from his refusal to condemn the rallying cry, "globalize the intifada."
Mamdani has refused to condemn the term, which has been adopted by pro-Palestinian protesters resisting the war in Gaza and, according to the American Jewish Committee, "calls for people from around the globe to participate in rising up against Israel."
Mamdani, who would become New York City's first Muslim mayor if elected in November, has said he doesn't support policing language. In multiple interviews since he initially sparked controversy on the campaign trail, he has refused to condemn the language.
He has also drawn criticism from Jewish New Yorkers, pro-Israel groups and Democrats for defending the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, which calls for consumers, companies and governments to cut ties with Israel in an effort to influence the country's policies toward Palestinians.
Mamdani refused to acknowledge, when asked repeatedly on the debate stage, that Israel has the right to exist as a Jewish state. Instead, he said that Israel has the right to exist as "a state with equal rights."
On Oct. 13, 2023, six days after the Oct. 7 Hamas terrorist attacks, Mamdani asked his supporters to join him at a rally outside Schumer's house "to speak out against the indiscriminate killing of Palestinians as we sit on the brink of a genocide."
However, despite the criticism, Mamdani has repeatedly condemned antisemitism.
"Antisemitism is such a real issue in this city, and it has been hard to see it weaponized by candidates who do not seem to have any real interest in tackling it, but rather in using it as a pretext to make political points," he said on the campaign trail ahead of Election Day.
Mamdani did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
5 minutes ago
Trump admin live updates: Jeffries' marathon speech continues as final megabill vote looms
Trump's megabill cleared a key procedural hurdle overnight after GOP drama. 3:34 After hours of Republican drama, the House on Thursday morning was nearing a final vote on President Donald Trump's sweeping tax cut and spending bill. Trump helped Speaker Mike Johnson pressure GOP holdouts into flipping their no votes to allow the measure to go forward in time to meet the president's self-imposed July Fourth deadline. Republican fiscal hawks were upset that the Senate version being voted is projected to add roughly $1 trillion more to the deficit than what the House passed back in May. 76 Updates Jun 30, 2025, 3:33 PM EDT Democrats use early hours of vote-a-rama to highlight cuts to Medicaid, SNAP Democrats are using Monday's "vote-a-rama" to highlight cuts they say President Trump's megabill will make to Medicaid, SNAP and rural hospitals -- and to hammer in the tax cuts they say this bill gives to the wealthiest Americans. So far, Republicans have defeated all Democratic efforts to modify or reconsider the bill. The Senate voted down 47-53 an amendment led by Minority Leader Chuck Schumer that he said would have undone "the travesty that is at the core of the Republican bill." "Their bill -- the so-called big beautiful bill, which is really a big, ugly betrayal -- cuts taxes for billionaires by taking away health care for millions of people. So what my amendment simply says -- if people's health care costs go up, the billionaire tax cuts vanish," Schumer said. Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo, a Republican, argued against Schumer's amendment, saying he incorrectly framed what the bill does. "The reality is, the reforms we are putting into place are to try to reign in control of wasteful and fraudulent and abusive spending that actually diverts resources away from the people who these programs really deserve to receive," Crapo said. Democratic Sen. Ed Markey's effort to strip provisions that he said would negatively impact rural hospitals due to cuts to Medicaid also failed, but did receive the support of two Republicans: Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, the top Democrat on the Senate Agriculture committee, argued that the SNAP provisions in the bill create "chaos for state budgets and hardship for families" and violate budget rules. Her motion was waived by Republicans. "The largest unfunded mandate is on the back of kids and veterans and seniors and people with disabilities," Klobuchar said. "It's hurting local grocery stores, it's hurting our farmers and it's all done to pay for tax cuts to the wealthy. I say to our colleagues: vote for families over billionaires." -ABC News' Allison Pecorin President Trump sent a handwritten note to Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell calling on him to lower interest rates, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said during Monday's briefing. Leavitt held up the note to reporters, which appeared to have been written by Trump using his signature black Sharpie. "I bring to you original correspondence from the president of the United States to our Fed Chair, Jerome Powell," she said. The paper included a list of interest rates from other nations, including Japan and the United Kingdom, which are lower than that of the U.S. A note written on top of the chart read, "Jerome, you are, as usual, 'too late.' You have cost the USA a fortune and continue to do so. You should lower the rate - by a lot! Hundreds of billions of dollars are being lost! No inflation." "I would remind the Fed chair, and I would remind the entire world that this is a president who was a businessman first, and he knows what he is doing," Leavitt said. "He has a proven economic formula that worked in his first term as president, and it is working again. The one problem that remains is high interest rates for the American people. The American people want to borrow money cheaply, and they should be able to do that. But unfortunately, we have interest rates that are still too high. So, the president sent this note to the Fed chair today." Jun 30, 2025, 1:46 PM EDT White House urges Republicans to stay unified on Trump megabill The White House had a message for Republicans on Monday as lawmakers rush to try to pass President Trump's megabill before his July 4 deadline. "Republicans need to stay tough and unified during the home stretch, and we are counting on them to get the job done," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters at her briefing. Leavitt was asked about the bill's prospects in the House, which will have to sign off on the Senate changes. There is currently little room for error in either chamber for Republicans -- Speaker Mike Johnson can only afford three defections if all members are present and voting. "We need the full weight of the Republican conference to get behind this bill and we expect them to, and we are confident they will," Leavitt said. "The president has been working hand in hand with Senate Majority Leader Thune and also our House Republican Leader, or the Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, both of whom will be at the White House today to meet with the president yet again. I believe they were here this morning," she added. Jun 30, 2025, 10:11 AM EDT 'Vote-a-rama' kicks off in the Senate on Trump's megabill
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Did Zelensky Wear A Suit? Ukrainian President's NATO Outfit Leaves Crypto Bettors In Shambles
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. What is a suit? This seemingly simple question is at the center of a $53 million dispute on the popular cryptocurrency betting platform Polymarket. Specifically, cryptocurrency bettors are split on whether Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's recent NATO summit attire was a suit. Zelensky's wardrobe decisions have become a hot-button topic since his ill-fated meeting with President Donald Trump at the White House in February. At that meeting, Zelensky's signature military-esque sweatshirt, donned as an act of solidarity with Ukrainian troops fighting Russia's invasion, attracted snide comments from Trump. 'You're all dressed up today,' Trump said, referring to Zelensky as he stepped out of his car. Don't Miss: — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – . In recent months, this incident has inspired multiple betting markets on whether Zelensky will wear a suit on Polymarket. The most recent market, 'Will Zelensky wear a suit before July?' was supposed to resolve on Tuesday, but is still open on Thursday amid disputes over whether what he wore at the NATO summit at The Hague on June 24 was a suit. At the summit, Zelensky ditched his signature military-style sweatshirt for a black military-style black jacket, black shirt, and black pants, an outfit widely reported by several media outlets and an official Polymarket X account as a suit. While this reporting consensus should have typically led to the resolution of the market in favor of bets that Zelensky would wear a suit, the market is in dispute. Trending: New to crypto? on Coinbase. For one, some have taken issue with the unorthodox style of Zelensky's outfit. 'I dno [dunno] what kind of suit you wear but what the Z man worse [wore] is NOT a suit!' a user under the name 'Grinch' said on Polymarket's Discord. At the same time, others have pointed out that Zelensky wore a similar outfit in May, but the market resolved 'No,' suggesting it was not a suit. On the other hand, some have argued that individual opinions on whether or not it was a suit should not matter, citing the mass media coverage and the condition for resolution of the market. That condition reads, 'The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.' Voices in this camp argue that the market only resolved "No" in May because there was no reporting far, two attempts to resolve the market in the affirmative on Universal Market Access have been blocked. UMA is a decentralized finance oracle and dispute resolution protocol partnered with Polymarket. The protocol allows token holders to vote on the truthfulness of assertions based on real-world data. The clarification from the second resolution attempt reads, 'At the time of this clarification, 09:33am ET July 01, a consensus of credible reporting has not confirmed that Zelenskyy has worn a suit.' This clarification has stoked manipulation claims. 'The June market must resolve Yes,' a user under the name 'vazelin' said on Discord. 'There is overwhelming consensus from global media, including Polymarket itself. If this resolves No like May, it damages trust.' The recent dispute raises questions about the fairness and reliability of prediction markets in nuanced situations. The dispute comes as Polymarket is reportedly close to announcing a $200 million raise that will see it achieve unicorn status. Polymarket has yet to return a Benzinga request for comment. Read Next: Named a TIME Best Invention and Backed by 5,000+ Users, Kara's Air-to-Water Pod Cuts Plastic and Costs — Image: Shutterstock This article Did Zelensky Wear A Suit? Ukrainian President's NATO Outfit Leaves Crypto Bettors In Shambles originally appeared on Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Politico
6 minutes ago
- Politico
Newsom to tour South Carolina next week in potential 2028 preview
The California governor will speak to Southern voters in an early sneak peek into a possible presidential bid. California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during a news conference on April 16, 2025, in Ceres, California. |By Jacob Wendler 07/03/2025 01:23 PM EDT California Gov. Gavin Newsom will meet with voters across South Carolina in a two-day trip through the state next week, further fueling speculation that the Democratic governor is preparing for a 2028 presidential run. The South Carolina Democratic Party — which announced the trip Thursday — is marketing the series of meet-and-greets as an opportunity for the governor to meet with communities impacted by natural disasters and 'speak to the urgent need for federal support and investment' in the wake of Hurricane Helene and the Los Angeles wildfires. Newsom traveled to the state in January 2024 to stump for former President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris in the run-up to the presidential election. He received a lukewarm reception from some voters skeptical of his liberal reputation, POLITICO reported at the time.
