logo
Biden Gaza pier fiasco left 62 US forces injured, one dead and caused $31M in damages: report

Biden Gaza pier fiasco left 62 US forces injured, one dead and caused $31M in damages: report

New York Post07-05-2025
WASHINGTON — Former President Joe Biden's failed floating Gaza pier plan left 62 US personnel injured, one service member dead and caused at least $31 million in damage to military equipment, according to a scathing Pentagon watchdog report that found the Army and Navy failed to properly train, prepare, coordinate and plan for the mission.
The project, which Biden announced during his 2024 State of The Union address amid mounting protests on the left over Israel's war against Hamas, sought to deliver humanitarian aid to the terrorist-controlled enclave — but ultimately was functional for just 20 days before being abandoned.
The Defense Department Office of Inspector General (DoD OIG) report, released late Tuesday, found that the military services were not adequately prepped for the mission — dubbed Operation Neptune Solace — but the project moved ahead despite the Army and Navy facing 'low equipment mission-capable rates and low manning and training levels.'
'The Army and Navy did not allocate sufficient maintenance, manning, [or] training,' according to the report, which also found that the services 'did not organize, train, and equip to a common joint standard' for the so-called 'joint logistics over-the-shore' — or JLOTS — operation
Advertisement
3 Army Soldiers assigned to the 7th Transportation Brigade use a rope to stabilize humanitarian lifted by a crane aboard the MV Roy P. Benavidez during the floating pier initiative.
U.S. Army photo / Staff Sgt. Malcolm Cohens-Ashley
The disjointed nature of the effort contributed to 27 watercraft and other paraphernalia suffering damage costing $31 million to repair, the report found, as 'Army-and Navy-specific equipment, including watercraft, piers, and causeways, as well as command, control, and communications systems was not interoperable.'
This week's report follows a similar review by the US Agency for International Development (USAID) Office of the Inspector General from August 2024 — which found Biden charged ahead with the $230 million pier despite the urgings of multiple federal aid workers.
Advertisement
Army officials interviewed by the DoD OIG noted that 'the lack of interoperability created challenges during (the Gaza operation), resulting in equipment damage and communications security risks,' according to the report.
3 Former President Joe Biden directed the creation of a humanitarian pier for Gaza.
POOL/AFP via Getty Images
US Central Command (CENTCOM reported 62 injuries during the course of Operation Neptune Solace, though the report said it was unclear whether they happened 'during the performance of duties or resulted off duty or from pre-existing medical conditions.'
The Pentagon had previously confirmed that three service members were injured May 23, 2024, as the result of a non-combat incident during the operation.
Advertisement
One of those injured, Army Sgt. Quandarius Davon Stanley, 23, died Oct. 31 while under long-term medical care.
3 The pier ultimately operated for just 20 days and delivered less than a third of the intended amount.
AP
The Biden White House had expected that it would allow delivery of enough provisions to feed an estimated 1.5 million Palestinians over a three-month period.
But the pier ultimately delivered less than a third of that for roughly 450,000 Palestinians before it was decommissioned on July 17, according to the USAID report.
Advertisement
The report also found serious issues with the planning of the operation, noting the pier's designers 'did not fully consider mission-specific information requirements, such as beach conditions, average sea states, and other factors that affect the ability to successfully plan and conduct JLOTS operations.'
A Pentagon spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SCOOP: Top Hegseth aide resigns from Pentagon after 6 months of service: 'Incredibly inspiring'
SCOOP: Top Hegseth aide resigns from Pentagon after 6 months of service: 'Incredibly inspiring'

Fox News

time3 hours ago

  • Fox News

SCOOP: Top Hegseth aide resigns from Pentagon after 6 months of service: 'Incredibly inspiring'

A top advisor to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has left the Pentagon after six months of service, the Department of Defense (DoD) confirmed to Fox News Digital on Saturday. Justin Fulcher told Fox News Digital he formally resigned on Thursday evening, describing the decision as entirely his own. Fulcher said he had originally planned to serve six months in government and, having reached that point, chose to move on "amicably." He also emphasized what he described as the "great work" being done by Hegseth "for our troops and country." "The Department of Defense is grateful to Justin Fulcher for his work on behalf of President [Donald] Trump and Secretary Hegseth. We wish him well in his future endeavors," chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement. In addition to advising Hegseth on personnel and policy, Fulcher played a role in several defense initiatives during his tenure, he told Fox News Digital. Fulcher said he contributed to reviews of major acquisition programs aimed at strengthening lethality and the U.S. industrial base, and helped streamline software procurement timelines "from years to months," modernizing key IT systems across the department. He also said he supported Hegseth in high-level meetings across the Indo-Pacific, including the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, and participated in efforts that redirected nearly $50 billion from non-lethal line items into readiness and more impactful defense programs. Fulcher praised the "dedicated men and women of the Department of Defense," cited progress in "revitalizing the warrior ethos" and "rebuilding the military," and thanked both Hegseth and Trump for their leadership. "Still, this is just the beginning," Fulcher added. Fulcher, who had served as a senior advisor to Hegseth since April, announced his departure Saturday afternoon in a message posted to X. "As planned, I've completed 6 months of service in government to my country," he wrote, calling the experience "incredibly inspiring." "None of this could have happened without Secretary Hegseth's decisive leadership or President Trump's continued confidence in our team," he wrote. "I will continue to champion American warfighters in all future endeavors." Fulcher joined the DoD earlier this year as part of Hegseth's inner circle, a cohort of loyal advisers appointed after Hegseth took the helm at the Pentagon in Trump's second term. His departure comes amid a broader reshuffling of senior personnel inside Hegseth's office. At least six aides have left since January, though defense officials have downplayed the moves as standard transitions. It's unclear what Fulcher's next step will be, though his statement suggests he intends to remain active in national security circles. The Pentagon has not yet named a replacement.

Pentagon dismisses report that US strike on Iran only destroyed 1 nuclear site
Pentagon dismisses report that US strike on Iran only destroyed 1 nuclear site

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Pentagon dismisses report that US strike on Iran only destroyed 1 nuclear site

The Trump administration is pressing back on a new intelligence assessment, first reported by NBC News, that contradicts President Trump's repeated assertions that U.S. airstrikes 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear facilities last month. Citing five current and former U.S. officials familiar with the latest assessment, NBC News reported Thursday that Iran's Fordow nuclear enrichment site was mostly destroyed in the U.S. military operation, while two others — Isfahan and Natanz — may have only been set back by months and could resume operations. 'The credibility of the Fake News Media is similar to that of the current state of the Iranian nuclear facilities: destroyed, in the dirt, and will take years to recover,' Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said in a statement to The Hill's sister network NewsNation on Thursday. 'President Trump was clear and the American people understand: Iran's nuclear facilities in Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz were completely and totally obliterated.' 'There is no doubt about that,' he added. The White House also pushed back on the latest NBC News report. 'As the President has said and experts have verified, Operation Midnight Hammer totally obliterated Iran's nuclear capabilities,' deputy press secretary Anna Kelly told NewsNation. 'America and the world are safer thanks to his decisive action.' Reports first surfaced last month, shortly after the U.S. launched its surprise attacks on Tehran's nuclear sites, that U.S. intelligence officials at the Defense Department found that the attacks did not destroy Iran's nuclear infrastructure. The president and his allies forcefully pushed back on that assessment. NBC News reported that American and Israeli leaders have since discussed whether additional strikes on two less-damaged facilities could be necessary if Iran does not restart negotiations on a nuclear deal. The U.S. launched its Operation Midnight Hammer on the three key nuclear facilities on June 21 as Tehran and Israel traded airstrikes. The Israel-Iran conflict halted the U.S.'s efforts to reach an agreement with Tehran to prohibit the country from developing a nuclear weapon. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

National security elites accept Trump is creating a new world order
National security elites accept Trump is creating a new world order

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

National security elites accept Trump is creating a new world order

ASPEN, Colorado — Six months into President Donald Trump's second administration, national security elites at the annual Aspen Security Forum have accepted that this president has irrevocably upended the global order. Against the backdrop of the leafy Aspen Meadows Resort, former and current U.S. and foreign officials, business leaders and analysts acknowledged publicly and privately that the Trump administration has dealt a lasting blow to much of the post-World War II consensus around free trade and long-term cooperation. 'We have to recognize that we're probably not going back to exactly that system,' former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said at the closing panel of the summit. Rice is a co-chair of the Aspen Strategy Group, which puts on the annual Rocky Mountains national security confab. Her words reflect the striking efficacy of the second Trump administration, which in its first six months has taken a sledgehammer to the norms and conventions that governed U.S. trade relations, use of military force and engagement with stalwart partners and alliances. It has also overseen the elimination of agencies that handle foreign policy tasks — most notably the now-defunct U.S. Agency for International Development — and slashed staff within the intelligence community, the Pentagon and the State Department. The administration has said these moves are necessary to create a more focused and effective foreign policy process that can prioritize American interests above all. But its critics have said the U.S. is reducing its ability to respond to crises, losing its credibility with allies and undermining the global economy by taking such a pugilistic approach to policy. Either way, attendees at Aspen are trying to adjust to an America First world order. The first time Trump was president, the national security establishment started out thinking they could influence his policy, and then assumed his policy moves could be easily reversed once he left office. Now that same group is struggling to come up with strategies to influence even on the edges, especially when the administration doesn't want to be part of the conversation. The day before the conference was scheduled to start, the Pentagon pulled its speakers, calling the conference a 'den of globalists' that didn't match the administration's values. In the end, only one administration official attended the conference: Adam Boehler, Trump's special envoy for hostage release. The other non-Pentagon official who'd been slated to speak — U.S. Ambassador to Turkey and Syria envoy Tom Barrack — withdrew following Israel's Wednesday strikes on Syria. Boehler participated in a convivial on-stage interview with CNN anchor Kaitlan Collins where he outlined how the Trump team addressed conflicting portfolios and argued the administration is moving in lock step to achieve key priorities, including freeing Americans held hostage by rogue regimes and actors around the world. 'I have a president and team that backs it up,' Boehler said of his efforts to free Americans. 'It gives me strength. When we decided to make a move, and the president decided to move on Iran for me, getting Americans out — that's going to get Americans out.' Given the administration's limited presence, attendees were forced to wrestle with how to address the president's many changes to foreign policy amongst themselves. The main approach at the conference seemed to be to at least avoid antagonizing team Trump. Much praise was offered for Trump's recent expressions of support for Ukraine and the success of U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities in deteriorating Tehran's nuclear capabilities. And Trump's overhaul of federal agencies and departments was met with resignation and even some optimism. In informal conversations, there was recognition from some attendees that the State Department was overdue for reform to cut through decades of bureaucracy. The main protest was about the manner in which the cuts were being made. 'They all need reform,' said a former U.S. diplomat who attended the forum of USAID and State. 'There are a lot of challenges with how the bureaucracy is set up, and part of it is because of congressional demands. But this isn't reform. This is just dismantling and shutting down government bodies … and poor treatment of federal workers.' The former diplomat, like others cited, was granted anonymity to speak freely about the conference. Panelists and attendees also embraced the need to rethink the way that the U.S. offers foreign assistance. In one session discussing the future of foreign aid, panelists agreed that the Trump administration's pursuit of access to critical minerals in Africa's Great Lakes region represents an opportunity for alliances with countries that China has looked to court in recent years. 'There are a number of questions that rightfully should be asked, but I wouldn't condemn it outrightly. I think there is an opportunity to be had going down the line,' Comfort Ero, who leads the International Crisis Group think tank, told the audience. Especially on economic questions, attendees and panelists were quick to note that the protectionist tendencies Trump embraces are gaining adherents across the U.S. ideological spectrum. 'It's a big deal that you've now had two presidents of two different parties take a protectionist line,' former U.S. Trade Representative and World Bank Group President Robert Zoellick, said on one panel. 'That is a very big switch in the nature of trade politics." Some attendees expressed frustration at what they saw as pandering to Trump, saying there was a missing opportunity to have more discussion on the main stage about the potential impacts of Trump's policies and governing style on U.S. democratic institutions and institutions around the world. A recurring theme across panels was frustration with Congress over its repeated inability to pass a budget on time. Such delays in passing a budget and a reliance in recent years on continuing resolutions have been blamed for lags in innovative defense initiatives and snags in securing contracts. The threats posed by China in the Indo-Pacific — which many Democrats and Republicans agree are pressing — came up in many discussions, as foreign officials and former U.S. officials warned that the risk of full-scale conflict with Beijing over Taiwan or other flashpoints had reached an unprecedented level. Still, some Democratic attendees argued that Americans aren't necessarily sold on Trump's vision for the world. On a panel Friday, Biden administration national security adviser Jake Sullivan argued that people on both sides of the aisle are too ready to read Trump's 2024 victory as a mandate for protectionism and isolationism. 'We tend only to read the signals in one direction. And I think that's not right,' said Sullivan, who noted that few people suddenly argued Americans were newly interested in the world after President Joe Biden — widely seen as a fervent internationalist — defeated Trump in 2020. 'I actually believe the American people continue to believe in principled engagement in the world, and continue to believe that our fate is tied to the fate of people elsewhere.' Few solutions were also being offered to the fundamental changes Trump is ushering in, cautioned the former U.S. diplomat. 'Especially on soft power, I'm seeing a lot fall apart but it doesn't seem like there's something else being built to put in its place,' the diplomat said. Some officials focused their warnings on the dangerous uncertainty created by the kind of reshaping of the world that Trump has embarked on. 'Any student of history will know the most dangerous phase is the interregnum between one world order and another,' said Singaporean Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan during a fireside chat at the conference. 'Are we in that interregnum? Yes, we are.' Nahal Toosi and Felicia Schwartz contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store