logo
The economic cure to populism

The economic cure to populism

Photo by Stefan Rousseau/Getty
If there is one theme that has featured most heavily in these columns over the last four years, it has been the dangers of right-wing populism. The destructiveness of Brexit, the dishonesty of Boris Johnson, the recklessness of Liz Truss, and the authoritarianism of Donald Trump have all been familiar themes.
It has to be said, however, that populism seems to be surviving my weekly onslaught. Reform UK leads in the opinion polls. The Conservative Party is led by someone who is half-tempted to turn her party into a fully-fledged populist party and who will likely soon be replaced by someone who will not hesitate in turning his party into a fully-fledged populist party. To the extent that President Trump is running into political difficulties, it is for being insufficiently committed to isolationism and conspiracy theories.
The public is angry, dissatisfied with the status quo. There is a market for politicians who can articulate that anger, identity something to blame, and promise simple answers to complex problems. And it cannot be a coincidence that the rise of this type of politics has occurred during a period of economic stagnation. There is much more to populism than this; it is at least as much a cultural phenomenon as an economic one. But it is also surely the case that the attraction of populism in the UK would diminish if, by the time we got to the next general election, living standards were rising and expected to continue to rise.
It is, therefore, an option for the Government to focus relentlessly on delivering economic growth as a means of achieving re-election (not to mention the more than incidental benefits to the country). Of course, many factors determine economic growth. Some of them can only be delivered in the long term; some – such as Trump's obsession with tariffs – are largely beyond the Government's control; some come at a very high political cost.
Let us, for a moment, assume that the Government is willing to risk these high political costs to deliver higher economic growth. What could it do?
Before making a few suggestions, what is not an option is an expanded borrow-to-invest strategy. Our current fiscal rules are already loose, in part to fund higher levels of capital spending. That is no bad thing, but remarkably little of that higher capital spending is going into the most economically beneficial areas, like transport or scientific research.
The markets are already nervous about our fiscal sustainability and we have the third-highest debt interest costs of any developed country. If the interest rates on our government debt were at the same levels as Germany, we would be paying £50bn a year less than we do. Rather than borrowing more, a credible plan for fiscal credibility is necessary to get those costs down. Contrary to the fashionable view that austerity is bad for growth, it is the loss of control of the public finances that is the real danger.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
This does mean reducing the costs of government both in the short term (the disability benefit bill cannot be allowed to grow at the current rate) and in the long run. For a start, a plan should be announced to get us off the pensions triple lock. Even with spending control, taxes will have to go up. The challenge is that the least unpopular taxes are the most economically damaging. Focusing on the rich goes down well with most of the public but drives away the mobile wealthy. At least a partial retreat on non-doms is necessary, and the idea of a wealth tax should be dismissed. If we need more revenue (and we do), use the main taxes for a broad-based increase.
The Government has made some progress on planning but even on this has recently retreated on environmental requirements. The real benefits of planning reform come from increasing the population of the highly productive parts of the country. This requires a substantial expansion of housebuilding in London (where next to no houses are being built) and the Ox-Cam corridor (where we should be massively ambitious), with spending on transport infrastructure focused there too. Ignore the complaints about the Treasury Green Book; we should invest where we get the best return. Economic growth should be prioritised ahead of reducing regional inequality.
And while I am being provocatively right wing (at least for a New Statesman column), we should also drop the onerous tax we place on developers that reduces housebuilding, namely the requirement to build large numbers of affordable homes. Just build more homes. Planning is one area where regulations have become too onerous. Rachel Reeves was right to highlight in her Mansion House speech last week that excessive regulation is stifling growth. Her rhetoric needs to be matched by implementation – including in the context of employment rights.
Returning to centrist dad mode, what about Brexit? Reduced access to our biggest trading market has proven to be a substantial drag anchor on our economy, predictably enough. The bolder and more ambitious the plans to restore a sensible relationship with the EU, the better. The economic gains will be worth upsetting a vociferous but shrinking minority.
Taken together, it would be an agenda that maximises our chances of delivery economic growth and, in the long term, defeating populism. Is it an agenda that a government, especially this Government, could deliver politically? Probably not. It reminds me that, as I conclude the last of these regular New Statesman columns, that it is a lot easier to write about politics than to be a practising politician.
[See also: Why is Boris Johnson so scared of Emmanuel Macron?]
Related
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Putting out the unwelcome mat for Donald Trump in Scotland
Putting out the unwelcome mat for Donald Trump in Scotland

Scotsman

time24 minutes ago

  • Scotsman

Putting out the unwelcome mat for Donald Trump in Scotland

US President Donald Trump, pictured at Trump Turnberry in 2023, is expected to come to the UK for a state visit later this year (Picture: Andy Buchanan) Donald Trump is due to visit these shores later this week which, he maintains, means a great deal to him as it is the land of his mother's birth. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Mary Anne MacLeod was born and raised in Tong on the island of Lewis in the Outer Hebrides before later emigrating to New York at the age of 18, where she sought work as a domestic servant. In common with tens of thousands of Scots who embarked upon the same journey across the Atlantic in the early part of last century, in search of a better life in the USA and Canada, she left the hardships of her life in the Hebrides behind her. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Leaving Lewis in 1930, she landed in New York and just six years later, she married a rich property developer namely Frederick Trump, the son of German migrants, who was regarded as one of the most eligible men in the city. She returned to visit Lewis throughout her life and always spoke Gaelic. She died in the year 2000 at the age of 88. So, given his family background it is easy to see why Donald Trump has an affinity with Scotland, yet his impending visit is set to be marked with protests and demonstrations, with some justification. And as you would expect, his trip has already been the subject of some controversy. Never one to respect the freedom of the press, he has ejected a Wall Street Journal reporter from his press pool for his visit. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This is in retaliation after the paper published an article alleging that he sent Jeffrey Epstein a 50th birthday letter that included a drawing of a naked woman and concluded with the message 'Happy Birthday - and may every day be another wonderful secret.' Trump has said that he intends to sue Rupert Murdoch's 'ass off' but undeterred, a spokesperson for the journal's parent company, Dow Jones, said that the company 'has full confidence in the rigour and accuracy of our reporting' and 'will vigorously defend against any lawsuit.' So, let battle commence, but, given Trump's propensity for lying, my money is on the newspaper. Trump's last visit here prompted demonstrations in Edinburgh, Aberdeen and Glasgow and a paraglider flew into the 'no fly zone' which operated at Turnberry golf course, which he owns, trailing a banner which read 'Trump: well below par.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This time protestors who have formed the 'Stop Trump Coalition' are planning to display a huge rude message on the Aberdeenshire coastline which they are confident he will see as he flies in to visit his Turnberry golf course. The coalition is also organising a protest this Saturday in Edinburgh outside the US consulate where Palestinian flags in particular will be out in force. There are some who say that Trump's visit presents an opportunity for politicians to meet him and press Scotland's case on tariffs, which is all well and good. But (among other things) given his support of Israel's actions in Gaza and his attacks on the free press, my sympathies lie with the protesters.

Carney shows our leaders how to handle Trump - Alex Cole-Hamilton
Carney shows our leaders how to handle Trump - Alex Cole-Hamilton

Scotsman

time24 minutes ago

  • Scotsman

Carney shows our leaders how to handle Trump - Alex Cole-Hamilton

US President Donald Trump greets Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney as he arrives at the White House in Washington, DC, on May 6 As Donald Trump descends on Scotland this week, there will be an understandable clamour for politicians to boycott opportunities to meet him and for the citizenry to protest against him. I understand that impulse, I travelled across the Atlantic in October to help Kamala Harris try to defeat him. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... But here's the deal: like him or loathe him, Scotland and the UK export billions of pounds worth of good to the US and without American arms, the prospects for Ukraine look grim. Donald Trump holds plenty of cards right now and it's just not serious politics to think that shutting him out in the cold and refusing to speak to him will do any good whatsoever. To my mind, our political leaders should look to the approach taken by new Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney as to how we deal with President Trump. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Days after the Scottish Parliament broke up for the summer, I took my family to visit my sister in Vancouver. She has a house on the water, a ferry ride away from the city and, bathed in the sunshine of the Pacific North West, we swam in the sea, went paddleboarding every day and watched on as black bears devoured the cherry trees in her garden. It was a terrific break, but one thing I noticed about my visit this time was the proliferation of Canadian flags. They're everywhere. There was a time when the Canadian flag had been a symbol for the alt-right political wing of Canadian politics. During Covid times, truck drivers and anti-vaxxers would descend on Ottawa to protest against the Liberal government. Well now the maple-leaf has been reclaimed by the normal people of Canada and is proudly displayed on cars and shops in defiance of the belligerence of their southern neighbour. American products have been stripped from Canadian supermarket shelves and companies are both quick and proud to demonstrate their Canadian heritage. In large part it's a response to the trade hostility and the tariffs imposed on them by Trump, but a more sinister apprehension also lies beneath the surface of Canadian sentiment. Readers will be aware of the provocative talk by Trump of his desire to make Canada the 51st state of the US. Well in Canada, I was surprised at just how seriously people had taken this. Some people there really thought that there was a solid chance of American military invasion and had started making plans, gathering emergency supplies and even starting to think about what a resistance movement would look like. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Canada's new Liberal Prime Minister, Mark Carney offers the rest of the right-thinking leaders of the world a masterclass in how to handle the Orange One. Against all this, he calmly dismantled the lunacy of Trump's assertions and he did so on camera and in the White House. When Trump started with the 51st state schtick, Carney calmly said 'As you know from real estate, there are some places that are never for sale. We're sitting in one right now, Buckingham Palace that you visited, as well. And having met with the owners of Canada over the course of the campaign the last several months, it's not for sale, it won't be for sale, ever.' It was an elegant piece of diplomacy. One which both the Prime Minister and the First Minister would do well to well to emulate. And we should not forgot that the Scotland has cards to play too. Trump has ancestral and business ties to Scotland. He admires our Royal family. Britain and America have long shared vital intelligence. As distasteful as it may be, we need to keep Trump on side, for Ukraine, for our trade prospects, but we need not and should never kowtow to him.

Reform councillors criticised after voting to spend £150,000 on political advisers
Reform councillors criticised after voting to spend £150,000 on political advisers

The Guardian

time25 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Reform councillors criticised after voting to spend £150,000 on political advisers

Reform UK councillors have been accused of hypocrisy after voting to spend £150,000 on hiring political advisers at a county council despite pledging to cut waste and save money. The plans were put forward by Reform councillor George Finch, a 19-year-old who was narrowly elected as the leader of Warwickshire county council during a meeting on Tuesday, which was picketed by protesters. The protest came after a row over an attempt by Finch, as interim leader, to have a Pride flag removed from council headquarters before the end of Pride month. The chief executive refused the request, telling him she was responsible for such decisions. However, there was fresh controversy during a meeting of the council, one of several where Reform became the largest party in the recent local elections, as it narrowly pushed through plans to hire political advisers but lost a separate vote relating to the climate crisis. Opposition councillors accused Reform of reneging on promises to voters over the political advisers, who would be publicly funded for it and the other two largest parties, the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats. 'These proposals are all about spending some money so they can have a chum in their group and I think that is not particularly helpful given the financial state of this council,' said George Cowcher, councillor and deputy leader of the Liberal Democrats. He added that it was almost a quarter of the way through the financial year and there had yet to be any proposals from Reform about managing the authority's budget. Sam Jones, a Green party councillor, said: 'Reform have had a sniff of power, they're making it so clear that they never cared a jot for the will of their supporters. No to overpaid, unelected bureaucrats before the election, but yes to up to £150,000 of unfunded spending on political assistants now the campaigning is over.' Finch defended the plans, which would involve a political assistant for each of the three big parties, on the basis that it was permitted by legislation and occurred in other councils. If other parties were against it, he challenged them to vote against the plan and then choose not to hire political assistants. His colleague, the councillor Michael Bannister, said the party saw the move as 'value for money' and funds would be found from elsewhere. However, there was a defeat for Reform when opposition MPs supported a green motion to recognise that scientific evidence clearly states climate change is happening, and support the council's 2019 vote to declare a 'climate emergency.' 'We are here as local people sorting out local problems. It is ridiculous to be asking for anything else,' said Reform councillor Luke Cooper, who said he had experience of installing solar panels and measures that he said people could not afford. Sarah Feeney, the Labour leader, said the climate crisis was a 'not a hypothetical' and was already having a major impact on farmers, with flooding causing elderly people to sometimes barricade themselves in their homes. Tracey Drew, a Green party councillor, said: 'The least well off in our county are going to be the first and the most to be impacted by the effects of climate change.' Outside the council meeting, demonstrators included Becky Davidson, a district councillor who said she was there to support the LGBT community. Finch was 'using a marginalised community as a propaganda tool', she said. Carolyn, a resident of Stratford-upon-Avon, was holding a placard reading: 'Donald Trump inspires Farage to import to the UK DEI: Division, Exclusion, Inequality'. She said she was worried about Reform overturning 'policies around recognising the climate emergency' and that she was there to object to Finch's 'pettiness' over the Pride flag.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store