New Forbes Survey Reveals C-Suite's Vision For Tech-Powered Growth In 2025
Their optimistic projections, along with the short-term challenges that could derail that trajectory, are captured in our fifth annual CxO Growth Survey, which reflects the viewpoints of 1,000 global executives representing companies with at least $1 billion in revenue. This story, published in March 2025, marks our first release of its findings.
Read on for an inside look at CxOs' investment strategies, their collaboration dynamics and the challenges they face in the race toward technological excellence.
Executive leaders now view technology as the primary enabler of business growth, citing accelerating digital transformation as their top strategic priority, up from the number-three spot just last year. Chief financial officers are backing this shift, with tech set to receive the biggest jump in capital spending.
Trailing technology in second and third place on the CxO agenda are:
In contrast, sustainability and diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives—last year's top concerns—have slipped to seventh and eighth place for this year. 'This reflects increased pressure to balance long-term commitments with short-term profitability in this period of uncertainty,' says Ross Gagnon, executive director of research at Forbes.
While this survey was conducted prior to Donald Trump's presidency, the findings also align with U.S. companies' growing retreat from corporate social responsibility. Dozens have walked back DEI commitments amid political and regulatory change, while others have cooled on climate pledges, delaying key decarbonization deadlines.
However, executives' longer-term goals tell a different story. When asked how their priorities will evolve over the next two years, CxOs put DEI back on their top-three list. They also consider investing in the circular economy—a system that minimizes waste by extending the lifespan of materials through reuse and resource efficiency—as essential to their company's long-term growth. While these focus areas may be taking a temporary backseat, executives affirm their continued importance in shaping future strategy.
*Indicates the percentage of respondents who gave this answer
According to surveytakers, that's the most hotly debated question in the C-suite.
Artificial intelligence and cybersecurity solutions top the list of tech investments, with 93% of organizations increasing spending in these areas over the next two years. And expect bold moves, not modest hikes: More than half plan to up their AI and cybersecurity budgets by more than 16%.
This strategy reflects the ongoing race between innovation and protection, as cybersecurity solutions strive to combat the rise of AI-driven threats while also harnessing AI's capabilities for defense.
'We're living in a very interesting space where we're building tech to protect against tech, and the speed is just accelerating,' Allegra Driscoll, chief technology officer of payments solution provider Bread Financial, said at the Forbes CIO Summit in November.
Fifty-five percent of survey participants struggle to handle the blitz of cyber threats and attacks they say has escalated over the past year. Stirred to action, 83% have implemented zero-trust security models, and 88% have continuous security improvement programs in place that include regular assessments, vulnerability remediation and ongoing employee training.
RELATED: Do You Think Like A CEO? Take Our Quiz To Find Out
Ripple Bhular, executive vice president and head of U.S. Capital Markets and Diversified at IT services company Kyndryl, sees these actions as not just a defense posture but also a growth strategy.
'Organizations need to start seeing cybersecurity as a competitive differentiator for them,' she said, speaking on the same CIO Summit panel. 'If a consumer is impacted or has an inclination that a certain business is not protecting their data, they're gonna take their business elsewhere.'
Our survey portrays an increasingly unified and collaborative C-suite.
Chief information officers (82%) and chief marketing officers (78%), for example, increasingly see themselves as bridge-builders within their organizations, reaching across departments to advocate for organization-wide innovation.
This type of multidisciplinary approach facilitates CxOs' intertwined priorities:
CEOs aren't just endorsing this cross-functional approach; they're modeling it. Eighty-eight percent are prioritizing stronger engagement with their leadership teams and say encouraging greater collaboration among their direct reports is one of their top strategic goals.
Tech executives, meanwhile, topped the list of C-suite leaders CxOs want to collaborate with more in the future—highlighting their conviction that tech-driven growth is the key to advancing their functions and the organization as a whole.
Forbes Research takes the pulse of the most important topics in business through original surveys, analysis and storytelling.
Explore our findings, and learn more about partnering with Forbes Research.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
2 days ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Wisconsin Bar Surrenders on DEI
Diversity, equity and inclusion programs are shutting down in many corners of the U.S., but some bar associations need an extra push. On Thursday the Wisconsin Bar Association settled a federal lawsuit by ending the use of DEI in race-based leadership programs. Under the settlement terms with a conservative legal group, the Wisconsin bar agreed to remove race, gender or other 'immutable characteristics' on applications for its Leadership Development Summit or Leadership Academy, which are programs geared toward young lawyers. The bar said it would also be 'reiterating in promotional and application materials' that its programs 'are available to all Wisconsin law students,' not only those of certain races.
Black America Web
3 days ago
- Black America Web
T-Mobile Removes DEI Programs Just In Time For FCC To Approve Mergers
Source: picture alliance / Getty Boy, I tell ya, 2025 has really been the year of finding out how many companies don't value Black dollars. Cell service provider T-Mobile is the latest company announcing an end to its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives to appease the Trump administration. Last week, T-Mobile sent a letter to Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chair Brendan Carr stating it was ending its DEI initiatives 'not just in name, but in substance.' T-Mobile has removed any mention of DEI on its website and employee training manuals, and no longer has any positions or teams dedicated to DEI. 'This is another good step forward for equal opportunity, nondiscrimination, and the public interest,' Carr wrote in response to T-Mobile's letter. On Friday, the FCC approved T-Mobile's acquisitions of regional carrier United States Cellular and internet provider Metronet in two separate transactions. Most of the companies that've made similar moves have at least tried to soften it with some corporate speak about how 'we stand committed to creating a welcoming environment for all customers,' but T-Mobile really stood 10 toes down here. 'Not just in name, but in substance,' is crazy work and tells T-Mobile's Black, Brown, and LGBTQ employees and customers that it has no problem throwing them under the bus when it's politically expedient. FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez, a Democrat, criticized T-Mobile's decision, calling it 'yet another cynical bid to win FCC regulatory approval. T-Mobile is making a mockery of its professed commitment to eliminating discrimination, promoting fairness, and amplifying underrepresented voices.' What's interesting to me is that the GOP loves to go on and on about 'ideological purity tests' and then use their power to punish any individual or organization that doesn't agree with their ideology. Throughout his tenure as FCC Chair, Carr has shown no hesitation in weaponizing his position to target any company that has DEI initiatives he agrees with. He most notably opened an investigation into NBC over Comcast's DEI policies earlier this year. In an interview with Bloomberg, Carr openly said, 'Any businesses that are looking for FCC approval, I would encourage them to get busy ending any sort of their invidious forms of DEI discrimination.' Carr's willingness to use the FCC's merger approval process to pressure companies into removing their DEI initiatives has drawn criticism from House Democrats, resulting in the House Committee on Energy and Commerce opening an investigation into Carr. As a result of the Trump administration's crackdown on DEI initiatives, this year has seen several companies announcing an end to their DEI programs. While it may have gained them favor with the Trump administration, it hasn't gone over smoothly with consumers. Several consumer boycotts have been launched this year over companies removing their DEI programs, with Target being the most notable. The company announced in January it'd be winding down its commitment to DEI and is steadily facing the consequences of that decision. Several consumer boycotts were launched by Rev. Jamal Bryant and Minnesota activist Nekima Levy Armstrong, resulting in foot traffic being down in stores, and the company posting a sales loss during its quarterly earnings report in May. Consumer boycotts over DEI closures are so effective that companies are listing them as potential risks for investors. While T-Mobile may gain the FCC's approval, it's now running the risk of alienating a substantial part of its consumer base. SEE ALSO: Stacey Abrams Warns Companies Dropping DEI, 'It Costs You' Survey: High-Level Business Execs Say DEI Is Necessary SEE ALSO T-Mobile Removes DEI Programs Just In Time For FCC To Approve Mergers was originally published on
Time Magazine
3 days ago
- Time Magazine
Target to End Price-Matching Policy Amid Business Challenges
For years, Target customers were able to get the lowest possible price through Target's policy of matching prices with its competitors. But that policy is coming to an end. The company told Bloomberg News that it will update the policy on July 28 and that the move is an effort to simplify Target's pricing strategy. Target will still match prices between its own online platform and retail stores, a company spokesperson added. TIME has reached out to Target for comment. Some customers have lamented the decision. 'I've gotten some crazy deals price matching to Amazon plus using my discounts. R.I.P. price matching,' wrote one Reddit user. 'Well I'll just buy less or buy it where it's cheaper,' wrote another. Ashley Dudarenok, who runs a China- and Hong Kong-based consumer research consultancy, said the decision 'eliminates a safety net for consumers' who could be sure that they were getting the most competitive prices at Target. 'For consumers, this means the onus is now on them to compare prices before shopping, potentially pushing the most price-sensitive shoppers to competitors like Walmart or Amazon for certain purchases.' Dudarenok says that Target is hoping its 'loyal customer base, often attracted by the in-store experience and exclusive brands (the 'Tar-jay' effect) will absorb this change.' But the move is risky, she adds, at a time when U.S. consumer spending is falling. Target has grappled with a slump in sales this year, with the company missing its Q1 revenue estimate and cutting its full-year sales outlook in May. Target CEO Brian Cornell said in an earnings call in May that U.S. tariffs were one factor in a number of 'massive potential costs' for the company. He also warned that price hikes could come as a 'very last resort' after earlier in March telling CNBC that certain goods will 'likely see price increases' for consumers. Target has also struggled with consumer boycotts following its decision on Jan. 24 to roll back its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies. President Trump signed an executive order on Jan. 20 decrying DEI as 'illegal and immoral discrimination' and ending federal initiatives. The order does not force private employers to abolish DEI programs but opens up companies to anti-DEI backlash. 'The company is juggling significant financial pressures, including the looming threat of tariffs on Chinese goods, with the need to maintain customer loyalty,' Dudarenok says. 'Ending the price match policy is a defensive financial move. At the same time, the company is still navigating the fallout from its DEI initiatives, trying to find a neutral ground that doesn't alienate its diverse customer base.' Target's challenges date back several years. The company's annual revenue has stagnated since 2021, while its shares have fallen around 60% in that time.
