logo
Now it's the DIMBYs! Villages at war over 2,000 house housing estate they DO want to be built in their back yards

Now it's the DIMBYs! Villages at war over 2,000 house housing estate they DO want to be built in their back yards

Daily Mail​27-05-2025
Two small communities are locked in an extraordinary dispute about who should have a massive housing development in their area – with both insisting it should be them.
Discussions are underway about 2,000 homes being built at Robertson Barracks in Norfolk - a historic 400-acre military base where Churchill and Eisenhower once met during the Second World War.
But this has sparked a feud as the land lies on the boundary between Swanton Morley and neighbouring Hoe and Worthing – both of which are laying claim to the development as it will generate significant council tax revenue.
Much of the base, including where the barracks are located, is in Swanton Morley.
But the area which once formed an RAF airfield – and where most of the new homes would go up – is in Hoe and Worthing.
Swanton Morley, which has a population of 2,300, is now arguing it would make sense for the entire site to be administered by one parish, triggering accusations by its smaller neighbour, which has 300 residents, of a 'land grab'.
The issue exploded at a recent general purposes meeting hosted by Breckland District Council, the planning authority for the area, where Roger Atterwill, the chairman of Swanton Morley Parish Council, put forward the proposal.
But Celia Daniel, the chairman of Hoe and Worthing Parish Meeting, complained there had been 'no engagement' between the two areas about it.
She said: 'This is deeply concerning. The proposal to enlarge Swanton Morley means reducing the Hoe and Worthing parish area. What they are asking for is morally wrong.'
Michael Goff, who farms land by the airfield, added: 'Fundamentally, this is a land grab.
'This will reduce Hoe and Worthing to an utterly irrelevant, moon-shaped sliver of a parish. It might as well disappear at that point.'
Ms Daniel declined to comment further when contacted by the Mail today, saying only that there had been 'various meetings since last year' about the proposed sustainable development.
But Mr Atterwill, who is also leader of the Independent and Green group at the district council, insisted there was no 'land grab' - and claimed his parish was better suited to take on the responsibility of the new dwellings and more deserving of the funds.
'Between the two villages, Swanton Morley would have all the traffic and all the construction vehicles and everything that goes with that but the houses would be in Hoe and Worthing,' he said.
'Every local authority has to have a local development plan which is made up of the district council's local plan and a selection of parish councils that have done their own neighbourhood plans, so that they can have their own development policies.
'Hoe and Worthing is quite a small hamlet. They don't have a local development plan and they've got no intention of doing one.
'Hoe and Worthing is not a parish council. They're a parish meeting. They are only meeting once or twice a year. They get a total precept of around £1,800 and ours is £98,000, so there is a difference in resources…
'This is very important to Swanton Morley because we're one of the largest villages in the district of Breckland.
'We have a medical practice here, road infrastructure that needs to be improved and the village school grounds could be expanded.
'Hoe and Worthing doesn't really have assets. It's got a couple of dog bins and notice boards but no other assets. They don't have a village hall.'
Mr Atterwill added having a local development plan meant his parish council would be able to lock in Section 106 agreements, under which developers must pay for local facilities in return for planning approval of lucrative sites.
And he said Swanton Morley had ambitions to turn the Grade II listed air traffic control tower at the base into a museum due to its significance.
On July 4, 1942, British prime minster Winston Churchill and General Dwight D Eisenhower, the Supreme Commander of the Allied Expeditionary Force in Europe, watched American and British airmen take off from what was then RAF Swanton Morley on the first combined bombing raid of the war.
The operation targeted German airfields in occupied Holland and involved six US crews from 15th Bombardment Squadron and six RAF crews from 226 Squadron, using Boston light bombers.
Mr Atterwill added: 'There is no intention to land grab because we are not grabbing any land. We're not looking to grab any buildings.
'It's simply moving the boundary around the field. There's no homes or base within that field [at present].'
Locals were bemused by the feud between the modestly-sized communities, noting they might normally be expected to fight expansion to preserve their way of life.
One said: 'I wouldn't call it a David and Goliath situation, more David and David.'
A Swanton Morley resident added: 'This is Dimbyism – definitely in my back yard.'
The RAF handed the base over to the Army in 1995 and it was renamed after Sir William Robertson, head of the British Army during the First World War.
It is currently home to 400 personnel of 1st The Queen's Dragoon Guards, with family accommodation and a pre-school on-site, but is scheduled to close in 2031.
Troops will relocate to Wales and the site has been earmarked for development under the district council's local plan for the next 20 years as part of efforts to build 16,500 homes in total.
Breckland District Council were contacted by the Mail for a comment.
But speaking at the May 15 general purposes meeting, district councillors said Swanton Morley's proposal had been put forward 'prematurely'.
Conservative member Mark Kiddle-Morris commented: 'Once there is a planning application, then it would be appropriate to consider this. But we are not quite there yet.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The situation in Gaza is dire – but Starmer should be clear about who is to blame
The situation in Gaza is dire – but Starmer should be clear about who is to blame

Telegraph

time28 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

The situation in Gaza is dire – but Starmer should be clear about who is to blame

SIR – The situation in Gaza is awful and has been for some time. However, there are two sides in this war – Israel and the terrorist group Hamas, which, let's not forget, started this conflict with its brutal attack on Israel and the taking of 251 hostages. The Israeli response to Hamas has been devastating and the innocent people of Gaza are suffering. However, if Hamas truly cares about those in Gaza and wants to end this suffering, it should release all the remaining hostages and stop using hospitals, public buildings and aid centres for military purposes, thus risking them being hit as military targets. Rather than unilaterally recognising a Palestinian state (report, July 29), if Western leaders want an end to this conflict, they must make demands of Hamas, along with Israel – or else it won't happen. Alan Carter Newcastle upon Tyne SIR – Why is it that not one country that wants to recognise a Palestinian state has made it a precondition that the Palestinian Authority drop its 'pay to slay' policy? The so-called Martyrs Fund means that, every month, the Palestinian Authority gives money to Palestinian terrorists who are in Israeli prisons, for attacking Israelis. It also gives money to the families of Palestinians killed or injured during the course of attacking Israel – money which for decades was paid on the basis that, the more serious the attack or the longer the prison sentence, the higher the payment would be. Lynton Stock London NW7 SIR – We have two very different ongoing situations in the region. One is in Gaza and one is in the West Bank. While most are concentrating on Gaza, Israeli settlers are illegally taking over land in the West Bank and building settlements there. This crime gets very little coverage, but it matters: where else could a Palestinian state be set up but on the West Bank? Before that is possible, Israel has to stop the settler activities there. This is what our Prime Minister should be concentrating his efforts on. Herbert Chappell Woking, Surrey SIR – Puntland in north-east Somalia has a government, a constitution, established borders and effective state institutions. Despite years of wrangling, it is still not recognised internationally as a state. Yet the British Government is planning to recognise a state called 'Palestine', which has none of these things except a name. For an administration full of international lawyers, this is strange indeed. Jolyon Grey Cheltenham, Gloucestershire SIR – As countries seem to be queuing up to recognise a Palestinian state (report, August 1) it might be timely to remind certain politicians that some 25 countries, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Lebanon, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Algeria, Iran, and Venezuela, do not actually recognise the state of Israel. Strange, that, since Israel does exist and, as it stands, Palestine's claim to statehood is ephemeral. Dr Gerald Edwards Glasgow

Jeremy Corbyn's new party needs a name and it's trickier than you might think
Jeremy Corbyn's new party needs a name and it's trickier than you might think

BBC News

time28 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Jeremy Corbyn's new party needs a name and it's trickier than you might think

The first thing anybody wants to know when a new political party is launched is what it's going to be Jeremy Corbyn has decided to do things differently. The former Labour leader claims more than 600,000 people have registered as supporters for the new left-wing party he is setting up with fellow independent and ex-Labour MP Zarah is, so far, a party without a reports that it was going to be called Your Party - because that's what the sign-up website is called - were quickly shot down by has said she thinks The Left or the Left Party would be a good title for the new the pair have said they want supporters to come up with a name, as part of their debate on what the new party will stand for. They will not be able to put forward candidates for election until they have registered a name with the Electoral Commission, which has strict rules about not copying other parties' names or sounding too much like apart from that, supporters have a blank canvas."The name should sum up in one simple phrase the pure essence of what the party is all about," says Sheffield University's Prof Matthew time is also ripe for a political party named for the modern world, he Flinders argues the mainstream parties' brands were forged in different times and "most young people don't really understand what Labour means, or Conservative". "The especially don't know what Liberal Democrat means."Whereas parties were once sustained by local branch or social meetings that has "eroded in a digital age, making the relationships thinner and putting more pressure on name and brand recognition to resonate with voters", Prof Flinders the commercial world, brand names are everything."There's a lot of power in a name and if you can clearly convey your point of view and use those words effectively it does a lot of work," says Laura Rogers, an executive creative director at advertising agency AMV BBDO, which counts retailer Currys and charity the RSPCA among its sweet spot, she argues, is something that works well for sharing online and sells well as "merch". Get the wrong name and you risk ridicule. Just ask the Post Office, which in 2001 wasted £2m to rebrand as Consignia, only to reverse course after the baffling name became a laughing stock. A new political party must also be alive to the risks of social media that loves to turn everything into punchlines."Make sure the first three letters don't spell a bad word," warns journalist Ash Sarkar of the left-wing media site Novara Media. "Like the word assembly can very easily be changed to 'ass'."While this may seem flippant ,"People experience and understand politics through the content they share online", Sarkar the general public to name a party would have been a disaster, leading to "Party McPartyface" says Sarkar - referencing the time Boaty McBoatface won a public poll to name a £200m polar research Bailey, co-founder of branding and design agency Baxter and Bailey, thinks Corbyn's decision to ask supporters for names is a clever stunt that has created buzz and a sense of ownership for those signing up. "It also really fits with his brand to be social and democratic with the choice of name," Bailey says."But being democratic in naming and design doesn't make a whole lot of sense," he warns. Political history is littered with cautionary tales for new parties trying to make a name for themselves. The Electoral Commission website shows a new party is registered almost every week in the UK, and most fade without making an impact at a national when a party launches with 11 MPs and a national profile they can collapse without ever really defining themselves - like The Independent Group (TIG), which launched at the height of the Brexit deadlock in 2019 as an avowedly centrist, pro–European Union political party only lasted ten months but changed its name twice, first to Change UK and then to The Independent Group for Change after petitions website threatened to sue over the Allen, the ex-Tory MP who was the first leader of Change UK, recalls her party became "lost in admin", sapping the fledgling movement of a name that speaks to your message and is not already taken by another political group of business is "trickier than you think", says Allen. Pamela Fitzpatrick, who runs the Peace and Justice Project with Corbyn, registered a party last month named "Arise" - a name drawn from one of Corbyn's favourite political strategist and pollster Chris Bruni‑Lowe, who has written a book on the history of politic slogans, would advise against using Arise as the new party's name. "Vague or overly poetic names will underperform, especially if the party is meant to be a corrective force," he his book, Bruni-Lowe says he found "voters don't reward wordplay - they reward clarity and conviction".A name must also be "clear" rather than "clever", he the most effective political brands "offer a vision or mission, not just an organisational label" and use "the electorate's own language and frustrations". Corbyn has insisted the final decision will only come after "all the responses" are in. The plan is to settle on a name at the party's founding conference, in the the discussions around the name are just a distraction, says tends to "hyper-fixate on things that don't really matter", she argues."It's not going to live or die based on a name," insists Sarkar. "It will live or die based on its political strategy.""The fact that 600,000 people have signed up to the new Corbyn project with no name is an answer to the question on how much the name matters," she a message to supporters on Friday, the party with no name said: "Make no mistake: whatever the name, it is always going to be your party." Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.

Angela Rayner's department spends thousands in taxpayers' cash on woke diversity training
Angela Rayner's department spends thousands in taxpayers' cash on woke diversity training

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Angela Rayner's department spends thousands in taxpayers' cash on woke diversity training

ANGELA Rayner's department has spent thousands of pounds of taxpayers' cash on woke diversity training. Her housing department splashed £47,272 on the coaching — including nearly £5,000 to a firm that advises on the dangers of banter at work. Inclusive Employers Ltd teaches how to 'decolonise the workplace' and offers 'inclusion allies' training. The Deputy PM's department refused to give full details of what this training involved when quizzed in parliamentary questions. But the company provides courses on unconscious bias and micro aggressions, according to its website. It warns workplace 'banter, when unchecked, can escalate into harmful behaviour including bullying, harassment and discrimination'. The website also provides tips on how to 'navigate the anti-woke backlash' and suggests many Baby Boomers are anti-woke. It states boomers 'may be uncomfortable with the rapid shifts and evolving language associated with being woke' and have a 'nostalgia for the values and beliefs' of the past. The Tories, who helped to uncover the near £50,000 spend, bashed it as a waste of taxpayers' cash. Shadow cabinet office minister Mike Wood said: 'Angela Rayner seems determined to push through her divisive Equality, Diversity and Inclusion agenda by any means necessary — even though it's clearly not in the national interest. 'This is part of a wider pattern of taxpayers' money wasted across Whitehall under Labour on woke virtue-signalling. It must be stopped.' Ms Rayner is in charge of steering the new Employment Rights Bill, which massively beefs up the powers of trade unions, through parliament. Angela Rayner says lifting 2-child benefit cap not 'silver bullet' for ending poverty after demanding cuts for millions It will force businesses to recognise union 'equality representatives' and let them have paid time off for their trade union work. A government spokesman said: 'The vast majority of this spend went on accredited, practical training to help managers better support disabled colleagues.' 1

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store