NPA says overturned Cholota extradition will not affect Ace Magashule trial
Image: Supplied
The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) said the judgment by the Bloemfontein High Court in upholding Moroadi Cholota's special plea of lack of jurisdiction will not impact the trial of the rest of the accused.
It will meanwhile consider its options, including possibly appealing against the judgment.
'The NPA will specifically consider options to appeal considering the potential impact of the judgment in respect of the case against Ms Cholota, and broader extradition processes,' NPA spokesperson Mthunzi Mhaga said.
He explained that it should be noted that this judgment has no bearing on the trial against the other accused that is expected to resume on Wednesday (June 4) as Cholota was an accused person and not a state witness.
The NPA remains confident in the strength of its case against the accused in this matter and is ready to proceed when the trial resumes.
'The members of the prosecuting team always acted with the highest standards of ethical conduct, guided by the evidence and information available at any given time,' Mhaga said.
The court found on Tuesday that it has no jurisdiction to try the former Free State premier Ace Magashule's personal assistant in the R255-million asbestos case, as her extradition from the United States of America was unlawful.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
The judge upheld her special plea regarding the asbestos removal tender following a trial-within-a trial to ascertain whether Cholota's extradition process by the South African authorities was done lawfully.
While a Free State director of Public Prosecutions applied for Cholota's extradition, Judge Philip Loubser found that this power lies with the Justice Minister and with the National Prosecuting Authority. Thus, he said, the extradition was not done lawfully and it is not valid.
'This court does not have the power to try you. You are free to leave,' the judge told Cholota. Cholota was one of the 18 accused in the high-profile trial where the accused are facing a host of charges relating to alleged fraud, corruption and money laundering. All of the accused had pleaded not guilty and vehemently denied any involvement in the allegations against them.
Cholota was studying in the USA at the time of her extradition and at first regarded as a state witness, before it was decided to add her as accused no 17 to the criminal trial. In challenging her extradition, Cholota claimed that the State had lied or misrepresented to the US authorities that there was a case for her to answer in South Africa.
In delivering his judgment, Judge Loubser said there was no need to go into these arguments, as he found the extradition process was wrong in law. The only two witnesses who testified during the extradition challenge were Hawks officials. The Cholota camp did not call any witnesses.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
21 minutes ago
- IOL News
Under Watch: Pakistan's Journalists Struggle to Stay Afloat in a Sinking Democracy
While the South African media still enjoys constitutional protections and a relatively free press environment, Pakistan's journalists are battling to breathe amid a tightening noose drawn by military and intelligence institutions. Image: Supplied As South Africa continues its journey of democratic consolidation and media transformation, the situation in Pakistan serves as a chilling reminder of how press freedom can be slowly strangled under the guise of regulation and national security. While the South African media still enjoys constitutional protections and a relatively free press environment, Pakistan's journalists are battling to breathe amid a tightening noose drawn by military and intelligence institutions. A recent report titled ''Intimidation on All Fronts: Press Freedom and Media Safety in Pakistan'', released ahead of World Press Freedom Day 2025, paints a grim picture. Journalists in Pakistan face a growing array of threats: surveillance, legal intimidation, censorship, financial pressure, and in some cases, violent attacks. Despite constitutional guarantees, the freedom to report independently has become a high-risk act. Pakistan's history of media repression is not new. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ From the military regimes of Ayub Khan and Zia-ul-Haq to the more modern, media-savvy control strategies under Pervez Musharraf, the trend has remained the same — muzzle dissent and protect power. The Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, formed in 2002, was meant to regulate broadcast media. But over time, it has morphed into a weapon used to punish outlets and journalists who challenge the state narrative. Recent developments have added digital spaces to the list of controlled domains. The Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act, initially aimed at curbing cybercrime, has often been misused to target online journalists and civil society voices. Amendments passed this year have broadened the state's powers even further, allowing for arrests and censorship under vague definitions of 'offensive content.' During the 2024 general elections, media access was deliberately restricted. Entire regions, including the capital Islamabad, faced mobile and internet shutdowns, severely hampering election coverage. The Pakistan Telecommunication Authority, then under the command of a retired general, enforced these blackouts on instructions from the Ministry of Interior. The timing raised serious concerns about transparency and the integrity of the electoral process. One of the most alarming proposals is the creation of the Pakistan Media Development Authority. Critics argue that it would function more as a state enforcer than a media watchdog, with powers to shut down outlets and prosecute journalists in special tribunals. Such bodies, in a democracy, would be unthinkable. But in Pakistan, they are becoming tools to silence critical reporting under a veil of legality. Economic pressure also plays a part. The government controls a large portion of advertising revenue, and this leverage is used to reward compliant media houses and starve those that refuse to toe the line. Newspapers like *Dawn* and *Daily Sahafat*, which have maintained editorial independence, have faced sharp revenue cuts, while pro-government platforms remain well-funded. But the financial and legal constraints pale in comparison to the physical dangers. Journalists are being harassed, abducted, or worse. In 2024 alone, seven journalists were killed. These included well-known names like Khalil Jibran and Saad Ahmed, whose deaths have not led to meaningful investigations or justice. The case of Arshad Sharif, shot dead in Kenya after fleeing threats in Pakistan, remains a haunting symbol of the lengths to which journalists must go to avoid repression, only to meet violence abroad. Women in the industry are also increasingly targeted. Javeria Siddique, the widow of Arshad Sharif and a journalist in her own right, has faced ongoing harassment both online and off. Such stories are no longer isolated incidents—they reflect a pattern. The Pakistan Press Foundation documented 34 cases of physical assaults, digital threats, or kidnapping in just the first half of 2025. Dozens of journalists have either been arrested or forced into exile. Even prominent figures like Imran Riaz Khan have been repeatedly detained for challenging state institutions, with little or no legal recourse. As South Africans, we should not look away. The experiences of Pakistani journalists should remind us that the freedom to write, question, and investigate must never be taken for granted. When military or political elites control narratives, societies lose not only their access to truth but also the accountability that keeps democracies a time where disinformation is rampant and authoritarian tactics are spreading across borders, the struggle of Pakistani journalists must be seen for what it is — a frontline battle for democracy. South Africa, with its hard-won media freedoms, must stand in solidarity with those who risk everything for the simple act of telling the truth.
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
Nature reserve and communities collide in Cape Town's landfill controversy as Coastal Park nears capacity
Cape Town's Coastal Park Landfill faces a critical capacity crisis by September 2026, prompting a controversial height extension proposal. This plan is heavily criticised due to existing informal settlements within the landfill's buffer zone, with concern about permit violations and the city's long-term waste strategy. The Coastal Park Landfill, in close proximity to the larger False Bay Nature Reserve in Cape Town, is rapidly approaching its maximum capacity, projected to be reached by September 2026. To mitigate this imminent waste crisis, the City of Cape Town proposes extending the landfill's height from 45 metres to 67m above sea level. But the proposal has drawn sharp criticism from surrounding communities and groups, including whether this is the right way to deal with the escalating waste crisis and that informal settlements already breach the site's buffer zone, allegedly contravening the permit for operating the site. According to the city, the height extension would extend the landfill's lifespan to September 2028. Extending the lifespan of the landfill by two years will also extend the lifespan of the Vissershok Municipal Landfill Site by about two years to 15 years. But this proposed expansion is mired in controversy as informal settlements around the site have encroached directly on to what should be a 400m buffer zone, raising significant environmental and social risks. The city, in response to Daily Maverick, acknowledged that 'unlawful occupation of land' had occurred within the landfill's buffer zone and it was working through required legal processes to correct this. The inhabitants in the buffer zone have been issued eviction notices. According to a city statement, operation of a landfill in contravention of permit conditions may result in a fine of up to R10-million or imprisonment of up to 10 years. Vrygrond community outcry Michael Khumalo, who runs a recycling centre in Vrygrond and chairs the Vrygrond Community Development Forum — which covers Xakabantu, Overcome Heights, Dubai and Capricorn informal settlements — said the community was frustrated by a lack of consultation. 'We would have expected the first thing is first to engage the community that is going to be affected by anything to come. But that has not happened. In fact what we see, we see in newspapers and so on,' said Khumalo. He said that at a recent community meeting, it was resolved that the Vrygrond community would organise a march to the mayor's office on 2 August to deliver a memorandum of demands — including calls to address the lack of service delivery. Khumalo said people were 'living in terrible conditions' and that many had been there for years, deserving respect and mitigation of their living conditions. When it came to the community moving further on to the buffer zone, Khumalo said this was a contradiction from the city, as it said the area was a nature reserve where people could not live and small businesses could not operate, yet the landfill itself was in the nature reserve, and the city was looking at expanding it. Khumalo said the city's massive recycling plant had been constructed within the nature reserve area, implying a double standard where large businesses were allowed, but small, community-driven ones like his were not. Speaking to Daily Maverick while overlooking the landfill, Khumalo described it as a 'gold mine' because it contained a lot of recyclable materials such as metal and plastic, that should not have been buried. He said that the community had been living off the landfill site for years by picking up reusable and recyclable materials and selling these to buy-back centres – this was one of the few employment opportunities available to the community. Brian Nkhata, a Vrygrond resident and part of the Back to Work campaign, and from the recycling association in the Southfield area, said he was also deeply concerned about the plans for the expansion of the landfill. He said that he had seen people dumping recyclable materials on the landfill site and recounted that the city's actions, such as using a large truck to destroy dumped materials, prevented people from recovering recyclables. Khumalo said, 'You don't fix your shortcomings by expanding. Even if you expand [the landfill], you're going to have a bigger mountain in a short space of time because you are not dealing with the problem. The issue is how do we divert stuff that ends up at the landfill, which should not end up there.' He believed that this was where small community-owned recycling businesses like his, having buy-back centres and working with waste-pickers, should be focused on and supported. Nkhata shared his experience with Daily Maverick. He initially did not know what recycling was, but quickly learnt he could earn a living from it. Since becoming involved in recycling around Vrygrond, he has joined a recycling association and attends meetings and seminars related to recycling. He said many others in the community depended on the landfill site for their livelihood through recycling, just like him. Vrygrond resident Jeanette Manuel has struggled with unemployment for years, but now she makes baked goods which she sells at a complex created out of recycled materials, based at Khumalo's recycling centre. When asked about the community moving on to the buffer zone around the landfill, Manuel said some had moved on to the landfill's boundary wall temporarily due to severe flooding that destroyed their homes during heavy rains last year. She said that this was not a permanent move, as residents needed a dry, safe and warm place to stay, and they knew where the boundary was. She said that the community simply expected the city to consider them as 'human beings' who had no other place to go. Friends of Zeekoevlei and Rondevlei (FOZR) vice-chairperson Tom Schwerdtfeger said: 'Cape Town is running out of space for landfill sites. We should be in top gear with recycling initiatives and reducing the amount of waste going to landfill as much as possible. 'The cost of waste removal is going to increase dramatically in the coming years – Vissershok is in Tableview. If waste has to be transported from Simon's Town across the city, it is going to cost a fortune, let alone concerns about traffic congestion,' said Schwerdtfeger. Destruction of the natural environment Schwerdtfeger told Daily Maverick that the expansion 'cannot be considered' while there were people inhabiting the buffer zone. He said that the buffer zone had not been maintained since 2020, leading to the destruction of the natural environment in the nature reserve. 'If the current site is unable to meet its licensing conditions, then there can be no scope for expansion. Therefore, the land invasion must be dealt with, with urgency, before the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) proceeds further,' said Schwerdtfeger. Schwerdtfeger said the FOZR understood the need for the application for the height extension, as no alternative site for landfilling had been secured to succeed the Coastal Park Landfill Site. 'This in itself is of great concern to FOZR. Refuse removal in Cape Town is probably going to become a much bigger concern in years to come. [The] Vissershok Waste Management Plant is too far away to service the southern regions of Cape Town in a cost-effective manner, and just the traffic implications alone are hugely concerning,' said Schwerdtfeger. He said the Slangetjiebos section of False Bay Nature Reserve experienced an influx of informal settlers during the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020. Schwerdtfeger said the number of informal settlers had continued to increase and that there were around 1,600 informal settlements. 'We are hugely concerned that this section of the nature reserve might be lost forever unless the city takes a firm stance on ensuring the integrity of our nature reserves,' he said. Slangetjiebos is part of False Bay Nature Reserve, which is a Ramsar site, and Schwerdtfeger said there had been many proven health risks associated with people living near the landfill. 'The proposed expansion of Coastal Park Landfill Site exacerbates all these points.' Public health and safety concerns Schwerdtfeger said that with an increase in height, 'it is anticipated that the methane content within the landfill will increase about 19% over and above current levels,' said Schwerdtfeger. When it came to the potential risks of the increase in landfill height without addressing the buffer zone issue first, Schwerdtfeger said they would see an increase in the probability of fires caused by more [waste] pickers on the site and associated health concerns. Schwerdtfeger said the city had not adequately conferred with residents and groups on the buffer zone issue. 'Pamphlets should be distributed to people living within the buffer zone, highlighting the dangers associated with living in the area. Regular interventions and site visits should be conducted by the city health department. If [there had been] adequate engagement, would people still be living there ?' asked Schwerdtfeger. Zeekoevlei resident Susanne Karcher told Daily Maverick, 'I used to go to the landfill monitoring meetings from the city… but I actually stopped going because I felt it's basically a tick-box exercise.' Karcher said it had always been pointed out at these meetings that informal settlement growth in the buffer zone was a critical deviation. She said that everyone would shake their heads and express how terrible this was, but felt that there wasn't any urgency to do something about it, which was why she stopped attending. 'How can the city even start discussing the heightening, or want to discuss the heightening of a landfill, and expanding the footprint — if already in the current footprint, the operational conditions are not legal… We have a 400m buffer zone and informal settlements go all the way to the fence… and the situation is actually getting worse,' said Karcher. Karcher said she understood the landfill constraints of the city, particularly that they had only two landfill sites currently operational (Coastal Park Landfill and the Visserhok Landfill). 'They are between a rock and a hard place… but I also think it is gross negligence,' said Karcher. Karcher suggested that instead of allowing informal settlements to encroach on valuable nature reserves, the city should map and redevelop existing 'brown sites' (for example, former industrial areas) for affordable housing, arguing that this would reduce land invasions. Cape Town's waste strategy The city is in the basic pre-application Basic Assessment Report (paBAR) phase of project approval for its 'possible application' for height extension at Coastal Park Landfill. The paBAR was available for public review and comment to be incorporated into the formal basic application report, which will be submitted alongside the environmental authorisation to the regulator for approval. The paBAR commenting period concluded on Friday, 25 July 2025. Mandy Marr, the city's councillor in the area, said: 'There is no other alternative in place at the moment… It [the landfill] is going to be full by September next year if we don't extend the height. So that is the issue that we're facing at the moment.' Marr said people had invaded the area and were within the landfill's 400m buffer zone. This meant the landfill was now not operating according to the permit, due to the growth of informal settlements since the Covid-19 pandemic. Asked if a new site had been earmarked to supersede Coastal Park Landfill, the city confirmed that it had identified a possible site, and that the public would be informed when the EIA process began. 'The city is preparing for an EIA process linked to the new site and the land parcels earmarked will be identified during the EIA process.' According to a city statement in response to queries from Daily Maverick, 'This extension is intended to accommodate the increasing volumes of waste generated by Cape Town's residents, ensuring continued access to safe, compliant waste disposal services while protecting both the environment and public health. 'Without the additional airspace, the City of Cape Town could face significant traffic disruptions and socioeconomic strain on both residents and businesses.' According to the statement, these impacts could be avoided if approval were granted. It also said that the city's existing refuse transfer stations, the Swartklip Refuse Transfer Station (17km east of the Coastal Park Landfill Site), among others, would be upgraded from an infrastructural perspective to receive greater volumes of waste, particularly household waste, and this would ensure continued waste management service delivery. In the long term, the city said a refuse transfer centre was planned for construction at the Coastal Park Landfill and was slated to begin operations in the fourth quarter of 2030 or sooner. 'The city is also working to extend available landfill airspace and defer the need for additional landfill capacity by encouraging waste diversion,' said the city's statement. Among plans for this was to extend the city's Think Twice recyclables collection service to more areas in the coming months, complemented by swap shops, where residents could swap their recyclables for groceries or vouchers. 'Builders' rubble is currently being repurposed for use in [the] construction of roads and other construction projects. There are also plans to introduce additional drop-off sites, where garden waste is chipped (at the larger sites) for off-site composting, and recyclables are sorted for sale into the markets,' said the city's statement. More information on planned efforts to reduce reliance on landfills can be found in the city's waste strategy. The city manages about 2.1 million tonnes of waste annually, with a diversion rate of 31.53% – but like other cities, it faces major challenges in managing waste due to rapid urbanisation, population growth and increasing consumption patterns. This is what we see unfolding at the Coastal Park Landfill. The City of Cape Town officially launched its new waste strategy on 17 July 2025, outlining a roadmap to achieve its vision of a clean city, where residents and businesses have access to quality, well-regulated, sustainable and affordable waste services. DM
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
National Dialogue will be meaningless without honest leaders, warns Mbeki
The National Dialogue, which will be held in three weeks, aims to foster national unity and develop shared solutions to South Africa's pressing challenges. As South Africa prepares for the National Dialogue, with an estimated price tag of R700-million, former President Thabo Mbeki warned that without capable leadership, the process risked being meaningless. 'What will come out of that National Dialogue will need honest, capable hands with integrity to implement what people have said,' said Mbeki. He was giving a keynote address at UDM leader Bantu Holomisa's 70th birthday celebration in Sandton, Johannesburg, on Saturday night. In recent years, Mbeki has been critical of the ANC, speaking about what he refers to as a decline in ethical leadership and the growing problem of corruption in the party. On Saturday, however, he toned the criticism down, saying that although he had views about ANC leaders, he was not free to mention them by name. He admitted that he, too, was part of the broader problem and anticipated that this would come up during the dialogue. 'They [South Africans] will say uncomfortable truths about us. 'You were President, and look what a mess you have created in the country.' And this is therefore what needs to be done in order to respect the people and implement what they have discussed: you need a particular kind of leader. I am not free to talk about our leaders by name.' The National Dialogue aims to foster national unity and develop shared solutions to South Africa's pressing challenges, including failing public services, high unemployment, rising crime, corruption, food inflation and economic stagnation. It starts with a National Convention on 15 August, which will set the agenda for the broader dialogue. The dialogue has been widely criticised by political parties and ordinary citizens, some of whom have argued that these are not just topics for debate but their daily realities. They want a concrete plan to lead the country out of crisis. One of the the parties that has rejected the National Dialogue is the EFF. Addressing President Cyril Ramaphosa in Parliament two weeks ago, the party's Nontando Nolutshungu said it was not the people of South Africa who had wrecked state-owned enterprises, failed to create jobs and allowed drugs to destroy young people. She pointed to the ANC's performance in the 2024 elections. 'The people have spoken, and you don't need R700-million to repeat the message they gave you at the ballots in 2024,' said Nolutshungu. The uMkhonto Wesizwe party's John Hlophe said the ANC sought to use the National Dialogue as part of its election campaign ahead of the 2026 local government polls. 'Let me tell the people of South Africa what it really is: it is not a dialogue for them, it is an ANC election campaign funded by taxpayers' money. 'Mr Ramaphosa, you lead a broken ANC: a party with the lowest membership in decades, a party that has lost key metros, a party that has become a mere shadow of its once proud self. Branches are non-existent, communities are leaderless, and the people have lost faith,' said Hlophe. Last month, the leader of the DA, John Steenhuisen, announced that his party had withdrawn its support for the National Dialogue, citing Ramaphosa's failure to act against officials accused of corruption, some of whom were members of the Cabinet. 'It is clear that this dialogue will be nothing more than a waste of time and money to distract from the ANC's failures. This explains why President Ramaphosa and the ANC are so obsessed with it,' said Steenhuisen. 'It is an electioneering ploy, at taxpayer expense, to gloss over the serious crises that the ANC has plunged South Africa into. The dialogue also has no constitutional standing whatsoever to take or impose decisions.' Responding to the criticism, Ramaphosa said people must ask themselves: 'Do we want to break or do we want to rebuild?' The National Dialogue will be led by the Eminent Persons Group, made up of 31 prominent South Africans, including business leaders, former MPs, academics, athletes, actors, and traditional and spiritual leaders. Some of those in the group are Springbok captain Siya Kolisi, Miss South Africa 2024 Mia le Roux, the leader of the Zion Christian Church, Bishop Barnabas Lekganyane, and the award-winning actor John Kani. Mbeki wants the dialogue to be a 'genuine' one. 'Let the people get together and say this is the South Africa we want,' he said. DM
