DWP benefit cuts hit people with Parkinson's and MS
Labour backbencher Graeme Downie has proposed a welfare reform Bill amendment, so universal credit claimants with Parkinson's or MS (multiple sclerosis) who cannot work do not face repeated medical assessments to receive a payout.
If MPs back his amendment, patients with 'evolving' needs who cannot work could also qualify for a higher rate of benefits.
The Government's Bill has already cleared its first Commons hurdle at second reading, after work and pensions minister Sir Stephen Timms vowed not to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), with any changes coming in only after a review of the benefit.
To meet his promise, ministers have had to table amendments to their own draft new law, to remove one of its seven clauses, which MPs will debate next Wednesday.
Universal credit claimants with Parkinson's 'are already possibly struggling financially', Mr Downie said, ahead of the debate.
He added: 'The cost of living with a condition like Parkinson's can be very high. You may well require or need additional support.'
Today the UK government published its Bill that will cut eligibility criteria for, and access to, Personal Independence Payments (PIP). Here is our response 👇
🧵1/3 pic.twitter.com/5eRXQW4ezh — Parkinson's UK (@ParkinsonsUK) June 18, 2025
The Dunfermline and Dollar MP said patients who struggle with their motor control might buy pre-chopped vegetables or chicken.
'Those things are expensive, so if you're already on universal credit and you're struggling, being able to do that significantly impacts your health, it significantly impacts your ability to live properly,' he continued.
To qualify, claimants must have limited capability for work or work-related activity (LCWRA) and symptoms which 'constantly' apply.
🚨 Reminder: cuts to disability benefits affect everyone.
You might not need disability benefits today. Or tomorrow.
But you can become disabled at any time and find yourself in need of a financial safety net. pic.twitter.com/YQgvyGaRvh — Scope (@scope) July 3, 2025
Mr Downie's amendment would expand these criteria to claimants with 'a fluctuating condition'.
It would cover 'conditions like Parkinson's but also multiple sclerosis, ME (myalgic encephalomyelitis), long Covid and a whole range of other conditions where, you know, in the morning things could be really good and in the afternoon things could be really bad, and even hour by hour things could change', he said.
'I felt it was necessary to table an amendment to really probe what the Government's position is on this, and ensuring that people with Parkinson's and conditions like that are not excluded from even applying and being considered.'
Mr Downie's proposal has backing from 23 cross-party MPs so far.
Recommended reading:
Juliet Tizzard, external relations director at Parkinson's UK, said: 'Criteria in the Bill say that a new claimant for the universal credit health payment will have to be 'constantly' unable to perform certain activities to qualify.
'This doesn't work for people with Parkinson's, whose symptoms change throughout the day.
'People with Parkinson's and other fluctuating conditions like multiple sclerosis will be effectively excluded from getting all the financial support they need.
'The Government has responded to our call and withdrawn the damaging restrictions to Pip.
'Now, they must do the same with the universal credit health element. The health of many people with Parkinson's is in their hands.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
43 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Readers' letters: Labour rebels were elected with a welfare reform mandate
A reader says Rachel Reeves' tears would be understandable if they were about Labour rebels wrecking her work to reform the benefits system Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... If Rachel Reeves had said she was crying because a large section of Labour MPs comprehensively destroyed her and Work and Pension Secretary Liz Kendall's hard, vital work and plans to make a few small steps to reform the benefits system and booted it into the long grass I doubt there'd be so much puerile fuss, including the undertones on BBC Scotland's Morning Call that narrowly avoided diagnosing it as a girlie thing. The truth is these rebels were elected on a manifesto that included welfare reform, so the basics of it were well known – as were the dire financial implications of the current torrent of claims and claimants. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Perhaps these two ministers should just have resigned, explained why, precipitated the increasingly inevitable Greece 2009 collapse facing this country and trigger the brutal policies that entails. Rachel Reeves looked visibly tearful as Keir Starmer spoke during Prime Minister's Questions in the House of Commons on Wednesday (Picture: House of Commons/UK Parliament/PA Wire) The world has moved on from the draconian undertones of the 1834 Poor Law's 'deserving and undeserving poor' but surely few could disagree with the argument put forward by former Labour MP Tom Harris in the media this week that the objectives of reform should be aimed 'squarely at those who have given up trying to get a job and have decided they would prefer to rely on benefits long-term'. Allan Sutherland, Stonehaven, Aberdeenshire Reform imperative Wednesday's backbench rebellion has undermined the Prime Minister's reputation and that of his Chancellor. In effect it has driven a coach and horses through planned savings on welfare of £5 billion and has imperilled the sanctity of the Chancellor's 'fiscal rules'. Politically sensitive tax rises in the Autumn Budget are now a virtual lock-in. Ouch! It's enough to bring tears to the Chancellor's eyes. However, none of this should be allowed to obscure the challenges of welfare reform that remain. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Institute of Fiscal Studies has reported that more than four million people of working age currently receive some kind of health benefit (ten per cent of the workforce). This is expected to rise to around 5.5 million by the end of the Parliament. This is unsustainable! We have a system unfit for purpose, and one which can be easily gamed. The failure of Labour (soft and hard) to acknowledge the consensus around these shortcomings perhaps says more about ideological desires to pursue redistribution policies – albeit by the back door – regardless of the wider social and economic consequences. The inefficiency of the present system is an obvious misuse of scarce public resources. The real injustice here is the diversion of these resources away from those who are most in need of genuine welfare support. Moreover, cost-cutting can never be the primary justification for fundamental change in this sensitive policy area: fundamental reform remains an urgent imperative in and for its own sake! Ewen Peters, Newton Mearns, East Renfrewshire Head over heels The Labour government has made so many U-turns that Keir Starmer doesn't know whether he is standing on his head or his heels, but he has a number of options. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He could resign, which is unlikely, or he could threaten to call a snap election, which would frighten many of his MPs who have got used to their £90k salary, index-linked pension and other freebies, but have Reform UK snapping at their heels. Many welfare recipients have got used to their easy life and in fact have become institutionalised, as the balance between work and welfare is quite narrow and many just don't want the bother of having to work. One easy solution which would not come into force immediately would be to freeze welfare payments just as the the personal tax allowance has been frozen. James Macintyre, Linlithgow, West Lothian Dig deeper Perhaps, the highly gutted Welfare Reform Bill will turn out to be a benefit in disguise for a beleaguered Labour government. With the loathsome moves withdrawn, we're left with a reasonably decent Bill at some cost. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Welfare is not the only aspect of government that is broken. The NHS and education are also stretched to breaking point, and I would suggest that the tax system is broken too. Only defence seems exempt. Rachel Reeves is constrained by her own self-imposed fiscal limits. If they were removed, as the German equivalent was recently, so much that is broken could begin to be repaired. Quite frankly, all of us who can afford it should be paying more tax, and those who can't, less. The Patriotic Millionaires, for example, are desperate to increase their share. For far too long, raising taxes has been the elephant in the room, which has never been a vote winner. Perhaps, just perhaps, it is now. If we could be assured that our increased taxes went towards the urgent repair of our NHS, education and welfare, we'd be prepared, I'm quite sure, to delve deeper into our financial pockets. All three deserve nothing less. Ian Petrie, Edinburgh Forced laughter Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad We have all been to that family wedding where unpopular members of the extended family attend whom, normally, we avoid. We engage in the forced laughter, the exaggerated smiles and back slapping to ensure the day is not ruined. Equally risible was that wonderfully over the top public show of support as Rachel Reeves unexpectedly turned up to join Sir Keir Starmer and Wes Streeting at the launch of the ten-year plan for England's NHS in East London. It surely gave 'fake news' new meaning. John V Lloyd, Inverkeithing, Fife Turn back time The election of Keir Starmer with a near-landslide majority last year I considered great news. I confess freely that was mainly because he deflated the SNP. To say I have been disappointed since would be a gross understatement. The trouble is, if I abandon Labour, where could I possibly turn? The Tories are in as bad if not worse a mess; the Lib Dems are wishy-washy and the Greens in Scotland a gender-obsessed joke; the SNP unthinkable. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Can we turn the clock back please to the halcyon days of pre-devolution? Alexander McKay, Edinburgh Critical thinking I was disappointed to read Jenny Lindsay's latest opinion piece: 'Self-righteous zealots driven by hate decided I was a 'genocidal Terf'' (Scotsman, 3 July). Surely Scottish feminism is not this myopic? Without a doubt, the ongoing genocide in Gaza is one of the world's most pressing feminist concerns. Tens of thousands of Palestinian women and girls are being killed, maimed, displaced, bereaved and subjected to sexual violence by Israel's military forces, according to the UN. War is always a feminist issue. Palestinian women at the forefront of their nation's cause are supported by an international network of feminists that stretches all the way to Scotland. In the last few years, I have met so many incredible women from all over the country who are marching, writing, fundraising and speaking out for peace. This is the reality of the pro-Palestinian movement. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad I know many women are bruised by Scotland's shockingly toxic debate on gender reform in recent years. Like Jenny, I took my fair share of misogynistic abuse as a candidate at the last Scottish Parliament election. I don't doubt people are still saying appalling things to gender critical women on the internet. But social media doesn't represent real people or real movements. Its profit-seeking algorithms feed on and amplify hate and abuse. It's time for Scottish feminists to pull themselves out of the maelstrom. There is so much real work to do. Catriona MacDonald, Glasgow Publicity seekers I don't understand some of the comments amongst readers about Kneecap and Bob Vylan's controversial outbursts during performances at Glastonbury, the latest being Lewis Finnie (Letters, 3 July). The real reason for the behavior of these so-called artists is to draw attention to themselves and seek publicity. They have little interest in the people of Gaza. If they did, they would be actively helping them rather than mouthing off about the IDF. Benjamin Netanyahu and his despotic regime control the IDF and it is they that should be condemned. The BBC should ban airing 'high risk' labelled acts such as Bob Vylan, not just live feeds. With all the publicity, these acts portray themselves as martyrs and gain sympathy amongst the weak-minded. Prancing on a stage and getting fans wound up through hate speech is one thing, it's another to donate their fee to help the Gaza victims or be called out as hypocrites. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Finnie suggests that the war will end with the elimination of Hamas, I would beg to differ. Leaving Netanyahu in power risks a wider conflict in the Middle East and tens of thousands more innocent civilians deaths in another bloodbath. By stating 'yes innocents die' he dismisses the current apocalypse as collateral damage. Really? Neil Anderson, Edinburgh Seating plan On a recent visit to Haymarket station in Edinburgh I was dismayed that the large waiting hall before the ticket barriers had seats for coffee concessions – but not a single public seat for the travelling public or those meeting them. That simply isn't good enough. Christopher Ruane, Lanark, South Lanarkshire Write to The Scotsman
Wales Online
an hour ago
- Wales Online
Tell us what you think of Starmer's Labour party after one year in UK government
Tell us what you think of Starmer's Labour party after one year in UK government One year has passed since Keir Starmer was elected to power on July 5, 2024 Today marks a year since Sir Keir Starmer became UK prime minister (Image: PA ) Labour may have ruled Wales for 26 years in the Senedd, but when the UK party won the 2024 General Election, it marked their return to power in Westminster for the first time since 2010. It was a landslide victory, Keir Starmer's party securing one of its biggest ever majorities in the House of Commons. In Wales, they won the majority of seats but saw its vote share fall in many areas and the party lost key target seats to Plaid Cymru. A year on there are many causes for concern in the party, dividing party members and politicians both in the UK and Welsh branch. You can read our political editor Ruth Mosalski's report of the Welsh Labour conference this week here: Fear and loathing in Labour: A party on the edge, angry at Drakeford, Morgan and Starmer. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here . Add to the debate in our comments secton below. Article continues below Tell us how you feel in our poll below or you can open it here:
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Buy British buses to save 400 Scottish jobs at Alexander Dennis, says MP
EXCLUSIVE: Euan Stainbank said procurement rules needed reform to ensure UK manufacturers were given priority when it came to investing in public transport. Holyrood and Westminster must "buy British" if 400 Scottish jobs are to be saved at an historic bus manufacturer, an MP has said. Euan Stainbank said strict procurement rules should be reformed to ensure UK manufacturers are given priority when it comes to investing in the public transport of the future. The Labour MP for Falkirk is campaigning to save jobs in his constituency at two closure-threatened Alexander Dennis (ADL) factories. Bosses at the firm launched a consultation last month on plans to shutter the plants at Camelon and Larbert and centralise production in Scarborough. The move would end a century of bus building in the Falkirk district and comes just weeks after the oil refinery at nearby Grangemouth was shut down, with 400 jobs lost. Stainbank told the Record: "There's global momentum to decarbonise transport. The UK must lead — not fall behind. A greener bus network should mean jobs and prosperity. But only if we have the right strategy. "In 2020, Boris Johnson promised to deliver 4,000 zero-emission buses, built in Britain. By 2024, only about 2,270 had been delivered through the ZEBRA scheme, with nearly half made abroad — despite £312 million in taxpayer funding. "Scotland has seen worse. In the most recent ScotZEB2 scheme, over 80 per cent of buses were ordered from overseas. Just 44 of 252 orders went to Scottish producers. That's simply unacceptable — 400 skilled jobs in Falkirk are at stake. "We cannot justify using UK public money to support foreign competitors while British factories struggle. A global economy doesn't mean outsourcing opportunity. It means competing with confidence — and with a plan. "Manchester has shown what leadership looks like. Under Mayor Andy Burnham, the Bee Network brought buses back under public control and procured the fleet domestically, including from Falkirk." The Falkirk MP added: "Ministers have shown they're willing to intervene, from supporting British steel in Scunthorpe to committing £200 million to Grangemouth. Now they must act to safeguard UK bus manufacturing. "For the 400 workers at Alexander Dennis, this isn't an abstract policy debate — it's their future. These are the people who have helped build the UK's low-carbon transport network. "They deserve more than warm words. We have the skills. We have the capacity. We have the need. Now we need the political will to back British buses — for British passengers, with British workers." Shona Robison, the SNP Finance Secretary, welcomed the announcement last week that ADL had extended its consultation on potential job losses - allowing more time to find an alternative. She said: "The company has been clear there are a number of factors that impact on its decision about the future of its workforce in Scotland - the availability of orders both in the short and long term, changes to the regulatory landscape around procurement, and assistance in supporting a short-term company furlough scheme. "The Scottish Government is continuing to work tirelessly on this issue, and is maintaining close contact with the company, the unions and the UK Government to understand all options to support the workforce."
