Woman, 24, watched a third of her skin ‘peel and detach' from her body just four days after taking routine NHS drug
SKIN HORROR Woman, 24, watched a third of her skin 'peel and detach' from her body just four days after taking routine NHS drug
A YOUNG woman saw nearly a third of her skin peel away in sheets just days after starting a new medication.
The 24-year-old had been prescribed lamotrigine, a drug commonly used on the NHS to treat mood disorders and epilepsy.
Advertisement
3
The unnamed woman developed Lyell's syndrome, also known as toxic epidermal necrolysis
Credit: Cureus
3
It caused the 25-year-old's skin to peel off in sheets
Credit: Cureus
3
The skin condition carries with it a mortality rate between 20 and 40 per cent
Credit: Cureus
But just days after starting the medication to treat her bipolar, she noticed a red rash spreading rapidly across her body.
By day four she decided to head to the hospital after the marks started blistering and large areas of skin started falling off.
Doctors treating her at Cheikh Khalifa International University Hospital in Morocco quickly diagnosed her with Lyell's syndrome, also known as toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN).
This is a rare but life-threatening reaction to a medication - which in this case was lamotrigine. But it has also been associated with antibiotics, and anti-inflammatory painkillers like ibuprofen.
Advertisement
It happens when the body overreacts to a drug causing the outer layer of skin, known as the epidermis, to detach and peel away in sheets, exposing the raw, sensitive tissue beneath.
In previous reports survivors of the condition have described the experience as feeling like they were being 'burned from the inside out' or 'cooked alive, due to the intense pain and widespread skin loss it triggers.
In worst-case scenarios, it can leave those affected vulnerable to life-threatening complications like sepsis and organ failure - it carries a mortality rate between 20 and 40 per cent.
In this case, published as part of a report in the journal Cureus, almost 30 per cent of her body surface area had been affected including her chest, back, arms, and thighs.
Advertisement
Large sections of skin had already sloughed off by the time she arrived at hospital, leaving painful, exposed areas that had to be treated like serious burns.
Doctors also noted that her mucous membranes were involved, meaning the reaction had affected not just her skin but also the inside of her mouth and genitals, a common but dangerous feature of TEN.
Charlotte's agony: Surviving Stevens-Johnson Syndrome
Once admitted, the unidentified woman was transferred to a specialist burns unit, as TEN causes skin damage similar to that seen in people with major burn injuries.
"TEN is often described as a severe burn-like skin reaction because it causes widespread epidermal necrosis and detachment similar to that seen in patients with extensive burns," the authors of the report wrote.
Advertisement
After intensive treatment in the burns unit including wound care, pain relief, and fluid replacement she began to recover.
Doctors immediately stopped the lamotrigine to prevent further skin damage and prescribed another medication to manage her bipolar disorder safely.
The authors stressed that while TEN is a rare reaction, patients starting drugs like lamotrigine should be monitored closely for early symptoms such as fever, rash, and blistering.
"The early recognition and discontinuation of the offending drug is crucial in improving patient outcomes," they concluded.
Advertisement
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Doctor's warning to anyone who takes omega-3 pills
Dr Federica Amati has warned about the potential risks of using supplements Dr Federica Amati, chief nutrition scientist at Zoe Health, has issued a warning to people who take omega-3 supplements. Earlier this year, the expert joined Davina McCall on her Begin Again podcast, where she spoke about the pitfalls she sees with people who take vitamins and nutrients in pill form. During the chat, Dr Amati shared her concerns and said: "Taking a supplement is easier than changing your diet... People take supplements and then they think 'okay, I've done my bit'." She added that many continue with unhealthy habits like poor diets, excessive drinking, lack of sleep, and inactive lifestyles. Dr Amati continued: "That supplement, in the grand scheme of things, is going to have a very marginal effect on your health." Her comments come as recent figures show almost half of UK adults regularly take supplements. The expert also recommends getting nutrients from food over pills, highlighting the difference with omega-3 intake. The doctor pointed to a "really good long-running clinical trial" that looked into whether omega-3 supplements deliver on their health promises, such as cutting down risks of cancers, heart disease, and mortality. She concluded: "It doesn't do it. It doesn't do it in the same way that eating fish does." Omega-3 fatty acids have an abundance of benefits, including supporting heart health, improving dry skin and eyes, lowering inflammation in the body. The NHS adds that omega-3s are "also important for women who are pregnant or breastfeeding, because it can help a baby's nervous system to develop". Health chiefs recommend you eat "at least two portions of fish a week, including one of oily fish". If you don't like seafood, other omega-3 sources include flaxseed, chia seeds, walnuts, soybeans, and spinach.
South Wales Argus
5 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Liza Collins on the meaning of relational leadership in NHS
It was inspiring, but many were left wondering: what does that actually mean in practice, especially on a busy NHS ward or in an overstretched community team? Relational leadership is more than a buzzword. It's a mindset and a practice, one that might just hold the key to a healthier future for our NHS teams. At its heart, relational leadership is about how we show up in relationships at work. Not as titles, hierarchies or roles, but as people. It asks us to move beyond command-and-control styles and towards connection, curiosity and care. To lead with both clarity and compassion. To listen more. To build trust and rebuild it when it's broken. That may sound idealistic, but the evidence tells us otherwise. Teams thrive when people feel safe to speak up. They perform better, innovate more and recover faster from setbacks. This is what psychological safety looks like: an environment where you can share ideas or admit mistakes without fear. But here's the catch: it does not happen by accident. It is created, moment by moment, through how we treat one another. A good relational leader is not always the loudest or most confident voice in the room. They are often the most consistent. They notice the tone. They welcome feedback. They understand that a difficult conversation handled well is a form of leadership. They recognise that it takes time to build trust, and only a moment to lose it. When leadership is too harsh, trust is lost. When it's too absent, people flounder. Relational leadership strikes the balance, with clear boundaries and human connection. In the NHS, we already understand relational care. We know the difference a kind word or a thoughtful gesture makes. The challenge now is to extend that same humanity into how we lead. Because the truth is, we do not change workplace culture by policy alone. We change it through everyday relationships. So, if we want a thriving NHS for the future, we must ask: what kind of leaders, and teammates, are we choosing to be? Liza Collins, MA, FRSA NHS Culture Strategist and Future of Healthcare Executive Leadership Coach
Times
5 hours ago
- Times
Times letters: Long-term fixes for the failures of the NHS
Sir, While there is much to like in the ten-year plan for the NHS ('NHS app to give patients a 'doctor in your pocket'', news; 'Sacred Cow', leading article, Jul 4) nobody will be convinced by it without the government providing specific annual milestones for internal project management, and by which the public can judge whether after ten years the plan is likely to have been achieved. If the government is itself convinced that the plan is a good one, it will already have worked out what it needs to achieve in the next 12 months to make sure the plan is on track, and of course in each year thereafter. Maybe the government should consider publishing what the milestones are so it can show the public real progress is being made. If it doesn't, one can only assume that it is not confident that it will achieve its milestones (or worse, hasn't yet decided what they are). Alistair Groom East Martin, Hampshire Sir, The prime minister talks about the NHS app as a 'doctor in your pocket' and the 168-page heath plan makes many references to using AI to answer clinical questions. This seems replete with risk. When an NHS AI gives poor advice, who is liable? In its principles for AI policy document, the BMA strongly advises that 'clear lines of legal liability must be established'. The NHS plan makes no mention of who is to blame when these systems make mistakes. Does the health secretary have an answer for this — or I should I ask Dr Google? Dr Tom Riddington London SE12 Sir, The NHS app will not be 'an indispensable part of life' for me or my wife, both in our seventies, or for others like us, who do not have smartphones. In a world that puts diversity and inclusiveness at a premium, we are finding ourselves more and more excluded from things that others take for granted. John Orton Bristol Sir, My husband's cancer treatment has involved three hospitals and many departments within those hospitals. I endorse what Wes Streeting says about the need for medical data to be easily accessible ('We will end 8am scramble for a GP', Jul 4). Staff do not have all my husband's information in one place and it has been exhausting having continually to explain the side-effects, treatment and what my husband needs at every appointment, including emergency admissions. We are still reasonably articulate but we wonder what happens to those who are not able to fight their corner. The staff themselves have been wonderful and I am sure the situation is as frustrating for them as it is for us. Cynthia Blades Chichester, West Sussex Sir, How can the government claim its health plan will 'prevent sickness' when a proposal to warn people of the health risks of alcohol, the second biggest cause of death and disability among working-age people, are watered down after 'a furious response from the industry' (news, Jul 2)? Who is running this country? The elected government or the unelected drinks industry? Glyn Sloman Holt, Norfolk Sir, A more efficient, technologically adept NHS, less hospital-based and where information is more easily accessed is an essential part of the solution to our problems. But it must be combined with people taking greater responsibility for their health, including diet, exercise and cutting down on smoking and drinking. Tony Hunter Former chief executive, Social Care Institute for Excellence, Woodford, Essex Sir, Your reference to Rachel Reeves ('Tears on front bench were a personal matter', Jul 3) highlights how uncomfortable the British still are with public displays of emotion. Crying isn't a sign of weakness, but the physical manifestation of emotional turmoil. We should all learn to be more understanding. Following the death of our eldest child in 2016 I frequently cried in public. This often resulted in fellow passengers — exclusively men — changing seats without saying a word or pedestrians crossing the road to avoid me. If you really want to make your fellow man uncomfortable, crying while using a public urinal at the local supermarket will clear the room quicker than you can say Jack Robinson. Richard Houghton Great Missenden, Bucks Sir, The correspondence from your readers on Sir Keir Starmer's leadership (letters, Jul 3) is all focused on finger pointing. Not a single constructive suggestion is made. We live in an age where the sheer volume and speed of events both nationally and internationally comes dangerously close to making conventional governance impossible. This is the perfect Petri dish for the incubation of demagoguery and dictatorships. We should be more prepared to support our elected leaders. Nicholas Oppenheim London SW6 Sir, I am one of those consultants who has left the NHS to work exclusively in the private sector (letters, Jul 3 & 4). At the age of 62 I fear what this government may do to my pension and have, therefore, taken it early. It also means I can continue to strive to practise medicine to the highest standards and not have to engage in what I perceive as the NHS drive to reduce everything to the lowest common denominator. My wife, a GP of 35 years, and I fear there will be no one left to look after us in our old age. Simon Marsh Consultant surgeon, Ipswich, Suffolk Sir, It is baffling why Fraser Nelson's article on the welfare trap and the easy solution he outlines is not being adopted by Labour ('How Liz Kendall can stop this national sickness', comment, Jun 28). Allowing — indeed almost encouraging — the young to game the system as it stands exacerbates any underlying mental health problems. There is a mass of evidence to suggest that employment is good for mental health. Meanwhile, there is a desperate need for people to work in the building trade if we are to get anywhere close to Labour's target of building 1.5 million houses over the life of this parliament. Instead of signing people off sick, give them an incentive to train as plumbers, electricians or any other of the skills required by housebuilders. Reversing the national insurance rise for people under 25 to encourage employers to take them on would provide a further incentive. Andrew ScottSalisbury, Wilts Sir, Emma Duncan's thoughtful piece on entitlement (comment, Jul 4) omits the stark difference between the political and the personal. I can agree politically that the welfare costs are out of control but personally I do not want the personal independence payment taken away from my granddaughter. In the same way, while it is obvious that paying ransoms encourages kidnapping, you would pay anything for the release of a family member in such a situation. Gillian Fogg Surbiton Sir, Orcas have been known for their interaction with humans for many years ('Killer whales come bearing gifts', Jul 4). A pod of them, known as 'the killers of Eden', operated in Twofold Bay, southeast Australia, for about 90 years from 1840. They helped baleen whale hunters by finding the whales, herding them into the bay and alerting the whalers to their presence. In return, the whalers would share the whales' tongues and lips with the orcas. Nicky Gill Richmond, Surrey Sir, My late father always assumed that gratitude had prompted a gift of food from an injured buzzard that he had nursed back to health. Shortly after its release back into the wild the buzzard reappeared carrying a dead mouse, placing it carefully on my father's shoulder. My mother was always most grateful that the gift to the family wasn't delivered to her. Caroline Tayler Nutley, East Sussex Sir, I have been following the tennis at Wimbledon and wonder whether the authorities could bring in a limit on the number of times a server bounces the ball before serving. It is an unnecessary and irritating habit. Just get on with the game. Diana Barrington Holt Lambourn, Berks Sir, I would happily have taken sandwiches to work had there been a staff room or somewhere suitable in the locality to eat them (letters, Jul 3 & 4). In the 1950s bank managers were required to live above their branches. The only facility for staff at my branch was a single lavatory. Later generations have no idea of the hardships undergone by those who lived through the Second World War and its aftermath. The country was bankrupt. 'Export or die' was the slogan, so there were no cars for the home market and most things were in short supply. Strict building controls were imposed to ensure priority was given to the war-damaged in the 1960s did matters improve. Robert Spratt Upton St Leonards, Glos Sir, The 'canard that bankers in the past worked only from 10am to 3pm' was nailed by Jerome K Jerome in Three Men in a Boat (1889), in which he describes how 'George goes to sleep at a bank from ten to four each day, except Saturdays, when they wake him up and put him outside at two'. Dr John Burscough Brigg, N Lincs Sir, I was amused by Deborah Ross's article about celebrities' rosé wines (Times2, Jul 3). Rosé was once a pleasant summery wine with an attractive light red colour and the ability not to give one a thumping headache on a hot day, all for a reasonable cost and without being pretentious. Suddenly it has morphed into an overhyped weedy looking light pink concoction barely distinguishable from cheap white and puffed by celebrities pushing their own particular labels. Where are the robust Côtes de Provence of yesterday? Martin J Eames Caterham, Surrey Sir, Why are we obsessed with keeping British art in this country, raising huge sums to do so (Richard Morrison, Times2, Jul 4)? If people want to buy it, be proud of that, don't stop them. Our art is hugely undervalued abroad. Let the world see it. The more it leaves this country, the better for Britain. Anthony Jennings London WC1 Sir, If it is possible to decommission the royal train because the royal family no longer use it (letters, Jul 3 & 4) is it not also possible to decommission the titles still used by the King's youngest son on the basis that he (and his wife) are no longer of any discernible use to the people of this country? Rob Green Braintree, Essex Sir, I notice with some amusement, and indeed amazement, that there were two letters to the editor on the same day from Hartley Wintney in Hampshire (Jul 3). Is this a record? Sophia Bennett Hartley Wintney, Hants Write to letters@
