
Republican lawmakers want to repeal Maine's 72-hour waiting period on firearms purchases
House Minority Leader Billy Bob Faulkingham, R-Winter Harbor, has submitted one of two bills to repeal the 72-hour waiting period on firearm sales. Rep. Jennifer Poirier, R-Skowhegan, has proposed eliminating mandatory background checks for private sales.
The waiting period and a law expanding background check requirements to include private, advertised sales were passed by the previous Legislature after a gunman killed 18 people in October 2023.
Faulkingham said Wednesday the waiting period law was the result of government overreach. "This requirement may have been well-intentioned, but ultimately it is unnecessary, burdensome and of questionable constitutionality," Faulkingham said.
Gun rights advocates also sued the state in November to overturn the waiting period law. The outcome of the lawsuit is pending, but a federal judge ruled in February to pause implementation of the law while the case works its way through the court system.
Faulkingham pointed to Chief U.S. District Judge Lance Walker's injunction, which has been continued pending a decision by a federal appeals court, in making his case for LD 208 to members of the Judiciary Committee Wednesday.
"This is a strong signal the courts believe this law will ultimately be found unconstitutional and if that is the case, it makes little sense for us to keep it on the books," Faulkingham said.
Gun safety advocates, however, have said that 72-hour waiting periods are useful in preventing suicides by giving people a "cooling off" period before they're able to access a gun — an argument that resurfaced during Wednesday's public hearing.
"It allows ... time for the suicidal person to have second thoughts and to change their mind before acting," said David Moltz, a physician and psychiatrist who testified on behalf of the Maine Association of Psychiatric Physicians. "They still get to have their gun; they just have to wait a few days to get it. But those few days may mean the difference between life and death."
Lawmakers only narrowly passed the 72-hour waiting period last year, with the House of Representatives voting 73-70 and the Senate voting 18-17. Gov. Janet Mills allowed the bill to become law without her signature, saying at the time that she was deeply conflicted over the bill and that similar laws were being challenged in other states, including Vermont. The Vermont lawsuit still has not been resolved.
Rep. Quentin Chapman, R-Auburn, has proposed a second bill, LD 1230, identical to Faulkingham's, that would also eliminate the waiting period. Both bills have several Republican co-sponsors.
Supporters of gun rights argued Wednesday that the new law, which was in effect for a few months before being paused by the court, hurt business at gun shops and has made it harder for people to be able to defend themselves.
Andee Reardon, a Maine representative of the group Women for Gun Rights, told the committee that she lives just minutes away from where the Lewiston shooting took place and that she was overwhelmed hearing from women who felt unsafe in the aftermath as it took police two days to locate the shooter.
"For those people, that 72-hour wait period is much too long," Reardon said. "If we have another tragedy in our state people are going to want to arm themselves, because the police are busy."
Nacole Palmer, executive director of the Maine Gun Safety Coalition, which pushed for the reforms last year, testified against both 72-hour bills as well as a proposal from Rep. Jennifer Poirier, R-Skowhegan, to eliminate requirements for background checks on private gun sales. "These policies are two of the most basic tools in our toolbox to reduce crime and save lives," Palmer said.
IMPROVING STORAGE
Lawmakers also heard proposals Wednesday for improving the safe storage of firearms. LD 1120 would strengthen the criminal penalties associated with negligent storage of firearms and would require dealers to post public notices in areas where sales occur warning of the risks associated with having firearms at home.
Another pair of bills, LD 1174 and LD 1104, would facilitate firearms hold agreements through which people could temporarily store their firearms with a gun shop. Rep. Vicki Doudera, D-Camden, the sponsor of LD 1104, said such arrangements would be useful in a variety of scenarios, including during the sale of a home, when children are visiting or during a tumultuous time such as a divorce.
Doudera suggested the committee could combine her bill with LD 1174, from Rep. Stephen Wood, R-Greene, because she said the language in Greene's bill is stronger. She suggested also expanding Greene's bill, which would only provide the option for firearms owners who are veterans or emergency responders.
Greene said gun shops are currently not allowed to offer such a service. He said it would be a valuable tool for helping people who are more likely to experience a mental health crisis, but expressed concerns about opening up hold agreements for broader groups of people, saying it could overwhelm firearms dealers with needs for storage.
"If it's just military and first responders, it would be fewer people and they could make the room for them," Greene said.
Copy the Story Link
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Got Instantly Fact-Checked On Live TV After Bragging About His Poll Numbers
President Donald Trump repeatedly boasted that he has 'the best poll numbers [he's] ever had' in an interview with CNBC on Tuesday morning, even though the majority of Americans disapprove of his performance in the job. Asked whether he would run for a third term in office despite the fact that the US Constitution's 22nd Amendment bars him from doing so, Trump replied 'probably not,' before going on to say he would like to do so. Related: 'I'd like to run. I have the best poll numbers I've ever had. You know why? Because people love the tariffs and they love the trade deal and they love that foreign countries aren't ripping us off anymore. For years they ripped us off, friend and foe,' Trump said, even though voter surveys suggest otherwise. Kernen interjected, clarifying that the president enjoys high support among Republican voters, but not the overall electorate. Trump didn't seem to blink. 'I have the best poll numbers I've ever had,' Trump said. 'I have poll numbers where I'm 71%.' 'Those are among Republicans,' Kernen replied. Related: Related: Trump would not relent, insisting Kernen was wrong. Trump also claimed that polls that showed him faring poorly with voters were 'fake.' The source for the figures cited by Trump is unclear. His approval rating currently stands at 44%, according to an average of polls compiled by the New York Times. Related: An issue that has garnered much attention in recent weeks appears to be a thorn in Trump's side as a majority of Americans disapprove of his administration's handling of documents related to the investigation into late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, according to an Economics/YouGov poll conducted late last month. You can watch the whole exchange here. This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:

Washington Post
25 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Mike Flood met with anger at Nebraska town hall
LINCOLN, Nebraska —Nebraska was anything but nice. Rep. Mike Flood (R-Nebraska) faced about 750 voters during a contentious town hall here on Monday night. The two-term Republican lawmaker was there to explain his vote for President Donald Trump's signature achievement: the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' that extended the 2017 tax cuts and plowed billions into immigration enforcement while slashing health care and food programs for the poor.


Boston Globe
27 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Epstein's ex, Ghislaine Maxwell, doesn't want grand jury transcripts released
Advertisement A message seeking comment from prosecutors was not immediately returned. Government attorneys have been trying to quell a clamor for transparency by seeking the transcripts' release — though the government also says the public already knows much of what's in the documents. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Most of the information 'was made publicly available at trial or has otherwise been publicly reported through the public statements of victims and witnesses,' prosecutors wrote in court papers Monday. They noted that the disclosures excluded some victims' and witnesses' names. Prosecutors had also said last week that some of what the grand jurors heard eventually came out at Maxwell's 2021 trial and in various victims' lawsuits. There were only two grand jury witnesses, both of them law enforcement officials, prosecutors said. Advertisement Prosecutors made clear Monday that they're seeking to unseal only the transcripts of grand jury witnesses' testimony, not the exhibits that accompanied it. But they are also working to parse how much of the exhibits also became public record over the years. While prosecutors have sought to temper expectations about any new revelations from the grand jury proceedings, they aren't proposing to release a cache of other information the government collected while looking into Epstein. The filing aimed to support their request to release the usually secret records amid a public clamor for more transparency about the investigation into Epstein, six years after the financier died in prison. Maxwell, his former girlfriend, was later convicted of helping him prey on underage girls. The transcript face-off comes six years after authorities said Epstein killed himself while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges and four years after Maxwell was convicted. Some of President Donald Trump's allies spent years suggesting there was more to the Epstein saga than met the eye and calling for more disclosures. A few got powerful positions in Trump's Justice Department — and then faced backlash after it abruptly announced that nothing more would be released and that a long-rumored Epstein 'client list' doesn't exist. After trying unsuccessfully to change the subject and denigrating his own supporters for staying interested in Epstein, the Republican president told Attorney General Pam Bondi to ask courts to unseal the grand jury transcripts in the case.