Top 9 warning signs the economy's in trouble: What that means for you
HONOLULU (KHON2) — If you feel more worried about money than you did last year, you're not alone. A new report shows that Americans are losing confidence in the economy, their wallets and even their future.
According to a new study on the Economic Index, consumer confidence dropped nearly 8% between April 2024 and April 2025. That means more people are stressed about their finances, less likely to make big purchases and more uncertain about what lies ahead.
This isn't just about numbers. It's about how people are living day to day, what they're buying, what they're skipping and how hopeful they feel.
'We're seeing a real slowdown in how people feel about their money,' said Chip Lupo, an analyst from the study. 'That can hurt the economy in a big way.'
The index is based on how people answer questions about things like jobs, debt, spending and savings. And this year, those answers show a clear pattern: less confidence, more stress.
So, what exactly is going on? And what should you watch for? Here are the top things to know about the latest drop in consumer confidence.
When confidence drops, so does spending, especially on big-ticket items. Consumers are thinking twice before committing to major expenses like cars, home renovations or electronics.
Even necessary upgrades are being delayed. With economic uncertainty looming, people are prioritizing essentials and holding on to their cash. This pullback in spending can create a ripple effect that slows down businesses and weakens the broader economy.
Whether it's a car, a new appliance or a dream vacation, people are backing away from spending on these big-ticket items. The likelihood of making a large purchase dropped nearly 10% this year.
Auto-buying plans dropped even more by 13.4% lower than last year. That's a big deal for industries that rely on consumer demand to grow, especially when combined with falling home-buying interest, the tariff war that's tanking the economy and economic retaliation both from within and without the United States.
The percentage of people who plan to buy a home in the next six months dropped by more than 10%. That reflects a tough market that includes high prices, interest rates and uncertainty make people hesitate.
Even though some real estate markets are seeing more listings or price adjustments, the emotional math of buying a home just doesn't add up for many.Optimism about personal finances in the next six months dropped 4.5%. That means more people expect their money situation to stay the same or get worse rather than improve.
This might explain why people are avoiding debt, skipping big purchases and cutting back where they can.
Stress about money went up 1.8% since April 2024. That might not seem like a huge jump, but it reflects a steady climb and adds up over time.
When people feel anxious about their financial security, they may delay everything from home repairs to healthcare to school payments. It can make life feel like it's on hold.
Confidence in debt reduction fell by 3.9%. If fewer people believe they'll reduce their debt in the next six months, it could be a sign that many are already stretched thin.
Paying off debt takes extra income, discipline and a stable outlook. But if prices are high and incomes feel uncertain, that hope starts to fade.
The share of people who think their credit score will go up in the next six months dropped by 2.8%. That's important, because a good credit score opens the door to better loan terms, lower interest rates and more opportunities.
This drop may signal that people expect to use credit more or fall behind on payments.
Not all of the news is gloomy. A few areas in the report index show improvement. More people (+0.7%) say they're confident they'll have a job in six months.
And even more (+3.7%) feel there are 'abundant' job opportunities right now. That could help keep the economy moving if wages and job quality match people's needs.
Oddly, some people feel slightly more positive about their finances right now compared to a year ago. That's a 0.9% uptick, but it doesn't match the bigger drop in future optimism.
It's like standing on a shaky bridge: you're still standing, but you don't know if you'll get across.
The study's Index isn't just about feelings. It tracks how likely people are to spend, save, invest and borrow. And when those numbers dip, it affects everyone.
When confidence goes down, so does spending. And when spending slows, businesses feel it. They may hire less, produce less or even cut back; and this continues a cycle that makes people even more cautious.
A nearly 8% drop in consumer confidence doesn't scream panic, but it's a red flag. The economy is built on people feeling secure enough to take financial risks. Right now, more people are pulling back.
You can read the full .
Get news on the go with KHON 2GO, KHON's morning podcast, every morning at 8
How they feel next month, or six months from now, could shape what happens next and not just in the market, but in everyday life for millions of families across the country.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Dave Ramsey sounds alarm on student loan debt
Many Americans receive an unexpected sum of money at one time or another. It can be a welcome surprise, but it often comes with complicated decisions. Some consider using it to relieve long-standing financial burdens such as paying off debts from student loans or credit cards, while others weigh the potential of turning it into something more. The best path isn't always clear. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Popular radio host and bestselling personal finance author Dave Ramsey was recently asked by an advice-seeker about a scenario fitting this description - and he offered some key advice that came with a warning. "Our daughter is a student, and she has $10,000 in student loan debt. She works part-time, and has a couple of scholarships, but she has borrowed a little along the way to bridge gaps," explained a man named Gilbert in an email sent to TheStreet by Ramsey Solutions. Related: Dave Ramsey has blunt words for Americans buying a car "Her uncle recently sold his business, and he told us he would like to give her a gift of $10,000," he continued. "We've talked to her about this, and we'd like to guide her in the smartest possible direction. Should she begin planning for the future, and use this gift to start investing, or should she use it to pay off her student loans?" One of Ramsey's major pieces of financial advice centers around the importance he places on getting out of debt - and finding ways to stay out of debt. But neither one of the two options for what to do with the unexpected $10,000 windfall being discussed here involve something irresponsible such as taking an unnecessary expensive vacation or buying a lavish sports car. So getting Ramsey's view on the best way to handle this fortunate turn of events would be be intriguing. Ramsey responded to the individual circumstance being described with a hypothetical thought about investing money in the stock market if no existing debt were present. "We'll start by pretending she doesn't have any student loan debt. In a case like that, would it be wise for her to borrow money on a student loan in order to invest?" Ramsey asked. "Of course not," he wrote. "It's a dumb question, but I want to get you thinking." More on personal finance: Dave Ramsey offers urgent thoughts about MedicareJean Chatzky shares major statement on Social SecurityTony Robbins has blunt words on IRAs,401(k)s Ramsey then summarized that imagined financial activity and the lesson he hoped would be learned from engaging in the thought exercise. "If you don't pay off the loans, and invest it instead, it's just like you borrowed money to invest," Ramsey wrote. "See what I mean? That would be a pretty bad plan," he added. Related: Dave Ramsey has blunt words on spending money to keep a dog alive Ramsey bluntly explained his perspective on what he thought the daughter's financial priority should be in this situation. "In my opinion, your daughter needs to get her student loan mess cleaned up as soon as possible," Ramsey wrote. "And this gift from her uncle represents the perfect opportunity to do just that." Ramsey emphasized the importance of helping the daughter understand the need to get out of debt with an increasing sense of ugency. "Listen to me, Gilbert," he wrote. "The last thing in the world your daughter needs is a big pile of debt waiting on her when she gets out of school." "I want her to start investing at some point down the road, but she's just not in a good position to be an investor right now," he added. "She needs to pay off all those student loans. I'm talking about wiping out all that debt the minute she gets this wonderful gift in her hands." Ramsey closed with some encouraging words of advice. "And the second after she pays off those student loans, she should get to work on saving a pile of money, so she can complete her studies without racking up any more debt!" he wrote. Related: Jean Chatzky sends strong message on buying vs. leasing a car The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.


American Military News
2 hours ago
- American Military News
Gas prices at 4-year low under Trump admin
Following President Donald Trump's military strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities and his announcement of a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, gas prices have dropped to a four-year low. As of Friday, the national average price for a gallon of gasoline was $3.20, according to Fox Business. The outlet noted that oil prices remain at the same level they were at prior to a temporary spike in prices amid concerns that conflict between Iran and Israel could disrupt the supply of oil in the Middle East. According to CNBC, Patrick De Haan, the head of GasBuddy's petroleum analysis, recently suggested that Americans could see the lowest gas prices in years over the upcoming summer months. De Haan also indicated that the national average price of gas could drop under $3 per gallon by September. 'It's going to be the cheapest summer since 2021, when the economy was heavily influenced by Covid,' De Haan told the outlet. According to Fox Business, oil temporarily spiked to $78 per barrel following Trump's military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities in June; however, the outlet noted that the temporary spike in oil prices quickly dropped just two days after the U.S. military strikes. READ MORE: Gas prices soar to eight-month high Addressing the temporary spike in oil prices, De Haan said, 'Obviously the Middle East situation is an exception, but now that this is, seemingly for now, in de-escalation, gas prices should resume their slow decline over the course of the summer.' De Haan explained that gas prices are close to the lowest level observed over the last two decades when prices are adjusted for inflation. De Haan added, 'Americans are actually spending far less of their income on energy than they have in quite some time.' According to Fox Business, Lipow Oil Associates President Andy Lipow explained oil prices are expected to remain at their current level due to an abundant supply of oil and increased production from OPEC+. Lipow suggested that gas prices could drop between three and five cents over the week ahead of the July 4 holiday weekend. Phil Flynn, an energy market analyst, told Fox News that the reduction of geopolitical concerns following the destruction of Iran's nuclear program has 'shown up in the gas prices.' The energy market analyst also highlighted the Trump administration's favorable energy regulations, saying, 'This is going to be a big win for consumers as inflation continues to come down.'


New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
‘Big beautiful' AI rule means feds must act NOW to stop Big Tech's abuses
Deep within President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act — the major spending legislation he wants to see by July 4 — is a rule that holds enormous implications for the rapidly developing artificial intelligence sector. The Senate is debating a provision that would prevent state governments from regulating the AI industry for years. Supporters claim this moratorium would stop a patchwork of conflicting state laws from slowing AI's rocketing development. But without subsequent federal action, a moratorium on state regulation risks making the AI industry a law-free zone, where Big Tech companies can essentially do whatever they want with an untested, sometimes exploitative new technology. We've needed federal regulation on AI companies for some time, but if this new moratorium passes, it will become even more urgent for Congress to act. If the AI industry is going to grow sustainably and responsibly, we need legislation to provide guardrails and clear rules about how to protect the creators of content that AI tools use — publishers, authors, journalists, artists, musicians and creatives of all types. Right now, those content creators are AI's victims. Big Tech and AI companies scrape vast amounts of content to build and operate their generative AI products, which turn content into GenAI outputs for users. Sometimes they just reproduce content creators' passages word for word — without credit or compensation. AI companies admit these unfair and un-American tactics are fundamental to their businesses, but they refuse to pay because it's cheaper to steal. Even worse, this predatory behavior lets AI models act as information gatekeepers. If Big Tech is left to its own devices, Americans will have less access to accurate information, and certainly no one to hold accountable for errors and mistakes. Reporting on stories that Americans need to know will dwindle as the AI companies undermine the business models of publishers, opening the door to viewpoint suppression and creating opportunities for foreign propagandists. How dire these problems will become is a matter of guesswork — because AI development is currently a black box. Developers do not share information on whether or how they are obtaining consent for using publisher content. (News reports suggest that when they do share information about these methods, it is sometimes misleading.) Publishers must hire experts to reverse-engineer how their content has been taken, a costly process that overburdens small publishers and can't always identify all works that were used in training the models. This lack of transparency hinders the enforcement of intellectual property rights and distorts regulatory decisions, business development and more. Federal legislation could address these issues by requiring recordkeeping and full disclosure. AI companies must let publishers know whether a generative AI model was trained on their work — and must also explain whether certain publications have been specifically excluded from AI models, so that the public can judge any bias. Further, AI companies must disclose the sources they use to keep their models' responses current. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Simple rules such as these will prompt commercial GenAI developers to enter agreements with publishers to use their content — agreements that will likely block AI companies and foreign actors from distorting the news that the public receives. The benefits will be widespread. These rules would strengthen America's position in the AI race by making its products more trustworthy and preserving the journalism that lies at its foundation. Protecting intellectual property and homegrown content is what gives American AI companies an international competitive edge. Strong federal rules will also keep many small media businesses viable, and protecting thousands of workers and their communities. The White House blueprint for AI wisely recognizes that AI development must be responsible and aligned with American values, including respect for intellectual property and the rule of law. If Congress is going to act, as it appears it might, to limit the ability of states to enact these important regulations, then it's up to the House and Senate to fill that gap — and set this growing but potentially dangerous industry on a solid foundation. Danielle Coffey is president and CEO of the News/Media Alliance, which represents more than 2,200 publishers nationwide.