Many US Ice Cream Producers to Phase Out Artificial Food Dyes by 2028
The producers, which together represent more than 90% of ice cream sold in the US, are the latest food companies to take voluntary steps to remove dyes since Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in April said the US aimed to phase out many synthetic dyes from the country's food supply.
Several major food manufacturers, including General Mills, Kraft Heinz, J.M. Smucker, Hershey and Nestle USA, have previously announced their plans to phase out synthetic food coloring.
The 40 ice cream companies will remove Red 3, Red 40, Green 3, Blue 1, Blue 2, Yellow 5, and Yellow 6 from their retail products, excluding non-dairy products, according to the International Dairy Foods Association.
The IDFA announced the plan at an event at the US Department of Agriculture headquarters on Monday with Kennedy, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary and Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins.
"We know that our current health outcomes, especially for our children, are unsustainable and that American agriculture is at the heart of the solution to make America healthy again," Rollins said at the event, referencing a slogan aligned with Kennedy.
Rollins and Kennedy have worked closely together on food sector efforts like encouraging states to ban soda from the nation's largest food aid program.
Kennedy has blamed food dyes for rising rates of ADHD and cancer, an area many scientists say requires more research.
The IDFA said artificial dyes are safe, but that ice cream makers are taking the step in part to avoid disruption to sales from state efforts to phase out dyes from school foods and West Virginia's recent food dye ban.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
21 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Trump pulls US from World Health pandemic reforms
President Donald Trump's administration said Friday the United States was rejecting reforms agreed last year to strengthen the World Health Organization's pandemic response, saying they infringed on national sovereignty. Trump, who returned to office on January 20, immediately began the country's withdrawal from the UN health body. The State Department said language adopted in 2023 would still have been binding on the United States despite the pullout. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime critic of vaccines, said in a joint statement the changes 'risk unwarranted interference with our national sovereign right to make health policy.' 'We will put Americans first in all our actions and we will not tolerate international policies that infringe on Americans' speech, privacy or personal liberties,' they said. Rubio and Kennedy formally disassociated the United States from a series of amendments to the International Health Regulations—legal instruments that guide global cooperation in combating disease—that were adopted at the 2023 World Health Assembly in Geneva. 'We regret the US decision to reject the amendments,' WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in a statement posted on X. He stressed that the reforms 'are clear about member states' sovereignty' and said the WHO 'cannot mandate lockdowns or similar measures.' The changes included a stated 'commitment to solidarity and equity,' and established a working group to assess the needs of developing countries in future emergencies. Countries have until Saturday to formally lodge objections to the reforms. Conservative activists and vaccine skeptics in the United States, Britain and Australia have led public campaigns against the changes, even as those nations' governments supported them. The amendments were passed after countries failed to agree on a more ambitious global pandemic treaty. Most member states finalized a version of that treaty in May 2025, though the United States did not participate as it was then in the process of leaving the WHO. Under President Joe Biden, the United States took part in negotiations during May–June 2024 but declined to support a final consensus, citing concerns about protecting US intellectual property rights related to vaccine development. Rubio's predecessor, Antony Blinken, had welcomed the WHO reforms as progress. But Rubio and Kennedy said the changes 'fail to adequately address the WHO's susceptibility to political influence and censorship—most notably from China—during outbreaks.' The WHO's Ghebreyesus said the organization 'is impartial and works with all countries to improve people's health.'
Arab News
a day ago
- Arab News
Trump pulls US from World Health pandemic reforms
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump's administration said Friday the United States was rejecting changes agreed last year for the World Health Organization on its pandemic response, saying they violated the country's sovereignty. Trump on returning to office on January 20 immediately began his nation's withdrawal from the UN body, but the State Department said the language from last year would still have been binding on the United States. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr, who is a longtime critic of vaccines, said the changes 'risk unwarranted interference with our national sovereign right to make health policy.' 'We will put Americans first in all our actions and we will not tolerate international policies that infringe on Americans' speech, privacy or personal liberties,' they said in a joint statement. Rubio and Kennedy disassociated the United States from a series of amendments to the International Health Regulations, which provide a legal framework for combatting diseases, agreed last year at the World Health Assembly in Geneva. 'We regret the US decision to reject the amendments,' WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in a statement posted on X. He stressed the amendments 'are clear about member states sovereignty,' adding that the WHO cannot mandate lockdowns or similar measures. The changes included a stated 'commitment to solidarity and equity' in which a new group would study the needs of developing countries in future emergencies. Countries have until Saturday to lodge reservations about the amendments. Conservative activists and vaccine skeptics in Britain and Australia, which both have left-leaning governments, have waged public campaigns against the changes. The amendments came about when the Assembly failed at a more ambitious goal of sealing a new global agreement on pandemics. Most of the world finally secured a treaty this May, but the United States did not participate as it was in the process of withdrawing from the WHO. The United States, then under president Joe Biden, took part in the May-June 2024 negotiations, but said it could not support consensus as it demanded protections for US intellectual property rights on vaccine development. Rubio's predecessor Antony Blinken had welcomed the amendments as progress. In their rejection of the amendments, Rubio and Kennedy said the changes 'fail to adequately address the WHO's susceptibility to the political influence and censorship – most notably from China – during outbreaks.' WHO's Ghebreyesus said the body is 'impartial and works with all countries to improve people's health.'
Arab News
2 days ago
- Arab News
UN: Over 11 million refugees risk losing aid because of funding cuts
GENEVA: Massive cuts to humanitarian budgets risk leaving more than 11 million refugees without desperately needed aid, the United Nations warned Friday. That corresponds to a full third of the number reached last year by the UN refugee agency, UNHCR. In a new report, the agency highlighted a deadly confluence of factors pummeling millions of refugees and displaced people globally: 'rising displacement, shrinking funding and political apathy.' 'We are right now facing a deadly cocktail,' UNHCR's head of external relations, Dominique Hyde, told reporters in Geneva. 'We are incredibly concerned for refugees and displaced populations around the world.' Dramatic aid cuts by the United States and other countries have left UNHCR and other aid organizations facing gaping shortfalls. UNHCR has said it needs $10.6 billion to assist the world's refugees this year, but so far it has received just 23 percent of that amount. As a result, the agency said it was seeing $1.4 billion of essential programs being cut or put on hold. The impact, Hyde cautioned, risks being that 'up to 11.6 million refugees and people forced to flee are losing access to humanitarian assistance provided by UNHCR.' The agency said families were being forced to choose between feeding their children, buying medicines and paying rent. Malnutrition is especially severe for refugees fleeing war-ravaged Sudan, where the UN has been forced to reduce food rations and nutrition screening, she said, decrying the 'devastating impact for children who have fled to Chad.' The cuts have also forced UNHCR to pause the movement of new arrivals from border areas to safer locations in Chad and South Sudan, 'leaving thousands stranded in remote locations,' the agency said. Health and education services for refugees are also being scaled back worldwide. In camps in Bangladesh hosting nearly a million Rohingya refugees from Myanmar, education programs for some 230,000 children risk being suspended. UNHCR also said its entire health program in Lebanon was at risk of being shuttered by the end of the year. Funding for aid programs is not the only issue. Last month, UNHCR announced it would need to cut 3,500 staff – nearly a third of its workforce worldwide – amid the budget shortfall.
