
Scientists believe they have solved the mystery of what killed more than 5 billion sea stars
Since 2013, a mysterious sea star wasting disease has caused a mass die-off from Mexico to Alaska, affecting over 20 species and continuing its destructive path today. The sunflower sea star was particularly hard hit, losing approximately 90 per cent of its population within the first five years of the outbreak.
"It's really quite gruesome," said marine disease ecologist Alyssa Gehman at the Hakai Institute in British Columbia, Canada, who contributed to pinpointing the cause. She described how healthy sea stars typically have "puffy arms sticking straight out," but the disease causes them to develop lesions before "their arms actually fall off."
The long-sought answer, published in the journal Nature Ecology and Evolution, points to a bacterium that has also been found to infect shellfish. The findings "solve a long-standing question about a very serious disease in the ocean," commented Rebecca Vega Thurber, a marine microbiologist at the University of California, Santa Barbara, who was not involved in the study.
Identifying the cause proved to be a complex, decade-long endeavour, fraught with false leads. Early research mistakenly focused on a densovirus, which was later found to be a normal resident within healthy sea stars, not linked to the disease, according to Melanie Prentice of the Hakai Institute, a co-author of the new study. Previous attempts also failed because researchers studied tissue samples from dead sea stars that no longer contained the vital bodily fluid surrounding their organs.
The latest study, however, meticulously analysed this fluid, known as coelomic fluid, where the bacterium Vibrio pectenicida was ultimately discovered. Microbiologist Blake Ushijima of the University of North Carolina, Wilmington, who was not involved in the research, praised the team's "really smart and significant" detective work, noting the immense difficulty in tracing environmental disease sources, especially underwater.
Scientists say they have solved the mystery of what killed more than 5 billion sea stars
Show all 5
With the cause now identified, scientists are better positioned to intervene. Ms Prentice suggested that researchers could now test the remaining sea stars for health, considering relocation or captive breeding programmes to reintroduce them to areas where sunflower sea stars have been decimated. They may also investigate if certain populations possess natural immunity or if treatments like probiotics could boost resistance to the disease.
The recovery of sea star populations is not merely about saving a single species; it is vital for the entire Pacific ecosystem. Healthy sea stars play a crucial role in controlling sea urchin populations. "They're voracious eaters," Ms Gehman explained about the Sunflower sea stars, despite their seemingly innocent appearance, as they consume almost everything on the ocean floor.
The dramatic decline in sea stars led to an explosion in sea urchin numbers, which in turn devoured approximately 95 per cent of Northern California 's kelp forests within a decade. These kelp forests are critical habitats, providing food and shelter for a diverse array of marine life, including fish, sea otters, and seals. Researchers are hopeful that these new findings will enable them to restore sea star populations and, consequently, regrow the kelp forests that Ms Thurber aptly compares to "the rainforests of the ocean."
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The 1am shut-eye: what is the prime bedtime for your health and happiness?
Name: Bedtime. Age: Bedtimes vary depending on how old you are, so if you're a newborn … A very clever, early-developing, Guardian-reading newborn. If you were a newborn, you wouldn't really have a bedtime; you'd sleep in bursts of a couple of hours, night and day. They do need a lot of rest. But this is about adults – and a new study. I was waiting for that, the new study. Go on. A survey of 2,000 Americans, conducted for a mattress company, found that the average time people fall asleep is 11.18pm. Seems quite late. For those who stayed up later than they planned, 29% said they were kept up by chores. But 21% said they stayed up because night was their favourite time of day. Anyway, the average American begins their going-to-bed routine at 10.15pm. How long does that take? Twenty-one minutes. They're tucked up by 10.36pm. Then it takes them 42 minutes to nod off, on average. What are they doing? Reading? Scrolling? Tantric sex? The survey is about bedtimes, not what goes on in them. And is there a prime time to go to bed? Good question. Thank you. Research from 2021 suggests that going to sleep between 10pm and 11pm is linked to a lower risk of heart disease. Better research than the mattress-company survey? More scientific, certainly, using data from more than 88,000 participants aged 43 to 74, published in the European Heart Journal. But even so, as the British Heart Foundation points out, it doesn't prove cause and effect, just shows an association. What else you got? A study from last year by researchers at Stanford University, published in Psychiatry Research, which analysed the sleep patterns of nearly 74,000 adults. Sounds legit. It found that staying awake too late can be bad for your mental health. What time? I need a time. They recommend lights out by 1am. What! Too late? Then do what the twentysomethings are doing, apparently. Which is? Going to bed at 9 o'clock. What! How long are they staying there? Asleep? Nine hours and 28 minutes, on average. That was from analysis in 2022, up from eight hours and 47 minutes in 2010. It's probably about 12 hours now. No partying? A 19-year-old told the Wall Street Journal: 'Nothing good happens after 9pm.' Generation Zzzzzzz. Of course, that might all change when they get a job … on the night shift. Do say: 'Early to bed and early to rise makes a zoomer healthy, wealthy and wise.' Don't say: 'Elon Musk tweets all night and he's doing OK.'


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Great Barrier Reef suffers biggest annual drop in live coral since 1980s after devastating coral bleaching
The Great Barrier Reef has suffered its biggest annual drop in live coral in two out of three areas monitored by scientists since 1986, a new report has revealed. The Australian Institute of Marine Science (Aims) report is the first to comprehensively document the devastating impacts of the early 2024 mass coral bleaching event – the most widespread and severe on record for the Great Barrier Reef. In the months that followed that event, scientists described a 'graveyard of corals' around Lizard Island in the north and a study recorded the death of 40% of corals at One Tree Island in the south. Aims has conducted annual in-water surveys of the world's biggest reef system since 1986, checking the health and extent of corals. Sign up: AU Breaking News email This year's survey report found that in the reef's northern section – between Cooktown and the tip of Cape York – bleaching, two cyclones and associated flooding had caused coral cover to fall by 25%. In the southern section, from Mackay to just north of Bundaberg, coral cover had fallen by 30%. The northern and southern zones suffered the highest annual drops on record. Coral cover fell by 13% in the central section, which had escaped the worst of the heat in 2024. Dr Mike Emslie, who leads the long-term reef monitoring program at Aims, said coral cover was becoming more volatile. 'It has been a pretty sobering year of surveys with the biggest impacts I have seen in the 30-plus years I have been doing this,' he said. 'This volatility is very likely a sign of an unstable system. That's our real concern. We're starting to see record highs in coral cover that quickly get turned around to record falls.' Coral bleaching describes a process whereby the coral animal expels the algae that live in its tissues and give it its colour and much of its nutrients. Without its algae, a coral's white skeleton can be seen through its translucent flesh, giving off a bleached appearance. Mass coral bleaching over large areas, first noticed in the 1980s around the Caribbean, is caused by rising ocean temperatures. Some corals also display fluorescent colours under stress when they release a pigment that filters light. Sunlight also plays a role in triggering bleaching. Corals can survive bleaching if temperatures are not too extreme or prolonged. But extreme marine heatwaves can kill corals outright. Coral bleaching can also have sub-lethal effects, including increased susceptibility to disease and reduced rates of growth and reproduction. Scientists say the gaps between bleaching events are becoming too short to allow reefs to recover. Coral reefs are considered one of the planet's ecosystems most at risk from global heating. Reefs support fisheries that feed hundreds of millions of people, as well as supporting major tourism industries. The world's biggest coral reef system – Australia's Great Barrier Reef – has suffered seven mass bleaching events since 1998, of which five were in the past decade. With relatively benign impacts from cyclones and bleaching in the five years before the 2024 event, coral cover had reached record levels in some places. But that recovery, Emslie said, was largely driven by fast-growing acropora corals that were more susceptible to heat stress. 'We had said it could all get turned around in one year and, low and behold, here we are,' he said, adding that coral cover was now mostly back in line with long-term averages. The 2024 and 2025 events were part of an ongoing global mass coral bleaching event that led to more than 80% of the planet's reefs being hit with enough heat to cause bleaching, affecting corals in at least 82 countries and territories. A study last year found ocean temperatures on the Great Barrier Reef were likely at their hottest for at least 400 years and were an 'existential threat' to the Unesco World Heritage-listed reef. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Widespread mass bleaching of the Great Barrier Reef was first seen in 1998 and happened again in 2002, 2016, 2017, 2020, 2022, 2024 and 2025. Emslie said: 'These impacts we are seeing are serious and substantial and the bleaching events are coming closer and closer together. 'We will ultimately get to a tipping point where coral cover can't bounce back because disturbances come so quickly that there's no time left for recovery. 'We have to mitigate the root causes of the problem and reduce emissions and stabilise temperatures.' The Aims report comes a month before the federal government is due to reveal its emissions reduction target for 2035. The Albanese government promised Unesco last year it would 'set successively more ambitious emissions reduction targets' that would be 'in alignment with efforts to limit global temperature increase to 1.5C'. Last week, the Climate Change Authority, which will advise the government on what target to set, released a report that said holding warming 'as close as possible to 1.5C' was key to addressing the threats facing the reef. Richard Leck, head of oceans at WWF Australia, said the government needed to set a target consistent with 1.5C. 'This is the one action the government can take to give the reef a fighting chance.'


The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Photos of Mexican ranchers struggling to adapt as screwworm ravages their cattle exports to the US
The U.S. has suspended live cattle imports from Mexico due to concerns about the New World Screwworm, a flesh-eating parasite found in southern Mexico. This suspension has severely impacted ranchers like Martín Ibarra Vargas in Sonora, who are already struggling with drought. The U.S. Department of Agriculture calls the screwworm a 'devastating pest' and is taking measures to prevent its spread.