'Devastated' Sounds Air to axe two routes, sell some aircraft
The carrier confirmed it would axe its Blenheim to Christchurch and Christchurch to Wānaka services from September 28, reverting to what it calls a "back to the future" model squarely focused on Cook Strait crossings.
The airline will expand its Cessna Caravan fleet for shorter sectors while seeking buyers for five larger Pilatus aircraft, in order to help "rebuild the viability of the business".
Sounds Air managing director Andrew Crawford said the airline's hand had been forced.
"We are truly devastated that we have been forced into this position after five years of fighting for a solution," he said in a statement.
ADVERTISEMENT
"It will mean the loss of a number our dedicated and skilled staff, but we are also hugely disappointed for our incredibly loyal customer base who rely on us to get around New Zealand - not only for tourism and leisure purposes but also for regional access to critical healthcare, higher education, and to do business that contributes to regional economies."
The Government is hoping to boost tourism with more money for international marketing. (Source: Breakfast)
Sounds Air and other carriers, including Air Chathams, wanted the Government to step in and called for a concessionary loan scheme, 1News reported last month. The firm had already withdrawn Wellington to Taupō and Wellington to Westport routes in December.
Crawford said the company had been fighting rising costs that threatened regional aviation, and that it faced a "deadlock" between government and private capital markets.
"We are not alone in this, Air New Zealand and other regional carriers in New Zealand, and worldwide, have been hit by the same cost increases, and the irony is that our passenger demand has never been stronger," he said in a statement.
"Government appears to believe that private capital markets will step in to sort this out, while on the other hand, private capital markets believe that government should step in to level the playing field like they do in other parts of the world, in order to maintain essential regional air services."
Sounds Air will continue operating its core Cook Strait routes including Wellington to Blenheim, Wellington to Nelson, Wellington to Picton, Blenheim to Paraparaumu and Nelson to Paraparaumu.
ADVERTISEMENT
Associate Transport Minister James Meager has been approached for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
13 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Card surcharges to be scrapped
The government has announced it intends to ban surcharges at the till. Whether it'll actually lead to lower prices though is unclear, the retail sector has warned businesses may have to pass on those costs somehow. But the government has warned businesses not to, citing a big reduction in the fees they pay to accept Visa and Mastercard payments. Giles Dexter reports. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
Scoop
25 minutes ago
- Scoop
Surcharge Ban May Shift Costs Rather Than Eliminate Them
Hospitality NZ supports the Government's proposal to ban surcharges on card payments, but cautions the move could result in increased costs being absorbed into general pricing for many hospitality businesses. The Government has announced that the Retail Payment System (Ban on Surcharges) Amendment Bill will be introduced by the end of 2025, with the ban expected to come into force by May 2026. It will apply to most in-store transactions using domestic Visa, Mastercard and EFTPOS. Steve Armitage, Hospitality NZ's Chief Executive, says: 'We appreciate the intent behind this change. Simplifying the checkout experience for consumers is a positive step.' 'But at the same time, it's important to recognise that electronic payments come with real costs to businesses. If surcharges are removed, many operators will have to adjust their pricing to reflect that – particularly for small hospitality operators already under pressure.' The Government estimates the move could save consumers up to $150 million a year, including $65 million in excessive surcharges. However, Hospitality NZ notes that these savings will depend on how businesses respond and whether cost recovery mechanisms remain viable. Steve Armitage continues: 'Margins across the hospitality sector remain very tight. Some operators may be able to absorb the cost, but for many, particularly smaller businesses, that won't be realistic. These businesses may have no option but to reflect those costs in their pricing.' Hospitality NZ welcomed the Commerce Commission's recent action to reduce interchange fees – a major component of payment processing costs – and supports further efforts to ensure banks and payment providers pass those savings on to merchants. Steve Armitage says: 'The reduction in interchange fees is a helpful step, and we'd like to see more transparency in how those savings are shared. 'Our priority is to make sure that any changes introduced are sustainable for hospitality businesses and ultimately deliver a fair outcome for both consumers and operators.' Hospitality NZ looks forward to engaging constructively with the Government as the Bill progresses and to ensuring practical support is available for hospitality businesses adapting to the new framework.
NZ Herald
43 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Govt to increase Crown body board members' fee ranges, in some cases by 80%
He said the public sector had got 'out of whack' compared with the private sector. Luxon said when billions of dollars are being spent on the likes of healthcare, it's 'important that we actually are able to attract really good governance, of Health New Zealand for example'. 'This is just acknowledging that we need to make sure that we can attract good people.' Asked what his message was to someone struggling with the cost of living while the Government was lifting board fees, Luxon pointed to other actions the Government had taken. He mentioned efforts to clamp down on inflation, pouring money into new infrastructure, and today's announcement of removing surcharges from card payments. The Cabinet Fees Framework lays out a range of fee levels for appointees to different bodies and criteria that appointees are marked against. The higher their score, the more they could be paid. It applies to members of a range of bodies or groups the Crown has an interest in, such as royal commissions, ministerial inquiries and some governance boards. However, it doesn't cover pay set by the Remuneration Authority, which deals with MPs, the judiciary and the heads of various commissions and authorities. The framework is reviewed every three years by the Public Service Commission, which reports to Cabinet on the fees. A Cabinet Circular today revealed the new pay ranges. Photo / Mark Mitchell The circular issued today says Cabinet agreed to a revised framework that took effect from July 1. A list of 'main changes' from the previous framework include 'an increase of 80% to the fee ranges' for some governance boards and 'an increase of 30%' for other bodies. It is 'not intended to be prescriptive, and judgment will be required to determine best fit', the document says. It enables a 'consistent approach' to setting fees across bodies. The new framework says setting fees should 'support the appointment of appropriately qualified and diverse body members', contain expenditure within 'reasonable limits' and 'provide flexibility'. 'The framework enables fees to be determined by ministers and other fee-setting authorities who are most familiar with the work of particular bodies.' There is a lengthy process of setting or reviewing members' fees, which takes into account the complexity of their role, the degree to which the role is in the public eye, and recruitment or retention issues. 'Fees will continue to be set on a fair but conservative basis to reflect a discount for the element of public service involved,' the framework says. Members occupying identical positions on the same body should be paid the same rate, but the framework says in some cases it 'is necessary to secure people with scarce specialist skills' and therefore consideration may be given to a higher fee. Alternatively, a fee lower than the suggested range could also be paid in some circumstances. The framework says the schedule of fees 'reflects the nature of their business environment and the role requirements'. The 80% increase applies to the fee range for governance boards responsible for most Crown entities. The top range, for those appointees given the highest scores against the set criteria, is between $73,100 and $162,200 for a chair and between $36,500 and $80,400 for a member. This compares to the previous 2022 framework, which had a range of $40,596 to $90,123 for chairs and $20,295 to $44,655 for members. The new bottom range for this group is between $25,800 and $54,200 for a chair and between $12,900 and $27,100 for a member. On the face of it, to be in the top range, an appointee would need to chair the governance board of an entity with a budget in the hundreds of millions of dollars or above, and with more than one primary function. This would require consultation with the commission. The range reflects an annual rate, which the framework says is consistent with the private sector and is appropriate given the workload is 'predictable and/or substantial'. It's expected these members work about 30 days a year, 'which is in line with the amount of time spent by board directors in private sector companies', while chairs are expected to work about 50 days a year. 'The fees for chairs is set at approximately twice the rate of the members to take account of both the differences in responsibility and in workload,' the framework says. 'Where it is anticipated that a chair or members will have a lesser workload than above, it is expected that this be reflected in the fee level.' One group has had its fee ranges increased by 80%. Another grouping with its own fee ranges are members of statutory tribunals and authorities. This is reflected in a daily rate as it is expected their workload will be 'unpredictable'. The top range for these chairs is between $995 and $1550, or between $640 and $990 for members. The bottom range is between $525 and $770 for chairs, and between $416 and $500 for members. A range of additional information is also provided around expenses, how to review current members' fees and where exceptions to the framework could apply. A report from the Institute of Directors in October found directors' fees had not been keeping pace with inflation. 'Despite some claims that directors are overpaid, non-executive director fees rarely increase in line with general employee increases or inflation.' Jamie Ensor is a political reporter in the NZ Herald press gallery team based at Parliament. He was previously a TV reporter and digital producer in the Newshub press gallery office. In 2025, he was a finalist for Political Journalist of the Year at the Voyager Media Awards.
