.jpg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C50%2C0%2C50%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
Fox News host proclaims Paramount's settlement with Trump as a win for the little guy
'It turns out that you actually can go up against the system and actually put up some wins like this,' the MAGA-boosting Fox & Friends Weekend co-host proclaimed on Wednesday morning.
Just hours ahead of the company's annual shareholders meeting, where many of the board members would be up for re-election, Paramount announced late on Tuesday evening that it had agreed to pay Trump and his legal team $16 million to settle the $20 billion complaint he brought against CBS News over the editing of a Kamala Harris interview last October.
The president's lawsuit, which legal experts said was baseless and would fail in court, accused the network of 'election interference' for cutting portions of the former vice president's answer to a question about Israel during the 60 Minutes broadcast. He would later add that the interview, which came weeks before his electoral victory, resulted in 'mental anguish.'
While the network would argue that the case was completely without merit and move for its dismissal, Paramount's top shareholder Shari Redstone and the company's board had pushed for a settlement amid a pending $8.4 billion merger with Skydance Media, which requires final approval from the Trump administration.
With the CBS newsroom roiled with tensions over the looming settlement for months, the late-night announcement that Paramount was paying Trump off was received as one would expect. 'No one is a fan of Shari right now,' one network staffer told The Independent on Tuesday evening. 'People are still angry and frustrated and morale is very low.'
At the same time, while Paramount maintains that 'this lawsuit is completely separate from, and unrelated to, the Skydance transaction and the FCC approval process,' the company is very likely to face civil lawsuits and perhaps even criminal probes over potential violations of anti-bribery statutes.
The Freedom of the Press Foundation, which had threatened to sue Paramount on behalf of shareholders if it settled the lawsuit with Trump, told The Independent that it is currently in discussions with its legal team about the next steps. 'Paramount's spineless decision to settle Trump's patently unconstitutional lawsuit is an insult to the First Amendment and to the journalists and viewers of '60 Minutes,'' the group said on Wednesday, 'It's a dark day for Paramount and for press freedom.'
On Fox News, whose pro-Trump personalities had largely cheered on the 60 Minutes lawsuit, the deal was portrayed as a major victory for the president. 'Paramount, CBS forced to pay eight figures, change editorial policy in settlement with President Trump,' a Fox News headline read on Tuesday night, claiming that Trump could secure as much as $30 million from Paramount. (The company has disputed those claims.)
Appearing on America's Newsroom on Wednesday morning, Hurt was asked to weigh in on the settlement, with anchor Dana Perino noting that Trump claimed CBS News had 'put their thumb on the scale before the election' with the editing of the Harris interview.
'The only reason any of this happened, much like with the University of Pennsylvania decision, the only reason any of this happened is because President Trump was willing to go and pick a fight that few Republicans ever want to get into,' Hurt gushed. 'He has fought with the media every step of the way. He is not afraid of it. This is the result of it.'
The right-wing pundit also said he 'loved the fact' that the president secured a 'Trump rule' that CBS News will now release full and unedited transcripts of 60 Minutes interviews with presidential candidates. In the end, though, Hurt insisted that the leader of the free world getting paid off by a company that is seeking his government's approval is akin to David vs. Goliath.
'And just a reminder of, you know, the guy is unafraid to take on any entity that is in his way, and it winds up paying off,' he exclaimed. 'It turns out that you actually can go up against the system, and actually put up some wins like this!'
Co-anchor Bill Hemmer, meanwhile, concluded the segment by declaring that the money Trump secured in the settlement is a 'stunner,' despite it being roughly the same amount Disney paid to make Trump's ABC News lawsuit go away last year and a tiny fraction of the insane $20 billion he initially sought.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Meghan Markle's As Ever wine goes on sale for wild price per bottle... but it is already SOLD OUT
Meghan Markle 's As Ever rosé wine is now available for purchase for a steep price - but it is already sold out. On Tuesday, the sales for the wine went live, with customers able to purchase three bottles for $90, six bottles for $159, and 12 bottles for $300. If you bought the six bottle package, Meghan promised that you were receiving 12 per cent off, while a 12-pack gets you a 17 per cent saving. Daily Mail exclusively revealed this week that the alcoholic beverage is made by Fairwinds Estate, a California winery that creates bespoke wines for celebrities, as they've now added Meghan to their list of clients. When FEMAIL in New York went to purchase a bundle of the wine, we weren't asked for proof of ID - only our birthday. In New York State, there are strict rules about the shipping of wine, as 'manufacturers in other states can make direct shipments of wine, distilled spirits, cider, mead, and braggot to New York residents with an Out-of-State Direct Shipper's License,' per the state's website. The state also requires that the manufacturer must require the customer to represent that they are 21 or older at purchase (and on delivery provide proof that they are 21 years of age or older) and that the alcohol is being purchased for personal use only. Wine shipped to New York must also be labeled in a specific way, as the package must read, 'signature of person age 21 or older required for delivery.' So, in New York, you may be able to order the wine online, but you will need to show proof of identity and age in order to accept the package. But while it may be simple for anyone of age to get their hands on Meghan's As Ever wine, a supplier like Total Wine won't even ship wine to New York State. Other websites, like Wine Access, however, follow As Ever's lead and only ask for a birthdate upon ordering. The As Ever wine is the first alcoholic product to be sold under the brand, and will join her current rolodex of raspberry and apricot spreads, cookie mixes, flower sprinkles and herbal teas - all of which received a less-than-perfect review by FEMAIL. However, Caitlin Jardine, a Social Media Manager at Ellis Digital, previously shared with Daily Mail that The Duchess could risk 'alienating' some fans with the boozy introduction. Jardine noted that Meghan will be 'entering a highly competitive and established market' that is 'most likely to appeal to a more expansive audience, particularly those who see wine as more than just something to drink but an accessory to their lifestyle.' 'However, having already associated herself with all things wellness, this could alienate some of her fan base who feel as though she is going against her core wellness-centered brand image, different to her existing line of products, with the potential to contradict her values around mindful living,' Jardine explained. But it is not all bad news for the entrepreneur. 'What it does do is add versatility to her current line of As Ever products, reflecting a more modern, balanced lifestyle,' she shared. 'Rather than one that is more rigid and "clean," it reflects one that is more in tune with her diverse audience and how they live.' Jardine noted that in the past, Meghan has faced criticism from the public about her lack of relatability - and thinks this new line of rosé could help recover her image. Meghan's July 1 wine launch is her second in just a matter of weeks. On June 20, she released a new apricot spread and limited-edition orange blossom honey - but unfortunately, her infamous raspberry spread was nowhere to be found.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Gold and its miners may enjoy a 'critical mineral' upgrade
LAUNCESTON, Australia, July 3 (Reuters) - Is gold the next metal to be added to the list of "critical minerals"? Gold is not a vital component of advanced manufacturing like other critical minerals such as rare earths, lithium and copper. But the precious metal appears to be undergoing a subtle shift in how it is viewed by governments and investors. Since countries moved away from the gold standard by the early 1970s, gold has largely been viewed as a relatively niche part of investment portfolios and government reserves. Gold was something that was added to portfolios as an inflation hedge or during times of heightened geopolitical tensions. In some ways, the role of gold in both central bank and investment portfolios was overtaken by bonds, with U.S. Treasuries becoming the most important of these assets. But the return of Donald Trump to the U.S. presidency is leading to a global reassessment of the relative safety of U.S. assets, the independence of the Federal Reserve and the likely worsening of the U.S. fiscal position. Add in Trump's attacks on the rule of law in the United States and the likely hit to both the U.S. and global economies from his trade policies, and the stage is set for a reevaluation of the role of gold. The precious metal has gained 32.3% from a low of $2,536.71 an ounce hit on November 14 in the days after Trump's victory over his Democratic Party rival, former Vice President Kamala Harris. It reached a record high of $3,500.05 an ounce on April 22, and has since retreated slightly to close at $3,357.08 on Wednesday. While gold's day-to-day moves are still largely driven by the news cycle, the overall backdrop looks supportive. The World Gold Council released a report last month in which it surveyed 73 central banks, and 95% of them expected the official sector to increase holdings in the coming 12 months. "This is a record high since it was first tracked in the 2019 survey and represents a 17% increase from the 2024 findings," the council said. Central banks are also moving to repatriate more of their holdings back to their home countries and away from the United States, a further sign that there is a loss of confidence in U.S. assets and the policies of the Trump administration. Gold is also well-placed as one of the few viable alternatives if more governments, fund managers and private investors outside the United States form the view that the era of U.S. exceptionalism is over and that U.S. Treasuries are now a riskier asset as the country's fiscal position deteriorates. Another factor that is showing the positive story for gold is the performance of gold mining equities. Major gold producers have seen their share prices rise at a far faster pace than the actual metal. There are several reasons why this could be the case, including the expectation that shareholders will receive higher dividend payouts in the future and that companies are being rewarded for showing capital discipline in prior years. But it also may be that investors are starting to re-rate gold mining companies in the expectation that gold becomes a more vital and larger part of portfolios, both public and private. For example, shares in Newmont (NEM.N), opens new tab, the world's largest listed gold miner, have risen 63% from their most recent low on December 30 to close at $60.06 on Wednesday. Canada's Barrick Mining ( opens new tab has seen its shares gain 40.6% in U.S. dollar terms from its recent low on December 19 to the close on Wednesday. Anglogold Ashanti (AU.N), opens new tab shares in New York have surged 108% from the low on December 30 to the close of $46.66 on Wednesday, while Gold Fields (GFIJ.J), opens new tab has seen a gain of 88% in U.S. dollar terms from its November 14 low to the close on Wednesday. If gold does become a more central part of investment strategies, the listed miners are likely to become more attractive, given the difficulty of finding and developing new projects and the long time between exploration and production. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab. The views expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Tesla sales hit three-year low as Musk feuds with Trump
Sales at Elon Musk's Tesla have fallen to a three-year low amid the billionaire's public spat with Donald Trump. The electric carmaker said customer deliveries fell by 13.5pc in the second quarter of the year, a period in which Mr Musk left his role in the White House and publicly fell out with the US president over his tax and spending bill. Sales were 384,122 between April and June, down from 443,956 compared to the same quarter a year ago. It is the second straight double-digit drop in quarterly deliveries for Tesla, meaning sales for the year so far are at their lowest since 2022. The figures put Tesla on track for a second successive year of declining sales. Falling demand in recent months has been blamed partially on a political backlash against Mr Musk over his support for Mr Trump. However, growing competition from low-cost Chinese manufacturers has also threatened Tesla's grip on the electric vehicle (EV) market, with Shenzhen-based BYD overtaking Tesla in sales across Britain and Europe in recent months. Driverless taxis Meanwhile, Mr Musk has also increasingly focused on Tesla's efforts on his Robotaxi project. The company last week started offering driverless taxi rides in Texas, and Mr Musk has said Tesla will begin production of a Cybercab next year. The decline in Tesla's sales led to heightened scrutiny of Mr Musk's work at the White House, where he sat in on cabinet meetings and spearheaded the department of government efficiency (Doge). This prompted some Tesla investors to raise concerns that Mr Musk was not focused enough on running the company. In April, Tesla revealed that quarterly sales had fallen by 13pc – its biggest drop since 2012. Investors had hoped that an upgrade to its best-selling Model Y would revive sales, but the drop in the second quarter was almost as severe. 'Disgusting abomination' Tensions between Mr Musk and Mr Trump exploded in the last month, shortly after the South African-born businessman stepped down from the White House. The Tesla boss, who described Mr Trump's 'big beautiful bill' as a 'disgusting abomination', previously claimed the president should be impeached. Mr Trump hit back by threatening to cancel federal contracts for Mr Musk's rocket company, SpaceX. The two briefly held a truce, but the row was reignited this week when Mr Musk threatened to start a new political party and Mr Trump suggested he could deport him. Mr Musk has publicly criticised Mr Trump's bill for adding to the ballooning US deficit, but the legislation also cuts incentives for electric cars and renewable energy, which have boosted Tesla sales. The company's shares fell by 5pc on Tuesday amid the widening rift between the pair, although they rose on Wednesday because the sales drop was less severe than some analysts had feared. Mr Musk has predicted that Tesla will have millions of robotaxis in operation this year.
