logo
US strikes Iran: How legendary 88-year-old reporter Seymour Hersh scooped that Donald Trump would attack Iranian nuclear sites

US strikes Iran: How legendary 88-year-old reporter Seymour Hersh scooped that Donald Trump would attack Iranian nuclear sites

Time of India22-06-2025
In an age where news breaks on social media feeds faster than newsroom alerts, it wasn't CNN, BBC or The New York Times that first reported the United States' military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
It was Seymour Hersh.
Yes, that Seymour Hersh—the 88-year-old Pulitzer-winning investigative reporter, best known for uncovering the My Lai Massacre in Vietnam and the Abu Ghraib prison abuses in Iraq. And now, in the summer of 2025, the veteran journalist has done it again—beating major media outlets and intelligence briefings by publishing details of the Trump administration's plan to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities, nearly 48 hours before the world knew it had actually happened.
The Scoop
On June 19, Hersh published a detailed report via his Substack newsletter, claiming that US B-2 bombers and naval platforms were preparing a "coordinated assault" on Iran's underground nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. The piece cited unnamed sources in the intelligence community who warned that the operation was imminent and being conducted with minimal oversight from Congress or America's NATO allies.
At the time, most dismissed it as another speculative post from a journalist long estranged from the legacy media. But by June 22, when US President Donald Trump went on record confirming the strikes—calling the targets 'obliterated'—Hersh had already been vindicated.
The Attack
The strikes, launched late on June 21, targeted three high-profile Iranian nuclear facilities. While initial reports from state media in Iran downplayed the damage, satellite imagery and eyewitness accounts suggested precision airstrikes had indeed hit deep underground bunkers at Fordow and Natanz, as well as key infrastructure in Isfahan.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Yet despite the intensity of the operation, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported no significant radiation spikes, prompting speculation that either:
Iran had preemptively moved or buried sensitive material, or
The sites were largely non-operational or decoy facilities.
Either way, it challenged Trump's claim of having 'wiped out' Iran's nuclear capability.
Déjà Vu: From Nord Stream to Natanz
Hersh's report bore eerie similarities to his controversial 2023 scoop on the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines, which he attributed to US covert operations.
At the time, mainstream outlets largely ignored the piece, but subsequent leaks from German and Nordic investigations lent circumstantial credibility to his claims.
The Iran story followed a similar arc: initial media silence, public disbelief, and then abrupt confirmation—except this time, the stakes involved possible nuclear escalation in the Middle East.
The Media Gap
Hersh's scoop once again spotlights the widening chasm between traditional journalism and independent reporting.
A 2023 study by the Reuters Institute found that 62% of US adults now rely on social media, newsletters, and independent platforms for breaking news—often citing speed, authenticity, and ideological distrust of legacy media.
Hersh, for his part, has long been critical of what he calls the 'lapdog press'—journalists too embedded in officialdom to question military narratives or dig beneath the surface. His latest work only reinforces that critique.
Even defenders of legacy media recognize the challenge. In late 2024, Jeff Bezos, owner of The Washington Post, penned a stirring op‑ed titled 'The hard truth: Americans don't trust the news media,' in which he conceded:
'Reality is an undefeated champion. … We must be accurate, and we must be believed to be accurate. It's a bitter pill to swallow, but we are failing on the second requirement.'
Bezos's admission—calling out both accuracy and credibility—served as a tacit acknowledgment that even powerful legacy outlets are circling back to the same core demand: fearless, truthful reporting, just as Hersh delivers time and again.
What Next?
Iran, for now, has not confirmed the full extent of the damage but has vowed to retaliate 'at a time and place of its choosing.' Meanwhile, in Washington, Trump faces minimal political backlash, with key GOP figures framing the strike as a 'preemptive blow' to prevent Tehran from developing a nuclear bomb.
But the bigger story might be this: Seymour Hersh, nearly nine decades old, once again scooped the world. In an era of TikTok pundits and algorithm-fed outrage, his dogged reliance on old-school sourcing—combined with new-age platforms like Substack—has given him a second act few journalists ever get.
Legacy vs Longevity
While major networks scrambled to confirm what Hersh had already written, one truth remained clear: in the information war, experience still matters. Hersh's longevity in investigative reporting—not in spite of, but because of his outsider status—continues to disrupt the cosy, slow-moving machinery of legacy media. The attack on Iran may or may not spark a wider conflict. But Hersh's scoop has already ignited a different kind of reckoning—one about where we get our news, and who we still trust to tell us the truth.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran Won't Stop Enrichment, Trump 'Ready' To Bomb Again, Can US Stop Tehran From Going Nuclear?
Iran Won't Stop Enrichment, Trump 'Ready' To Bomb Again, Can US Stop Tehran From Going Nuclear?

News18

time19 minutes ago

  • News18

Iran Won't Stop Enrichment, Trump 'Ready' To Bomb Again, Can US Stop Tehran From Going Nuclear?

If Iran were to try and enrich Uranium again with the express purpose of developing a weapon, what will America do? President Donald Trump has said he wouldn't hesitate from striking Tehran again. A threat he reiterated this week, after evidence of the damage left behind in Iran. With much of Iran's air defences destroyed, Israeli or American forces could attack again, stopping any reconstruction efforts. An Israeli official repeated last week that the country was prepared to 'mow the lawn,' suggesting Iranian sites could be reattacked. n18oc_world n18oc_crux

Ghislaine Maxwell's photo from Chelsea Clinton's wedding resurfaces as Trump-Epstein videos go viral
Ghislaine Maxwell's photo from Chelsea Clinton's wedding resurfaces as Trump-Epstein videos go viral

Hindustan Times

time22 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Ghislaine Maxwell's photo from Chelsea Clinton's wedding resurfaces as Trump-Epstein videos go viral

After CNN resurfaced a photo of Jeffrey Epstein at President Donald Trump's 1993 wedding to Marla Maples, an old photo of Epstein's aide and convicted sex trafficker, Ghislaine Maxwell, at the wedding of Chelsea Clinton, the daughter of Bill Clinton, is being reshared. Former President Bill Clinton on stage discussing his book "The First Gentlemen" at The 92nd Street Y on Wednesday, June 11, 2025, in New York. (Photo by Greg Allen/Invision/AP)(Greg Allen/Invision/AP) The photo, which has often been shared to allege the Clinton family's links with Jeffrey Epstein, shows the former President walking Chelsea Clinton down the aisle ahead of her wedding at Astor Courts in Rhinebeck, New York, on July 31, 2010. However, the photo became infamous after it was noticed that Ghislaine Maxwell was among those in the audience as Bill Clinton and Chelsea walked down the aisle. Former First Lady Hilary Clinton was also in attendance, but the photo does not capture her. Chelsea Clinton married Marc Mezvinsky, an investment banker, in a private inter-faith ceremony. Here's the photo: Despite some claims that the photo is doctored, it is a real photo, taken by Genevieve de Manio for Getty Images. Also read: Trump again ditches Jeffrey Epstein question, tells reporter to 'stop talking about nonsense' amid 'witch hunt' Trump's New Photos And Videos With Epstein On Tuesday, CNN published exclusive photos of Jeffrey Epstein attending the wedding of Donald Trump and Marla Maples. The fact that Epstein was in attendance as Trump and Maples tied the knot was not a widely known fact. Additionally, CNN looked into footage of Trump's public appearances in in the 1990s and found a footage of him with Epstein at the 1999 Victoria's Secret fashion show. The CNN photos came on the back of Wall Street Journal Publishing a letter that Trump wrote to Epstein on the latter's 50th birthday. Described as "bawdy," the letter contained a birthday wish in typewritten text inside the background of a naked woman drawn with a marker. Trump's signature was in place of the pubic hair of the figure. Trump, however, has dismissed both reports as "fake news."

Amid India agri standoff, US gains access to politically sensitive rice market in Japan
Amid India agri standoff, US gains access to politically sensitive rice market in Japan

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

Amid India agri standoff, US gains access to politically sensitive rice market in Japan

Signalling a resolute push on agriculture sector negotiations, US President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced a trade deal with Japan that includes market access for American agricultural products, including politically sensitive items such as rice. Under the deal, Japan has agreed to impose 15 per cent reciprocal tariffs, compared to the 25 per cent the US had threatened earlier this week. This comes just days after India concluded an extended round of talks but failed to sign a deal, mainly due to differences over market access for agricultural products. The Japan agreement is significant as New Delhi too remains particularly sensitive over staple food items such as wheat and rice. As in India, rice is an economically important and politically sensitive commodity in Japan — so much so that when Japan's farm minister joked he never had to buy rice because his supporters gave him 'plenty' as gifts, he was ultimately forced to resign, the BBC reported. Japan is currently facing a rare cost of living crisis, which has affected rice prices. In 2025, prices have more than doubled compared to the previous year. The ruling coalition, led by Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, also suffered a defeat in the upper house elections amid widespread discontent over the cost of living. 'We just completed a massive Deal with Japan, perhaps the largest Deal ever made. Japan will invest, at my direction, $550 Billion Dollars into the United States, which will receive 90% of the Profits. This Deal will create Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs — There has never been anything like it,' Trump said in a social media post. 'Perhaps most importantly, Japan will open their Country to Trade including Cars and Trucks, Rice and certain other Agricultural Products, and other things. Japan will pay Reciprocal Tariffs to the United States of 15 per cent. This is a very exciting time for the United States of America, and especially for the fact that we will continue to always have a great relationship with the Country of Japan. Thank you for your attention to this matter,' Trump added. While agriculture remains a contentious issue in US trade negotiations, India's reliance on agriculture remains critically high. However, Western nations, including the US, have criticised India for providing excessive support to rice farmers. Although New Delhi has resisted pressure to reform its farm policies, it has also questioned the methodology used to calculate subsidies at the WTO. Notably, India is the world's largest rice exporter. When India banned rice exports in July 2023, global prices rose by up to 32 per cent in key rice-importing countries. The ban was lifted last year following a rise in domestic inventories. Meanwhile, the Indian Coordination Committee of Farmers Movements (ICCFM) — a network of farmers' organisations across 11 states including Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Punjab, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra — has urged the government to exclude all aspects of agriculture from the proposed trade deal with the US in order to safeguard Indian farmers' interests. The ICCFM highlighted the risks to Indian farmers, stating that the US government is one of the world's largest providers of agricultural subsidies. The 2024 US Farm Bill has allocated a staggering $1.5 trillion towards farm support. Such extensive subsidies not only restrict agricultural imports into the US but also allow American products to enter export markets at artificially low prices, the farmers' group said. Permitting heavily subsidised US imports into India, the ICCFM argued, would undermine India's longstanding position at the World Trade Organization (WTO) against such subsidies. Ravi Dutta Mishra is a Principal Correspondent with The Indian Express, covering policy issues related to trade, commerce, and banking. He has over five years of experience and has previously worked with Mint, CNBC-TV18, and other news outlets. ... Read More

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store