
US bans China from buying farmland
Brooke Rollins, the head of the department of agriculture, announced on Tuesday that the US government plans to prohibit sales of farmland across the country to buyers from China and other adversaries to protect US food security.
Speaking at a joint press conference alongside Pete Hegseth, the defence secretary, and Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary, she also announced the administration is looking at clawing back land purchased by entities from China, Russia and Iran.
'American agriculture is not just about feeding our families, but about protecting our nation and standing up to foreign adversaries who are buying our farmland, stealing our research, and creating dangerous vulnerabilities in the very systems that sustain us,' Ms Rollins said.
Chinese investors currently hold around 280,000 acres of US farmland, according to USDA data, equating to around 0.03 per cent of total agricultural land.
Around half of this is tied to a single company, Smithfield Foods, a meat giant which has come under fire from lawmakers because of its Chinese owners.
Smithfield is owned by WH Group, a conglomerate owned by billionaire Wang Long.
Company chiefs push back
The US chiefs of Smithfield and Syngenta, a pesticide supplier, have pushed back against criticism, saying overseas investment has helped create jobs.
Mr Hegseth said that foreign adversaries buying farmland close to military bases was a particular cause for concern, adding that blocking these sales would help ensure supplies reach soldiers, 'especially in a contingency'.
'No longer can foreign adversaries assume we aren't watching,' he said.
State lawmakers have long warned that China could use US farmland to facilitate espionage or threaten US food security.
Scrutiny has stepped up in recent years following a controversial 2022 land deal in North Dakota, where Chinese-owned Fufeng Group bought hundreds of acres for a corn mill around 12 miles from Grand Forks Air Force base.
The purchase was ultimately blocked by local officials, who cited national security concerns.
The case drew attention to a loophole in foreign investment rules that allowed foreign adversaries to buy land near military facilities not formally listed as sensitive sites.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
24 minutes ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - China treads a fine line with its trade warning
HONG KONG, July 10 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Beijing faces some tough choices when it comes to hitting back at Donald Trump's trade deals. The People's Republic has vowed to retaliate against nations that heed the U.S. president's desire to cut the world's second-largest economy out of supply chains. Yet wielding a stick at its Asian trading partners could backfire, and Beijing may find offering them carrots hard to reconcile with its other strategic priorities. China fears a "grand encirclement" which U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent describes, opens new tab as Washington striking deals with allies to isolate China. Yet this is becoming a reality. Earlier this month, Trump said he'd struck a deal with Vietnam to impose 20% levies on its U.S. exports alongside a tariff twice that level for trans-shipments from third countries through the country. It bodes ill for Chinese manufacturers that ship goods or parts to the Southeast Asian nation. It is risky, though, for Beijing to respond aggressively to Vietnam and other Southeast Asian countries that follow this tariff template. In 2020, China imposed a raft of restrictions on exports from Australia after a diplomatic spat, only to see the country ship its wine, beef and lobsters to new markets and lessen the economy's trade dependence on China. A safer option may be to offer more incentives. Last month, for instance, China said it will remove all tariffs on African exports. If Beijing also drops tariffs for Southeast Asia, that would be mostly symbolic given up to 90% of trade between the two partners is already tariff-free. But it could force Washington to change its approach: After meeting with the leaders of five African countries on Wednesday, Trump suggested they could be exempt, opens new tab from heightened U.S. reciprocal tariffs, adding"we treat Africa far better than China or anybody else". China also could sweeten any proposal to its trading partners with infrastructure investments. At the sideline of the BRICS summit this week, Vietnamese officials called on its larger neighbour to prioritise railway cooperation, including projects like an $8.3 billion cross-border railroad. How much Beijing can ultimately offer will depend on how much technology it is willing to transfer and the financial terms it seeks on investments. On both fronts there are signs that China is turning wary. In the meantime, countries caught between the two big economics powers may be more demanding. That ensures any retaliation for China will be a fraught exercise.


Reuters
39 minutes ago
- Reuters
China automakers' price war, overcapacity hurt finances
July 3 (Reuters) - China's auto sector is reeling from overcapacity and an extended price war, raising alarm among regulators and industry executives who warn the turmoil is undermining the sector's long-term viability. China's top leaders have pledged to step up regulation of aggressive price-cutting and support the orderly phasing out of outdated production capacity, state media reported earlier this month. LSEG data for 33 listed automakers headquartered in China show a broad deterioration in key financial metrics over the past six years, highlighting the impact of a brutal price war that began in 2023. Data showed that the average time carmakers took to pay their suppliers and other short-term creditors widened to 108 days in 2024 from 99 days in 2019. On June 1, new regulation kicked in, requiring large companies to settle payments within 60 days of receiving goods, engineering services or materials. Joerg Wuttke, Washington-based partner at DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group, said that European and German suppliers generally paid suppliers within 40 to 50 days. "That (new regulation) is going to enforce a more level playing field and basically stop these automakers from turning their suppliers into bankers," he said. Among major brands, top electric vehicle seller BYD ( opens new tab took an average of 127 days to pay suppliers and other short-term creditors in 2024, up from 81 days in 2019, the LSEG data showed. When asked about the data, BYD said its average payment period to suppliers that covered both accounts payable and notes payable dropped to 127 days by 2024 from 139 days in 2019. Geely Automobile's ( opens new tab payment period also rose to 193 days in 2024 from 139 days in 2019, according to LSEG data. Geely declined to comment. Bucking the trend, Great Wall Motor Co ( opens new tab shortened its payment cycle to 94 days in 2024 from 115 days in 2019. The company did not respond to a Reuters request for comment. The sector's combined inventory levels more than doubled to 370 billion yuan ($51.55 billion) in 2024 from 2019, even as dealers complained of many firms dumping cars on them to meet high sales targets. Total debt among carmakers surged 56% to 959 billion yuan last year from 2019's level. The median debt-to-equity ratio climbed by 21 percentage points to 51.3%. The sector's median net profit margin fell to just 0.83% in 2024 from 2.7% in 2019. BYD, however, boosted its profit margin to 5.4% from 1.7% in 2019. The company, which makes cars and mobile phone components, attributed the improvement to a change in its business mix as the contribution of automotive-related revenue as a share of total revenue grew from 49.5% to 79.4% over the period. Nio Inc and Xpeng Inc , two of China's best-known EV brands, had among the longest payment periods among the 33 firms. The two companies stretched their payment periods to suppliers and other short-term creditors to 223 days and 237 days, respectively. Both companies continued to remain in the red, although both improved their negative margins sharply over the period. Nio said it would commit to paying suppliers within 60 days. Xpeng said its cash liquidity continued to improve and referred to comments its CEO He Xiaopeng made last Thursday at a media event that the company would also, like other firms, endeavour to meet a commitment to pay suppliers within 60 days as soon as possible. ($1 = 7.1769 Chinese yuan renminbi)


Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Courting Trump: Why African nations want to win over the White House
👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈 After an evening briefing on the latest attempt to broker an Israel-Hamas ceasefire in Gaza, will Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's visit to Washington bear fruit in the search for peace in the region? Wednesday also saw five leaders from African states visit the White House, where they became the latest to lavish the US president with praise in the hope of gaining his favour, and a path to avoiding his trade tariffs. Is this the new status quo in interacting with Trump's America? And - why is one of Donald Trump's cabinet members under fire for saying that there is no Jeffrey Epstein 'client list'? If you've got a question you'd like the Trump100 team to answer, you can email it to trump100@ You can also watch all episodes on our YouTube channel