
Tuesday briefing: The story behind the Edinburgh University ‘skull room' – and a reckoning over its history
Today's newsletter takes you behind a series of locked doors at the University of Edinburgh's Anatomical museum. The 'skull room' is at the end of a long corridor, rarely visited by anyone outside the university – and inside it are mahogany-framed glass cabinets containing appropriately 1,500 human skulls, some with peeling labels and catalogue numbers, others bare.
Hundreds of these were shipped to Scotland by supporters of 'phrenology', the belief that you can calculate someone's intelligence and character by looking at the shape of their skull.
Spoiler alert: it was all nonsense. But back in the 18th century it carried weight. Generations of Edinburgh alumni dispersed across the British empire with beliefs about racial superiority encapsulated by the collections in this room. These skulls tell a story about the role played by one of the UK's oldest and most respected universities in creating and perpetuating ideas about white superiority from the late 1700s on.
That is what prompted the university to commission the most extensive review by any UK university into its connections with transatlantic slavery and empire. For today's newsletter, I spoke to the Guardian's Scotland editor, Severin Carrell, on what has been found in this landmark inquiry and what the university is going to do about it. That's after the headlines.
Israel | Two leading human rights organisations based in Israel, B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights, say Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, and Israel's western allies have a legal and moral duty to stop it. Donald Trump has told Israel to allow 'every ounce of food' into Gaza as he acknowledged for the first time that there is 'real starvation' in the region.
Politics | The US president heaped praise on Keir Starmer as the two met in Scotland, but in a domestic intervention that will not have been appreciated by the British PM, Trump urged him to cut taxes and tackle illegal immigration to win the next election.
Economy | The French prime minister, François Bayrou, said the EU had capitulated to Donald Trump's threats of ever-increasing tariffs, as he labelled the framework deal struck in Scotland on Sunday as a 'dark day, when an alliance of free peoples, brought together to affirm their common values and to defend their common interests, resigns itself to submission'.
Labour | Angela Rayner has hit back at anonymous No 10 officials who have briefed against senior cabinet ministers in recent months, warning them they are committing 'self-harm'.
Cost of living | Food prices rose by 4% in July from a year earlier, up from 3.7% in June and above the three-month average of 3.5% according to the latest snapshot from the British Retail Consortium (BRC). The rising cost of staples like meat and butter – which have both increased by over 15% – has been blamed for large retailers struggling to entice shoppers back to the high street.
In recent years there had been debate from within the university about its role in slavery. 'Working in Scotland for the Guardian for the past 19 years, I have been watching and following stories about Scotland's entanglements with transatlantic slavery and empire,' says Severin.
In 2018 the University of Glasgow became the first UK institution to critically examine its role with transatlantic enslavement. That triggered other institutions – including the Church of England and the National Trust – to look into this issue. The Black Lives Matter protests in 2020 turbocharged these conversations. The Guardian has also done its own investigations into its founders' complicity with the slave trade in the Cotton Capital series.
The Edinburgh review, though, is the most extensive investigation of its kind carried out by any university in the UK. The inquiry examined its own academics' conduct at the time, and also did investigations into the university's current demographics and its underrepresentation of Black professors and students. This included having two research fellows spend months going through archives, reading reams of lecture notes from the 1700s. 'Now that is a substantial advance on what other UK universities have done so far,' says Severin.
It's likely that other universities might find similar material in their archives, says Severin. 'One of the interesting arguments that's levelled about Edinburgh is that, in its day – in the late 1700s early 1800s – it was one of the most significant and important academic institutions in Europe and possibly the world. The Edinburgh medical school was one of the world's first, so it had a disproportionate impact on the teaching of medicine, and also what the doctors it then taught were doing when they went out to work in the British colonies or immersed themselves in the plantation economies of the Americas.'
What do we know about the skulls?
The University of Edinburgh skull room was part of the former anatomy museum built in the 1880s (the museum is still there, just smaller). It was open to the public and was where the university could showcase its research. The skulls were obtained through networks linked to the British empire and the Edinburgh Phrenological Society. Many heads were taken without consent from prisons, asylums, hospitals, archaeological sites and battlefields. In the 19th century scientists were intent on classifying the natural world into taxonomic categories. Typically, non-white populations were depicted as inherently inferior (a convenient truth for those promoting colonialism).
Some of Edinburgh's most celebrated intellectuals argued that different human races were so distinct that they ought to be considered separate species. Despite the fact that phrenology was never formally taught at Edinburgh (it was criticised by some for its unscientific approach) the skull room was built to house these collections. Modern genetics has since shattered the idea that there are biologically distinct racialised groups – although this piece by Hannah Devlin shows there is a resurgence in interest about theories of racial exceptionalism.
Once a source of pride, these heads are now a source of shame to the university. The skull room has been preserved in situ, but 'it's not accessible to the public and is rarely visited by anybody outside the university', explains Severin, who described coming face-to-face with the skulls as 'quite unsettling and sobering'.
More than 100 of these skulls have already been repatriated, with plans for many more to be returned. In 2023 the remains of four tribal warriors were returned to Taiwan. Many of the skulls will never be identified and their provenance is likely to remain unknown. 'The university now regards this as a place which needs to be protected and looked after with respect and decorum. It's not a place they want people ogling,' says Severin.
What has the inquiry found?
The inquiry found that Edinburgh became a 'haven' for professors who developed theories of white supremacy in the 18th and 19th centuries. These individuals played an important role in the creation of discredited 'racial pseudo-sciences' that placed Africans and their descendants at the bottom of a racial hierarchy.
Hundreds of graduates went on to make fortunes from the transatlantic slave trade or generally profiting from the empire. They served as doctors on slave ships, administrators, lawyers to enslavers, merchants, plantation owners, or were slavers themselves.
The university raised the equivalent of at least £30m today from former students and donors with links to slavery or colonial wealth building, the report found. That £30m can, however, be interpreted in different ways: it can be argued it should be seen as the higher figure of £202m based on the growth of wages since they were received, and as much as £845m based on economic growth since then.
The report's authors have said their findings show a darker side to the Scottish Enlightenment in the 18th and 19th centuries during which time the university became famous for the work of celebrated individuals such as the economist Adam Smith and the philosopher David Hume. Sir Peter Mathieson, the university's principal, who commissioned the investigation, said Edinburgh could not have a 'selective memory'.
Severin says: 'It's crucial that we understand our history accurately and are candid about what our country's societies, economies, history has involved in the past, and denying the bad things is not an intelligent way of grappling with our inheritance.'
Demands to decolonise the curriculum
One of the academics leading the university's inquiry is Tommy J Curry, who is the first Black philosophy professor in the university's 442-year history. The point is not to simply produce a report but to act, he said. Fewer than 1% of its staff and just over 2% of its students are Black, well below the 4% of the UK population, and despite Edinburgh's status as a global institution.
The university will set up a new race review implementation group, which will actively support the review's call for Edinburgh to establish a centre for the study of racism, colonialism and anti-Black violence. Reparations are a key part of recommendations. 'Academics argue it's not about cutting a cheque, it's about making substantive change which addresses all of the damage and violations from our past, and making sure that we repair the harms,' says Severin.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
She'd be too modest to recommend it herself, but just before joining First Edition, in her day job as a biodiversity reporter Phoebe Weston put together this stunning feature explaining in excruciating detail what microplastics do to our world, our wildlife … and our bodies. Charlie Lindlar, newsletters deputy editor
Nesrine Malik wrote powerfully about children starving in Gaza (illustrated above). 'Every single one of these deaths, and those that will come, is preventable,' she writes. An aid worker overheard children telling their parents that they want to die and go to heaven, because 'at least heaven has food'. Phoebe
The EU has 'capitulated' to Trump with its new trade deal, writes academic Paul Taylor in his breakdown. Worse? The 'humiliation' Ursula Von der Leyen and company have put the continent through doesn't even put a permanent end to its economic problems with the US. Charlie
Sympathies to Samuel Rowe who returned home from his allotment in Manchester with a trug of vegetables only to be arrested by armed police. Within a canvas sheath he had a Niwaki Hori Hori gardening trowel that aroused particular suspicion. 'That's not a garden tool,' the officer said as he pulled it out. Phoebe
Our film team's series on feelgood movies by design yields all sorts of surprising picks, but perhaps few quite so terrifying yet touching as James Cameron's genre-defining Aliens. Emily Steer writes thoughtfully on how the film's body horror and take on motherhood provided a release during 'an IVF crisis'. Charlie
Football | Chloe Kelly and Hannah Hampton (pictured above) are expected to be awarded MBEs with England's Lionesses set to be lavished with nominations in the new year honours list after their historic European Championship victory.
Cycling | Demi Vollering's hopes of continuing in the Tour de France Femmes were uncertain after she crashed at speed on the approach to the finish of stage three in Angers. Vollering landed on her back and left side, and hit her head, but was able to remount and finish the stage, which was won by Lorena Wiebes of Team SD Worx-ProTime.
Cricket | Jamie Overton has returned to England's squad for the final Test against India, which starts at the Oval on Thursday, to provide cover should the seamers who toiled through the drawn fourth fixture fail to recover in time.
'Trump urges Israel to let food aid into Gaza to tackle 'real starvation'' says the Guardian while the i paper has 'You can't fake that starvation: Trump and UK send new Gaza warning to Israel'. The Financial Times leads with 'EU markets reel as bloc's big nation cast doubt on Washington trade deal'. The Mail says 'Trump tells Starmer how to see off Farage' and the Express splashes on 'Trump's 'pretty simple' advice for PM' – that advice being 'Cut tax to beat Farage', the Times shares. Similarly the Telegraph says 'Trump: Cut taxes and stop the boats'. 'It's come home again!' – the Metro continues to celebrate the Euros win. 'For my brother' – the Mirror reports on the posthumous graduation ceremony that awarded honorary degrees to Nottingham stabbing victims Barnaby Webber and Grace O'Malley-Kumar.
Protests against Zelenskyy as drones torment Ukraine
Luke Harding talks to people in Kyiv protesting against the Ukrainian president's recent changes to the country's anti-corruption bodies, and analyses where the war against Russia is heading next
A bit of good news to remind you that the world's not all bad
Three months ago, the Guardian's Arifa Akbar set out to kick that most modern of vices: her coffee habit. For our series The one change that worked, she writes about how she finally got off it … sort of.
'Three months ago, I decided, emphatically, not to kick the habit but to enjoy a single daily dose,' she writes. 'This was initially born out of necessity: I went to a retreat where we were limited to a single cup of freshly ground coffee a day, at a time of our choosing, and I took great pains over deciding when I'd have mine, and where. Then I savoured it, desperate to make its effects last.
'Strangely, when I got back home, I stuck to that single cup.' Why? Read on for more.
Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday
And finally, the Guardian's puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow.
Quick crossword
Cryptic crossword
Wordiply
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why Robert Jenrick wants Law Society to withdraw its ‘race and ethnicity' guidance
Robert Jenrick has demanded the Law Society withdraw new guidance that he claimed 'seeks to divide people on the basis of race and ethnicity'. The shadow justice secretary has written to the body, which represents solicitors across England and Wales, complaining about new advice aimed at promoting the use of inclusive language by legal professionals. The guidance says that racial categorisation is based in white supremacy, and 'was developed as an attempt to prove biological superiority and maintain dominance over others'. Mr Jenrick said these were 'dangerous ideas' and that society should be 'colour-blind and merit-based'. He claimed the guidance runs contrary to 'the principle of equal treatment' and 'seeks to divide people on the basis of race and ethnicity'. 'It is unacceptable for the Law Society to promote this kind of ideology, particularly as other legal bodies back away from these ideas,' Mr Jenrick said in a letter to Law Society president Richard Atkinson. 'I urge you to withdraw this guidance immediately.' The Law Society has been contacted for comment. It comes after a row over new guidance directing judges to consider the lives of offenders from ethnic minority and other backgrounds before sentencing. Opponents claimed the changes could lead to a 'two-tier justice system' in which people from minority groups are treated more leniently. The guidance, which the Sentencing Council argued would ensure courts had comprehensive information to decide on an appropriate punishment, was later abandoned after ministers tabled legislation to override it. The Law Society's guide is separate, and its stated intention is to help solicitors 'be more inclusive with the language we use'.


The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Police chief hits back after accusations of ‘cover-up' regarding rape suspects
Police have denied a 'cover up' after a Reform UK councillor accused the force of withholding information following the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl. Warwickshire Police's chief constable, Alex Franklin-Smith, has asked the Home Office to confirm the full immigration status of Ahmad Mulakhil and Mohammad Kabir, who have been charged in connection with the offence. It comes after Reform UK's leader Nigel Farage and Warwickshire County Council leader George Finch claimed there had been a 'cover up' after police charged the two men, who are Afghan asylum seekers. In a letter to the Home Secretary and Warwickshire Police's chief constable, Mr Finch, the youngest council leader in the country, claimed that not publicising the pair's immigration status 'risks public disorder breaking out on the streets of Warwickshire'. Responding to Mr Finch, Mr Franklin-Smith wrote that the force 'did not and will not' cover up alleged criminality. 'I am confident that Warwickshire Police has treated this investigation seriously from the outset working tirelessly to identify, locate, arrest and charge those suspected of being responsible for this awful crime as quickly as possible.' Of the suspects, he wrote: 'The immigration status of Ahmad Mulakhil and Mohammad Kabir is now public knowledge, having been placed into the public domain by yourself. 'In light of that, I have asked the Home Office to confirm the full immigration status of Ahmad Mulakhil and Mohammad Kabir as per the information we shared with the Crown Prosecution Service and the courts as part of this case.' Of a conversation he and Mr Finch had on July 31, Mr Franklin-Smith wrote: 'You informed me you had already received a confidential briefing from your chief executive and that you knew the person charged was an asylum seeker. 'I confirmed this was accurate and we wouldn't be releasing immigration status at point of charge as we follow national guidance. 'I explained the information would become public knowledge as part of the court process and that all partners must ensure we are prepared to manage any potential protest and/or disorder at that stage. 'I explained we had a police gold commander leading the overall response to this case and that the communications plan agreed by them followed consultation with the Crown Prosecution Service. 'I also explained we had briefed the Home Office. 'To be clear, I cannot tell elected individuals what to do.' Following the reported attack in Nuneaton, Mulakhil, 23, was arrested on July 26 and charged the next day with rape, according to police. Mulakhil appeared at Coventry Magistrates' Court last Monday and has been remanded in custody. Kabir, 23, was arrested in Nuneaton on Thursday and charged with kidnap, strangulation and aiding and abetting rape of a girl under 13, the force added. Kabir appeared at Coventry Magistrates' Court on Saturday and has been remanded in custody. The issue of how much information is revealed by police regarding suspects has been the subject of fierce debate following a string of high-profile cases including the Southport killings last year. On Tuesday, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said 'we do think more transparency is needed' in the information given by police and that 'guidance needs to change'. In a statement released on Tuesday evening, a Home Office spokesperson said: 'As the Home Secretary said this morning, it has been widely reported that this case involves two Afghan individuals who are in the asylum system, some of which information has already been confirmed in open court. 'The Home Secretary has made clear that there is a strong public interest in maximum transparency wherever that is possible. 'That is why the Home Office and College of Policing are working together to strengthen and clarify the guidance around how and when information is released.' Warwickshire Police previously said they do not believe anyone else was involved in the reported rape but are continuing to appeal for witnesses who may have information that could assist inquiries.


Telegraph
5 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour faces questions over £30,000 ‘cash for access'
A Labour group is facing questions over 'cash for access' after offering businesses private meetings with 'an influential Labour figure' in return for thousands of pounds, it has been reported. The Labour Infrastructure Forum (LIF), which is run by lobbyists and has an advisory council of senior party figures, has reportedly been offering sponsorship packages to businesses since it launched last summer. Companies are said to have been approached and offered the chance to sponsor events at which they can meet 'key policymakers' in private and ' shape the discussion '. Deals on offer have included £7,850 plus VAT for a 'private breakfast/dinner roundtable with an influential Labour figure', £11,750 plus VAT for a 'parliamentary panel event with key policymakers', and between £21,500 and £30,000 plus VAT to sponsor a 'Westminster drinks reception', according to The Times. LIF describes itself as a think tank on its website and said its mission was to develop policy proposals focused on 'getting Britain building and growing again'. The group was launched in September at an event that featured speeches from Darren Jones, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, and Varun Chandra, a business and investment adviser to Sir Keir Starmer. Its advisory council includes three Labour MPs – Mike Reader, Kirsteen Sullivan, and Bill Esterson – alongside Ruth Kelly, a former transport secretary, and Lord McNicol of West Kilbride, who served as general secretary of the Labour Party from 2011 to 2018. Baroness Blake of Leeds, a government whip in the House of Lords, was also involved in the group until several months ago. According to The Times, the group is not a lobbying company or part of the Labour Party, meaning it does not have to abide by rules for lobbying firms or political parties. It also has no legal obligation to publicly disclose details of payments it has received from sponsors, or of who has attended its private events. It also does not have to register with the lobbying watchdog, the Office of the Registrar of Consultant Lobbyists (ORCL). Gerry McFall, the group's director, is also the director of the lobbying firm Bradshaw Advisory, which is said to have a strong relationship with government figures. He reportedly told undercover reporters that one of the firm's clients had been able to have a meeting with Jonathan Reynolds, the Business Secretary, at last year's Labour Party conference. However, the LIF claimed it had told the undercover reporters it does not engage in consultant lobbying activity. An LIF spokesman said: 'LIF is a think tank, does not engage in consultant lobbying and does not have clients, and is therefore not required by law to register with the ORCL. This is clear on LIF's website and in any communications or contractual arrangements with potential sponsors. 'Like all think tanks, LIF seeks sponsorship to operate and cover costs, and does so on a case-by-case basis. 'LIF does not endorse any of its sponsors' products or services. LIF's policy work is entirely editorially independent from any sponsorship and solely expresses the views of LIF's executive.' The Times also reported that the Labour Party's events team offered lobbyists the chance to pay £15,000 plus VAT to partner with the party for winter receptions at which their staff could meet MPs. Officials reportedly emailed the companies saying any payments would not have to be publicised as they were a 'commercial transaction' rather than a 'gift to the party' and so was 'not a recordable donation'. A Labour Party spokesman said: 'Commercial partnerships at events are a longstanding practice and have no bearing on party or government policy. The party fully complies with all rules relating to the reporting of donations.'