Beyond training, Singapore's legal industry needs a culture shift to curb attrition: Opinion
Source: Business Times
Article Date: 28 May 2025
Author: Tessa Oh
A post-call survey found that 60% of new lawyers are likely to move out of legal practice within the next five years.
As high attrition rates among young lawyers raise concern, a new structured training initiative seeks to curb the outflow of talent, among various aims.
The Junior Lawyers Professional Certification Programme (JLP) by the Singapore Academy of Law (SAL) aims to help young lawyers stay ahead of the artificial intelligence (AI) curve, while also strengthening basic legal skills.
Launched on May 21, the programme targets lawyers with up to five years of post-qualification experience.
Yet, as SAL chief executive Yeong Zee Kin told The Business Times in an interview, the JLP focuses on skills and knowledge acquisition, while many young lawyers cite the demanding nature of legal practice as reason for leaving the industry.
Said Yeong: 'The JLP can address one aspect, which is training, and hopefully also a nurturing environment in the office that supports training...
'But it won't address the workplace pressures, because clients are in competitive global markets and (local law firms) need to compete with foreign law firms for the same kind of work.'
Some in this cohort have expressed disappointment via social media. Their beef is that the programme focuses on technical skills, and not solutions to address such workplace pressures.
Excessive workload, poor work-life balance and negative work culture were reasons cited by young lawyers for leaving legal practice, according to a survey of post-call lawyers this year.
It found that 60 per cent of respondents were likely to move out of legal practice within the next five years, to pursue an in-house career, academia or employment with other legal service providers.
Slightly more than a third of the new lawyers said they are likely to leave the legal profession altogether.
The reasons for such departures are cultural factors which training cannot address.
Disruption
To be sure, there is no denying that generative AI will disrupt the legal industry, and lawyers must prepare for that.
As Yeong explained, the widespread accessibility of AI tools like ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot means that clients can easily generate basic contracts and seek advice on legal strategies.
A programme that informs lawyers of the developments and ethics of AI is thus necessary and important.
Further, lawyers in smaller firms – which may have fewer resources for training – can also benefit from a structured programme that hones basic advocacy and drafting skills.
One must also acknowledge that the legal industry is a challenging one.
Singapore law firms face an increasingly competitive global market, and are up against international firms with significant resources.
As a service industry, firms also face rising expectations from clients for better, faster and cheaper solutions.
But training alone is not enough to incentivise young lawyers to stick it out in legal practice, if the more pressing push factors are not addressed.
To meaningfully address attrition, the legal industry must make headway in addressing the cultural and environmental reasons pushing young lawyers away.
In the long run, law firms will not be able to compete if they lack a healthy pool of new talent to refresh their ranks. It is thus in their interest to address these issues, as a dwindling workforce will hit them hardest.
For instance, young lawyers have called for better protection against bullying and exploitation.
Hence, it is a good start to see the SAL convening a legal profession symposium in July to discuss some of these issues.
Spearheading change
Still, to be fair to the SAL, as a promotion and development agency, it cannot prescribe how law firms develop and mentor their associates. It is for the senior lawyers to lead the change in the culture at their firms.
As Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon said at the JLP opening conference, any solution to address the sustainability of legal practice is unlikely to be effective unless the mindsets of both young and older lawyers change.
On one hand, young lawyers must appreciate that a legal career is demanding and requires long-term commitment.
Meanwhile, senior lawyers 'have a duty and a responsibility to impart their knowledge and experience to their juniors'.
The Chief Justice added: 'Indeed, much of a young lawyer's development comes through mentors and seniors who maintain a personal interest in their welfare, and who invest the time and the effort to guide and support them in their work.'
In this regard, in addition to catering programmes for young associates, there can be initiatives to engage older lawyers on these issues and on how to cultivate better workplace practices.
After all, if the legal fraternity is serious about keeping young lawyers from leaving the profession, then it is key for the law firms and their leaders to lead the cultural change.
Source: The Business Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Artificial intelligence rules to go ahead, no pause, EU Commission says
BRUSSELS :The European Union's landmark rules on artificial intelligence will be implemented according to the timeline agreed by legislators and EU countries, the European Commission said on Friday, dismissing suggestions and pressure from some companies and several EU countries for a temporary pause. "I've seen, indeed, a lot of reporting, a lot of letters and a lot of things being said on the AI act. Let me be as clear as possible, there is no stop the clock. There is no grace period. There is no pause," Commission spokesperson Thomas Regnier told a press conference. "We have legal deadlines established in a legal text. The provisions kicked in February, general purpose AI model obligations will begin in August, and next year, we have the obligations for high risk models that will kick in in August, 2026," he said.
Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
ChatGPT's mental health costs are adding up
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox From brain rot to induced psychosis, the psychological cost of generative AI is growing and flying under the radar. The private and personalized nature of AI use makes its mental health impact difficult to track, but the evidence of potential harms is mounting Something troubling is happening to our brains as artificial intelligence platforms become more popular. Studies are showing that professional workers who use ChatGPT to carry out tasks might lose critical thinking skills and motivation. People are forming strong emotional bonds with chatbots, sometimes exacerbating feelings of loneliness. And others are having psychotic episodes after talking to chatbots for hours each day.
Business Times
13 hours ago
- Business Times
Why I'm afraid to commit to a full-time job as a Gen Z Singaporean in the age of AI
AS A 20-something in Singapore, I often hear older generations talk about job security, retirement savings or climbing the corporate ladder. But for many in my generation, those ideas feel increasingly outdated – if not completely out of reach. I'll admit it: I'm afraid to commit to a traditional full-time job. Not because I lack ambition. Not because I'm lazy. But because I genuinely don't know if the job I train for today will even exist five years from now. A recent article in The Business Times, 'Rethinking AI skilling: From awareness to practical adoption', rightly points out that companies are rapidly investing in artificial intelligence (AI). Tools like ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot and other enterprise-grade platforms are now embedded in workflows. McKinsey's report that 92 per cent of companies will increase their AI investment over the next three years says everything: the AI wave is no longer on the horizon – it's here. While businesses talk about upskilling employees to 'work with AI', the reality for many of us entering the workforce is this: we're not just learning to work with AI. We're quietly trying to figure out how not to be replaced by it. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 3 pm Thrive Money, career and life hacks to help young adults stay ahead of the curve. Sign Up Sign Up Take marketing, my field of study. I've used generative AI tools like ChatGPT for copywriting, Invideo AI for automated video creation, and even niche GPTs like Excel AI to process and sort information. These tools are fast, scalable and increasingly accessible. But they also raise uncomfortable questions: If AI can write, design and even strategise at scale, where does my human value lie? Is it worth specialising in something today if AI could automate it tomorrow? Should I take a full-time job when the skills I'm hired for may be obsolete before I get promoted? These are not theoretical concerns – they're daily mental roadblocks. Instead, many of my peers are exploring alternative routes: building portfolio careers, freelancing across domains and constantly picking up short-term micro-skills to stay adaptable. But this agility comes with its own cost: instability, burnout and the fear of never becoming truly 'expert' at anything. AI has undeniably unlocked opportunities. But for young professionals, it has also introduced an undercurrent of quiet anxiety. We need not just skilling pathways, but also realistic conversations about what long-term employability looks like, in an age where technology evolves faster than training programmes can keep up. Until we bridge that gap, don't be surprised if more Gen Zs like myself hesitate to sign on to the traditional 9-to-6 contract – not out of disinterest, but out of deep uncertainty. Amos Lau
