ActionSA prepares for court battle against eThekwini Municipality over sewage crisis
Image: Tumi Pakkies Independent Newspapers
The legal battle between ActionSA and the eThekwini Municipality over the municipality's failure to address sewage pollution is set to commence at the Durban High Court next week.
The case will be heard on July 24 and 25.
ActionSA said it was pleased that the matter is finally before the courts and was looking forward to the opportunity to fight this long-overdue battle on behalf of all residents of eThekwini.
In a statement, the party said, 'Following long-term failures to resolve its sewage crisis, ActionSA filed papers in 2022 against eThekwini Municipality, citing violations of the constitutionally enshrined rights of eThekwini residents to a safe and clean environment and their right to economic development."
ActionSA said the sewage crisis has profoundly impacted the city, leading to the frequent closure of beaches due to high E. coli levels, the pollution of water systems, and communities suffering the indignity of sewage overflows.
The impact on the domestic economy has been devastating, with annual tourist visits to eThekwini dropping from 15 million in 2015 to less than 800,000 in 2023, the party said.
ActionSA's legal action seeks to have the court declare the failures of the eThekwini Municipality unconstitutional and to compel the municipality to produce a turnaround plan for the crisis, which will be made a time-bound order of court.
If ActionSA is successful, the party stated, either the sewage crisis will be resolved, or senior eThekwini Municipality officials will face jail time for contempt of court if they deviate from the court-ordered turnaround plan.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The party explained that in 2024, the Democratic Alliance filed similar papers in the Pietermaritzburg High Court. However the court had decided to join DA's legal action to ActionSA's case.
'It is clear from the past few years that the eThekwini Municipality has not resolved this issue and is indifferent to the constitutional violations of the rights of its residents.
'ActionSA has committed itself to focus on this kind of work to demonstrate its commitment to reversing the collapse of the basic service delivery infrastructure in many municipalities across South Africa. This case is a vital demonstration of our long-term commitment to this principle and the residents of eThekwini,' said the statement.
THE MERCURY
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
a day ago
- Daily Maverick
ARTsolar throws in towel in ‘gagging' case against ‘whistle-blowers' and journalist
The solar panel company had wanted to stop three 'whistle-blowers' and a journalist from reporting that it was importing and not locally manufacturing its solar panels. Solar panel manufacturer ARTsolar has thrown in the towel in its controversial battle against three 'whistle-blowers' and a journalist. The company had successfully gagged them by court order from making or reporting on 'defamatory' allegations that ARTsolar was importing and not locally manufacturing its solar panels. The interim gagging order was granted in March by Durban High Court acting Judge Perlene Bramdhew against businessman Brett Latimer, two former employees of ARTsolar and journalist Bongani Hans. The date to determine whether the order should be confirmed or discharged was set for 29 July. But this week, ARTsolar withdrew the application and tendered to pay the costs of Latimer, Hans and former employees Kandace Singh and Shalendra Hansraj. It also tendered to pay the costs of the Industrial Development Corporation, which entered the legal fray because it had provided R90-million funding to ARTsolar to set up its 'proudly South African' factory in New Germany. The IDC wanted to interview Latimer about his claims. The initial court order specifically barred Latimer from communicating with the IDC. The IDC launched its own urgent court application, successfully arguing that it should have been joined in the proceedings, and that the order was stifling an investigation into the matter on the instruction of Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition Parks Tau. The order was amended to exclude reference to the IDC. The shift in ARTsolar's stance came after it appointed new attorneys last month. Mohamed Mota, partner at Cox Yeats, confirmed the withdrawal. He said his client had no comment 'at this stage'. Media freedom Because the case had implications for freedom of expression, the amaBhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism had applied to be admitted as an amicus curiae. Managing partner Sam Sole said the withdrawal was a 'bittersweet victory'. 'The facts of the case make it clear the order should never have been granted and amaBhungane was looking forward to urging the court to give decisive direction to other presiding officers about the very narrow and limited circumstances which could justify such pre-publication censorship,' he said. 'We had also intended to remind the court that an effective press is a 'public sentinel' and is a conduit for the public's right to receive and impart information, meaning curbs on the media effectively limit the rights of the general public. 'This places a duty on the courts to be exceptionally vigilant in ensuring adherence to the legal safeguards of press freedom, especially where the public have no voice in the proceedings – as in this case, where the media house did not initially come to court.' Sole said there were various reasons that a journalist may fail to effectively oppose such an application, especially an extremely urgent one, such as a lack of timely access to adequate (or any) legal representation. 'We hope the publicity engendered by this case will discourage other parties from running to court and will also encourage presiding officers to exercise due care and caution when faced with similar cases,' Sole said. ARTsolar's urgent application was sparked by Hans sending questions, based on Latimer's allegations, to the company. Latimer, a former client of ARTsolar, alleged that he had been duped into believing that the panels were locally manufactured when they were in fact imported from China. He was backed up by Singh and Hansraj, who previously worked for the company. On the back of the gagging order, Latimer obtained a subpoena against Turners Shipping and, in a supplementary affidavit, he said the shipping documents (bills of lading) showed that the company imported 99% of its panels. Latimer's attorney MS Omar said: 'The interim gagging order was a drastic and draconian violation of my client's fundamental rights of freedom of expression as enshrined in section 16 of the Constitution. The overbroad interim order plainly prohibits permissible statements, based on truth and public interest, and failed to take account of the high threshold for a defamation interdict.' The application will be formally withdrawn in court on 29 July. DM
Mail & Guardian
2 days ago
- Mail & Guardian
MPs recommend an ad hoc parliament committee to investigate Mkhwanazi's allegations
KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. Parliament's justice and police committees have recommended the formation of an ad hoc committee to consider allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Lieutenant-General During a joint sitting on Wednesday, committee members agreed that this was the most appropriate mechanism to consider Mkhwanazi's allegations that Mchunu pressured him to disband a unit investigating organised crime in KwaZulu-Natal. ActionSA MP 'This work must be wrapped up before the end of the year,' he said. National Assembly speaker Thoko Didiza had tasked the committees with determining how to handle Mkhwanazi's allegations earlier this month that political interference in police operations led to direct instructions to shut down investigations into high-level criminal activity in KwaZulu-Natal. Last year, Mkhwanzi told the Mail & Guardian that political interference remained one of the During Wednesday's joint sitting of the committees, parliament's legal team warned MPs that a full-scale inquiry by the legislature would probably replicate the work of the Legal adviser Andile Tetyana said parliament still had a constitutional obligation to exercise oversight but should do so through a streamlined, time-bound mechanism. He recommended the formation of an ad hoc committee under rule 253 of the National Assembly, which allows for temporary committees with a defined scope and duration. 'This is about accountability and improving police governance,' Tetyana told MPs. He said the ad hoc committee could look into several specific issues raised by Mkhwanazi, including the disbanding of the political killings task team, the alleged removal of 121 case dockets by the minister, leadership instability in crime intelligence and the overlap in roles of the South African Police Service and the Independent Police Investigative Directorate (Ipid). 'Parliament's control over the executive means influence, not direct power. It remains advice, not command; criticism, not obstruction,' Tetyana said. The committees considered three options: a full parliamentary inquiry; invoking rule 169 to allow committees to confer; or establishing a new ad hoc committee. The latter was favoured as the least likely to cause jurisdictional overlap and the fact that it could conclude its work within a specific timeframe. MPs also proposed that any interim reports produced by the presidential commission be made available to parliament to ensure coordination and oversight without interference. The committees are expected to meet again next week to finalise the draft terms of reference and reporting timelines for the ad hoc committee. A formal recommendation is expected to be tabled in the National Assembly next Wednesday. This comes as the police service grapples with the continued fallout from Mkhwanazi's allegations. On Tuesday, national police commissioner Fannie Masemola confirmed that deputy commissioner for crime detection Shadrack Sibiya had been Both Mchunu and Sibiya have denied any wrongdoing. If the National Assembly approves the recommendation, the ad hoc committee will be empowered to summon witnesses, gather evidence, and deliver a report to parliament.
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
‘Where's the proof?': Calls for Ntshavheni to answer for coup claims
Ramaphosa absorbed the intelligence portfolio into his office after the 2021 unrest. The MK party is demanding proof about an alleged coup that has been foiled by the South African government. This comes after Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni told parliament on Tuesday that the country's intelligence services managed to prevent a number of coup attempts, the latest being two weeks ago. MK party spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela told The Citizen on Wednesday that the minister must provide evidence to back her claims. 'She must tell us who, what and where. She has already told the public, now she must give us details and stop politicking,' he said. Is state security still functional? Despite Ntshavheni's praise of the country's intelligence services, Ndhlela said they are dysfunctional. 'If they have been closing on coups, why did they fail to prevent the July unrests four years ago?' he asked. Ndhlela criticised President Cyril Ramaphosa for absorbing the intelligence portfolio into the office of the Presidency. Efforts to discredit Mkhwanazi? ActionSA leader Herman Mashaba also dismissed Ntshavheni's claims. 'This is nonsense. We do not have time for this. This is the first time we are hearing of it and I think this is just a plan to discredit [KZN police commissioner] Lt Gen Mkhwanazi,' he said. ALSO READ: Ntshavheni assures SA is safe after detected potential coup risk Mkhwanazi made several allegations against top police officials, including Minister Senzo Mchunu, accusing them of political interference and collusion with alleged criminal syndicates. During a parliamentary meeting on Wednesday, National Coloured Congress member Fadiel Adams described Mkhwanazi's allegations as a threat to the country. 'He had what looked like an armed militia behind him. That was a threat to this country. 'He was trying to incite policemen to take action in the event of whatever it is he knows is coming,' he speculated. 'Very low risk' of a coup Political analyst Ntsikelelo Breakfast told The Citizen that Ntshavheni's comments have the potential to alarm the public. 'She should not have said that. There are things that you are privy to as a leader of a cluster. 'If there is a threat, I think she should have kept the public at bay about that. We do not want to agitate people to pursue that agenda,' he said. Breakfast said the intelligence service in the country had been weaponised in party politics. 'The intelligence apparatus has always been, and maybe still is, used in the factional battles of the ANC,' he said. Another political analyst, Theo Neethling, said he was surprised by Ntshavheni's remarks. 'I can only say that the possibility of a coup in South Africa has always been regarded by analysts as a matter of very low risk – unlike what we've seen in recent years, for example, in West Africa. This announcement therefore comes as a complete surprise and even a shock,' he said. Neethling said the announcement comes at a time when the police are in deep trouble. 'In addition, allegations of corruption and misconduct against ANC members and top police officials hang like a dark cloud in the air, creating major uncertainty about our national security,' he said. NOW READ: Leave and a commission don't make Mchunu immune from prosecution, parliament hears
