‘Entirely unsurprising': Issues with return-to-office mandates coming to light
Among the businesses that have issued these types of orders are Amazon, JPMorgan Chase, Tabcorp, AT&T and Dell.
Now, a few months on from many of these mandates being in force, it seems things may not be going as smoothly as decision makers would have hoped.
In the case of technology giant Dell, a new report from Business Insider has suggested the company is dealing with significant issues in the return-to-office rollout.
In March 2025, Dell began requiring all employees who live within an hour from an office to return to in-person work five days a week.
An internal memo stated all employees that met this criteria would be expected to do a 'regular working day in the office', though there would be 'flexibility as needed'.
It has been over three months since staff were ordered back to the office, with 10 Dell employees painting a very varied picture of how things are panning out.
Business Insider reported the degree of enforcement very much varies between managers, with some employees saying they were in eight hours a day, while others seemingly coming into the office to show their face and leaving soon after.
One employee, a program manager, said the lack of blanket enforcement was causing 'lots of in-office politics', with this 'haphazard' nature leading to friction among employees.
'So much of this is dependent on leaders,' they said.
A recent internal FAQ obtained by the publication laid out examples of when employees may be approved to work from home, such as a temporary medical condition, needing to provide temporary care, or adjusting in-office hours to avoid peak traffic.
However, of the five employees who claimed they sometimes work from home, none said it was due to any of the reasons listed above.
'I personally have not been adhering to eight hours a day,' one employee said, claiming they were aware they may be breaking the rules but have not yet been corrected.
Another said that, while their team was in the office full time, they usually only work about half the day in person before finishing the rest of their shift at home.
One staff member claimed they had intentionally been coming in less as the new policy made them feel like they were being 'treated like a child'.
Speaking to news.com.au, Rebecca Moulynox, ANZ General Manager of Great Place To Work, said the issues we are seeing arise from widespread return-to-office mandates were 'absolutely predictable'.
'Our data couldn't be clearer – when employers mandate work location, whether remote, hybrid, or onsite, productivity drops, retention plummets, and relationships with managers deteriorate,' she said.
'We found that employees who can choose where they work are three times more likely to want to stay with their company.
'When companies ignore this data and impose mandates anyway, the outcomes we're seeing at Dell and elsewhere are entirely unsurprising.'
Dell is far from the only company experiencing return-to-office issues.
Earlier this month, a leaked internal memo from JPMorgan showed morale had taken a hit in the wake of the RTO mandate.
Every year, employees are asked to complete a survey that asks them to assess aspects of the company culture, such as internal mobility, work-life balance and health and wellbeing.
An internal memo from CEO Jamie Dimon and Chief Human Resources Officer Robin Leopold, obtained by Barron's, revealed the company's health and wellbeing scores had dropped, with leaders attributing this to the return to office.
'Health and wellbeing scores remain favourable, though they dipped slightly year on year,' the memo stated.
'We know return full-time to the office has been an adjustment and one that not everyone agrees with, but we continue to believe in-person is how we do our best work and how we foster connections and mobility opportunities.'
Elsewhere, there have also been complaints of companies introducing RTO mandates but actually not having the capacity for everyone to come back.
Telecommunications giant AT&T required staff to come back to the office five days a week from January 2025.
In the wake of the return, several workers from the company's Atlanta offices told Business Insider that there was a shortage of available desks and the parking lots had become overcrowded.
There were also claims of increasingly long wait times for elevators, leading to the company posting signs with 'motivational quotes' encouraging staff to use the stairs.
Ms Moulynox said one of the key drivers behind the issues we are now seeing is a 'fundamental disconnect' between executive decision making and employee needs.
'The specific issues like desk shortages and inconsistent enforcement stem from companies trying to force a one-size-fits-all approach without understanding why employees value flexibility in the first place,' she said.
'When you mandate where people work without recognising that employees need flexibility for things like picking up children from school, managing family responsibilities, or avoiding toxic office dynamics, you're bound to face resistance and practical failures.'
Neal Woolrich, Director, Advisory in the Gartner HR practice, has also noticed that, not only are organisations struggling with unclear policies, there is also a lack of guidance for how leaders are meant to be applying the policies.
'So there's that lack of consistency, and that leads to feelings of inequity or unfairness,' he told news.com.au.
Mr Woolrich said some companies are also running into issues because they haven't established in advance how they are going to enforce the mandates.
'What we've seen over the last few years is that, where organisations have set a target for in-office attendance, on average, most organisations are just not getting close to that target,' he said.
This means that companies are now in the position where they have to get serious about their enforcement mechanism and how strict they want to be.
Mr Woolrich said the 'logical extension' is that not meeting in-office targets becomes a performance issue that could then impact promotions or pay rises.
On the extreme end of things, companies may be having to decide whether they exit people from the business for noncompliance to RTO mandates.
'Different organisations are taking different views to that. Some are using return-to-office mandates as a bit of a Trojan horse, and using it just as an excuse to exit people from the business quickly,' he said.
'Others don't necessarily want to go down that path, but then that might be where it leads to if they really want to be strict about in office attendance.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Daily Telegraph
Paris Jackson's bitter battle over Michael Jackson's estate
Michael Jackson's estate revealed they dealt with 'issues' related to one of the King of Pop's ex-wives and his former home as part of a plea for legal fees. Earlier this month, the pop star's daughter Paris raised 'serious' concerns over payments made from her father's estate. The payouts in question were to law firms for 'unrecorded attorney time' in 2018, which was unclear what the lawyers were being paid for. In court documents from February 2025 obtained by Us Magazine, the estate's executers, John Branca and John McClain, detailed what one of the law firms worked on during that period. According to the lawyers, some work was done 'addressing issues relating to Michael Jackson's former spouse'. RELATED: Staggering wealth of MJ's kids exposed 'Big allure': Secret MJ homes reveal sad life Presley's girl exposes life at MJ's Neverland However, the filing did not identify which of the singer's former wives was involved. Jackson was married to Lisa Marie Presley from 1994 to 1996 and Debbie Rowe, who is the mother of Paris and her brother Prince, from 1996 to 2000. Other matters included legal issues related to the musician's former home, Neverland Ranch, and meetings with a potential buyer. The property was put on the market in 2015 for $US100 million ($A128 million). After five years and numerous price cuts, the sprawling property finally found a buyer. Billionaire and friend of the late pop star Ron Burkle purchased the 2700-acre (1092Ha) estate for $US22 million ($A28 million). It was considered a 'bargain' far below its initial asking price of $US100 million ($A128 million). Paris, who is one of the beneficiaries of her father's estate along with her brothers Prince and Bigi, objected to 'premium payouts' made for unrecorded attorney time. In her court filing, the 27-year-old's argued, 'During this [six-month period] alone in 2018, Executors request that the Court approve $625,000 ($A957,000) in payments to three law firms for what they say is uncaptured time, without explanation as to why counsel was incapable of recording unbilled time, or why such a failure should not preclude payment.' Her lawyer added, 'Even worse, these payments appear, at least in part, to consist of lavish gratuities bestowed upon already well-compensated counsel.' Jackson's legal team argued the payouts reflect poorly on the executers of the estate, writing: 'These irregular payments raise serious and substantial questions about Executors' ability to effectively supervise counsel … and refraining from wasteful, six-figure gift-giving to themselves and their colleagues.' The filing added: 'Despite repeated inquiries from the Court, Executors are unable to provide even remotely satisfactory explanation for their delay, nor have they provided the beneficiaries any sort of plan to fix this ongoing and worsening issue.' A hearing has been set for later this month. MORE: Fortune left behind by Ozzy revealed DiCaprio's insane $35m ask exposed Silverchair star's huge move after demolishing Aus home

News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
Tesla profits drop as Musk warns of 'rough' patch before riches
Tesla reported another drop in quarterly profits Wednesday as CEO Elon Musk warned the company could face a few "rough" quarters following the elimination of federal tax credits for electric vehicles under President Donald Trump's big fiscal package. Musk, on an earnings conference call with analysts and investors, reiterated that Tesla's technology advantages position it for significant long-term profitability, but suggested the company's recent slump would continue or worsen in a difficult interim period until new autonomous transport ventures can be monetized. At issue is the period after the $7,500 federal tax credit for EV purchases expires on September 30, among the green tax credits zeroed out by Trump's sweeping package approved earlier this month. "We probably could have a few rough quarters. I'm not saying we will, but we could," Musk said of a period that immediately follows the expiration of the US tax credit for EVs. "But once you get to autonomy at scale" by the second half of 2026, "I'd be surprised if Tesla economics are not very compelling," said Musk. His comments acknowledge more short-term pain following Wednesday's results, its third straight quarter of lower profitability as the company faces intensifying electric vehicle competition and deals with backlash due to Musk's political activities. Tesla reported second-quarter profits of $1.2 billion, down 16 percent from the year-ago level. The company in a press release emphasized ongoing efforts to lead in artificial intelligence and robotics. Revenues fell 12 percent to $22.5 billion. Lower profits had been expected after Tesla earlier this month disclosed a decline in auto deliveries. Results were also impacted by a fall in average vehicle selling prices and higher operating expenses driven by AI and other research and development projects. Tesla did not offer an outlook on full-year vehicle production, citing shifting global trade and fiscal policies, as well as factors such as "the broader macroeconomic environment, the rate of acceleration of our autonomy efforts and production ramp at our factories." - 'Top pick' - The results come on the heels of Tesla's launch last month of a robotaxi service in the Texas capital Austin, Musk's first fully autonomous offering after pushing back the timeframe many times. Musk has heavily touted Tesla's autonomous driving program, as well as the company's "Optimus" humanoid robot, which employs artificial intelligence technology. But analysts have criticized Tesla's sluggishness in unveiling new autos, while questioning Musk's commitment to an earlier goal of launching a state-of-the-art electric vehicle priced at around $25,000 to bolster the odds of mass deployment. On the call, Musk reiterated his desire for a lower priced vehicle. Tesla's press release said the company began building "a more affordable model" in June, with volume set to rise in the second half of 2025. Tesla executives said they had pushed back the ramp-up on the new vehicle in order to maximize production of the company's current generation of autos before the federal tax credit expires. The worsening near-term outlook for EV sales is one reason analysts at JPMorgan Chase call Tesla's stock price "completely divorced from increasingly deteriorating fundamentals." But analysts at Morgan Stanley rate the company a "top pick" in light of its leadership in robotics and artificial intelligence, although a recent note warned Musk's political activity "may add further near-term pressure" to shares. - Political controversies - Disagreements over Trump's fiscal package have been a factor in Musk's recurring feud with the president, whose name was not mentioned during the 60-minute conference call. The billionaire donated huge sums to Trump's successful 2024 presidential campaign and then joined the administration to lead the "Department of Government Efficiency," which cut thousands of government jobs, sparking boycotts and vandalism that tarnished the Tesla brand. Musk left the White House in May. After their bitter falling out, Musk warned Trump's legislation would bankrupt the country. On July 5 the tech mogul announced he was launching a new political party in the United States, the "America Party." Trump dismissed the launch as "ridiculous," and has also threatened to look at deporting Musk and to revoking his government contracts. Shares of Tesla fell 4.1 percent in after-hours trading.

ABC News
6 hours ago
- ABC News
Federal politics live: Government lifts ban on US beef imports to Australia
A ban against some US-slaughtered beef will be scrapped in a move that could be used as a bargaining chip to secure the removal of trade tariffs. Follow the day's coverage live.