logo
Pakistan's diplomatic victory conceals its weakness

Pakistan's diplomatic victory conceals its weakness

Mint22-05-2025
Nothing boosts a Pakistani general's flagging domestic popularity like being able to claim he won a confrontation with his country's archenemy, India. Asim Munir, Pakistan's army chief, has been on a victory lap since President Trump announced an abrupt end to a four-day subcontinental conflict May 10. On Tuesday the Pakistani government promoted Mr. Munir to field marshal, a self-promotion for the country's most powerful man.
Mr. Munir has emerged stronger from his confrontation with India, but the same can't be said of his country. Though Pakistan may have scored diplomatic points, beneath its breathless claim of victory lie inconvenient facts. By striking terrorist infrastructure and air bases deep in Pakistan's heartland, and by suspending a 65-year-old bilateral river water-sharing treaty, India has weakened Pakistan's strategic position.
For the U.S., the simmering conflict presents challenges and opportunities. A successful U.S. strategy in the region would achieve two interconnected goals: curbing the Pakistani army's support for transnational jihadist groups and ensuring that any subcontinental conflict doesn't go nuclear. America must also recognize that China's military and diplomatic support for Pakistan has made the subcontinent a site of U.S.-China competition.
Nearly three years ago, when Mr. Munir became army chief—the most powerful position in a country where generals call the shots—he was widely seen as an outsider with a shaky grip on power. Unlike many of his predecessors, Mr. Munir entered the army through the Officers Training School rather than the more prestigious Pakistan Military Academy.
The son of a schoolteacher who doubled as an imam, Mr. Munir advertises his piety. He uses the honorific hafiz, given to those who have memorized the Quran. Unlike many predecessors, Mr. Munir wasn't trained in the U.S. or U.K. His foreign exposure was mostly limited to serving in Saudi Arabia when that country was still synonymous with hard-line Islam.
Mr. Munir became chief after a feud between the army and former Prime Minister Imran Khan, a 72-year-old charismatic populist who became prime minister with the army's help in 2018 but later fell out with Mr. Munir's predecessor, Qamar Javed Bajwa. Mr. Bajwa reportedly helped oust Mr. Khan in 2022. Mr. Bajwa and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif saw Mr. Munir as a safe pick because Mr. Khan and Mr. Munir had clashed during the latter's brief tenure as head of the country's military spy agency in 2018-19. Mr. Munir had reportedly angered the prime minister by investigating alleged corruption by his wife.
Despite Mr. Khan's popularity, the army outmaneuvered him. Since August 2023, Mr. Khan has been imprisoned on a raft of charges, most of them widely seen by independent observers as politically motivated. In an interview last week, Mr. Khan's sons, who live in England, alleged that their father has been kept in solitary confinement and denied basic rights such as medical care and regular phone calls with family.
The persecution of Mr. Khan made Mr. Munir arguably the most unpopular Pakistani army chief in living memory—that is, until India bombed nine 'terrorist infrastructure" sites on May 7 in retaliation for a terrorist attack on Indian tourists in Kashmir. The conflict has allowed Mr. Munir to reinvent himself as a hero.
The version of events publicized in Pakistan goes like this: First, India lost at least five fighter jets in its initial attack on May 7, including three French-made Rafales, the most advanced jet in India's air force. Second, Mr. Trump's Truth Social post announcing the cease-fire and his subsequent remarks about the conflict handed Pakistan a clear diplomatic victory.
This account contains some truth. India has admitted to losing fighter jets, though it hasn't said how many. Reporting by the Washington Post suggests India likely lost at least two jets. And Mr. Trump has indeed set back Indian diplomacy by casting India and Pakistan as peers and offering to mediate their dispute over Kashmir.
But if you look past Indian embarrassment, the balance clearly tilts in New Delhi's favor. India has shown that it can hit targets across Pakistan at will, raising questions about the effectiveness of Pakistan's Chinese-made air defenses. Indian air defenses largely neutralized hundreds of Pakistani drones and missiles.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on May 12 announced a new doctrine according to which India 'will not differentiate between the government sponsoring terrorism and the masterminds of terrorism." India says the current lull in fighting isn't a permanent cease-fire but a temporary 'suspension of military operations." In the coming months and years, India will almost certainly seek to increase its capacity to pressure Pakistan by building dams on shared rivers.
For now, the Pakistani army's skilled public-relations machinery may have turned the once-unpopular army chief into a hero at home. But looked at dispassionately, it's hard to see how Field Marshal Asim Munir has made Pakistan any safer.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wrong to claim India halted Operation Sindoor under pressure, Rajnath Singh tells Parliament
Wrong to claim India halted Operation Sindoor under pressure, Rajnath Singh tells Parliament

Scroll.in

time27 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

Wrong to claim India halted Operation Sindoor under pressure, Rajnath Singh tells Parliament

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh told Parliament on Monday that it was ' absolutely wrong ' to claim that India halted Operation Sindoor under any pressure. Opening a 16-hour debate in the Lok Sabha on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor, Singh said that India decided to pause its action against the terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir as it had achieved its political and military objectives. The defence minister also said that nine terror camps were destroyed at the start of the operation of May 7, and that India has proof of damage caused inside Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Singh said that the operation on May 7 lasted 22 minutes and was 'non-escalatory' in nature. He added that the armed forces had taken all precautions to avoid civilian casualties. 'Before executing Operation Sindoor, our forces studied every aspect and chose the option that would cause maximum damage to terrorists, while ensuring no harm to innocent civilians,' he said. Singh said that while the Opposition had questioned the government's claims, they had not once asked how many Pakistani aircraft had been shot down. 'I believe these questions do not reflect national sentiments,' he said. 'Their question should be whether India destroyed terror bases, and whether Operation Sindoor has been a success,' the defence minister said. 'The answer is yes. They should ask whether any of our brave soldiers have been harmed in the operation. The answer is no.' Tensions between New Delhi and Islamabad escalated on May 7 when the Indian military carried out strikes – codenamed Operation Sindoor – on what it claimed were terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The strikes were in response to the terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam, which killed 26 persons on April 22. The Pakistan Army retaliated to Indian strikes by repeatedly shelling Indian villages along the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir. At least 22 Indian civilians and eight defence personnel were killed in the shelling. India and Pakistan on May 10 reached an 'understanding' to halt firing following the four-day conflict.

Uttarakhand's development begins with precision on paper.
Uttarakhand's development begins with precision on paper.

Time of India

time27 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Uttarakhand's development begins with precision on paper.

No Pak Hand in Pahalgam? Chidambaram Remarks Trigger Political Face-off Between Centre, Opposition Parliament is bracing for a political explosion over the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor. As the Lok Sabha holds a special discussion on Operation Sindoor, the Opposition and ruling BJP are locked in a fierce showdown. Former Home Minister P Chidambaram's explosive remark "No proof Pakistan was involved" has triggered national outrage. The BJP says the Opposition is echoing Pakistan. Samajwadi Party's Akhilesh Yadav says terrorists are vanishing under BJP's watch. Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi demands truth from the government. Meanwhile, Shiv Sena's Priyanka Chaturvedi says India needs no more 'proof', we've lived the pain of Pakistani terror. The nation watches as politics, security, and sovereignty collide in Parliament.#operationsindoor #pahalgamattack #parliamentdebate #chidambaram #bjpvscongress #rahulgandhi #pmmodi #nationalsecurity #terrorism #pok #akhileshyadav #gauravgogoi #priyankachaturvedi #kirenrijiju #nishikantdubey #anuragthakur #indianarmy #pakistanterror #parliamentshowdown #indiafirst #toi #toibharat #bharat #trending #breakingnews #indianews 2.4K views | 3 hours ago

‘Armed forces were given full freedom to choose targets': Rajnath Singh in Lok Sabha
‘Armed forces were given full freedom to choose targets': Rajnath Singh in Lok Sabha

Hindustan Times

time32 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

‘Armed forces were given full freedom to choose targets': Rajnath Singh in Lok Sabha

Union defence minister Rajnath Singh on Monday said the Indian armed forces were given full freedom to choose their targets and give a befitting reply to Pakistan under Operation Sindoor. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh with Union Ministers Amit Shah, Nitin Gadkari and others in the Lok Sabha during the Monsoon session of Parliament, in New Delhi, Monday, (Sansad TV Videograb) 'The overall politico-military objective of Operation Sindoor was to punish Pakistan for waging a proxy war in the form of terrorism. That is why the armed forces were given complete freedom to choose their targets and give a strong response,' Rajnath Singh told the Lok Sabha. Follow all the latest updates on the Parliament Monsoon Session here He said the objective of Operation Sindoor was not to start a war, but to demonstrate the use of force in a way that compelled the adversary to bow down. 'On the morning of May 10, when the Indian Air Force struck multiple Pakistani airfields, Pakistan admitted defeat and tried to end hostilities,' Rajnath Singh said. Rajnath Singh also told the House that Operation Sindoor has been paused, not terminated, adding that if Pakistan attempts any misadventure in the future, the operation will be resumed. Tri-service response forced Pakistan to bow down: Rajnath Singh 'The Indian Air Force's powerful strikes, the Indian Army's strong response along the Line of Control, and the Indian Navy's offensive posturing compelled Pakistan to back down,' Rajnath Singh added. Rajnath Singh also said that India once spoke the language of peace through initiatives like the Lahore bus journey, but after Pakistan failed to respond appropriately, the country answered with strong actions like the Balakot strike. 'India first extends hand of friendship, but it also knows how to twist the wrist if any country betrays it,' said Rajnath Singh. He also told the House during the debate on Operation Sindoor that the Opposition should ask whether any of India's brave soldiers were harmed. 'The answer is no, not a single one of our soldiers was harmed,' Rajnath Singh said. 'The Opposition should ask whether Operation Sindoor was successful. The answer is yes,' Rajnath Singh told the Lok Sabha.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store