
The Finance Ghost: Why mining is a tough industry
This week, we saw several updates from the mining sector. This included some of the industry giants, as well as junior miners – companies that are much earlier in their journeys.
Before we go any further, it's useful context that Valterra Platinum (previously Anglo American Platinum) has enjoyed an increase of 44% in its share price over 12 months, while BHP is down 10% over the same period. Based on that, you would think that BHP is struggling in its operations, while Valterra is shooting the lights out, right?
advertisement
Don't want to see this? Remove ads
GOOGLE GRAPH HERE
Mining isn't hard just because of how difficult it is to get the stuff out of the ground, both safely and efficiently. No, it's hard because even if you do that perfectly, your fortunes are primarily tied to global commodity prices for whatever commodity you happen to be extracting from Mother Nature. And if your operations hit a rough patch, those prices can save you (if you get lucky).
It's like training your heart out for a 400-metre race and then waiting to find out if someone has added a greyhound to the mix that day, with a result that is out of your control no matter how hard you try.
You see, BHP has just reported record production in both copper and iron ore for the year ended June 2025. Thanks to this excellent outcome, it also expects to hit its unit cost guidance across almost all its operations, as a period of efficient production is always great news for unit costs. But it hardly matters, as the average realised price for iron ore was down 19% for the period, while steelmaking coal fell 27% and energy coal was down 11%. Copper was the only positive story, with a 7% increase in the average realised price. Copper, much like Hansel all those years ago in Zoolander, is so hot right now.
advertisement
Don't want to see this? Remove ads
Alas, if the market had positive feelings about the trajectory for iron ore prices, then the BHP share price would've already started turning higher. Instead, there are worries about global demand in an environment of tariff uncertainty and substantial risks to global trade and consumption. The domestic Chinese market remains a serious headache as well. For a commodity such as iron ore to be doing well, the engine rooms of the global economy need to be in overdrive. Instead, they are spluttering.
Conversely, Valterra Platinum (and the rest of the PGM sector) is having a grand old time thanks to an upswing in PGM prices. Every dog has its day in the mining sector, with this dog now basking in the sunshine and being fed organic biltong from Woolies after a long night in the cold. If you look at the share price, you would never believe that Valterra released a trading statement this week that headline earnings per share (HEPS) will plummet by between 76% and 88% for the first half of the year. What on earth happened? And how is the share price still doing so well?
The main reason for this collapse in profitability is that there was flooding at the Tumela Mine at Amandelbult in February. Sure, there were some other issues as well (such as substantial once-off demerger costs related to the separation from Anglo American), but the bulk of the problem is thanks to factors way beyond management's control. If you exclude Amandelbult, then own-mine production was up 1%. That's little comfort when PGM sales volumes fell 25% thanks to this issue.
advertisement
Don't want to see this? Remove ads
We've now answered the first question about the reason for the drop in earnings, but what about the second one? Why is the share price still doing so well?
To begin with, 'so well' is a relative term. Over the same period that Valterra experienced a 44% upswing in the share price, Northam Platinum is up 72%, Impala Platinum is up 98% and Sibanye Stillwater is up more than 102%. So, in reality, Valterra is actually significantly underperforming the peer group.
advertisement
Don't want to see this? Remove ads
Then, it's important to keep in mind that PGM sector sentiment is generally positive at the moment. With Valterra promising the market that it can reach the lower end of full-year production guidance, there's a chance that it has a decent year overall – and the market is very willing to forgive tough periods at the moment. The demerger costs are also behind it, while recent cost saving initiatives should continue. These factors are supportive of a much stronger second half of the financial year, with the market inclined to believe in that outcome, thanks to strength in the PGM basket price.
We finish off with another rampant success story: AngloGold Ashanti. The share price is up 65% in the past year on the JSE, with the market continuing to back the yellow metal. The dollar gold price is up almost 40% in the past year, driven by worries about inflation and weakness in the dollar.
It's incredible to be able to write about a weaker dollar and stronger PGMs in the same piece – what year are we in anyway?
AngloGold certainly isn't looking this gift horse in the mouth. In fact, it is using the strength in gold to take advantage of opportunities to grow, with the latest example being the acquisition of Augusta Gold. This company is listed in Toronto, but the underlying assets are in the Beatty District in Nevada – and they just so happen to be alongside AngloGold's existing assets in that district. This is a regional consolidation play, with the market not even batting an eyelid at AngloGold paying a 37% premium to the 20-day Volume-Weighted Average Price of Augusta Gold.
advertisement
Don't want to see this? Remove ads
advertisement
Don't want to see this? Remove ads
Gold looks easy right now, but it hasn't always been that way. PGMs are doing much better, but that comes after a terrible period. And although iron ore looks tough right now, BHP was trading at a vastly higher share price just a couple of years ago.
Mining is about cycles. And that's what makes it hard. DM

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Economic spin cycle: how anti-dumping duties could impact South African consumers
South Africa's washing machines are about to get more expensive, and Defy is hoping that's good news. The Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC) has endorsed the defence of the fully automatic top-loading washer hill. What began as a complaint lodged by Defy Appliances has now become a formal anti-dumping investigation and, soon, the likely imposition of provisional duties against imports from China and Thailand. It looks like a straightforward response to cheap foreign goods flooding the market, hammering local manufacturers and threatening jobs. But it is simultaneously a complex web of strategic policy, protectionism, precedent, and unintended consequences in the spin cycle. A heavy load The saga officially began in October 2024 when Defy asked the International Trade Administration Commission (Itac) to investigate imports of top-loading washers (10-17kg capacity) from China and Thailand. Defy alleges dumping margins of 21.48% for Chinese products and a whopping 67.11% for Thai machines, figures based on SA Revenue Service import data and overseas retail prices. It claims these imports have undercut local prices, slashed profits and forced an inventory build-up – a sign of unsold stock piling up in warehouses. In Defy's view, unless something is done, the injury will get worse as global overcapacity looks for cheap destinations such as South Africa. Itac seems to agree, at least enough to say a prima facie case exists. Provisional duties are expected by the end of 2025. Caught in a whirlpool Hisense South Africa was named alongside Chinese giant Midea in the Government Gazette, but the company says there's nothing sinister at play. 'Hisense SA categorically affirms that it has never been complicit in facilitating any form of alleged dumping, nor has it acted in contravention of South African trade laws or ethical business practices,' Luna Nortje, deputy general manager at Hisense SA, told Daily Maverick. 'We are fully committed to fair, transparent trade and continue to work closely with all relevant regulatory bodies to ensure full compliance.' 'These are standard processes designed to ensure market fairness and in no way imply unethical practice,' she said. Hisense's local credentials are significant. Since setting up shop in 1996, the company has invested more than R350-million into its Atlantis manufacturing plant, which today produces up to 500,000 refrigerators and a million televisions annually – not just for South Africa, but for export to more than 10 African countries. In fact, Nortje said Hisense was exploring further localisation: 'We are currently in the process of assessing the viability of manufacturing chest freezers at (the Atlantis) facility.' That said, she acknowledged the consumer pain. 'These tariffs will sadly affect consumers – as the product prices of those specific items would correspondingly increase.' A beast of Defy's own design Defy has danced this policy waltz before. Back in 2004, the company lobbied for a reduction in washing machine tariffs – it had halted local production and argued that duties hurt consumers. Then in 2019, it asked for a 30% hike on smaller top-loaders to protect planned investments in local manufacturing. Fast forward to 2025, and Defy is calling for protection again, but this time with localisation and industrial strategy riding shotgun. The DTIC's 'Reimagined Industrial Strategy' leans heavily on import substitution and job retention, and Defy's latest campaign aligns perfectly with those goals. In a way, the company is using trade policy not just as a shield, but as a tool to de-risk investment. Whether that's smart industrial pragmatism or self-serving protectionism depends on where you sit in the value chain. Copying moves from across the pond South Africa's washer war borrows heavily from America's. When Whirlpool triggered a trade war in the US against Samsung and LG a decade ago, it led to a game of global musical chairs. Once South Korean and Mexican washers were slapped with duties, production shifted to China. Then, when Chinese goods were targeted, factories moved to Thailand and Vietnam. This tactic (called 'country-hopping') made the US tariffs look more like speed bumps than roadblocks. Defy's decision to hit both China and Thailand out of the gate is a direct nod to that history; to plug the loopholes before they appear. But the American experience also shows how these moves can backfire. Prices on US washing machines rose by nearly 12% after those 2018 tariffs. Even dryers, which weren't tariffed, saw price hikes because retailers usually sell them in pairs. In the end, American consumers forked out $1.5 billion more, for 1,800 saved jobs. That worked out to more than $800,000 per job. Who wins, who spins? South Africa's washing machine trade wars come at a bad time for the economy. Winners: Defy gets a reprieve, likely recovering margin and market share. Policymakers score localisation points and can point to job protection. Local component suppliers might benefit if production ramps up. Losers: Consumers face higher prices – potentially 22% or more on affected washers. Low-income households bear the brunt; appliance affordability is a key cost-of-living metric. Retailers and importers scramble to find new sources, maybe from Vietnam, Turkey or Eastern Europe. Chinese and Thai exporters are likely to lose Southern African Customs Union market share, at least temporarily. Even complementary goods such as dryers could see price bumps, mimicking the US model. And as Defy gains pricing power, don't expect them to keep prices flat. Airing dirty laundry Anti-dumping duties sound noble, shielding local jobs from unfair trade, but they also set a precedent. What's stopping other industries from filing similar complaints? And if each results in price hikes, the inflationary impact stacks up. This matters for the South African Reserve Bank, which is already trying to keep inflation within the 3-6% target band. Appliances might be a small piece of the pie, but multiple actions like this create a cumulative effect. There's also the question of what happens in five years when the duties expire. Itac will have to decide whether the 'injury' risk still exists, and that decision will be just as political as it is economic… and Defy needs to show it was worth the effort with local investment. DM


The South African
16 hours ago
- The South African
Customs at checkout? Shein introduces 'import charge'
South African Shein shoppers have spotted a new feature that includes import duties in the checkout process. This means that payment now reportedly includes the cost of customs, which it claims no longer has to be paid separately. Shein shoppers in South Africa have noticed that customs can now be paid inclusive of the order total. In the checkout process, a breakdown of prices now includes an 'import charge' fee. The Chinese fast-fashion company reveals that the fee 'includes customs duty, VAT, and other import charges paid on your behalf.' Previously, import duties were paid directly to an international logistics company before the order was dispatched to your doorstep. 'You do not need to pay any additional charges to couriers separately', Shein added. On social media, South African consumers have praised Shein over the new feature, which calculates the import duties for shoppers. TikToker @micy_lesego posted: 'No more stressing about how much we are going to be charged at customs!' Another – @refilwe_molapisi – added: 'Much cheaper. These companies were overcharging us!' @shaolin273 WAIT—Did y'all notice @SHEIN SHEIN now adds import fees BEFORE you even pay? 😳 No more delivery day surprises 😭👏 Your customs are sorted! Just pay & wait for your drip 💅 #SheinSouthAfrica #CustomsIncluded #SheinTips #SheinPlug #TikTokMadeMeBuyIt ♬ original sound – Azwinndini🌸 When shopping on fast-fashion sites like Shein and Temu, consumers should anticipate paying a large portion of import taxes. This figure – provided by an international logistics company on behalf of the company – is broken down into customs duties and VAT. Customs duties are the fee you pay for declaring goods imported into the country. As of last year, SARS imposed a 45% import duty on clothing. For other items, this can be considerably less. VAT is set at 15% and is calculated as the sum of your order's total cost plus the customs duty cost. According to YouTuber Stefan van der Merwe, Shein and other Chinese fashion companies often underdeclare goods, meaning that import taxes could be considerably lower than what they should be. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.

TimesLIVE
18 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
China pivot not a quick fix to US trade pains
Trade, industry and competition minister Parks Tau says while South Africa and China have made in-principle agreements to enhance trade ties, this should not be seen as a quick solution to the ongoing trade ructions with the US. Addressing the media during a press briefing on Monday morning, Tau said there were discussions with China regarding an announcement at this year's Forum for China-Africa Cooperation (Focac) for lower duty trade with the second-largest economy in the world, but this was being studied. 'It is not as simple as opening up floodgates [to China]. There have been a few developments with regard to China. These include the fact that China announced at Focac this year that it will reduce tariffs to 0% for all countries but one. 'We took the opportunity to engage with the Chinese to say: 'What does this mean?'. How do we implement it?' This was two weeks ago. They said we need to sign the China-Africa economic partnership agreement, or some form of economic agreement, so we are able to unlock this.'