Special Needs Assistants who lose positions in a school to benefit from redeployment scheme
Special needs assistants (SNAs) support pupils who have care needs resulting from a disability, behavioural difficulties or a significant medical issue.
They are allocated to schools to work with children who have specific care needs and they provide non-teaching care support.
Principals and/or board of managements deploy SNAs within schools to ensure that students with the greatest level of need receive the greatest level of supports.
There are over 23,000 SNAs working in schools across the country.
Education Minister Helen McEntee and Minister of State with responsibility for Special Education and Inclusion, Michael Moynihan, today confirmed that work is underway on a redeployment scheme for SNAs.
Advertisement
The SNA Redeployment scheme will allow SNAs in posts which may no longer be required for reasons such as falling enrolments, reduced care needs or changing demographics to be redeployed to a school which has a vacant post.
The scheme will be operated by the National Council for Special Education (NCSE) and its CEO John Kearney remarked that it will 'not only facilitate allocation of SNA support where it is most needed but will also build capacity in the SNA workforce'.
'The scheme ensures valuable skills are not lost as the level of need shifts between schools,' said Kearney.
Minister McEntee meanwhile said it is 'crucial that experienced SNAs can be redeployed to a school where a vacant post arises, allowing them to stay in the sector and ensuring they can continue to share their skills and experience'.
She added that the scheme will 'increase job security for SNAs, and encourage prospective SNAs to enter the workforce'.
'Crucially, the scheme will benefit children and school communities by ensuring that the SNA workforce is agile, and in a position to respond to emerging needs,' said McEntee.
Elsewhere, Minister Moynihan said the scheme will 'further bolster how we support children and schools by ensuring SNAs can stay within the workforce and do what they do best in supporting children with additional needs'.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Remove statute of limitations to encourage churches and orders to pay sex-abuse redress
In November 2022, when a tsunami of sexual abuse allegations swept into the public domain following the broadcast of the RTÉ radio documentary Blackrock Boys, much of the focus was on abuse in Irish schools run by some of the religious orders. However, allegations soon emerged about similar abuse in primary and secondary schools run by the Catholic and Protestant Churches. On many grounds, not least moral, they would appear to be as obliged as the State and religious orders when it comes to contributing to compensation for people abused in their schools. Traditionally, the Irish education system has been run by the churches. Currently, 88 per cent of primary schools in Ireland are Catholic, with 5.7 per cent linked to the Church of Ireland . READ MORE At second level, of 717 of 722 post-primary schools are run in association with the main churches – 338 have a Catholic ethos, 21 are Church of Ireland, 211 are multi-denominational and 147 are inter-denominational. Of the remaining five, two are Quaker-run, while Presbyterians, Methodists and Jews run one each. All schools come within the remit of the Commission of Investigation into the Handling of Child Sexual Abuse in Schools, announced by Minister for Education Helen McEntee earlier this month. Based on previous inquiries and convictions in the courts, it is known there was sexual abuse in schools other than those run by religious congregations. Yet, recent discussion around redress seems focused entirely on contributions made, or not, by religious orders, which have been found wanting. For instance, all four religious orders involved in running Magdalene laundries refused to contribute to a redress scheme for women who spent time in those institutions. Of the eight religious congregations involved in running the Mother and Baby Homes , just two have agreed to contribute to redress for survivors. Of the approximate €1.5 billion paid to survivors of residential institutions for children, about 16 per cent has come from the 18 religious congregations that ran them. According to Department of Education figures, the total adjusted offers towards redress from those orders amounted to €435.53 million, with €245.24 million realised. Even the controversial 2002 'indemnity deal " entered into by the 18 religious congregation has not been fulfilled. Two properties have yet to be transferred, with €124.94 million of the €128 million pledged under the deal realised so far. Prof Conor O'Mahony, director of the Child Law Clinic at UCC, said one possible way of encouraging the orders and the churches to contribute to a redress scheme would be to remove a statute of limitations on survivors taking legal actions against them. 'Then it would be in their interest to contribute to a redress scheme, as a way of reducing overall costs.' O'Mahony noted, however, that under Article 44 of the Constitution, the orders are entitled to hold on to their property. Where the State is concerned, and repeating what he wrote in this newspaper following publication of the scoping inquiry report last September, he said 'survivors, solicitors, the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission and the Child Law Clinic in UCC have spent a decade battling the Department of Education , seeking the full implementation of the O'Keeffe judgment, but this has yet to happen". Louise O'Keeffe was aged eight when she was abused at Dunderrow National School in Cork in 1973 by principal Leo Hickey. Complaints had been made against him but, in line with Department of Education policy then, these were directed to the local priest. Hickey remained at the school, perpetrating more than 400 counts of abuse against at least 20 victims. Following further allegations, he resigned and moved to another school, where he taught for a further 22 years until his retirement in 1995. In 1998, he pleaded guilty to 21 sample charges relating to the sexual abuse of girls under his care and was sentenced to three years in prison. O'Keeffe took legal action for damages, but the courts ruled the department was not liable because the school was under Catholic Church management, even though the State paid Hickey's salary. She appealed to the European Court of Human Rights , which in 2014 found Ireland had failed to protect O'Keeffe from Hickey while at school. It said the State, when relinquishing control of education, should have been aware of the potential risks and put in place safeguards given its obligation to protect children. By failing to put in place adequate child-protection measures until the early 1990s at primary and second level, O'Mahony said the court found 'the Irish State had a stand-alone culpability for breach of convention rights, independent of any other actor'. 'The Irish government interpreted the ruling as meaning it was only liable for damages in cases where there had been a prior complaint against an abuser,' he said. O'Mahony said that while O'Keeffe was awarded damages, it was unfortunate that the scheme was 'designed from its inception to make it almost impossible to receive compensation'. 'Only one-third of the budget of €31 million allocated to the scheme was paid out. Most of the people abused by the same teacher as Louise O'Keeffe [was] would not have qualified for payments under the scheme – which demonstrates the bizarre logic at work,' he said. 'Very simply, the 2014 O'Keeffe judgment demands that every child who experienced sexual abuse in a defective child protection framework in schools be compensated for that abuse. The Government needs to match words with action for the first time on this matter.'
Irish Examiner
4 days ago
- Irish Examiner
'Small' number of special classes will not go ahead due to 'drop off' in expected level of need, Dáil hears
A 'small' number of special classes sanctioned for this September will not now proceed, the minister of State for special education has confirmed. The National Council for Special Education (NCSE) has advised minister of State Michael Moynihan this is mainly due to a 'drop off' in the expected level of need for these classes. It is expected that these classes may be required for the 2026/2027 school year subject to the local level of need, Mr Moynihan said. In response to a parliamentary question put to him by Sinn Féin TD Sorcha Clarke, Mr Moynihan said additional new special classes have been sanctioned. Mr Moynihan also confirmed he has directed a school in Kildare this year to open two special classes under Section 37A of the Education Act 1998. It is the third time these powers have been used by a minister, and for the first time outside Dublin. Mr Moynihan previously told the Irish Examiner that schools would be compelled to open special classes if reluctance to do so continues. Just over 400 new special classes are still being provided for the coming school year, he said in response to Ms Clarke. 'My department and the NCSE are committed to delivering an education system that is of the highest quality and where every child and young person feels valued and is actively supported and nurtured to reach their full potential.' Sorcha Clarke said she knows of at least two schools that were sanctioned to open a special class for September. "It's now the middle of July, parents need to know where their children are going to school in September," she said. In places where classes have been suppressed, the minister and the NCSE need to be incredibly clear as to why this happened. A number of families have initiated legal proceedings in a bid to secure appropriate school places for their children for this September. Sinn Féin education spokesman Darren O'Rourke is due to raise issues around the provision of special education places with education minister Helen McEntee in the Dáil before its summer recess. He has previously called on the minister and the NCSE to confirm how many children are without a school place for this September. The Oireachtas education committee previously heard that as many as 260 children could still be without a school place for the new term. An official figure was not provided. Ms McEntee previously told the Dáil that 92% of the students notified to the NCSE had been allocated a school place. "Parents and families feel like they are being gaslit in relation to this," Mr O'Rourke said. We know that last year 126 children were left without school places, and all of the indications at the minute are that there are far in excess of that without a school place currently. We really need to have some transparency and accountability, and more importantly, action to ensure there are places for these children come September. Meanwhile, Early Childhood Ireland is calling on Government to bring pay for early years and school-age care graduates in line with primary school teachers. The advocacy group has urged for a date to be introduced for when graduates will be brought within public sector pay and conditions. Early Years and school-age care graduates are educated and trained to the same level as their peers in primary education. 'Guaranteeing public pay and conditions for early years and school-age care graduates would mark a turning point for the system," said the group's director of policy Frances Byrne. "As things stand, we are losing too many talented educators to sectors offering better pay and greater security.' Figures show that the national average staff turnover rate stands at 25%, rising to 54% in some areas. Read More 'Catch-all' special schools will leave some children with nowhere to go
Irish Independent
6 days ago
- Irish Independent
Ireland pushes back at EU over hate-speech laws as it faces legal action
Last year, the Government decided to separate hate-crime and hate-speech legislation and drop the section on hate-speech laws. In May, the EU Commission told the Government it had two months to begin implementing an EU directive that combats racism and xenophobia. The Government has written back to the commission, saying the laws on hate crimes 'are effectively transposed' by existing Irish laws. The State faces legal action from the EU if it does not enforce European laws on hate speech. A spokesperson for Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan said: 'Ireland has engaged with the European Commission on this matter and has certain reservations with regard to the commission's analysis of the perceived shortcomings of the current Irish implementation, in particular, that sufficient weight has not been given to Ireland's position that the provisions in the framework are effectively transposed by existing Irish constitutional, statute and common law. 'The Government will continue to engage with the commission to ensure that any outcome respects Ireland's common law tradition and the implementation of the framework.' The spokesperson said the hate-crime laws already brought in mean longer prison sentences for hate crimes, if they can be proven to have been motivated by hatred or where hatred is demonstrated. 'For example, the legislation ensures that assault aggravated by hatred, or damage to property aggravated by hatred, will attract higher prison sentences. Where hatred is not proven, a person can still be charged with assault or damage to property,' they said. The hate-speech part of the law was dropped after pressure on the previous justice minister Helen McEntee from her own backbenchers in the last government. Sinn Féin also called for the contentious legislation to be scrapped, even though the party initially voted for the laws in the Dáil. Taoiseach Micheál Martin previously disagreed with the commission's position, saying existing laws go beyond the proposed EU laws. 'My understanding is the [Justice] Minister believes the commission isn't quite accurate, but it's a matter and we have to work out and deal with the commission. We want to be in compliance with the European framework,' he said.
