Financial checks people should do before State Pension age rises next year
Pensions, mortgages, benefits and personal finances should all be checked before turning 66.
Pension Credit – Could you or someone you know be eligible?
The State Pension age is set to start rising from 66 to 67 next year, with the increase due to be completed for all men and women across the UK by 2028. The planned change to the official age of retirement has been in legislation since 2014 with a further State Pension age rise from 67 to 68 set to be implemented between 2044 and 2046.
The contributory benefit provides essential financial support for nearly 13 million older people across the country, including more than one million retirees living in Scotland. This regular payment of up to £230.25 per week is available for those who have reached the UK Government's eligible retirement age and have paid at least 10 years' of National Insurance contributions.
Many people approaching the official age of retirement this year (or next) and eligible to start claiming State Pension from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), or those approaching 55 and keen to start withdrawing from a personal or workplace pension, may not be aware of a handy checklist produced by the Citizens Advice network to help navigate the unchartered territory of the road to retirement.
The nine-point checklist is a good place to start if you're nearing the end of your working life and not sure what financial support is available in later life to help you enjoy retirement to its fullest.
Retirement checklist
Citizens Advice Scotland has a full guide to retirement planning which you can read here, below is a quick overview of what you should check as you approach retirement.
1. Work out what money you'll have coming in and think about how your spending might change once you're retired - the Citizens Advice Budgeting Tool can help with drawing up a budget.
2. If you get benefits, let the benefit provider know when you will be retiring - you may have to claim a different benefit or the amount you get might change.
3. Check whether you're entitled to any new benefits - you might be able to get benefits like Carer's Allowance, Carer Support Payment, Housing Benefit or a Council Tax Reduction.
4. Work out how much is left to pay on your mortgage (if you have one) - you might want to pay off what's left with a lump sum, but you should get financial advice first
5. Get an estimate of your State Pension - the GOV.UK State Pension calculator can help you with this.
6. Track down any pension providers that you've lost contact with - the P ension Tracing Service can help with this. Call them on 0800 731 0193 or use their online form to find a lost pension.
7. Get in touch with all your pension providers and let them know you're planning for retirement - they'll usually send you important information about your pension.
8. Get financial advice or help from MoneyHelper (formerly Pension Wise) - if you have a personal pension so that you know all the options available to you. You may have to pay for independent financial advice, but it could be worth it in the long run.
9. Consider leaving your pension pot to someone when you die - there will be tax implications for doing this, so you should talk to your pension provider or an independent financial adviser.
here.
State Pension age change
It's important to be aware of the upcoming change now, especially if you have a retirement plan in place. Everyone affected by change to their State Pension age will receive a letter from the DWP well in advance.
Who will be affected by the State Pension age rise:
People born on April 6, 1960 will reach State Pension age of 66 on May 6, 2026 while those born on March 5, 1961 will reach State Pension age of 67 on February 5, 2028
Your State Pension age is the earliest age you can start receiving your State Pension. It may be different to the age you can get a workplace or personal pension.
Anyone of any age can use the online tool at GOV.UK to check their State Pension age, which can be an essential part of planning your retirement.
When you will reach State Pension age
Your Pension Credit qualifying age
When you will be eligible for free bus travel - this is at age 60 in Scotland
Check your State Pension age online here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
7 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Welfare U-turn will cost £2.5bn by 2030, Liz Kendall tells MPs
The Government's U-turn on welfare cuts will cost taxpayers around £2.5 billion by 2030, the Work and Pensions Secretary has told MPs as she laid out concessions to Labour rebels. Liz Kendall said the costs and savings of the Government's revised welfare package would be confirmed by the Office for Budget Responsibility at the budget in the autumn. But her statement to MPs on Monday suggested the measures would save less than half the £4.8 billion the Government had expected from its initial proposals. Ms Kendall's statement confirmed the concessions announced last week in an effort to head off a major rebellion by Labour backbenchers, including protecting people who claim personal independence payments from new eligibility criteria. Responding to claims this would create a 'two-tier' benefits system, Ms Kendall said: 'I would say to the House, including members opposite, that our benefits system often protects existing claimants from new rates or new rules, because lives have been built around that support, and it's often very hard for people to adjust.' Earlier, modelling from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) suggested the Government's proposals would push 150,000 more people into poverty by 2030. The figure is down from the 250,000 extra people estimated to have been facing relative poverty after housing costs under the original proposals. Modelling published by the DWP said the estimate does not include any 'potential positive impact' from extra funding and measures to support people with disabilities and long-term health conditions into work. Speaking in the Commons on Monday afternoon, Ms Kendall insisted that changes to her proposals on Pip and universal credit would 'ensure no existing claimants are put into poverty'. A Number 10 spokesman also said that the DWP's poverty modelling was 'subject to uncertainty' and did not 'reflect the full picture', including investment in the health service to help people get back to work. Ministers hope the concessions will be enough to avert defeat when MPs vote on the reforms on Tuesday, although Downing Street remains braced for a substantial revolt. A 'reasoned amendment' proposed by senior Labour backbencher Dame Meg Hillier had received support from 126 Labour MPs, enough to overturn Sir Keir Starmer's majority. On Friday, Dame Meg had described the concessions as a 'workable compromise'. But Labour MP Debbie Abrahams, who negotiated the concessions alongside Dame Meg, told ITV News on Monday that the Government had rowed back on what had been negotiated. Although she described the concessions as 'good', Ms Abrahams said the rebels were 'not quite there yet' on a deal with the Government. She added: 'The actual offer that was put to one of the negotiating team wasn't actually what we thought we had negotiated on Wednesday and Thursday. There are some issues around that.' In the Commons, both Dame Meg and Ms Abrahams raised concerns that a review of Pip, to be conducted by disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms, would report too late to have an effect on the changes scheduled for November 2026. Meanwhile, Conservative shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately accused the Government of making 'unfunded U-turns costing billions and welfare plans that are not worth the paper that they are written on'. She said: 'Their latest idea is a two-tier welfare system to trap people in a lifetime on benefits and deny them the dignity of work while leaving the taxpayer to pick up the ever-growing bill.' Tory leader Kemi Badenoch confirmed on Monday evening that her party would vote against the Government's proposals, saying they were 'not serious welfare reform'. Accusing Sir Keir of having 'watered down the small savings Labour were making', she added: 'We have a Government that is incapable of governing. For that reason, we will be voting against the welfare Bill tomorrow.' The U-turn will also cause problems for Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who will now have to find a way to cover the shortfall between the amount the Government had expected to save, and the new, lower figure. And that figure could be even higher, with economists at the Institute for Fiscal Studies and the Resolution Foundation suggesting last week the U-turn could cost in the region of £3 billion, raising the prospect of further tax rises.
North Wales Chronicle
7 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Welfare U-turn will cost £2.5bn by 2030, Liz Kendall tells MPs
Liz Kendall said the costs and savings of the Government's revised welfare package would be confirmed by the Office for Budget Responsibility at the budget in the autumn. But her statement to MPs on Monday suggested the measures would save less than half the £4.8 billion the Government had expected from its initial proposals. Ms Kendall's statement confirmed the concessions announced last week in an effort to head off a major rebellion by Labour backbenchers, including protecting people who claim personal independence payments from new eligibility criteria. Responding to claims this would create a 'two-tier' benefits system, Ms Kendall said: 'I would say to the House, including members opposite, that our benefits system often protects existing claimants from new rates or new rules, because lives have been built around that support, and it's often very hard for people to adjust.' Earlier, modelling from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) suggested the Government's proposals would push 150,000 more people into poverty by 2030. The figure is down from the 250,000 extra people estimated to have been facing relative poverty after housing costs under the original proposals. Modelling published by the DWP said the estimate does not include any 'potential positive impact' from extra funding and measures to support people with disabilities and long-term health conditions into work. Speaking in the Commons on Monday afternoon, Ms Kendall insisted that changes to her proposals on Pip and universal credit would 'ensure no existing claimants are put into poverty'. A Number 10 spokesman also said that the DWP's poverty modelling was 'subject to uncertainty' and did not 'reflect the full picture', including investment in the health service to help people get back to work. Ministers hope the concessions will be enough to avert defeat when MPs vote on the reforms on Tuesday, although Downing Street remains braced for a substantial revolt. A 'reasoned amendment' proposed by senior Labour backbencher Dame Meg Hillier had received support from 126 Labour MPs, enough to overturn Sir Keir Starmer's majority. On Friday, Dame Meg had described the concessions as a 'workable compromise'. But Labour MP Debbie Abrahams, who negotiated the concessions alongside Dame Meg, told ITV News on Monday that the Government had rowed back on what had been negotiated. Although she described the concessions as 'good', Ms Abrahams said the rebels were 'not quite there yet' on a deal with the Government. She added: 'The actual offer that was put to one of the negotiating team wasn't actually what we thought we had negotiated on Wednesday and Thursday. There are some issues around that.' In the Commons, both Dame Meg and Ms Abrahams raised concerns that a review of Pip, to be conducted by disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms, would report too late to have an effect on the changes scheduled for November 2026. Meanwhile, Conservative shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately accused the Government of making 'unfunded U-turns costing billions and welfare plans that are not worth the paper that they are written on'. She said: 'Their latest idea is a two-tier welfare system to trap people in a lifetime on benefits and deny them the dignity of work while leaving the taxpayer to pick up the ever-growing bill.' Tory leader Kemi Badenoch confirmed on Monday evening that her party would vote against the Government's proposals, saying they were 'not serious welfare reform'. Accusing Sir Keir of having 'watered down the small savings Labour were making', she added: 'We have a Government that is incapable of governing. For that reason, we will be voting against the welfare Bill tomorrow.' The U-turn will also cause problems for Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who will now have to find a way to cover the shortfall between the amount the Government had expected to save, and the new, lower figure. And that figure could be even higher, with economists at the Institute for Fiscal Studies and the Resolution Foundation suggesting last week the U-turn could cost in the region of £3 billion, raising the prospect of further tax rises.
South Wales Guardian
8 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Welfare U-turn will cost £2.5bn by 2030, Liz Kendall tells MPs
Liz Kendall said the costs and savings of the Government's revised welfare package would be confirmed by the Office for Budget Responsibility at the budget in the autumn. But her statement to MPs on Monday suggested the measures would save less than half the £4.8 billion the Government had expected from its initial proposals. Ms Kendall's statement confirmed the concessions announced last week in an effort to head off a major rebellion by Labour backbenchers, including protecting people who claim personal independence payments from new eligibility criteria. Responding to claims this would create a 'two-tier' benefits system, Ms Kendall said: 'I would say to the House, including members opposite, that our benefits system often protects existing claimants from new rates or new rules, because lives have been built around that support, and it's often very hard for people to adjust.' Earlier, modelling from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) suggested the Government's proposals would push 150,000 more people into poverty by 2030. The figure is down from the 250,000 extra people estimated to have been facing relative poverty after housing costs under the original proposals. Modelling published by the DWP said the estimate does not include any 'potential positive impact' from extra funding and measures to support people with disabilities and long-term health conditions into work. Speaking in the Commons on Monday afternoon, Ms Kendall insisted that changes to her proposals on Pip and universal credit would 'ensure no existing claimants are put into poverty'. A Number 10 spokesman also said that the DWP's poverty modelling was 'subject to uncertainty' and did not 'reflect the full picture', including investment in the health service to help people get back to work. Ministers hope the concessions will be enough to avert defeat when MPs vote on the reforms on Tuesday, although Downing Street remains braced for a substantial revolt. A 'reasoned amendment' proposed by senior Labour backbencher Dame Meg Hillier had received support from 126 Labour MPs, enough to overturn Sir Keir Starmer's majority. On Friday, Dame Meg had described the concessions as a 'workable compromise'. But Labour MP Debbie Abrahams, who negotiated the concessions alongside Dame Meg, told ITV News on Monday that the Government had rowed back on what had been negotiated. Although she described the concessions as 'good', Ms Abrahams said the rebels were 'not quite there yet' on a deal with the Government. She added: 'The actual offer that was put to one of the negotiating team wasn't actually what we thought we had negotiated on Wednesday and Thursday. There are some issues around that.' In the Commons, both Dame Meg and Ms Abrahams raised concerns that a review of Pip, to be conducted by disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms, would report too late to have an effect on the changes scheduled for November 2026. Meanwhile, Conservative shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately accused the Government of making 'unfunded U-turns costing billions and welfare plans that are not worth the paper that they are written on'. She said: 'Their latest idea is a two-tier welfare system to trap people in a lifetime on benefits and deny them the dignity of work while leaving the taxpayer to pick up the ever-growing bill.' Tory leader Kemi Badenoch confirmed on Monday evening that her party would vote against the Government's proposals, saying they were 'not serious welfare reform'. Accusing Sir Keir of having 'watered down the small savings Labour were making', she added: 'We have a Government that is incapable of governing. For that reason, we will be voting against the welfare Bill tomorrow.' The U-turn will also cause problems for Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who will now have to find a way to cover the shortfall between the amount the Government had expected to save, and the new, lower figure. And that figure could be even higher, with economists at the Institute for Fiscal Studies and the Resolution Foundation suggesting last week the U-turn could cost in the region of £3 billion, raising the prospect of further tax rises.
