Information Commission recommends inclusion of RTI Act in the curriculum of PU and degree courses
The Karnataka State Information Commissioners have appealed to Chief Secretary Shalini Rajneesh to include this in the agenda for discussion at a high-level meeting on the RTI Act being presided over by Additional Chief Secretary Gaurav Gupta on July 14.
The Information Commissioners have also suggested to the government to recommend the inclusion of a lesson on the RTI to the board of studies and syllabus revision boards of universities, according to an official release.
Expressing concern that there was still a need to create awareness about the RTI Act among government employees though 20 years had passed since the legislation came into effect, the Information Commissioners have suggested that the RTI should be a part of the subject for competitive examinations that are conducted by the Karnataka Public Service Commission and the Karnataka Examinations Authority.
Similarly, there was a need to provide training on the RTI Act to government officials and officers on the lines of training on various issues being imparted to them, they said and suggested that RTI should be one of the subjects for training being imparted by District Training Institute, Administrative Training Institute, and Fiscal Policy Institute.
Pointing out that the RTI dashboard on the website of the DPAR was not being used effectively, the commissioners said the responsibility of managing this dashboard should be entrusted to the Information Commission.
They also suggested that one more floor should be built at the Karnataka Mahiti Soudha so that the two court halls of the commission that are presently located in rented buildings could be accommodated in the main building itself.
They also sought that gunmen should be posted at the court halls of the Information Commission and assigned for the Information Commissioners.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Cash-strapped Himachal turns to lotteries for revenue
Cash-strapped Himachal turned to revival of the state-run lotteries to boost revenue. The state cabinet on Thursday gave its nod to initiate the operation of lotteries in the state that has been banned since 1999. Lottery was banned in the state by the Himachal government headed by BJP leader Prem Kumar Dhumal in 1999 and made its violation punishable under Lotteries (Regulation) Act. (File) The move aims at increasing the state's revenue amid declining central allocations and the withdrawal of GST compensation. The debt burden of the state government has already crossed ₹1 lakh crore and the state government is looking for measures to generate revenue. Lottery was banned in the state by the Himachal government headed by BJP leader Prem Kumar Dhumal in 1999 and made its violation punishable under Lotteries (Regulation) Act. Industry minister Harshwardhan Chauhan said the government expects to generate an additional income of ₹50 to ₹100 crore annually through the lottery system. Chauhan said that Punjab earned ₹235 crore and Kerala a staggering ₹13,582 crore from lotteries in the last financial year alone. 'There is no countrywide ban on lotteries. Currently, 13 Indian states, including Kerala, Goa, Maharashtra, Punjab, and Sikkim run legal lotteries. Himachal too will benefit if the scheme is regulated properly,' Chauhan said after the cabinet meeting. Officials said that the state government is likely to introduce specific legislation on lotteries in the upcoming monsoon session of the assembly, beginning August 18. 'This would ensure safeguards against fraud and protect consumers from illegal operators,' said a senior official not willing to be named. The finance department made a detailed presentation before the cabinet on the issue of starting operation of lotteries in the hill state to generate additional revenue. The decision has been taken on the recommendation of the Resource Mobilisation committee, headed by deputy chief minister Mukesh Agnihotri. Legalising lottery not in state's interest: Jai Ram Leader of the Opposition, Jai Ram Thakur, on Thursday lashed out at Sukhu government for legalising lottery. Jai Ram said, 'As a conclusion of the four-day cabinet meeting, the so-called reformist Sukhu government has legalised the lottery. Earlier, the lottery had been banned. Many families were devastated due to it—homes were auctioned off, and some people were driven to commit suicide. Now the government wants to bring back that dark era'. 'In the name of a self-reliant Himachal, the government is giving legal recognition to cannabis cultivation. It is allowing liquor sales wherever it pleases while shutting down schools and colleges. And now, going even further, it has legalized the lottery—so the government can even wipe out people's savings. This policy is not in the interest of the state, and the Bharatiya Janata Party strongly condemns it.'
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Goa assembly clears bill to regularise pre-2014 unauthorised houses on govt land
Panaji, Aug 1 (PTI) The Goa assembly has passed the Goa Land Revenue Code (Amendment) Bill, 2025, which will regularise unauthorised houses built on government land before February 28, 2014. The bill, moved by Revenue Minister Atanasio Monserrate on Thursday, seeks to add a new section — 38A — in the Goa Land Revenue Code, 1968, empowering the deputy collector to regularise such encroachments and confer Class I occupancy to eligible applicants. The legislation was passed in the House amidst debate from the opposition, who raised concerns that it would benefit non-Goans. According to the bill, the regularisation of a structure is subject to payment of an occupancy price, which will be notified separately by the government. 'It applies only to landless Goan residents who have lived in the state for at least 15 years before the cut-off date and who do not own any other land, house, flat, or ancestral share in property," Chief Minister Pramod Sawant told the House. The bill, however, excludes land falling within protected forests, wildlife sanctuaries, coastal regulation zones, eco-sensitive zones, Khazan lands (low-lying coastal wetland), road setbacks, and natural water channels. Sawant clarified that such structures will not be covered under the purview of this bill. The bill states that the maximum area eligible for regularisation is capped at 400 sq metres, which includes the plinth area and a two-meter buffer around houses, if available. Any encroached area beyond the prescribed limit must be surrendered to the government as a precondition for regularisation. The bill mandates that applicants file for regularisation within six months of notification of the Act, and the deputy collector will have another six months to dispose of such applications. The legislation also imposes a 20-year restriction on the sale or transfer of the regularised property, except by gift to a family member. 'Any false declaration by applicants may lead to cancellation of the regularisation, penal action including imprisonment up to two years, and a fine of up to Rs 1 lakh," the legislation states. The bill aims to provide tenure security to long-time occupants while also curbing large-scale encroachments and augmenting state revenue, as per the Statement of Objects and Reasons. There are no financial liabilities to the state under the bill, although it is expected to generate revenue through the occupancy price. PTI RPS ARU view comments First Published: August 01, 2025, 08:45 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
2008 Malegaon Blast Case: Special NIA court acquits all 7 accused
Mumbai: Seventeen years after the blast, a special NIA court in Mumbai has acquitted all the seven accused, including former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit, in the 2008 Malegaon blast case. The NIA court, in its judgment, said the prosecution had 'failed to prove the case' and that the accused 'deserved the benefit of doubt'. The provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) were not applicable to the case, the court said. The judge observed that the prosecution could not prove that the bike to which the bomb was allegedly strapped, belonged to Pragya Thakur. Pragya Thakur had turned into a sansyasi two years before the bomb blast took place in Malegaon. She had already given up all the material things in life before the incident happened, the court hard to establish prosecution's claims that there were any conspiracy between the accused. There is no evidence to prove the claims that an organisation named Abhinav Bharat that was founded by Pragya Thakur and Col Purohit, used the funds generated through the organisation to execute the bomb blast, the court further observed. The court also said there was no evidence to prove that Lt Col Purohit had sourced RDX from Kashmir and assembled the bomb at his residence. On September 29, 2008, a bomb exploded in Malegaon, Nashik district, killing 10 and injuring over 100 people. A case was filed by the Azad Nagar police station but later re-registered by the Anti Terrorism Squad (ATS) in November 2008 and charges under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) were applied. In January 2009, the ATS filed its first chargesheet followed it with a supplementary chargesheet in April 2011. However, in April 2011, the Ministry of Home Affairs suo motu directed the NIA to take up further investigation of the case. In May 2016, the NIA had filed its second supplementary chargesheet and dropped MCOCA charges against former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur, Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Purohit, retired Major Ramesh Upadhyay, Sameer Kulkarni, Ajay Rahirkar, Sudhakar Dwivedi and Sudhakar Chaturvedi. In December 2017, Special Judge S D Tekale dropped MCOCA charges and charged them under Sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Arms Act, the Explosive Substances Act and the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act. All the accused are currently on bail.
