
Willmar City Council again defers Municipal Utilities land purchase decision
on Monday again deferred action on a purchase agreement for 27 acres of land for
new facilities.
The presentation and discussion for that agenda item took more than an hour, after which action was deferred until the April 7 meeting of the City Council.
The land that Willmar Municipal Utilities wants to purchase for $600,000 for its new facilities is located just east of the Highway 71/23 Bypass and north of Willmar Avenue Southeast. It is adjacent to, but not within, the city limits.
The Municipal Utilities Commission approved the purchase agreement during its Feb. 24 meeting and it was on the City Council's agenda March 3 for approval. This is the fifth property down the list of properties that Willmar Municipal Utilities has tried to purchase since the search for land started in 2023.
The City Council on March 3 chose to defer approval for 30 days or until the next council meeting. City Attorney Robert Scott on Monday explained to the council that the City Charter's language is ambiguous, and he interpreted that to mean that the council could continue the matter to the April 7 meeting.
Some members of the City Council are questioning why Willmar Municipal Utilities wants to build its new facilities outside city limits — where there is significant cost to extend city sewer and water infrastructure — when there are parcels in the
that, in the opinion of those councilors, would be suitable for Municipal Utilities needs.
It should be noted that Scott has explained that if the council allows the purchase, the land would be considered owned by the city and be annexed into the city.
While most of the presentation and discussion focused on comparing the two properties, Willmar Municipal Utilities Facilities and Maintenance Supervisor Kevin Marti informed the City Council that if the purchase agreement were not approved, Willmar Municipal Utilities would not be looking at the industrial park location because other properties score higher on its list.
"This (Willmar Avenue) property scores quite a bit better than the industrial park property," Marti said. " ... There's other properties that are better, in our opinion, in our scoring system, than the industrial park. We would have to investigate those."
The cost to extend sewer and water services to the land on the bypass would be an estimated $2.7 million. However, that infrastructure, if built, would be able to service more than 400 acres of land in that area, not only the 27 acres to be purchased, according to Marti.
Of the estimated cost of $2.7 million, Willmar Municipal Utilities is responsible for more than $800,000 for extending the water main, and the remainder would be city costs to extend the sewer main and install a lift station.
Although the city does not foresee having the funds to pay for the infrastructure project at this time, one of the contingencies in the purchase agreement would be for Willmar Municipal Utilities to install private water and sewer services until such time that funds become available.
Marti asked the City Council if that is something it would consider allowing, which would not result in tax or rate increases because it is already built into the budget for the new facilities.
"I guess I worry about doing private services within the city limits," said Councilor Tom Gilbertson. "It obviously sets a precedent for any person in the city of Willmar to say, 'I don't want to hook onto the Willmar Municipal Utilities power grid. I don't want to hook onto their wastewater going forward.' And I don't think it's in your best interest to do that."
Although he said he agreed, Marti paraphrased city ordinance that states that if it is cost-prohibitive to extend sewer and water to certain properties, those properties can be served by private sewer and water until such a time that sewer and water services are extended and those properties can connect to the city system.
"That's what we would ask here. If there just isn't money in the cookie jar to do this, that would be what we would ask and pursue for this property," Marti said, noting it may be 10 years or more before the city would be able to extend the services across the bypass feasibly.
Some councilors also took issue with a perceived lack of communication to the city from Willmar Municipal Utilities about its plans.
Although there was not any direct communication with City Administrator Leslie Valiant or Willmar Planning and Development Director Christopher Corbett, Marti pointed out that since October, Willmar Municipal Utilities has been communicating with City Operations Director Kyle Box, who works directly under Valiant, and also with Kandiyohi County Engineer Mel Odens, the county's zoning board, the Minnesota Department of Transportation and a township supervisor.
"What does the Planning Commission say as far as what the future annexation of property to add to Willmar looks like?" asked Councilor Stephen Gardner. "Is this (property) even part of it? ... Is this utility pushing us in the direction we don't want to go?"
Despite the City Council's hesitancy in approving the purchase agreement, Mayor Doug Reese said he likes the location due to its ability to extend the city east of the bypass.
"I like that location because of the possibilities of annexation and extending services, because I know there has to be something that trips it up to allow the expansion to go to the east, because that bypass is a real barrier to expansion," Reese said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
Tax Credit Housing Project Costs Continue To Be 'Ridiculous.'
Sen. Todd Young (R-IN) talks to reporters just off the floor of the Senate Chamber. Senator Young ... More remains one of the biggest boosters of the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program in spite of it's costs (Photo by) There is a shocking story in the Washington Post with the headline, These publicly funded homes for the poor cost $1.2 million each to build. For me, what's shocking is not the cost, but that there is surprise among the people quoted in the story, especially a Washington D.C. City Councilmember who attended a ribbon cutting for the project only later to find out the price tag. I've been watching the per unit cost of 'affordable' housing, especially projects built using Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LITHC) climb for years. That simply is not a surprise to me or anyone else paying attention. That the Washington Post and local political leaders are just now figuring this out is scandalous and only emphasizes the ongoing need for reform. The Post story highlights 5 projects that range from $785,293 per unit to the $1,182,017 per unit. Costs for LIHTC projects continue to be "ridiculous." Taking the math further, that's 468 units for a total of $438,262,683 or $936,458.72 per unit. To get a sense of the scale of this spending, consider that the average house in Washington D.C., according to Zillow, sells for $607,908, or $328,550.72 less than the average cost of the units created in these projects. Also consider that for the price of building 1 unit at the pricey Ontario Place project, one could buy two homes in the District of Columbia, priced at $591,008 each. Finally, in Adams Morgan where the Ontario Place project was built, the average price, again, according to Zillow, is just $597,832. What's the excuse? Jubilee, the developer, told the Post in a statement (they wouldn't return phone calls), that 'Placing deeply affordable housing in high opportunity neighborhoods with on site and nearby programs and services helps harness the power of zip code.' The Post explains that the developer believes that 'The location promotes tenants' success by connecting them to high-performing schools, transportation options, grocery stores and other advantages, the statement said.' For these prices, Jubilee could just buy all the tenants a new car and free food and delivery for life from Whole Foods. And D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson, according to the Post, called the spending 'ridiculous' and 'really disturbing.' I agree. And so would most people in the housing world. Yet the culprits behind these projects wouldn't go on the record in an interview, and if they responded at all, sent a statement. The problem is the 'power of the zip code' doesn't make any sense. Why are market rate units, houses not apartments, selling – not renting – for half the cost of these rental units. If the 'power of the zip code' was a real thing, it would have made more sense to buy 900 people houses in Adams Morgan and other DC neighborhoods rather than building them and having to operate them into the future. But Mendelson is part of the problem too. He says in his comments that choices have to be made to avoid these kinds of costs. 'But that analytical work has never happened.' But yes, it has. I've been doing it for years. About 6 years ago, I looked at 10 years of LIHTC projects in Seattle and found that the average cost per unit over the period was about $245,000 per unit. What I found is that, depending on the year, the costs per unit were almost always the same or higher than a typical single-family home. One of the most egregious cases was a project called 12th Avenue Arts that rang in at $47 million for 88 units, a total development cost of $534,000 per unit. I wrote about that project in 2016 in a post titled When Will Affordable Housing Advocates Push For More Supply, Fewer Rules? The answer, based on the numbers from D.C. seems like never. One of the people that is most stubborn in their support of these spendy projects is Senator Todd Young, a Republican from Indiana. In his state there is one project, Artesian Place in Martinsville, Indiana with a price tag of $15,307,352 for 34 units, a total development cost of $450,216 per unit. How much to buy a single-family house, with three bedrooms in Martinsville? Listings on Zillow range from $200,000 to $450,000. According to Senator Young in a recent statement expressing his support for the expansion of LIHTC, this sort of 'investment' will 'help to tackle the housing affordability crisis head on to help Hoosier families, expand our workforce, and strengthen our communities.' Senator Young needs to turn over his membership card in the conservative club if he's going to support such profligate spending. If a Republican from Indiana won't hit the pause button on this sort of outrageous spending, it's difficult to see where the political will can come from. I thought maybe total development cost hitting $1 million per unit might be the threshold that would start a move toward reform. But as I put it in a post here a few years ago, Senator Young and his fellow LIHTC boosters seem to be saying what Nixon told John Dean when the later said keeping Watergate quiet could cost $1 million dollars: 'We could get that.'
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
NYC Passes $116 Billion Budget as Mayor Adams Looks to Election
(Bloomberg) -- New York City Mayor Eric Adams reached a deal with the City Council on a $115.9 billion budget, adding new funding for legal services for migrants and more money for early childhood education. Struggling Downtowns Are Looking to Lure New Crowds Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer The spending plan for the fiscal year that starts July 1, which the City Council approved on Monday, is the final one in Adams' first term. The budget is more than $3 billion larger than the $112 billion spending plan the city approved last year, and it comes as the mayor, who was elected as a Democrat, is seeking reelection as an independent in November. While Adams' previous budgets had been marked by dire predictions for the city's future — and what some critics decried as overly conservative revenue forecasts — the new plan adds funding for city services that the mayor had previously targeted for freezes or cuts. It passed unanimously— a rare moment of concord between the mayor and Council in a relationship that has mostly been acrimonious in previous years' budget negotiations. Adams branded the spending plan as the 'best budget ever' earlier this year. The plan adds roughly $50 million for legal services for immigrants, and will pay for a $10 million pilot program to provide free childcare for children ages 2 and under. It also fully funds the city's childcare program for 3-year-olds. The new funding represents a starkly different tack by Adams. Two years ago, he implemented unpopular cuts in response to the costly influx of thousands of migrants, which he estimated would cost the city billions of dollars. He slashed service hours at some libraries in response to the migrant crisis, cuts he partially restored last year after migrant arrivals slowed and costs sharply declined. The new budget adds seven-day service at 10 more city libraries, with locations to be announced at a future date. Some fiscal watchdogs criticized the new budget, which comes as the city faces potential funding threats from President Donald Trump's administration. The new plan is 'unaffordable' and 'unprepared for federal cuts,' said Andrew Rein, president of the Citizens Budget Commission, a nonpartisan fiscal watchdog group. The Trump administration has already paused or terminated nearly $400 million in federal grants the city received in the current fiscal year, and $134.5 million in funding for the next one, according to an analysis from state Comptroller Tom DiNapoli's office. City budget officials warned in financial documents released in May that Trump's immigration policies, federal spending cuts and proposed tariffs could create a 'severe downturn' in New York's economy, impairing the still-struggling office market, damping tourism and costing as many as 63,000 jobs in the current year, even under a mild recession scenario. (Updates with budget passing unanimously in fourth paragraph.) America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too China's Homegrown Jewelry Superstar Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


Business Wire
a day ago
- Business Wire
Marti Announces 2025 and 2026 Investment Plan
ISTANBUL--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Türkiye's leading mobility super app Marti Technologies, Inc. ('Marti' or the 'Company') (NYSE American: MRT), and the only at scale ride-hailing operator in the country, today announced a new investment plan for 2025 and 2026. Marti's 2025 and 2026 investment plan consists of two pillars: New city launches: In light of the strong growth of its ride-hailing business in its existing cities of Istanbul, Ankara, Izmir, and Antalya, Marti is launching its business in the new cities of Bursa, Konya, Adana, Kocaeli, Mersin, and Kayseri. These new city launches expand the population living in the cities served by Marti's ride-hailing service 1.5x, from 28.8 million to 42.2 million people. In order to prioritize the growth of its service in its new cities, Marti does not foresee charging drivers in these cities a subscription fee in 2025. Ride-hailing team growth: Marti will invest in growing and increasing the capabilities of its ride-hailing team to support a full scale ride-hailing business in Türkiye. The team will grow from its current size of around 180 people to approximately 260 people, with an emphasis on hires in the technology, product, business operations, and business performance departments that are key contributors to delivering optimal rider and driver experiences. Together with these investments, Marti reiterates its 2025 revenue forecast of $34.0 million, and revises its adjusted EBITDA* forecast from $3.0M to -$17.0M. Taken together, these investments will further cement Marti's position as the leading ride-hailing operator across Türkiye. The 2025 revenue and adjusted EBITDA guidance provided herein are based on Marti's current estimates and assumptions and are not a guarantee of future performance. Such guidance is subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including the risk factors discussed in the Company's reports on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission ('SEC'), that could cause actual results to differ materially. There can be no assurance that the Company will achieve the results expressed by this guidance. * This press release does not include a reconciliation of forward-looking Adjusted EBITDA for 2025 because the Company is unable, without making unreasonable efforts, to provide a meaningful or reasonably accurate calculation or estimation of certain reconciling items which could be significant to the Company's results. Non-GAAP Financial Measures Certain financial information and data contained herein are not presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States ('GAAP'), including adjusted EBITDA. We define these metrics as follows: Adjusted EBITDA as depreciation, amortization, taxes, financial expenses (net of financial income) and one-time charges and non-cash adjustments, plus net income (loss). The one-time charges and non-cash adjustments are mainly comprised of customs tax provision expenses resulting from the one-time amendment of customs duties and lawsuit provision expense which the Company does not consider the provision to be reflective of its normal cash operations. About Marti: Founded in 2018, Marti is Türkiye's leading mobility app, offering multiple transportation services to its riders. Marti operates a ride-hailing service that matches riders with car, motorcycle, and taxi drivers, and operates a large fleet of rental e-mopeds, e-bikes, and e-scooters. All of Marti's offerings are serviced by proprietary software systems and IoT infrastructure. For more information, visit Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements Certain statements made in this press release constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the 'safe harbor' provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements contained in this press release that do not relate to matters of historical fact should be considered forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements related to the ride-hailing business and its anticipated growth and impact on the Company's cash flow, the Company's expected revenue and adjusted EBITDA for 2025. These forward-looking statements are based on management's current expectations. These statements are neither promises nor guarantees, but involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including the risks discussed in the Company's filings with the SEC, including the Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F. Marti undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of future events, new information or otherwise, except as required by law.