logo
Not that Benning: Hegseth renames Fort Moore, but not for Confederate general, he says

Not that Benning: Hegseth renames Fort Moore, but not for Confederate general, he says

USA Today04-03-2025
Not that Benning: Hegseth renames Fort Moore, but not for Confederate general, he says
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Hegseth: 'Diversity is our strength' is dumbest phrase in military history
U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth called 'diversity is our strength' the dumbest phrase in military history.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth renamed Fort Moore to Fort Benning, following through on his pledge to restore the original names of military bases, also including Fort Bragg – but not exactly honoring their Confederate namesakes.
Hegseth renamed the Georgia base in honor of Cpl. Fred G. Benning, a World War I veteran awarded the Distinguished Service Cross, and not the Confederate general for whom it was originally named, according to a memo released Monday. Earlier this month, Hegseth also renamed Fort Bragg – another base whose original Confederate-inspired name was restored – in that case to honor a distinguished World War II soldier named Roland Bragg.
Hegseth had vowed to revert to the former names as part of his sprawling effort to erase diversity programs throughout the military. In his first remarks as defense Secretary, he referred to the bases as Fort Bragg and Fort Benning, hinting at changes to come. Last year, he called names like Liberty and Moore "garbage," and said changing them "breaks" a "generational link."
Fort Benning's name was changed to Fort Moore in 2023 in honor of Hal Moore, a Vietnam War general, and his wife Julia. Hal Moore was highly decorated for his service during the battle of Ia Drang. Julia Moore changed the way the Army notifies families of servicemembers killed in action through her activism.
Ty Seidule, a retired Army brigadier general and co-chairman of the commission that swapped out names of Confederate soldiers who waged war against the United States for American heroes, blasted the decision on Monday. He called Hegseth's decision 'capricious and cruel.'
'I'm heartbroken. First family to ever be recognized. First spouse. Legendary heroes who are buried on the post,' Seidule said. 'The Moores were and are an inspiration to all soldiers and all Americans.'
Hegseth's decision, Seidule said, overturns the will of the American people. Congress created the commission and accepted its findings.
'Commemoration reflects our values and nobody better reflects the values and mission of Fort Moore than the Moore family,' Seidule said.
The base's name was changed, along with that of Fort Bragg in North Carolina – which was renamed Fort Liberty during the Biden administration. Fort Cavazos – formerly Fort Hood – in Texas was renamed in honor of Richard Cavazos, the first Hispanic American four-star general.
More: Fort Liberty now Fort Bragg. What's the history behind the name and Hegseth's decision?
The changes came as part of an effort in Congress to scrub the names of Confederates from public tributes amid a national reckoning about institutional racism in the wake of George Floyd's murder. A commission created during former President Joe Biden's presidency issued recommendations for new names for bases, streets and monuments that honored Confederate leaders.
By picking names slightly different from those of the bases' original honorees, Hegseth skirted a Biden-era law that barred them from being named after people who fought against the U.S. in the Confederacy.
As part of the Trump administration's push to eradicate diversity initiatives, Hegseth has banned transgender people from the military and ditched official Defense Department celebrations such as Black History Month. Hegseth also ordered 8% of the military's spending next year to be redirected from "low-impact" Biden-era initiatives, including diversity programs, towards the military's "core mission of deterring and winning wars."
Corporal Benning, who served during World War I, received the Distinguished Service Cross, the Army's second-highest honor for valor, for his heroism on Oct. 9, 1918, in France.
Benning's platoon commander had been killed and two non-commissioned officers had been wounded in fighting south of Exermont, France. Benning then led the remaining 20 men through heavy fire to their mission supporting the Meuse-Argonne offensive, according to the Army.
Hal and Julia Moore's son explains Fort Benning name change
Retired Army Col. David Moore, Hal and Julia Moore's son, told USA TODAY in 2023 that he had grown to understand why Fort Benning's name was changed. He had lived there as a 3-year-old and went on to graduate from West Point in 1984.
Times had changed, he said, and naming the base after his parents who had loved their family, soldiers and the military profession made sense.
"In the end, it's the kind of force we put on the battlefield to win our nation's wars," Moore said. "I just hope and pray that this helps build a better culture for generations of soldiers and families behind me."
Henry Benning, for whom the base was originally named in 1918, had been an 'ardent secessionist, bitter opponent of abolition and senior officer in the Confederate Army,' according to the Army's website. 'He is on record as saying that he would rather be stricken with illness and starvation than see slaves liberated and given equality as citizens.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

August recess can't hide tensions ahead for Congress on spending and Trump nominations
August recess can't hide tensions ahead for Congress on spending and Trump nominations

Boston Globe

time19 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

August recess can't hide tensions ahead for Congress on spending and Trump nominations

Lawmakers will use much of September to work on spending bills for the coming budget year, which begins Oct. 1. They likely will need to pass a short-term spending measure to keep the government funded for a few weeks while they work on a longer-term measure that covers the full year. It's not unusual for leaders from both parties to blame the other party for a potential shutdown, but the rhetoric began extra early this year, signaling the threat of a stoppage is more serious than usual. Advertisement On Monday, Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer and House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries sent their Republican counterparts a sharply-worded letter calling for a meeting to discuss 'the government funding deadline and the health care crisis you have visited upon the American people.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up They said it will take bipartisanship to avert a 'painful, unnecessary shutdown.' 'Yet it is clear that the Trump Administration and many in your party are preparing to go it alone and continue to legislate on a solely Republican basis,' said the letter sent to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson. Republicans have taken note of the warnings and are portraying the Democrats as itching for a shutdown they hope to blame on the GOP. Advertisement 'It was disturbing to hear the Democrat leader threaten to shut down the government in his July 8 Dear Colleague letter,' Thune said on Saturday. '... I really hope that Democrats will not embrace that position but will continue to work with Republicans to fund the government.' Different approaches from the House and Senate So far, the House has approved two of the 12 annual spending bills, mostly along party lines. The Senate has passed three on a strongly bipartisan basis. The House is pursuing steep, non-defense spending cuts. The Senate is rejecting many of those cuts. One side will have to give. And any final bill will need some Democratic support to generate the 60 votes necessary to get a spending measure to the finish line. Some Democratic senators are also wanting assurances from Republicans that there won't be more efforts in the coming weeks to claw back or cancel funding already approved by Congress. 'If Republicans want to make a deal, then let's make a deal, but only if Republicans include an agreement they won't take back that deal a few weeks later,' said Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. Rep. Chuck Fleischmann, R-Tenn., a veteran member of the House Appropriations committee, said the Democratic minority in both chambers has suffered so many legislative losses this year, 'that they are stuck between a rock and their voting base.' Democrats may want to demonstrate more resistance to Trump, but they would rue a shutdown, he warned. 'The reality would be, if the government were shut down, the administration, Donald Trump, would have the ability to decide where to spend and not spend,' Fleischmann said. 'Schumer knows that, Jeffries knows that. We know that. I think it would be much more productive if we start talking about a short-term (continuing resolution.)' Advertisement Republican angry about pace of nominations Republicans are considering changes to Senate rules to get more of Trump's nominees confirmed. Thune said last week that during the same point in Joe Biden's presidency, 49 of his 121 civilians nominees had been confirmed on an expedited basis through a voice vote or a unanimous consent request. Trump has had none of his civilian nominees confirmed on an expedited basis. Democrats have insisted on roll call votes for all of them, a lengthy process than can take days. 'I think they're desperately in need of change,' Thune said of Senate rules for considering nominees. 'I think that the last six months have demonstrated that this process, nominations is broken. And so I expect there will be some good robust conversations about that.' Schumer said a rules change would be a 'huge mistake,' especially as Senate Republicans will need Democratic votes to pass spending bills and other legislation moving forward. The Senate held a rare weekend session as Republicans worked to get more of Trump's nominees confirmed. Negotiations focused on advancing dozens of additional Trump nominees in exchange for some concessions on releasing some already approved spending. At times, lawmakers spoke of progress on a potential deal. But it was clear that there would be no agreement when Trump attacked Schumer on social media Saturday evening and told Republicans to pack it up and go home. 'Tell Schumer, who is under tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the Radical Left Lunatics, to GO TO HELL!' Trump posted on Truth Social. Associated Press writers Mary Clare Jalonick and Joey Cappelletti contributed to this report. Advertisement

In his own words: Trump's comments over the past year on the jobs report
In his own words: Trump's comments over the past year on the jobs report

San Francisco Chronicle​

time19 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

In his own words: Trump's comments over the past year on the jobs report

WASHINGTON (AP) — In firing the head of the agency that produces monthly jobs figures, President Donald Trump alleged that the recent weaker-than-expected numbers were phony and that positive numbers reported before the 2024 election were manipulated to make him look bad. It's a familiar cadence Trump has adopted in reacting to jobs reports: He treats the figures as legitimate when they are favorable to him and fraudulent when they are less than stellar or seem to benefit his opponent. Aug. 5, 2024 'STOCK MARKETS ARE CRASHING, JOBS NUMBERS ARE TERRIBLE, WE ARE HEADING TO WORLD WAR lll, AND WE HAVE TWO OF THE MOST INCOMPETENT 'LEADERS' IN HISTORY. THIS IS NOT GOOD!!!' — Trump post on Truth Social Suggesting President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris were responsible, Trump was reacting to the news that U.S. employees had added 114,000 jobs in July — 35% fewer than expected — and that the unemployment rate was at its highest level in nearly three years. Nov. 1, 2024 'Today's jobs report is a great embarrassment for our Nation. Kamala has lied for years about their pathetic job growth, which has never been real. Kamala killed 46,000 manufacturing jobs, while 773,000 Americans have lost employment in just the last year — all while their jobs have been taken by foreign-born workers. America is a Nation in Decline because Sleepy Joe, and Lyin' Kamala, didn't do their job. 'TRUMP' WILL FIX IT! MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! GO VOTE!' — Trump post on Truth Social Days ahead of the presidential election, Trump blasted news that U.S. employers had added just 12,000 jobs in October, a total that economists say had been held down by the effects of strikes and hurricanes that left many workers temporarily off payrolls. Nov. 4, 2024 'Nearly 250,000 people dropped out of the labor force. They dropped out because they couldn't get a job. Can you imagine that? Can you imagine? These are the numbers, and they don't want to talk about it, but that's OK. These numbers are disqualifying.' — Trump campaign rally in Raleigh, North Carolina According to Bureau of Labor Statistics data, around 220,000 people left the civilian U.S. workforce from September to October 2024 during Biden's presidency. April 4, 2025 'GREAT JOB NUMBERS, FAR BETTER THAN EXPECTED. IT'S ALREADY WORKING. HANG TOUGH, WE CAN'T LOSE!!!" — Trump post on Truth Social Trump quickly praised news that in March, U.S. employers had added a surprising 228,000 jobs, showing that the American labor market was in solid shape as he embarked on a risky trade war with the rest of the world. The hiring numbers were up from 117,000 in February and were nearly double the 130,000 that economists had expected. June 6, 2025 'GREAT JOB NUMBERS, STOCK MARKET UP BIG! AT THE SAME TIME, BILLIONS POURING IN FROM TARIFFS!!!' — Trump post on Truth Social Trump responded enthusiastically to the initial numbers on the May jobs report, which indicated that the economy added 139,000 jobs. That estimate was later revised down to 125,000 jobs, prior to the most recent revision down to just 19,000. Aug. 1, 2025 'I was just informed that our Country's 'Jobs Numbers' are being produced by a Biden Appointee, Dr. Erika McEntarfer, the Commissioner of Labor Statistics, who faked the Jobs Numbers before the Election to try and boost Kamala's chances of Victory. ... I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY." — Trump post on Truth Social Trump ousted McEntarfer following a report showed hiring slowed in July and was much weaker in May and June than previously reported, taking issue in subsequent days to the revisions of jobs figures that are a regular occurrence with the monthly reporting.

Grassley places holds on three Trump Treasury nominees
Grassley places holds on three Trump Treasury nominees

The Hill

time19 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Grassley places holds on three Trump Treasury nominees

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is placing a hold on three of President Trump's nominees to the Treasury Department over forthcoming administration rules that are expected to hamper tax credits for wind and solar energy. Grassley, who recently engaged in a heated back-and-forth with Trump over the handling of judicial picks, announced his move to place the holds in the congressional record on Friday. 'Today, I placed a hold on three Department of the Treasury nominees,' he said in the record, specifically naming Trump's picks for the department's general counsel, assistant secretary and undersecretary. The Iowa Republican added that while the 'big, beautiful, bill' recently passed by Congress allowed for wind and solar companies to continue to get tax credits if they begin construction of their projects in the next year, the Treasury Department 'is expected to issue rules and regulations implementing the agreed upon phase-out of the wind and solar credits by August 18, 2025.' 'Until I can be certain that such rules and regulations adhere to the law and congressional intent, I intend to continue to object to the consideration of these Treasury nominees,' Grassley said. Sen. John Curtis (R-Utah), is also placing a hold on the same nominees — Brian Morrissey Jr., Francis Brooke and Jonathan McKernan — for the same reason, a source familiar told The Hill. It's not entirely clear whether these holds will actually have a significant impact on the nominations. Typically, they can slow the process of confirming a nominee, requiring the chamber to spend hours debating and taking additional votes for each nominee without ultimately blocking them. With a handful of nominees, holds are more of an annoyance, though in some cases — like when in 2023 Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) put holds on hundreds of military promotions — they have successfully delayed nominations for a significant period. It's unusual, though not unheard of, for lawmakers of the same party to place holds on the president's nominees. Grassley's decision was first reported Monday by C-SPAN'S Craig Caplan. Curtis's move was first reported by Politico. The hold comes amid a larger spat between Grassley and Trump after president told the senator last week to ax the Judiciary Committee's 'blue slip' tradition of allowing home-state senators to veto nominees to district courts and U.S. attorneys' offices. Trump reposted comments that accused Grassley of being 'sneaky' and a 'RINO,' an acronym for Republican In Name Only. 'I was offended by what the president said, and I'm disappointed it would result in personal insults,' Grassley said in response. Trump, meanwhile, has expressed frustration at the pace of the Senate's confirmation of his nominees, saying lawmakers should stay in Washington to confirm more people ahead of their yearly August recess. How rapidly to phase out energy tax credits was a major sticking point among Republican lawmakers as they put Trump's megabill together. The bill provisions that Curtis helped to secure allowing wind and solar projects to get the full value of a lucrative tax credit if they start construction within 12 months of its passage. After the bill was passed Trump signed an executive order that directed the Treasury to take a strict approach to limit which projects are eligible. The administration has been particularly hostile to wind and solar and broadly supportive of other energy sources, including oil, gas, coal and nuclear.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store