Hajiji: GRS to stay with Pakatan for state polls, Sabah needs stability over solo ambitions
The Parti Gagasan Rakyat Sabah president said that political stability — not just electoral victory — is the priority for the state, but also stressed that GRS would be contesting most of the 73 state constituency seats.
'We will continue our cooperation in the current government — both the state government, GRS, and Pakatan Harapan,' he said when speaking to reporters here.
'We also want to listen to local aspirations. So we will make the best decision for Sabah because for us, political stability is very important. It's not just about winning the election. After the election, we must ensure stability. Only then can we plan and develop our state,'
He said that he has had several discussions with Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim as chairman of PH and that they were reaching a decision on the seat negotiations soon.
Hajiji, who is GRS chairman, has been in favour of staying with PH during the election but grassroot calls for the local coalition to contest on its own has been getting stronger, particularly after the Parti Bersatu Sabah and Parti Solidariti Tanah Airku's joint convention two weekends ago.
Chants of 'solo' reverberated during the convention, reflecting the desire from the ground for local parties to form the state government without relying on national parties. The calls come from along-standingg perception of Sabah being taken advantage of and beholden to the federal government or national parties.
Another issue is that the federal government also comprises Umno, GRS's former state partners who had attempted a coup on Hajiji after what it claims was many broken promises and agreements and leading to a fallout between the two.
A three day PGRS convention this weekend is expected to serve as a platform to prepare the party machinery for a possible snap state election.
Earlier today, Hajiji presented scholarships to the best performing students in the state, noting that they have more than doubled the amount since it took over the government in 2020.
'From only RM50 million in 2020, the BKNS allocation has continued to increase year by year over the past five years, reaching RM136 million in 2025.
'This marks an increase of RM86 million from 2019, reflecting the State Government's commitment to supporting the education of Sabah's children,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
19 minutes ago
- The Star
Malaysia enhancing cooperation with Thailand for trade, says Liew
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia is enhancing strategic cooperation with the Thai government to facilitate smoother movement of goods through northern border checkpoints, says Liew Chin Tong. The Deputy Investment, Trade and Industry Minister said the collaboration aims to support industries such as Kedah Rubber City (KRC), which require efficient logistics to meet export demands. 'MITI remains committed to strengthening strategic cooperation with the Thai government to facilitate the movement of goods across border checkpoints, including through the Durian Burung entry point,' he told the Dewan Rakyat on Monday (July 28). Responding to a question from Nurul Amin Hamid (Perikatan–Padang Terap), Liew said the initiative involves close coordination with various ministries and agencies, including the Finance and Home Ministries, Immigration Department, Malaysian Border Control and Protection Agency (AKSEM), and the Northern Corridor Implementation Authority (NCIA). However, Liew said infrastructure at the ICQS Durian Burung Complex remains insufficient to support large-scale trade, particularly for container-based operations. To address this, he said the NCIA is spearheading several initiatives, including a feasibility study for a proposed Border Economic Zone to explore economic potential in the Durian Burung area and surrounding regions. He said other efforts include cooperation under the Indonesia-Malaysia-Thailand Growth Triangle (IMT-GT) and the Joint Development Strategy (JDS), which focus on sectors such as halal, logistics, rubber, and tourism. 'The JDS specifically aims to enhance connectivity and trade policy coordination, which in turn strengthens the synergy between both countries,' he said. Liew added that both sides had agreed to improve trade facilitation, including infrastructure upgrades, logistics systems, and streamlined procedures at key border crossings. 'These measures are expected to expedite customs clearance and reduce costs and turnaround time for cross-border goods movement,' he said. While acknowledging proposals to utilise Thailand's Songkhla Port as an alternative export route, Liew said the government is prioritising domestic ports such as Penang and Kuala Perlis. 'This aligns with our broader strategy to enhance the competitiveness of local ports and ensure the economic benefits reach local communities and industry players,' he said. He added that his ministry is open to studying proposals and making recommendations to the Finance Ministry to introduce incentives that would encourage higher usage of local ports by investors, particularly those setting up export-oriented manufacturing facilities.
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Govt working with Thai counterparts to facilitate goods movement
KUALA LUMPUR: The government remains committed to strengthening strategic cooperation with the Thai Government to facilitate the movement of goods across border checkpoints, including through the Durian Burung entry point in Kedah. Deputy Investment, Trade and Industry (MITI) Minister Liew Chin Tong told the Dewan Rakyat that the government was working closely with Thai counterparts to ease goods movement across the northern border and to support export needs for industries such as Kedah Rubber City. "Miti remains committed to strengthening strategic cooperation with the Thai government to facilitate the movement of goods across border checkpoints, including through the Durian Burung entry point. "This effort requires close collaboration with relevant ministries and agencies, such as the Finance Ministry, Home Ministry, the Immigration Department, the Malaysian Border Control and Protection Agency (AKPS), and the Northern Corridor Implementation Authority (NCIA)," he said in response to a question from Nurul Amin Hamid (PN-Padang Terap). Liew, however, acknowledged that the infrastructure at the ICQS Durian Burung Complex was still inadequate to support large-scale trade operations, especially those involving the use of containers. He said the government, through NCIA, was implementing several strategic initiatives, including conducting a feasibility study for a Border Economic Zone to identify potential economic opportunities that could be developed in the border area, including the KRC and surrounding regions near Durian Burung. Other initiatives include regional cooperation under the Indonesia-Malaysia-Thailand Growth Triangle (IMT-GT) and the Joint Development Strategy (JDS). "These collaborations focus on development in industries such as halal, logistics, rubber, and tourism. The JDS specifically aims to enhance connectivity and international trade policies, strengthening synergy between both countries. "In addition, the Malaysian government remains committed to enhancing strategic cooperation with Thailand through existing platforms such as the Malaysia-Thailand Joint Trade Committee," he said. He added that both parties had agreed to improve trade facilitation, including upgrading infrastructure, logistics systems, and procedures at border checkpoints. These steps, he said, were expected to accelerate Customs clearance processes while reducing time and costs for cross-border goods movement. "Although there have been suggestions to use Songkhla Port in Thailand as an alternative export route, the government is currently focused on maximising the use of domestic ports, especially in Penang and Kuala Perlis. "This initiative aligns with the government's broader strategy to enhance the competitiveness of local ports, while ensuring the economic benefits are fully realised by industry players and local communities," he said. Liew added that the ministry was also open to studying and proposing recommendations to the Finance Ministry to provide various incentives aimed at increasing the usage of local ports when asked on the ministry's short-term plans to encourage investors to use domestic ports for setting up factories or exporting products abroad.
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Populist spending not the same as helping the people
From Muhammed Abdul Khalid The government recently announced a rakyat assistance package, the headline measures of which included a reduction in RON95 petrol price, one-off cash aid of RM100 for all adults, and a freeze on toll rate hikes. While these moves sound rakyat-friendly, in reality, they are wasteful, regressive, and fail to address the root causes of hardship for Malaysians. Let's break it down. Petrol subsidies: rewarding the rich, ignoring the poor The government is currently spending RM20 billion to RM23 billion annually to subsidise RON95 petrol. In the coming months, fuel prices are expected to be reduced even further by six sen. But who benefits the most? Certainly not Mak Cik Kiah riding a kapcai or driving her old Kancil to the pasar. Instead, it is those filling up their luxury SUVs, such as Alphards, twice a week who are reaping massive benefits from a system that disproportionately favours high fuel consumption. Data shows that one-fifth of B40 households do not own any vehicles, compared to the 100% car ownership among T20 households. These poorer households receive no benefit from petrol subsidies, yet help fund them through taxes, particularly through indirect taxes such as the recently expanded sales and service tax. A mere six-sen drop in fuel prices could result in an additional RM2 billion to RM3 billion in subsidies, much of which would again flow into the fuel tanks of the well-off. On average, the T20 will receive nearly three times more fuel subsidies than the B40. This is clearly a policy that favours the wealthy, an absurd outcome in any system that claims to be just. RM100 for all, even the rich Another move is the RM100 one-off cash handout to all adults under the Sumbangan Asas Rahmah (SARA) programme, at a cost of RM2 billion to the government. There is no question that RM100 means a lot to those in need. This should not be dismissed or belittled. Perhaps policymakers intended for everyone, regardless of income, to benefit from government generosity. But is it really sensible for corporate leaders, ministers, and millionaires to receive the same RM100 as daily wage earners, pensioners, or rubber tappers? Is that fairness? Especially when the country is already RM1.6 trillion in debt, why are we giving money we do not have to people who clearly do not need it? Wouldn't that be a textbook example of waste? Moreover, economic growth is forecast to remain slow this year. Debt-to-GDP is unlikely to meet the 60% target under the new Public Finance and Fiscal Responsibility Act. The RM5 billion earmarked for these blanket handouts could be better directed to where it actually makes a difference, instead of being thrown at everyone equally. For instance, the existing SARA programme currently channels RM100 monthly to 5.4 million low-income households and individuals. If the new RM2 billion allocation were entirely redirected to them, each recipient could receive nearly RM400 in additional aid – four times more than what is being offered now. Wouldn't that be more meaningful, targeted, and Madani? The additional RM2 billion to RM3 billion in fuel subsidies would also go much further if spent on the poor. As of mid-July, about 300,000 families were officially registered as poor. If the government were truly prudent, it could distribute at least RM1,600 per family from these funds on a monthly basis between now and year-end, rather than through a meaningless one-off amount. This would be a better way to spend RM5 billion to RM6 billion of taxpayers' money, and a better way to stimulate the economy over the long term. If the government truly wants to help the rakyat, it should gradually phase out blanket fuel subsidies in a systematic way and avoid populist cash giveaways to those who do not need them. The savings could be redirected to free breakfast programmes at primary schools, more investment in public transport, or the construction of new hospitals. If nothing else, increase salaries for the police, soldiers, nurses, and teachers, or raise pensions for retirees. That would be far better than giving unnecessary handouts to the rich. In other words, much more can be done with RM5 billion to RM6 billion than doling out cash to those who do not need it. Don't squander the nation's taxes or its long-term economic future through reckless spending. With global headwinds mounting, we need smart spending, not blanket handouts that favour the wealthy while leaving the poor behind. Continuing with these regressive policies will not only strain our fiscal position but also deepen inequality. If these trends continue, it will not be reform but social injustice. Muhammed Abdul Khalid is a research fellow at the Institute of Malaysian and International Studies at UKM and a fellow at the World Inequality Lab at the Paris School of Economics. The views expressed are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.
