
Rs 12,000 crore fuels Shakti's 2-Year smooth run in Karnataka
BMTC leads the table, having issued over 150 crore tickets, closely followed by KSRTC with 140 crore. The four transport corporations — BMTC, KSRTC, NWKRTC, and KKRTC — collectively spent Rs 12,000 crore to implement the scheme.
Marking the scheme's second anniversary, a senior official involved in its implementation said that the Shakti scheme came as a major relief for road transport corporations (RTCs), which suffered immensely during the pandemic.
"The increase in patronage and optimal utilisation of vehicles benefitted RTCs. The four RTCs in the state operate a fleet of 24,500 buses, of which women can travel free on 20,500. There are no distance restrictions — for instance, women can travel between Bidar and Bengaluru (approximately 700 km) on ordinary services free of cost.
Additionally, RTCs are not passing toll charges onto women when they travel on toll roads."
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Pinga-Pinga e HBP? Tome isso 1x ao dia se tem mais de 40 anos
Portal Saúde do Homem
Clique aqui
Undo
The official noted that the scheme especially helped women in rural areas and low-income groups in urban areas. "It enabled many women to explore job opportunities and use the money saved on travel for other essential expenses, including children's education," the official added.
According to him, compared with other states like Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Punjab, and Delhi where similar free bus travel schemes exist, Karnataka has performed better in execution.
Transport minister Ramalinga Reddy said, "Over the past two years, the scheme enjoyed consistent patronage, indicating its widespread acceptance. While the state govt still owes Rs 2,000 crore in reimbursements under the scheme, it helped RTCs raise a Rs 2,000 crore loan to clear pending arrears related to provident fund, gratuity, and other employee dues. The principal and interest on the loan are being borne by the state govt.
Moreover, support is being extended for the induction of 2,000 new buses."
The minister added that the total outstanding liability of the transport corporations stands at Rs 4,000 crore, primarily due to mismanagement by the previous BJP govt. "This financial burden accumulated over the years. However, compared to RTCs in other states — Delhi, for example, has a liability exceeding Rs 59,000 crore — Karnataka's RTCs are in a relatively stronger financial position," he said.
At the time of launching the Shakti scheme, the state govt announced plans to issue dedicated smart cards to beneficiaries. However, even after two years, smart cards have not been introduced. "Currently, the system of verifying beneficiaries using Aadhaar cards is functioning well. Nevertheless, steps will be taken to implement separate smart cards for women availing the scheme," the minister said.
———-
1CR TRAVERL DAILY
* BMTC, KSRTC, NWKRTC, and KKRTC collectively spent Rs 12,000 crore on scheme in 2 yrs
* Four RTCs operate 24,500 buses, and women can travel free on 20,500
* No distance barriers for women travellers
* Daily ridership on these buses has improved from 85 lakh to a little over 1 crore

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
17 minutes ago
- Indian Express
After Ramanagara became Bengaluru South, Bengaluru Rural district renamed Bengaluru North
Over a month after renaming Ramanagara district as Bengaluru South district, Karnataka's cabinet on Wednesday cleared a proposal to rename Bengaluru Rural district as Bengaluru North district. Chief Minister Siddaramaiah announced the decision while addressing a news conference following a special cabinet meeting at Nandi Hills in Chikkaballapura district. This was among the two name change proposals approved by the cabinet; the other was to rename Bagepalli in Chikkaballapura district as Chikkaballapur. In May, the state government renamed Ramanagara district, located southwest of Bengaluru district, 'to benefit from the international reputation enjoyed by Bengaluru'. This was after the Ministry of Home Affairs refused a no-objection certificate for the name change, for which the state government submitted a proposal in July 2024. The proposal to rename Bengaluru Rural district was based on petitions from legislators representing the district, including Food and Civil Supplies Minister K H Muniyappa. The change was sought to attract more investors, as Bengaluru International Airport, Foxconn's iPhone assembly plant, and several business parks are located in the district. The cabinet also decided to rename Bengaluru University after former prime minister Manmohan Singh. During the cabinet meeting, projects worth Rs 3,000 crore were cleared. The cabinet meeting at Nandi Hills dealt primarily with the Bengaluru division. In the last two months, cabinet meetings were held at Kalaburagi (Kalaburagi division) and MM Hills (Mysuru division). A special cabinet meeting is also scheduled at Vijayapura, to clear proposals related to the Belagavi division.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
19 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Sonia, Rahul Gandhi wanted to usurp ₹2,000 cr AJL company: ED to court
The Enforcement Directorate on Wednesday alleged Sonia and Rahul Gandhi wanted to usurp the assets of Associated Journals Limited (AJL), a ₹2,000 crore company, the publisher of National Herald newspaper. Special judge Vishal Gogne was hearing the submissions on the point of cognisance in the National Herald case. Additional solicitor general S V Raju said a conspiracy was hatched to form Young Indian Private Limited in which the Gandhis held 76 per cent shares to usurp the assets of AJL, which took a₹90 crore loan from the All India Congress Committee (AICC) despite having assets worth in crores. Explaining the conspiracy, the ASG said, "AJL was not making profits but had assets worth ₹2,000 crore. But they were finding it difficult to manage their daily affairs. If you are doing reasonably well, you cannot say, I am in loss, etc. You have to build a facade.₹90 crore loan was taken from the AlCC. They (AJL) said we cannot repay you (AICC). Ordinarily, any prudent person would have sold their assets. (Rs) 90 crore is child's play." Raju further said, "The conspiracy was creation of Young Indian to usurp ₹2,000 crore in exchange for a ₹90 crore loan. Sonia and Rahul Gandhi wanted to take over this ₹2,000 crore company." Within six days of Rahul's appointment as the director of Young Indian, Raju said, it sent a representation to AJL to repay the loan or convert it into equity. Judge Gogne posed a question to Raju about the possibility of the AICC writing off AJL's loan, similar to public sector banks. The ASG said banks wrote off loans of defaulters in the absence of assets as collateral but in this case AJL had assets worth ₹2,000 crore which they gave away for a loan of ₹90 crore. Raju alleged that the AICC distanced itself from a direct transaction to avoid "creating ripples" and instead created Young Indian. The judge again asked Raju if it was peculiar for political parties to own a newspaper. "Political parties acquire running newspapers and channels. The main question is how can they acquire an asset for peanuts," Raju said adding that AJL was acquired by Young Indian, in which 76 per cent shares were held by Sonia and Rahul Gandhi. "Taking by the left hand and taking by the right hand. Buying and selling of shares. All bogus transactions." he added. The hearing would continue on July 3. On May 21, the ED alleged that the proceeds of crime in the case were obtained on "instructions of some senior party leaders" towards "protection, tickets to contest elections, and securing positions in the party". The ED had filed its chargesheet against Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and others under Sections 3 (money laundering) and 4 (punishment for money laundering) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The ED accuses the Gandhis, late Congress leaders Motilal Vora and Oscar Fernandes aside from Suman Dubey, Sam Pitroda and a private company Young Indian of conspiracy and money laundering over the fraudulent takeover of properties valued over ₹2,000 crore belonging to the AJL. The chargesheet names the Gandhis, Dudey, Pitroda, Sunil Bhandari, Young Indian, and Dotex Merchandise Private Limited.


Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
First eligibility list for Dharavi redevelopment released
The Dharavi Redevelopment Project (DRP) has released its first eligibility list, with over 75 per cent of tenement holders qualifying for new homes under the ambitious slum redevelopment scheme, according to data released by the DRP. All bona fide residents who settled in Dharavi before January 1, 2000, are eligible for a 350 sq ft flat within Dharavi. All such residents will qualify for the resettlement unless they do not provide documents. Those who settled between January 1, 2000, and January 1, 2011, may receive 300 sq ft units outside Dharavi at alternative locations. The first list identifies 505 households from Meghwadi and Ganesh Nagar in Mahim as eligible for rehabilitation. In the first list published for 505 households of Sector 6 (Meghwadi and Ganesh Nagar in Mahim), over 75 per cent of tenement holders have qualified for new homes under the redevelopment scheme, according to data released by the DRP. The balance would get qualified, based on additional checks and documents sought. Live Events Out of a total of 505 tenements, 31 tenements are yet to submit any documents, 137 cases are pending verification by BMC, which the DRP is pursuing, and the remaining 38 are amenity structures. Among the remaining 299 tenements, 229 have been found eligible for new homes under various criteria. The remaining 70 are in the process of submitting additional documents to validate their eligibility. DRP CEO SVR Srinivas assured that every resident will get a house either inside or outside Dharavi, basis their eligibility status. "I would like to reiterate that the Dharavi redevelopment is the most inclusive project ever contemplated in SRA history, where every resident is going to get a house. Not just that, all commercial units, whether eligible or ineligible, will get spaces inside Dharavi itself." He further explained that commercial units that are eligible will, in any case, get free in-situ spaces inside Dharavi. In fact, a proposal has been made to the government to accommodate ineligible commercial units as well, on a rental basis, inside Dharavi. "The 10 per cent commercial space reserved in every society can be given on a rental basis to ineligible commercial units so that they can sustain their livelihoods in Dharavi itself. We have already made this proposal." As per the Annexure-II data, 170 ground-floor tenements, including residential, commercial and residential/commercial, have all met the eligibility criteria and are entitled to new homes either within or outside Dharavi. Of these, 157 tenements came into existence before January 1, 2000, and are entitled to 350 sq ft homes within Dharavi. The remaining 13 are considered Shashulk Eligible, meaning they are entitled to 300 sq ft homes outside Dharavi at a subsidised cost of Rs 2.5 lakh, having settled in Dharavi before January 1, 2011. In a significant step, the inclusion of upper-floor tenement holders, typically disqualified under all other slum rehabilitation schemes, provides inclusivity. As per the data, 59 upper-floor tenements have qualified for new homes under the DRP's unique 'hire-purchase' scheme. These residents will receive 300 sq ft homes on rent for 12 years, after which they will become legal owners. They may also choose to buy the home outright at a government-decided rate at any time during the 12-year period. Typically, under other slum rehabilitation schemes, those who settle in the ground floor after 2011 are excluded from redevelopment benefits, and all upper-floor residents face outright eviction. However, DRP has ensured that all such residents are also provided new and modern homes outside Dharavi, but within the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR). These colonies will be modern and will be maintained free of cost for 10 years. The DRP has invited tenement holders to submit their suggestions or objections regarding the Draft Annexure-II. Submissions can be made to the DRP office by July 5.