This year's Fête nationale more meaningful than ever for some Quebecers
The Fleur-de-lis was out in full force as thousands gathered to watch marchers make their way to Maisonneuve Park. The main concert was set to take place later in the evening.
Mathieu Fortier arrived early to secure a good spot. For him, this year's Fête nationale has a special meaning, as U.S. President Donald Trump continues to poke at Canada's sovereignty.
'St-Jean this year has a taste of pride, a taste of celebration, and a taste of purpose,' Fortier said 'For me, personally, (Trump's attacks) have boosted my pride in being a Quebecer and my Quebec identity.'
Others were taking in the Montreal festivities for the first time. Claude Turgeon travelled with his wife from Boisbriand to celebrate.
'I've always been proud to be a Quebecer, but this year I wanted to participate,' Turgeon said.
There was an obvious political presence at the parade as local, provincial and federal politicians took in the festivities.
Quebec Culture Minister Mathieu Lacombe told reporters the importance of the day is tied in with the importance of ensuring the sustainability of Quebec culture.
'We must always stand up to defend our culture, our language, our identity,' Lacombe said. 'We've been fighting for who we are in Quebec for 250 years, so I think this fight is far from over, especially with the upheavals we're currently experiencing on the international scene with our neighbour to the south, but also in Canada as a whole.'
Steven Guilbeault, Canadian identity, culture and official languages minister and MP for Laurier—Sainte-Marie, highlighted the national pride that the U.S. threats have brought to light.
'We see it in Quebec and across the country: there's a movement of national pride,' Guilbeault said. 'People want to stand together in the face of what is perceived as an economic attack and also an attack on our identity and our sovereignty, so it's heartwarming to see people come together like this.'
Weather was a key player in this year's festivities, no matter where you lived in the province.
Some 650 events were planned to mark the day, also known as St-Jean-Baptiste Day, but some fell victim to the weather on Monday.
Thunderstorms and heavy rain dampened Fête nationale festivities in Quebec's provincial capital region on Monday, forcing the abrupt cancellation of the marquee concert and leaving thousands without power.
About 15 minutes before a concert was set to begin on the Plains of Abraham in Quebec City, organizers cancelled the event and evacuated the area because of extreme weather that brought thunder, lightning and heavy downpours.
Quebec City organizers said it was the right call as there were warnings for 100 km/h winds and torrential rainfall.
Mother Nature offered concertgoers in Montreal more favourable — if not considerably hotter — terms. Southern Quebec was enveloped in a 35 C heat that felt more like 45 with the humidity, meaning a hot, muggy evening for the Montreal event on Tuesday.
The Maisonneuve Park event was to include artists such as Robert Charlebois and Sara Dufour.
This year's celebrations commemorate the 50th anniversary of the first performance of Gilles Vigneault's song 'Gens du pays,' which is often considered the province's unofficial anthem.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Observer
15 minutes ago
- National Observer
Trump and the energy industry are eager to power AI with fossil fuels
This story was originally published by Wired and appears here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration AI IS 'NOT my thing,' President Donald Trump admitted during a speech in Pittsburgh on Tuesday. However, the president said during his remarks at the Energy and Innovation Summit, his advisers had told him just how important energy was to the future of AI. 'You need double the electric of what we have right now, and maybe even more than that,' Trump said, recalling a conversation with 'David'—most likely White House AI czar David Sacks, a panelist at the summit. 'I said, what, are you kidding? That's double the electric that we have. Take everything we have and double it.' At the high-profile summit on Tuesday — where, in addition to Sacks, panelists and attendees included Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, Google president and chief investment officer Ruth Porat and ExxonMobil CEO Darren Woods — companies announced $92 billion in investments across various energy and AI-related ventures. These are just the latest in recent breakneck rollouts in investment around AI and energy infrastructure. A day before the Pittsburgh meeting, Mark Zuckerberg shared on Threads that Meta would be building 'titan clusters' of data centers to supercharge its AI efforts. The one closest to coming online, dubbed Prometheus, is located in Ohio and will be powered by onsite gas generation, SemiAnalysis reported last week. For an administration committed to advancing the future of fossil fuels, the location of the event was significant. Pennsylvania sits on the Marcellus and Utica shale formations, which supercharged Pennsylvania's fracking boom in the late 2000s and early 2010s. The state is still the country's second-most prolific natural gas producer. Pennsylvania-based natural gas had a big role at the summit: The CEO of Pittsburgh-based natural gas company EQT, Toby Rice — who dubs himself the 'people's champion of natural gas' — moderated one of the panels and sat onstage with the president during his speech. All this new demand from AI is welcome news for the natural gas industry in the US, the world's top producer and exporter of liquefied natural gas. Global gas markets have been facing a mounting supply glut for years. Following a warm winter last year, Morgan Stanley predicted gas supply could reach 'multi-decade highs' over the next few years. A jolt of new demand — like the demand represented by massive data centers — could revitalize the industry and help drive prices back up. Natural gas from Pennsylvania and the Appalachian region, in particular, has faced market challenges both from ultra-cheap natural gas from the Permian Basin in Texas and New Mexico as well as a lack of infrastructure to carry supply out of the region. These economic headwinds are 'why the industry is doing their best to sort of create this drumbeat or this narrative around the need for AI data centers,' says Clark Williams-Derry, an energy finance analyst at the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis. It appears to be working. Pipeline companies are already pitching new projects to truck gas from the northeast — responding, they say, to data center demand. At a Pennsylvania conference last week, the US president did his best to wed the futures of AI and fossil fuels — but not everyone in the tech sector is on board with embracing the latter. The industry is finding a willing partner in the Trump administration. Since taking office, Trump has used AI as a lever to open up opportunities for fossil fuels, including a well-publicized effort to resuscitate coal in the name of more computing power. The summit, which was organized by Republican senator (and former hedge fund CEO) Dave McCormick, clearly reflected the administration's priorities in this regard: No representatives from any wind or solar companies were present on any of the public panels. Tech companies, which have expressed an interest in using any and all cheap power available for AI and have quietly pushed back against some of the administration's anti-renewables positions, aren't necessarily on the same page as the Trump administration. Among the announcements made at the summit was a $3 billion investment in hydropower from Google. This demand isn't necessarily driven by a big concern for the climate — many tech giants have walked back their climate commitments in recent years as their focus on AI has sharpened — but rather pure economics. Financial analyst Lazard said last month that installing utility-scale solar panels and batteries is still cheaper than building out natural gas plants, even without tax incentives. Gas infrastructure is also facing a global shortage that makes the timescales for setting up power generation vastly different. 'The waiting list for a new turbine is five years,' Williams-Derry says. 'If you want a new solar plant, you call China, you say, 'I want more solar.'' Given the ideological split at the summit, things occasionally got a little awkward. On one panel, Secretary of Energy Chris Wright, who headed up a fracking company before coming to the federal government, talked at length about how the Obama and Biden administrations were on an 'energy crazy train,' scoffing at those administrations' support for wind and solar. Speaking directly after Wright, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink admitted that solar would likely support dispatchable gas in powering AI. Incredibly, fellow panel member Woods, the ExxonMobil CEO, later paid some of the only lip service to the idea of drawing down emissions heard during the entire event. (Woods was touting the oil giant's carbon capture and storage business.) Still, the hype train, for the most part, moved smoothly, with everyone agreeing on one thing: We're going to need a lot of power, and soon. Blackstone CEO Jonathan Gray said that AI could help drive '40 or 50 percent more power usage over the next decade,' while Porat, of Google, mentioned some economists' projections that AI could add $4 trillion to the US economy by 2030. It's easy to find any variety of headlines or reports—often based on projections produced by private companies—projecting massive growth numbers for AI. 'I view all of these projections with great skepticism,' says Jonathan Koomey, a computing researcher and consultant who has contributed to research around AI and power. 'I don't think anyone has any idea, even a few years hence, how much electricity data centers are gonna use.' In February, Koomey coauthored a report for the Bipartisan Policy Center cautioning that improvements in AI efficiency and other developments in the technology make data center power load hard to predict. But there's 'a bunch of self-interested actors,' Koomey says, involved in the hype cycle around AI and power, including energy executives, utilities, consultants and AI companies. Koomey remembers the last time there was a hype bubble around electricity, fossil fuels and technology. In the late 1990s, a variety of sources, including investment banks, trade publications and experts testifying in front of Congress, began to spread hype around the growth of the internet, claiming that the internet could soon consume as much as half of US electricity. More coal-fired power, many of these sources argued, would be needed to support this massive expansion. ('Dig More Coal—The PCs Are Coming' was the headline of a 1999 Forbes article that Koomey cites as being particularly influential to shaping the hype.) The prediction never came to pass, as efficiency gains in tech helped drive down the internet's energy needs; the initial projections were also based, Koomey says, on a variety of faulty calculations. Koomey says that he sees parallels between the late 1990s and the current craze around AI and energy. 'People just need to understand the history and not fall for these self-interested narratives,' he says. There's some signs that the AI-energy bubble may not be inflating as much as Big Tech thinks: in March, Microsoft quietly backed out of 2GW of data center leases, citing a decision to not support some training workloads from OpenAI. 'It can both be true that there's growth in electricity use and there's a whole bunch of people hyping it way beyond what is likely to happen,' Koomey says.
Winnipeg Free Press
31 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Taliban tortured and threatened Afghans expelled from Pakistan and Iran, UN report says
ISLAMABAD (AP) — The Taliban have tortured and threatened Afghans forcibly returned from Iran and Pakistan because of their identity or personal history, a U.N. report said Thursday. Pakistan and Iran are expelling millions of Afghans who they say are living in their countries illegally. Afghan authorities have urged nationals to return, pledging amnesty for anyone who left after the Taliban seized power in 2021. But rights groups and the U.N. have repeatedly warned that some of those returning are at risk of persecution because of their gender, links to the former Western-backed administration or profession. Thursday's report from the U.N. mission in Afghanistan said some people have experienced serious human rights violations, while others have gone into hiding or relocated for fear of Taliban reprisal. The violations include torture, ill-treatment, arbitrary arrest, and threats to personal security at the hands of the Taliban, according to the report. A former government official told the U.N. mission that, after his return to Afghanistan in 2023, he was detained and severely tortured with sticks and cables. He was waterboarded and subjected to a mock execution. A non-binary person said they were beaten severely, including with the back of a gun. Volker Türk, the U.N. high commissioner for human rights, said nobody should be sent back to a country where they faced the risk of persecution on account of their identity or personal history. This was even more pronounced for Afghan women and girls, who were subjected to a range of measures 'amounting to persecution based on their gender alone,' he added. The Taliban have imposed severe restrictions on Afghan girls and women, cutting off education beyond sixth grade, most employment and access to many public spaces. Responding to the report, Taliban authorities denied mistreating Afghan returnees and rejected allegations of arrest, violence, intimidation or retaliation against people because of their identity or personal history. Afghans returning from neighboring countries were provided with facilities related to documentation, transportation, resettlement, and other legal support, they said, while the Interior Ministry provides a 'warm welcome.' They called on the U.N. mission to prevent forced deportations, adding the United Nations as a whole 'should not hesitate' in providing basic needs to refugees, such as food, medicine, shelter and education. Afghans who left their homeland in the millions over the decades are either being pushed out in expulsion campaigns, like those in Iran and Pakistan, or face an uncertain future because of reduced support for refugees. On Monday, thousands of Afghans in the U.S. lost protection from deportation after a federal appeals court refused to postpone U.S. President Donald Trump administration's decision to end their legal status. Homeland Security officials said in their decision to end the Temporary Protected Status for Afghans that the situation in their home country was getting better. But groups helping Afghans with this status say the country is still extremely dangerous. The Trump administration's January suspension of a refugee program has left thousands of Afghans stranded, particularly in Pakistan, and a travel ban on Afghans has further diminished their hopes of resettlement in the U.S.
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Has the son of Helms-Burton just been conceived?
Opinion The Canada-U.S.-Cuba nexus has once again raised its ugly head. Only this time it comes at a particularly delicate time for Prime Minister Mark Carney, and leaves him with some very difficult decisions to make. Since Canada capitulated to U.S. pressure to deep-six the digital services tax, it's only fair that Washington should terminate its new Cuba policy of embracing third country economic sanctions. Now, what do you think the chances of that are? Reportedly, the new Cuba regulations are part of a national security memorandum signed by U.S. President Donald Trump in late June. According to the White House directive, the executive branch seeks to end 'economic practices that disproportionately benefit the Cuban government or its military, intelligence, or security agencies or personnel at the expense of the Cuban people.' The Miami Herald is also claiming that U.S. sanctions will apply to any company (foreign or otherwise) providing 'direct or indirect support to companies directly or indirectly owned by the Cuban military.' U.S. President Donald Trump, right, and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, center, appear to be putting a new squeeze on countries — like Canada — doing business with Cuba. U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, left, looks on during a cabinet meeting at the White House, July 8. These so-called 'secondary sanctions' will punish foreign (read Canadian) companies from doing business with the Cuban government. More specifically, it prohibits Canadian companies from engaging in commercial activities with Cuba's Revolutionary Armed Forces and its corporate affiliates GAESA (a conglomerate of companies) and Gaviota (a tourism company). But if they do so, and thus violate the new Trump measures, those businesses will then be subject to stiff financial penalties. The chief objective is to disincentivize foreign investment in Cuba, to discourage tourism travel to the island, to cut off badly needed dollars to Havana (by going after tourism receipts) and to put foreign governments with ties to Cuba on notice. A policy such as this comes from the same U.S. place that spawned the damaging Cuban Democracy Act of 1992 and the anti-Cuba Helms-Burton Act of 1996. There is no doubt that the principal driver of this tougher Cuba policy is the anti-Cuba hawk and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio. It's a given that he will utilize every single waking moment trying to squeeze the life out of the island's population. This latest policy iteration is just another manifestation of America's long-standing Cuban economic strangulation strategy. It doesn't hurt that Trump undoubtedly believes that tightening the screws on Cuba plays well politically to the Cuban-American crowd in south Florida. And that is particularly important at this moment in time as boatloads of Haitians, Venezuelans ad Nicaraguans — many facing deportation and an extraordinarily difficult future — are fighting mad at Republican members of Congress and rapidly jumping off the Trump electoral ship. As far as I can tell, though, the new 'National Security Presidential Memorandum 5' regulatory changes to strengthen U.S. Cuba policy will negatively impact Canadian travel companies, airlines and hotels (typically joint ventures with the Cuban government). It will also target Toronto-based Sherritt International Corp. — Canada's largest foreign investor on the island — which has substantial interests in nickel mining, energy production and tourism. Like the Helms-Burton Law, the Trump administration's new 'maximum pressure' campaign will further undermine already strained diplomatic relations with Canada and countries of the European Union. National governments will then have little choice, as they did in the mid-1990s, but to respond with reciprocal punitive measures of their own and to bring this matter before the World Trade Organization. But how will Ottawa's response to Trump's extraterritorial application of U.S. regulations to Canada — or the 'externalizing' of the U.S. blockade of Cuba, if you will — impact the ongoing bilateral trade and security negotiations with Washington? More to the point: Can Carney seriously talk about 'elbows up' and all that while Canada effectively sits on its fanny and does nothing in the face of Trump's effrontery to Canadian sovereignty? Weekday Evenings Today's must-read stories and a roundup of the day's headlines, delivered every evening. I am worried that Carney's non-action in deference to Trump will undermine not only Canada's constructive and independent relationship with Cuba, but also our relations with the wider region. If Carney balks, he will wrongly differentiate himself from other Canadian prime ministers who stood up to the Americans on matters involving Cuba. At any rate, I'm certain that someone in official Washington is thinking that this is the perfect policy prescription given Cuba's current dire economic and financial situation. They've no doubt convinced themselves that these new sanctions will push struggling Cubans over the edge and thus precipitate the gradual demise of the Cuban government. Indeed, the U.S. presidential memorandum doesn't even bother to hide the fact that this 'maximum pressure' strategy will remain in place 'until a transition government in Cuba' takes power. There is no question that these tougher measures will make everyday life more miserable for the Cuban people. But they could also prove to be counterproductive: by pushing Cubans to seek greener pastures in the U.S., by galvanizing public support around the Cuban government and by isolating the U.S. from its Western allies and friends. Anyway, I doubt that Trump really cares. Peter McKenna is professor of political science at the University of Prince Edward Island in Charlottetown.
