Violence threatens Syria's fragile peace, leaving more than 50 dead
Advertisement
The Syrian government called for restraint and sent military forces to 'quickly and decisively' resolve the conflict, the Defense Ministry said in a statement released on social media. It added that its forces were providing safe passage for civilians trying to flee the area.
Eighteen soldiers who were sent to the region to quell the violence Monday were killed, according to a defense official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about sensitive matters related to military activities.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported that the military had sent reinforcements to protect security checkpoints that had been attacked by the Druse groups and was backing the local tribal fighters.
Neighboring Israel also intervened in the violence, bombarding several tanks that were advancing toward Sweida, according to the Israeli military. In a statement, the military said it attacked to prevent hostile forces from amassing in southern Syria.
Advertisement
Israel Katz, the Israeli defense minister, called the strikes an attempt to send a 'clear warning' to the Syrian government: 'We will not allow harm to come to the Druze in Syria. Israel will not stand idly by.'
Israel is home to a significant Druse minority, many of whom serve in the military. Israeli leaders have offered to protect Syrian Druse should they come under attack during the country's post-Assad transition. Many Syrian Druse reject that offer, wary what they consider potentially destructive foreign meddling.
The government said the violence showed that it needed to have control of the province. Sweida has remained mostly under the control of Druse armed groups since al-Sharaa, the former commander of a rebel group that previously had ties to Al Qaeda during Syria's 14-year civil war, came to power.
'The absence of state institutions, particularly military and security ones, is a primary reason for the ongoing tensions,' the interior minister, Anas Khattab, wrote on social media. 'There is no solution to this except by imposing security and activating the role of institutions to ensure civil peace and the return of life to its normal state in all its details.'
The Druse are a group that practices a religion that is an offshoot of Islam.
One Druse religious group called for an end to the fighting but also urged the government to protect its members from what it called 'uncontrolled gangs.'
'While we forbid and condemn aggression in all its forms, we at the same time refuse to accept the continuation of injustice or remain silent about the repeated violations that affect our people, our roads, and our dignity,' the leadership of the group said in a statement Sunday on social media.
Advertisement
The violence in Sweida, the heartland of the Druse community, threatens to further exacerbate religious and ethnic tensions stemming from the civil war.
In March, more than 1,600 people were killed in large-scale sectarian clashes in Syria's coastal provinces. Most of the victims were members of the Alawite religious minority, who were targeted for days by thousands of government-affiliated fighters.
In April, more than 100 people were killed in sectarian violence between progovernment forces and Druse fighters near Damascus, the capital.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said that the latest violence followed a series of tit-for-tat kidnappings between the Druse and pro-government tribal groups. In response, members of the tribal communities set up a checkpoint along a main road and detained Druse fighters.
Suwayda 24, another monitoring group, said on social media Monday that civilians were attempting to flee the area for their safety.
This article originally appeared in
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
22 minutes ago
- Associated Press
America's only rare earth producer gets a boost from Apple and Pentagon agreements
MP Materials, which runs the only American rare earths mine, announced a new $500 million agreement with tech giant Apple on Tuesday to produce more of the powerful magnets used in iPhones as well as other high-tech products like electric vehicles. This news comes on the heels of last week's announcement that the U.S. Defense Department agreed to invest $400 million in shares of the Las Vegas-based company. That will make the government the largest shareholder in MP Materials and help increase magnet production. Despite their name, the 17 rare earth elements aren't actually rare, but it's hard to find them in a high enough concentration to make a mine worth the investment. They are important ingredients in everything from smartphones and submarines to EVs and fighter jets, and it's those military applications that have made rare earths a key concern in ongoing U.S. trade talks. That's because China dominates the market and imposed new limits on exports after President Donald Trump announced his widespread tariffs. When shipments dried up, the two sides sat down in London. The agreement with Apple will allow MP Materials to further expand its new factory in Texas to use recycled materials to produce the magnets that make iPhones vibrate. The company expects to start producing magnets for GM's electric vehicles later this year and this agreement will let it start producing magnets for Apple in 2027. The Apple agreement represents a tenth of the company's pledge to invest $500 billion domestically during the Trump administration. And although the deal will provide a significant boost for MP Materials, the agreement with the Defense Department may be even more meaningful. Neha Mukherjee, a rare earths analyst with Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, said in a research note that the Pentagon's 10-year promise to guarantee a minimum price for the key elements of neodymium and praseodymium will guarantee stable revenue for MP Minerals and protect it from potential price cuts by Chinese producers that are subsidized by their government. 'This is the kind of long-term commitment needed to reshape global rare earth supply chains,' Mukherjee said. Trump has made it a priority to try to reduce American reliance on China for rare earths. His administration is both helping MP Materials and trying to encourage the development of new mines that would take years to come to fruition. China has agreed to issue some permits for rare earth exports but not for military uses, and much uncertainty remains about their supply. The fear is that the trade war between the world's two biggest economies could lead to a critical shortage of rare earth elements that could disrupt production of a variety of products. MP Materials can't satisfy all of the U.S. demand from its Mountain Pass mine in California's Mojave Desert. The deals by MP Materials come as Beijing and Washington have agreed to walk back on their non-tariff measures: China is to grant export permits for rare earth magnets to the U.S., and the U.S. is easing export controls on chip design software and jet engines. The truce is intended to ease tensions and prevent any catastrophic fall-off in bilateral relations, but is unlikely to address fundamental differences as both governments take steps to reduce dependency on each other. ___ Associated Press reporters David Klepper and Didi Tang contributed to this report from Washington D.C. Michael Liedtke contributed from San Francisco.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘American death zones': Trump admin announces $30m for Gaza aid program where dozens have been killed trying to get food
The Trump administration has approved $30 million in funding for a controversial American non-profit to deliver aid in Gaza, even after hundreds of Palestinians have been reported killed trying to get food at its sites in recent weeks. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a U.S.-based non-profit now run by an evangelical preacher who was a White House adviser during Donald Trump's first term, launched operations in May following a months-long Israeli blockade of nearly all food and aid. But Gaza's health ministry says that more than 500 Palestinians have been killed since then while attempting to get food at GHF sites and other aid points run by the United Nations in the north of the territory. In response to a question about the high death toll, a State Department spokesperson denied the 'false allegations' of killings at GHF sites, telling The Independent that 'most incidents are occurring at non-GHF aid sites that operate near GHF. And none of this would be happening if Hamas would lay down their arms.' 'Hamas will stop at nothing to stay in power and disseminated false propaganda in order to do so,' they added. But testimony collected by The Independent from Palestinians whose family members have been killed at the sites paints a picture of chaos and death. Some have described them as 'American death zones' because of the contractors who patrol them. Salwa Al-Daghma, 50, told The Independent that her brother Khaled, a 36-year-old father of five, was killed earlier this month while trying to get food for his family. 'Hunger is the reason. There is no food. He went to feed his wife and children. He went to provide them with food, but he left and never returned,' she said. 'When relatives came to tell me something, I assumed it was my son. They told me it was my brother, so I started screaming and crying.' 'This aid is a morsel of food soaked in blood. They don't want to help us; they are actually killing us,' she added. Iyad Abu Darabi, a 48-year-old father of six, said his son was killed when he went to get rice from a GHF distribution point. 'My son went to get some flour for his family, but came back in a coffin and a death shroud,' he said. 'This aid is a trap. It's in a barren land surrounded by fences, and the gates are opened for tens of thousands to fight over without any order. They leave people fighting each other over food,' he added. Almost all aid that has entered Gaza since Israel lifted a total blockade now runs through the GHF, which operates four food distribution sites that are overseen by American private security contractors and situated alongside Israeli army positions, which provide security at the perimeter. Israeli soldiers have described the sites as 'killing fields' and said they were ordered to shoot at unarmed civilians in shocking testimony released this week. "Where I was stationed, between one and five people were killed every day. They're treated like a hostile force – no crowd-control measures, no tear gas – just live fire with everything imaginable: heavy machine guns, grenade launchers, mortars. Then, once the center opens, the shooting stops, and they know they can approach. Our form of communication is gunfire," one soldier told the Israeli newspaper Haaretz. "We open fire early in the morning if someone tries to get in line from a few hundred meters away, and sometimes we just charge at them from close range. But there's no danger to the forces," the soldier added. The soldier quoted by Haaretz said he was 'not aware of a single instance of return fire. There's no enemy, no weapons," at the sites. The story includes testimony from an Israeli army officer who said his unit fired machine guns, mortars and threw grenades at civilians approaching the aid distribution centers because 'a combat brigade doesn't have the tools to handle a civilian population in a war zone.' Despite the dozens of deaths, the U.S. State Department has continued to back the GHF politically, and on Thursday said it would fund the group to deliver aid in Gaza. 'This support is simply the latest iteration of President Trump's and Secretary Rubio's pursuit of peace in the region," State Department deputy spokesperson Tommy Pigott told reporters at a regular news briefing. It is unclear why the Trump administration has decided to deliver aid to Gaza exclusively through the GHF, but former officials from the U.S. state department and USAID who have worked on emergency aid delivery described the new system as 'grotesque', 'dangerous' and part of a larger plan to use aid to control the movement of Palestinians. 'What is so infuriatingly tragic about this is that it's playing out exactly as any experienced humanitarian could have predicted,' said Jeremy Konyndyk, who oversaw famine relief at USAID for three years during the Obama administration and is now president of Refugees International. 'When you have an aid distribution model that is premised on forcing huge crowds of desperately hungry people to cluster directly adjacent to IDF military installations, you're going to get massacres,' he added. Mr Konyndyk said it was 'not a coincidence' that most of the distribution sites were in the south of Gaza, at a time when the Israeli army was trying to force Palestinians out of the north of the territory. 'A basic principle of humanitarian response is you move the aid as close to you can to where the people are. They're doing the opposite of that, the diametric opposite of that, which suggests that they want to draw people to the south,' he said. 'I think that is highly suggestive of the longer-term agenda here,' he added. Stacey Gilbert, who resigned from the state department in 2024 over the Biden administration's failure to hold Israel accountable for blocking aid to Gaza, also believes the sites are located primarily in the south to draw Palestinians away from the north. 'This is trying to draw them all to one area, to get them away from the area that Israel doesn't want them in,' she said. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz hit out at the Haaretz story in a joint statement, describing the testimonies as 'contemptible blood libels.' 'These are malicious falsehoods designed to defame the IDF, the most moral military in the world,' the statement said. The IDF said it is 'operating to allow and facilitate the distribution of humanitarian aid by the American 'Gaza Humanitarian Foundation' (GHF), and to secure the routes leading to the distribution centers, in order to allow the aid to reach the civilians rather than Hamas.' It added that it 'strongly' rejected the accusations raised in the Haaretz article. 'The IDF did not instruct the forces to deliberately shoot at civilians, including those approaching the distribution centers. To be clear, IDF directives prohibit deliberate attacks on civilians,' it said in a statement. The GHF's Interim Executive Director John Acree said in a statement provided to The Independent that 'there have been no incidents or fatalities at or in the immediate vicinity of any of our distribution sites.' 'However, IDF is tasked with providing safe passage for aid-seekers to all humanitarian organizations operating in Gaza, including GHF. GHF is not aware of any of these incidents but these allegations are too grave to ignore and we therefore call on Israel to investigate them and transparently publish the results in a timely manner,' he added. Acree said the GHF was 'grateful for the support from President Trump and his administration in getting life-saving aid directly into the hands of the Palestinian people in Gaza'. The GHF's current leader, Johnnie Moore, an evangelical preacher who was a White House adviser in the first Trump administration, said in a post on X on Thursday that the group has delivered more than 46 million meals to Gazans since it began its operations in May. Israel imposed a full blockade on aid into Gaza when a ceasefire collapsed in March, pushing the population to the edge of famine. When aid is finally permitted to enter, many convoys are overwhelmed by hungry families and civilians in desperation, and armed gangs have reportedly exploited the chaos on occasion to steal the aid.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The government wants AI to fight wars and review your taxes
Elon Musk has receded from Washington but one of his most disruptive ideas about government is surging inside the Trump administration. Artificial intelligence, Musk has said, can do a better job than federal employees at many tasks - a notion being tested by AI projects trying to automate work across nearly every agency in the executive branch. Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post. The Federal Aviation Administration is exploring whether AI can be a better air traffic controller. The Pentagon is using AI to help officers distinguish between combatants and civilians in the field, and said Monday that its personnel would begin using the chatbot Grok offered by Musk's start-up, xAI, which is trying to gain a foothold in federal agencies. Artificial intelligence technology could soon play a central role in tax audits, airport security screenings and more, according to public documents and interviews with current and former federal workers. Many of these AI programs aim to shrink the federal workforce - continuing the work of Musk's U.S. DOGE Service that has cut thousands of government employees. Government AI is also promised to reduce wait times and lower costs to American taxpayers. Government tech watchdogs worry the Trump administration's automation drive - combined with federal layoffs - will give unproven technology an outsize role. If AI drives federal decision-making instead of aiding human experts, glitches could unfairly deprive people of benefits or harm public safety, said Elizabeth Laird, a director at the Washington-based nonprofit Center for Democracy and Technology. There is 'a fundamental mismatch' between what AI can do and what citizens expect from government, she said. President Joe Biden in 2023 signed an executive order aimed at spurring government use of AI, while also containing its risks. In January, President Donald Trump repealed that order. His administration has removed AI guardrails while seeking to accelerate its rollout. A comprehensive White House AI plan is expected this month. 'President Trump has long stressed the importance of American AI dominance, and his administration is using every possible tool to streamline our government and deliver more efficient results for the American people,' White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said in a statement. The Washington Post reviewed government disclosures and interviewed current and former federal workers about plans to expand government AI. Some expressed alarm at the administration's disregard for safety and government staff. Others saw potential to improve efficiency. 'In government, you have so much that needs doing and AI can help get it done and get it done faster,' said Jennifer Pahlka, who was deputy U.S. chief technology officer in President Barack Obama's second term. Sahil Lavingia, a former DOGE staffer who pushed the Department of Veterans Affairs to use AI to identify potentially wasteful spending, said government should aggressively deploy the technology becoming so prevalent elsewhere. Government processes are efficient today, he said, 'but could be made more efficient with AI.' Lavingia argued no task should be off limits for experimentation, 'especially in war.' 'I don't trust humans with life and death tasks,' he said, echoing a maximalist view of AI's potential shared by some DOGE staffers. Here's how AI is being deployed within some government agencies embracing the technology. - - - Waging war The Pentagon is charging ahead with artificial intelligence this year. The number of military and civilian personnel using NGA Maven, one of the Pentagon's core AI programs, has more than doubled since January, said Vice Adm. Frank Whitworth, director of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, in a May speech. The system, launched in 2017, processes imagery from satellites, drones and other sources to detect and identify potential targets for humans to assess. More than 25,000 U.S. military and civilian personnel around the world now use NGA Maven. NGA Maven is being expanded, Adm. Whitworth said, to interpret data such as audio and text in conjunction with imagery, offering commanders a 'live map' of military operations. The aim is to help it better distinguish combatants from noncombatants and enemies from allies, and for units using NGA Maven to be able to make 1,000 accurate decisions about potential targets within an hour. The Pentagon's AI drive under Trump will give tech companies like data-mining firm Palantir a larger role in American military power. A White House executive order and a Defense Department memo have instructed federal officials to rely more on commercial technology. In May, the Defense Department announced it was more than doubling its planned spending on a core AI system that is part of NGA Maven called Maven Smart System, allocating an additional $795 million. The software, provided by Palantir, analyzes sensor data to help soldiers identify targets and commanders to approve strikes. It has been used for planning logistics to support deployed troops. - - - Air traffic control The Federal Aviation Administration is testing whether AI software can reliably aid human air traffic controllers, according to a person with knowledge of the agency's plans who spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid retaliation. Humans would remain in the loop, the person said, but AI would help reduce fatigue and distraction. Air traffic control staff would continue to communicate with pilots, for example, but AI might handle repetitive and data-driven tasks, monitoring airspace more generally. Due in part to ongoing staff shortages in air traffic control, the agency's AI plans include 'planning for less people,' the person said. Other uses for AI being explored at the FAA include analyzing air traffic or crash data and predicting when aircraft are likely to need maintenance, the person said. The FAA sees artificial intelligence as a potential tool to address airline safety concerns that were brought to the fore by the January midair collision that killed more than 60 people near Reagan National Airport. 'The FAA is exploring how AI can improve safety,' the agency said in a unsigned statement, but air traffic controllers do not currently use the technology. That includes using the technology to scan incident reports and other data to find risks around airports with a mixture of helicopter and airplane traffic, the statement said, while emphasizing humans will remain in charge. 'FAA subject matter experts are essential to our oversight and safety mission and that will never change,' the statement said. - - - Examining patents The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office wants to test whether part of the job of patent examiners - who review patent applications to determine their validity - can replaced by AI, according to records obtained by The Post and an agency employee who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe internal deliberations. Patent seekers who opt into a pilot program will have their applications fed into an AI search tool that will trawl the agency's databases for existing patents with similar information. It will email applicants a list of the ten most relevant documents, with the goal of efficiently spurring people to revise, alter or withdraw their application, the records show. From July 21, per an email obtained by The Post, it will become 'mandatory' for examiners to use an AI-based search tool to run a similarity check on patent applications. The agency did not respond to a question asking if it is the same technology used in the pilot program that will email patent applicants. The agency employee said AI could have an expansive role at USPTO. Examiners write reports explaining whether applications fall afoul of patent laws or rules. The large language models behind recent AI systems like ChatGPT 'are very good at writing reports, and their ability to analyze keeps getting better,' the employee said. This month, the agency had planned to roll out another new AI search tool that examiners will be expected to use, according to internal documents reviewed by The Post. But the launch moved so quickly that concerns arose USPTO workers - and some top leaders - did not understand what was about to happen. Some staff suggested delaying the launch, the documents show, and it is unclear when it will ultimately be released. USPTO referred questions to the Commerce Department, which shared a statement from an unnamed spokesperson. 'At the USPTO, we are evaluating how AI and technology can better support the great work of our patent examiners,' the statement said. - - - Airport security screening You may see fewer security staff next time you fly as the Transportation Security Administration automates a growing number of tasks at airport checkpoints. TSA began rolling out facial recognition cameras to check IDs in 2022, a program now live in more than 200 airports nationwide. Despite studies showing that facial recognition is not perfect and less accurate at identifying people of color, the agency says it is more effective at spotting impostors than human reviewers. A federal report this year found TSA's facial recognition is more than 99 percent accurate across all demographic groups tested. The agency says it is experimenting with automated kiosks that allow pre-checked passengers to pass through security with 'minimal to no assistance' from TSA officers. During the Biden administration, these and other AI efforts at TSA were aimed at helping security officers be more efficient - not replacing them, said a former technology official at the Department of Homeland Security, TSA's parent agency, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal matters. 'It frees up the officer to spend more time interacting with a passenger,' the former official said. The new Trump administration has indicated it wants to accelerate AI projects, which could reduce the number of TSA officers at airports, according to Galvin Widjaja, CEO of Austin-based a contractor which works with TSA and DHS on tools for screening airport travelers. 'If an AI can make the decision, and there's an opportunity to reduce the manpower, they're going to do that,' Widjaja said in an interview. Russ Read, a spokesman for TSA, said in an emailed statement that 'the future of aviation security will be a combination of human talent and technological innovation.' - - - Tax audits The Internal Revenue Service has an AI program to help employees query its internal manual, in addition to chatbots for a variety of internal uses. But the agency is now looking to off-load more significant tasks to AI tools. Once the new administration took over, with a mandate from DOGE that targeted the IRS, the agency examined the feasibility of deploying AI to manage tax audits, according to a person familiar with the matter, speaking on the condition of anonymity for fear of retribution. The push to automate work so central to the IRS's mission underscores a broader strategy: to delegate functions typically left to human experts to powerful software instead. 'The end game is to have one IT, HR, etc., for Treasury and get AI to do everything,' the person said. A DOGE official, start-up founder Sam Corcos, has been overseeing work to deploy AI more broadly at the IRS. But the lack of oversight of an ambitious effort to centralize the work of the IRS and feed it to a powerful AI tool has raised internal worries, the person said. 'The IRS has used AI for business functions including operational efficiency, fraud detection, and taxpayer services for a long time,' a Treasury Department spokeswoman said in a statement. 'Treasury CIO Sam Corcos is implementing the fulsome IRS modernization plan that taxpayers have deserved for over three decades.' - - - Caring for veterans In April, the Department of Veterans Affairs's top technology official emailed lieutenants with his interpretation of the Trump administration's new AI policy. 'The message is clear to me,' Charles Worthington, who serves as VA's chief technology officer and chief AI officer, said. 'Be aggressive in seizing AI opportunity, while implementing common sense safeguards to ensure these tools are trustworthy when they are used in VA's most sensitive areas such as benefit determinations and health care.' The email was published to VA's website in response to a public records request. VA said it deployed hundreds of uses of artificial intelligence last year, making it one of the agencies most actively tapping AI based on government disclosures. Among the most controversial of these programs has been REACH VET, a scoring algorithm used to prioritize mental health assistance to patients predicted to be at the highest risk of suicide. Last year, an investigation by the Fuller Project, a nonprofit news organization, found that the system prioritized help to White men, especially those who have been divorced or widowed - groups studies show to be at the highest risk of suicide. VA acknowledged that REACH VET previously did not consider known risk factors for suicide in women veterans, making it less likely that women struggling with thoughts of suicide would flagged for assistance. Pete Kasperowicz, a VA spokesman, said in an email that the agency recently updated the REACH VET algorithm to account for several new risk factors specific to women, including military sexual trauma, pregnancy, ovarian cysts and infertility. Since the program launched in 2017, it has helped identify more than 117,000 at-risk veterans, prompting staff to offer them additional support and services, he said. REACH VET was one of over 300 AI applications that the Biden administration labeled 'safety impacting' or 'rights impacting' in annual transparency reports. The Trump administration, which has derided the 'risk-averse approach of the previous administration,' discontinued those labels and will instead denote sensitive programs as 'high-impact.' GRAPHIC Related Content He may have stopped Trump's would-be assassin. Now he's telling his story. He seeded clouds over Texas. Then came the conspiracy theories. How conservatives beat back a Republican sell-off of public lands
