Vena Recognized as a Leader With Outstanding Overall Rating in 2025–2026 Performance Management Vendor Landscape Matrix from BPM Partners
TORONTO, July 29, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Vena, the only Complete FP&A platform powered by agentic AI and purpose-built to fully amplify the Microsoft technology ecosystem, today shared its eight total Outstanding and Excellent rankings in the new 2025–2026 Performance Management Vendor Landscape Matrix (VLM) produced by BPM Partners, the leading independent authority on business performance management. Vena was ranked as an all-around Outstanding provider, the highest possible ranking, with a score of 4.69 out of 5, signaling its ongoing success in providing customers with a holistic financial planning solution that meets their needs.
In addition to its overall ranking, Vena was a Top-rated provider in the Budgeting and Planning and Customer Support categories with scores of 4.85 and 4.62 respectively, well above competitors in both categories. The company also earned Excellent rankings in the following five categories: Performance and Scalability, Financial Reporting, Financial Consolidation, Finance Self-Sufficiency and Ease of Use.
The VLM found Vena's key strengths to be its intuitive interface, the platform's flexibility, the low total cost of ownership and its integrated business planning and AI-powered capabilities.
In BPM's report, 73% of survey respondents ranked the use of AI in CPM as either important or very important, showcasing Vena's future-forward focus and emphasis on providing customers solutions that integrate with the platforms they already know and trust. Vena is leading the way in FP&A with its agentic AI deployments and integrations, including industry-first reporting and analytics agents as well as Vena Copilot for Microsoft Teams, an integration that brings these powerful tools directly into business workflows and collaborations.
"Our VLM score jumped from 4.54 last year to 4.69 this year—concrete proof that Vena's AI-powered, customer-oriented approach is resonating more than ever with customers around the world," said Hugh Cumming, CTO of Vena. "We are particularly honored by the continued recognition for our integration capabilities. During times of volatility, a business needs better information flow and increased agility. Vena's integration and AI features help finance teams make more strategic decisions faster."
Finance teams are facing more pressure to provide fast and accurate information, reflected in 67% of VLM respondents saying pre-built templates were important or very important to them when evaluating a vendor's platform. In addition to its native integration with the Microsoft technology ecosystem, Vena offers a quick startup time and easy adoption no matter the industry, thanks to its robust library of 50+ pre-built templates that include everything from Power BI dashboards to employee growth kits.
"The VLM is an invaluable tool for anyone looking to purchase, upgrade or replace a performance management system," said Craig Schiff, President and CEO of BPM Partners. "We currently track more than 50 vendors that provide software to address one or more aspects of business performance management and related business intelligence. Only the most active vendors competing for and successfully delivering BPM solutions are included in the VLM report, and Vena is certainly making its mark."
From high-growth startups to global enterprises, finance and operations teams are turning to Vena to unify their planning in a single platform that's fast to deploy, flexible to use and powered by the tools finance teams already trust—Excel, Power BI, Teams and more. With agentic AI, real-time analytics and a seamless Microsoft-native user experience, Vena empowers finance leaders to go beyond the numbers and make confident, insight-driven decisions that move their business forward. To learn how companies are planning with confidence using Vena, visit our Customer Stories.
To download a copy of the 2025–2026 Performance Management Vendor Landscape Matrix (VLM) report produced by BPM Partners, click here.
About Vena
Vena is the only agentic AI-powered FP&A platform purpose-built to harness the full power of the Microsoft technology ecosystem for finance teams everywhere. Vena amplifies Microsoft's world-leading productivity tools, cloud technology and AI innovation to make FP&A, operational planning and adjacent strategic processes more flexible, efficient and intelligent. Thousands of the world's leading companies rely on Vena to power their planning. For more information, visit venasolutions.com.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250729387947/en/
Contacts
Media Contact: For immediate inquiries or more details regarding our latest business news, please contact:Jonathan PaulVice President, Content Marketingjpaul@venacorp.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
a minute ago
- Forbes
GameSir G7 Pro Review: Yes Sir, It's A Game-Changing Pro Controller
You've got to admire companies that like to get things done right, even when they don't go about it in the prettiest way. Much like Thrustmaster with its barmy yet ridiculously innovative eSwap X2 Pro, the GameSir G7 Pro is choosing function over fashion for Xbox, PC, and mobile. As far as wired controllers go, the GameSir G7 Pro isn't just up there with the Victrix Prime Gambit — it's better, depending on your usage and preferences. Despite its relatively dull looks, at least with its inaugural Mech White edition (a darker Shadow Ember design is in the works), it offers some of the best functionality for its mid-range price point in the market, with impressive attention to detail on the pro-level functions that matter the most. It's one of the most flexible controllers out there — and it's not difficult to see why it's gained the official thumbs up from Microsoft. What's in the box? As with a few Chinese controller manufacturers, like PB Tails, the unboxing isn't much of an event — lightweight foam rings protect the analog sticks, while the D-pad had come off the controller in transit — but these are daft complaints when you consider just how much the GameSir G7 Pro offers, given its specs. Gamesir G7 Pro specifications Prime competition FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™ Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase Pinpoint By Linkedin Guess The Category Queens By Linkedin Crown Each Region Crossclimb By Linkedin Unlock A Trivia Ladder In your hands, the G7 Pro feels brilliant. This is mainly because it's practically identical in form and factor to Microsoft's standard wireless Xbox controller, but with nice, rounded grips that curve rather than sharpen at the base of your hands. Smaller-palmed players will have no complaints about it. The programmable L3/R3 shoulder buttons sit nicely under your fingertips, while the two rear buttons are within easy reach, though they're a little too easy to trigger. Not that it's a problem; the G7 Pro has trigger locks for these, which is a true rarity, but they're also gratefully received for those of us who like the option but may rarely use them — for me, I only really adapt them for manual shifting in racing games. You've got to love a flappy-paddle gearbox. While it's definitely reminiscent of the Victrix Prime Gambit, it feels more premium. The G7 Pro shares the magnetic faceplates of the Gambit, but in three sections, and they're just as easy to remove — a bit of a godsend when it comes to switching D-pads. The GameSir G7 Pro also differs from the Gambit by putting a bigger focus on its wireless flexibility. The Prime Gambit's recessed USB-C connection is perfectly fine for a controller that lacks an internal battery, but the G7 Pro's removable cable retainer means it protects the wire just as well, and allows the controller to look the part when it's in wireless mode on PC and mobile. It's a simple design idea, but genuinely brilliant. Admittedly, you can't swap out the analog sticks on the G7 Pro, but I don't care — they're pretty much identical to a classic Xbox controller, and with the TMR technology (and its supremely responsive feedback), they'll keep delivering for months, and years, to come. Mechanical energy Mechanical buttons are a godsend on any controller, and the GameSir G7 Pro doesn't disappoint. The ABXY inputs alone are precise and comfortable, even if these sit a little higher than you'd hope (especially compared to the fighting game-primed Victrix Pro BFG), but its greatest strength is its triggers. In standard mode, the LT and RT buttons work as expected — nothing to write home about, but perfectly fine nonetheless. Switch the trigger stops to low-profile mode, and they're probably the best I've ever used — the micro-switch haptics are superb and precise. There are no clacky sounds or lack of dampening to make every pull jar your fingers and trigger misophonia. The trigger-lock switches on the back of the controller are stiff, but not unusable, especially given that players will rarely switch them. It's not all sunshine and rainbows The GameSir G7 Pro is a great controller, but it's not without its issues. Crucially, its D-pad feels mechanical yet imprecise. You can hear the eight-way input, but on fighting games, you can't fully trust it — like the ABXY buttons, it feels like the mechanism sits just a tad too high, which isn't ideal for such a delicate section of the pad. The software, too, is very basic. On Xbox, the GameSir Nexus app is hard to read, as even the crispest resolution barely shows thin text, even on a 4K OLED TV. Mapping is a breeze, but there aren't options for combination inputs, which will turn off fighting game players. It's not quite as bad as the weird interface for the PowerA Fusion Pro Wireless with Lumectra, but it's not far off. That said, the rest of the G7 Pro's criticisms are minor. My most common issue — at least, when it's wired to the Xbox, and automatically switches itself off after inactivity — is that it reconnects to, then disconnects from, the console. It can happen twice, or occasionally three times. You find yourself staring at the pad, hoping the light stays on. Then there's the charging station, which is a lovely extra, but it's useless if you're only buying the controller for your Xbox. Well, that's not strictly true; the G7 Pro still looks great sitting on it, even if you feel the overwhelming need to remove the wire and cable protector to make it look 'right.' A lovely little package My Gambit Prime was a go-to controller to switch between Xbox and PC, but between its wireless mode, grippier finish, and industry-leading clicky hair triggers, the G7 Pro is the better option. If only it was wireless on Xbox, it'd be the perfect recommendation. The GameSir G7 Pro doesn't pretend to be an attractive controller because it doesn't need to. It might not look beautiful, or offer a wireless mode for Xbox gamers, or provide a real depth of customization, but it just works — and incredibly well, at that.
Business Insider
9 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Microsoft (MSFT) CEO Labels Quantum Computing the Next Cloud Driver Amid Platform Expansion
Microsoft (MSFT) is making quantum computing a core part of its long-term cloud strategy. During the company's fourth-quarter earnings call on July 30, CEO Satya Nadella said, 'The next big accelerator in the cloud will be Quantum, and I am excited about our progress. In fact, earlier this month, we announced the world's first operational deployment of a Level 2 quantum computer, in partnership with Atom Computing.' Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Level 2 quantum systems include error correction and can support logical qubits, which makes them more stable than earlier quantum machines. Microsoft's deployment is seen as the first in-market system with this capability. The company also revealed plans to build a new machine called Magne with Atom Computing. Magne will use over 1,200 physical qubits to support 50 logical qubits. Construction is set to begin in fall 2025, with workloads expected in 2027. Microsoft Expands AI and Quantum Stack With $30B Capex Unlike peers such as Alphabet (GOOG) and International Business Machines (IBM), Microsoft is focused on neutral atoms instead of superconducting chips. The partnership with Atom Computing fits into the company's broader bet on scalable and fault-tolerant hardware. Microsoft said its capital spending would reach $30 billion this year, mainly to support AI and quantum workloads. The company has built over 400 data centers globally and added liquid cooling in each Azure region. Azure revenue rose 39% year-over-year in the quarter. Total revenue reached $76.44 billion, while earnings per share came in at $3.65. Microsoft is also layering its quantum work into Azure AI Foundry and Microsoft Fabric, its cloud-based data platforms. Fabric posted 55% year-over-year growth and now supports over 25,000 customers. OpenAI's use of Microsoft tools continues to deepen, including Cosmos DB and Azure PostgreSQL for ChatGPT operations. What Is the Price Target for MSFT Stock? average MSFT stock price target of $617.58. This implies a 17.83% upside from the current price.
Forbes
31 minutes ago
- Forbes
The Revision Economy And The Retraction Life
Last Friday, we learned we are less employed than we thought we were. A quarter million jobs vanished, yet no one new was fired and no one new quit. Those jobs never existed in the first place. Only our estimate of the truth changed, not the truth itself. This was definitely a large revision. The two-month downward revision in jobs hadn't been this negative since Covid, and before that, the global financial crisis in October 2008. Before that, it hadn't happened in decades, with only a handful of occurrences in 1979, 1980, and 1982. In response, the US equity market fell between one and two percent and Treasury bond yields collapsed, especially in the front-end, as the market began pricing in a substantially higher expectation of Fed rate cuts. President Trump ordered the firing of the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), citing 'a lengthy history of inaccuracies and incompetence.' Should he have? Revision History Usually, revisions are frequent and fairly modest. The monthly nonfarm payroll report is always revised twice, so there are three numbers: the preliminary estimate, the first revision the following month, and the second revision in the month following that. There are also annual revisions. The average magnitude of the revisions since 1979 are between 40,000 and 60,000 jobs. Sometimes we find out we are more employed than we thought we were, and sometimes less. On Friday, the May 2025 seasonally adjusted estimate was revised down 120,000 jobs from its first estimate and the June 2025 estimate was revised down 133,000 jobs. Each of those was historically extreme, worse than 95% of relevant monthly revisions since 1979. The two-month combination was basically a once-in-a-decade event, as the chart above shows. Big numbers. But ultimately, they are just one source of data. Jobs numbers help us think about the economy, but they are just one piece of the puzzle. What makes job numbers particularly useful is they may be forward-looking: rather than estimating historical consumer purchases, job creation can presage future spending. That's why revisions could matter too. You drive differently if you think your exit is three miles away than if you think it's a quarter mile away. But we can't live our lives in the past, constantly revising what we used to think about ancient history. So, when should a revision of the past change your perspective of the future? Estimates vs. Reality Surely, it should have some effect. One famous quote attributed to John Maynard Keynes summarizes this view: 'When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?' Of course, not all facts matter the same amount or at the same time. Yesterday's future is tomorrow's past. Eventually, other data should matter more than the jobs numbers. If the BLS announced an inadvertent and unnoticed typo in a jobs number from eight years ago, that should presumably have almost no effect on your views today, since so much additional data has already come in, about spending, saving, production, consumption, inflation, and more. In other words, those quarter million jobs either existed or not. Estimates and revisions won't change what actually happened. Even knowing the exact true number is only a proxy for the actual information you would be interested in, and as time has gone on, other data has come out that can be more valuable and important than a more accurate but more historically distant estimate. There is a devastating counterpoint, however, as anyone who has ever been in any kind of personal or professional relationship would know. If a piece of information about the ancient past can change or color your perception of the entire relationship, then almost no amount of time can reduce that emotional impact. In any fight with a loved one, the biggest pain isn't whatever action they did or did not do, or your best estimate of their action, or even the revisions of your best estimates of their actions: it's the possibility that they never loved you at all. Was it all a lie? President Trump's firing of the BLS commissioner may be controversial. But both the administration and its critics worry about the same thing: data ought to be as accurate and objective as possible. This issue is a lot like reading the news. The loud front pages say one thing, usually preliminary news. Later retractions or corrections are quiet and unnoticed. As a society, we can begin to split and live in two different worlds: those that did not know the truth and did not see the retraction, and those that knew the truth or saw the retraction. Therefore, we no longer even have the same facts. Some of us begin to live in the hallucinated, unrevised, unretracted world, a world much like the Mandela effect, where we swear we remember things that in fact never happened. Trust is a fragile thing. A good-faith revision here or a revision there can be fine. But if you notice a consistent bias or pattern in the revisions and retractions, if the errors are rarely in your favor, you may stop subscribing to that source of news or data. If you are in a relationship, you may look to end or fix it. If you are the President of the United States, you may seek a new commissioner. The primary challenge in all these cases is then the same: restore the trust. In the revision economy and the retraction life, beliefs can bend, but faith can snap.
