Elon Musk wants to shut down the International Space Station for which Donald Trump just sanctioned $1.25 billion; says time to focus on ...
Elon Musk
has triggered a debate by urging the retirement of the
International Space Station
(ISS), calling it a relic that's holding back humanity's cosmic ambitions. On July 3, Elon Musk took to Twitter to repost a summary of space-related funding in President Donald Trump's latest tax bill, which allocates $1.25 billion to sustain the ISS through 2030. Musk's blunt response: 'It's time to retire the Space Station and focus on Mars'. Musk's post sparked a heated online debate, with supporters cheering his bold vision and critics defending the ISS as a cornerstone of global scientific collaboration.
The ISS, said to be a marvel of engineering orbiting 250 miles above Earth, has been a hub for groundbreaking research since its first module launched in 1998. But at over two decades old, the station is showing its age. NASA has acknowledged that critical systems, including life support and structural components, are nearing the end of their operational life. The tax bill also includes $325 million to fund a safe deorbit process by 2030, signaling that the station's days are numbered. Last year, NASA awarded SpaceX an $843 million contract to build a U.S. Deorbit Vehicle to guide the ISS to a controlled reentry, ensuring it burns up safely over a remote part of the Pacific Ocean.
Why Elon Musk wants ISS deorbited
Elon Musk argues that the ISS's mounting maintenance costs -- estimated at $3-4 billion annually -- are a drain on resources that could be better spent on humanity's next frontier: Mars. 'The ISS was a great achievement, but it's a 20th-century project,' Musk said in a follow-up post on Twitter. 'If we want to become a multi-planetary species, we need to stop tinkering with old hardware and go all-in on Mars.' His vision for a self-sustaining Martian colony has been a cornerstone of SpaceX's mission since its founding in 2002, with the company's Starship rocket designed to carry crews and cargo to the Red Planet.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Providers are furious: Internet access without a subscription!
Techno Mag
Learn More
Undo
What supporters of International Space Station say
Critics, however, argue that Musk's push to abandon the ISS overlooks its ongoing contributions. The station hosts experiments in microgravity that have advanced medical research, materials science, and our understanding of long-term space habitation -- knowledge critical for Mars missions. 'The ISS isn't just a lab; it's a symbol of what nations can achieve together,' said Dr. Ellen Stofan, former NASA chief scientist, in a statement to Reuters. 'Dismissing it prematurely risks losing that momentum.' The ISS is a joint effort of the United States, Russia, Europe, Japan, and Canada, and its cooperative framework has weathered geopolitical tensions, including recent strains with Russia over Ukraine.
Elon Musk's 'time to retire ISS' divides the internet
Public reaction on Twitter too reflect the divide. 'Musk is right—ISS is a money pit. Mars is the future,' posted user @SpacePioneer2030, echoing sentiments from those who see the station as outdated. Others, like @AstroGeek42, countered: 'The ISS still delivers science you can't get anywhere else. Why ditch it before we're ready?' The debate underscores a broader tension in space policy: balancing immediate scientific gains with long-term exploration goals.
NASA's current plan keeps the ISS operational until 2030, with private space stations like Axiom Space's proposed orbital habitat expected to fill the gap. But Musk's comments suggest he'd rather see that transition happen sooner. SpaceX, which already ferries astronauts and supplies to the ISS, is positioned to play a key role in both the station's end and the next chapter of space exploration. The company's reusable rockets have slashed launch costs, making ambitious projects like Mars missions more feasible.
The tax bill's funding for the ISS and its deorbit underscores a pragmatic reality: the station's end is inevitable. Yet Musk's call to shift focus to Mars raises questions about priorities in an era of constrained budgets and competing global challenges. As one senior NASA official, speaking anonymously, told The Washington Post, 'Elon's not wrong that Mars is the big goal, but the ISS is still teaching us how to get there. It's not an either-or situation—yet."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
42 minutes ago
- News18
How Elon Musk Could Upend US Politics—And Why India Should Pay Attention
Last Updated: Elon Musk's new American Party could have ripple effects for India, given his deep business ties and disruptive influence. Find out how Billionaire Elon Musk has made his starkest threat to President Donald Trump after he stepped away from politics by launching his 'American Party'. The development comes after Musk condemned Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill" (new tax bill) on social media platform X a few days ago. 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame! And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth," he wrote. The President on Sunday assailed Musk, describing him as 'off the rails", over his new party announcement. 'I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks," Trump wrote on Truth Social on Sunday evening. 'He even wants to start a Third Political Party, despite the fact that they have never succeeded in the United States." The American Party confirms the rupture in Trump's relationship with Musk, who spent millions of dollars to support the Republican leaders in his campaign. Trump, in return, rewarded the businessman with a new position in the Department Of Government Efficiency, which oversaw drastic cuts to government staffing. Let us understand how Musk's new party threatens Trump's political capital and how the President could hurt the businessman. How Musk Could Threaten Trump Politically? With a net worth of $405 billion, Musk could single-handedly reshape US politics. In 2024, he poured $295 million into Republican campaigns—mostly backing Trump. While that's a record-breaking sum in politics, it's pocket change for Musk. For context, in 2023 and 2024, the total amount of money raised by all presidential candidates was only $2 billion, according to the Federal Election Commission. Congressional candidates raised $3.8 billion, while PACs raised a more respectable $15.7 billion. It won't be difficult for Musk to match those amounts because his wealth is tied up in stocks that can't easily be unloaded all at once. Based on last week's share prices, he could pay for the entire 2024 election cycle by liquidating just one fifth of his reported $130 billion stake in Tesla. He has also suggested donating the amount to Republican representative Thomas Massie, a persistent critic of Trump's. There's still another $100 million Musk previously promised Trump that he could decide to withhold, as per The Independent. He could even bankroll Democrats, who will likely take it (although Trump has threatened 'serious consequences" in that scenario). They are politicians, after all. While third parties rarely challenge America's two-party system, Musk's billions could disrupt the 2026 congressional elections — if he chooses to spend big, reports NPR. Interestingly, Musk believes that 80% of Americans share his views—a claim that seems far from reality. According to polling expert Nate Silver, Musk's net favourability stands at a weighted average of -18%, significantly lower than even Trump's, The Independent reported. Clash Of Personalities Musk has cultivated a loyal following that mirrors—and in some ways surpasses—the fervent base of Trump. Both men command near-religious devotion from supporters, blending celebrity, controversy, and populist rhetoric to dominate public discourse. But while Trump's appeal stems from his 'America First" nationalism and brash persona, Musk's influence is built on his image as a visionary technocrat, the real-life Tony Stark bending the future to his will. His tweets move markets, his memes go viral, and his every pronouncement sparks global debate. Where Trump mastered TV and rallies, Musk dominates X (formerly Twitter), using the platform to amplify conspiracy theories, troll critics, and position himself as a free-speech crusader. The parallels run deep. Both men thrive on polarisation, calling themselves as anti-establishment outsiders despite their immense wealth and power. Trump had his 'fake news" mantra; Musk decries 'woke mind viruses." Both attract fans who see them as truth-tellers fighting corrupt elites—even as Musk's companies benefit from government subsidies and Trump's presidency was defined by corporate favouritism. Their supporters dismiss scandals (Trump's indictments, Musk's erratic behaviour) as evidence of a rigged system targeting their hero. But Musk's cult may be more dangerous because it's apolitical at its core. Trump's base is ideological; Musk's is transactional, united by tech utopianism rather than policy. As the 2024 election showed, his endorsements—or withheld donations—can sway races. With his wealth, platform, and fanbase, Musk doesn't just rival Trump's influence—he's rewriting the rules of political power itself. The question isn't whether he'll reshape elections, but how far he's willing to go. How Musk Has Global Influence Musk's power extends far beyond any single nation or sector, giving him leverage few can match. For example, NASA depends entirely on SpaceX—currently the only reliable transporter of astronauts to the International Space Station. His satellite venture, Starlink, has become indispensable to militaries and governments worldwide, including US agencies. But his influence is far beyond. Thanks to Tesla's role in jumpstarting China's electric vehicle dominance, Musk enjoys both a massive fanbase in China and good relations with the Chinese Communist Party. Reports show Chinese supporters rally behind him—one Weibo user recently declared, 'Brother Musk, you've got over a billion people on our side backing you." Perhaps most intriguing, however, is the political ammunition Musk may possess. After spending months deeply embedded in Trump's White House, he likely holds insider knowledge that could damage Trump if revealed. Musk recently hinted at Trump's inclusion in the Epstein files, reviving long-standing (though unproven) associations between Trump and the disgraced financier. While nothing new, the remark demonstrates Musk's willingness to weaponise controversy. What Musk's Party Means For India? Musk's new American Party could have ripple effects for India, given his deep business ties and disruptive influence. As the CEO of Tesla, SpaceX, and owner of X, Musk wields significant economic and technological leverage—factors that directly impact India's tech and space ambitions. If his party gains traction, it could reshape US-India relations, particularly in areas like trade, climate policy, and defence. India has actively courted Musk, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi asking Tesla to invest in local manufacturing and SpaceX exploring partnerships with ISRO for satellite broadband via Starlink. A Musk-aligned US political movement prioritising deregulation and private-sector innovation could accelerate these collaborations, benefiting India's renewable energy and space sectors. However, his unpredictable stance on issues like free speech and trade protectionism might introduce volatility. For instance, if Musk pushes for US tech dominance at the expense of global partnerships, Indian start-ups relying on American markets or investments could face hurdles. top videos View all Politically, Musk's anti-establishment rhetoric could resonate with India's youth and tech elites, but his libertarian leanings could be an issue with India's regulatory frameworks. His influence could also complicate India's balancing act between the US and China—especially if his party takes a hardline stance on Beijing, given Tesla's reliance on Chinese supply chains. While Musk's political venture might open doors for tech-driven cooperation, India must navigate his policies and prepare for both opportunities and disruptions in trade, diplomacy, and innovation. About the Author Shilpy Bisht Shilpy Bisht, Deputy News Editor at News18, writes and edits national, world and business stories. She started off as a print journalist, and then transitioned to online, in her 12 years of experience. Her More Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : elon musk India-US relations SpaceX Starlink Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: July 07, 2025, 14:35 IST News india How Elon Musk Could Upend US Politics—And Why India Should Pay Attention
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Cash at HC judge's home: VP for probe
1 2 3 4 Kochi: Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar has said that the country went through a terrible time recently due to events in the judiciary concerning large amounts of cash found in the official residence of a high court judge. "It was worrisome because not many knew of it until a week later. The question that remains is whether this is an isolated incident or if there are other similar incidents," he said. During an interaction with the students of the National University of Advanced Legal Studies (NUALS) in Kochi, Dhankhar said it was important to find out those who are culpable and bring them to justice. "But so far, there has been no FIR." 'Centre Is Handicapped': VP Dhankhar Warns Of 'Ides Of March' In Judge Cash-At-Home Row He said that where there has to be rule of law, there has to be equality before the law, which means every crime must be investigated. "If the money is so huge in volume, we have to find out if it is tainted money? What is the source of this money? How was it stocked in the official residence of a judge? To whom did it belong?," he asked. "Several penal provisions are violated in the process. I do hope an FIR will be registered. We must go to the root of the matter because, for democracy, it matters that our judiciary, in whom the faith is unshakable, has its very foundations shaken. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo The citadel is tottering because of this incident," he said. Dhankhar said that each of the pillars of democracy must perform its function. But if the executive function is done by the legislature or judiciary, that will be antithetical to the essence and spirit of the doctrine of separation of powers. "I am aghast that a functionary of the executive, like the CBI director, is appointed with the participation of the Chief Justice of India. Why? The CBI director is not the senior-most person in the hierarchy. He has above him several layers: Chief vigilance commissioner, cabinet secretary, all secretaries. After all, he's heading a department. Why should an appointment of the executive be made by anyone else other than the executive?" he said, asking the students to study and work on these topics. "There is a constitutional provision, if you can understand, that certain constitutional authorities are not permitted to hold assignments after their office — like a public service commission member cannot take any assignment under the govt. The comptroller and auditor general can't take that assignment. The chief election commissioner and election commissioners can't take that assignment because they must be free not to be subjected to allurements and temptations. This was not for judges. Why? Because judges were expected to be totally away from it. And now we have post-retirement posts for judges," he said.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Karnataka must win over Tamil Nadu to unlock Mekedatu dam project, say experts
Bengaluru: Experts believe the impasse over the Mekedatu balancing reservoir project would not be permanent if Karnataka changes its approach from confrontation to collaboration. Planned at the confluence of Cauvery and Arkavathi rivers in Bengaluru South district, the Rs 9,000-crore project aims to store 48tmcft of water, supply 4.7tmcft for Bengaluru's drinking needs, and generate 400Mw of hydropower. Karnataka claims the project will help regulate water flow, prevent droughts and floods, and recharge groundwater. Despite political unity within Karnataka, the project has failed to move forward due to Tamil Nadu's opposition and pending approvals from central agencies. Tamil Nadu fears the dam will reduce its share of Cauvery water. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru A 2018 Supreme Court verdict on the Cauvery water-sharing issue did not prohibit Karnataka from building a dam at Mekedatu, but it said any such project must be cleared by Cauvery Water Management Authority (CWMA), which is bound to consider Tamil Nadu's objections. Although both states are now partners of the INDIA bloc, the dispute remains. For Karnataka, which is battling erratic rainfall and mounting demand in Bengaluru, shelving the project is not an option. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo The state assembly has repeatedly passed unanimous resolutions demanding early clearance, escalating tensions with Tamil Nadu. Deputy chief minister DK Shivakumar, who led a 168-km padyatra in 2023 ahead of the assembly polls in support of the project, has been less vocal in recent months. He continues to express commitment but blames the Centre for not facilitating inter-state talks or granting approvals. Experts say Karnataka must reposition the project as a cooperative effort. "This is a project that can move forward but only if Karnataka stops presenting it as a unilateral exercise," said Dr Roopesh Kumar, a retired professor and water policy expert. "It should bring Tamil Nadu into the process. There is room for negotiation under the Cauvery tribunal framework if Karnataka can prove that the project won't affect flows to Tamil Nadu. " Political analyst Vishwas Shetty believes Karnataka's unity on the project offers leverage. "This is a rare issue where all Karnataka parties agree. The state can use that consensus to build pressure on the Centre," he said. "But Karnataka must first assure Tamil Nadu through diplomatic and technical channels that its water share won't be compromised." JD(S) state chief and Union minister HD Kumaraswamy also urged a direct dialogue between states. "The Congress govt in Karnataka should convince the DMK govt in Tamil Nadu to clear the project. I will then get clearance from Prime Minister Narendra Modi in five minutes," he said. Tamil Nadu had passed resolutions opposing the project, citing the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956, and moved the Supreme Court. "Any construction across the Cauvery by Karnataka will violate both tribunal and court orders," a senior Tamil Nadu official said. Karnataka maintains Mekedatu is a non-irrigation project and does not threaten Tamil Nadu's allocation of 404tmcft under the tribunal's final award and the apex court's revised 2018 order. Karnataka's allocation is 284tmcft. A Central Water Commission official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Karnataka must back its case with data. "Karnataka needs to submit a fresh, detailed project report with real-time data on flow, storage, and release mechanisms. If the DPR is watertight and shows that regulated releases will ensure Tamil Nadu's share, the Centre and CWMA may find it difficult to reject." A senior Jal Shakti ministry official said CWMA could mediate too. "CWMA's role isn't only to monitor releases; it can facilitate coordinated efforts to manage water resources. If both states are willing to discuss safeguards, a resolution is not impossible."
