India vs Thailand LIVE streaming info, FIFA international friendly: How to watch on TV, Where to live stream
For the Blue Tigers, ranked 127th, the match serves as preparation for the AFC Asian Cup 2027 Qualifier against Hong Kong to be held on June 10 in Kowloon City.
'We are preparing for the game against Hong Kong, and Thailand are preparing for Turkmenistan. It's a good friendly game for both teams because we are in a similar situation (playing the Asian Cup Qualifiers),' India head coach Manolo Marquez said.
Read full preview HERE
When and where will the India vs Thailand FIFA international friendly kick-off?
The India vs Thailand FIFA international friendly will kick-off at 6 PM IST, Wednesday, June 4 at the Thammasat Stadium in Thailand. Where to watch the India vs Thailand FIFA international friendly?
FanCode app and website will be live streaming the India Vs Thailand, FIFA International Friendly match.
Unfortunately, till now, there is no telecast details for friendly match.
Also, you can follow Sportstar's app and website for all the latest information and live updates from the clash.
Related Topics
India
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Solidity of Dravid and Pujara': Ashwin lauds Sai Sudharsan's knock at No. 3 but slams India management for hurting Karun Nair's confidence
Former India off-spinner R Ashwin slammed the Indian team management for disrupting Karun Nair's confidence by drafting him in at No. 3 in two matches before dropping him in the Manchester Test. Ashwin was, however, effusive in his praise for Sai Sudharsan, who returned to the XI at Nair's expense and cracked a half-century, drawing him into a comparison with No. 3 stalwarts Rahul Dravid and Cheteshwar Pujara. Sai Sudharsan's inclusion meant that Nair was axed despite receiving the backing from India captain Shubman Gill on match eve. 'We have had conversations with him (Nair). We think Karun is batting well. (In) first match, he didn't played at his number. It's difficult when a player is making a comeback in a series like this, and but I don't think there's any issue with his batting,' Gill told reporters on Tuesday. While he batted at No. 6 in the first Test, scoring 0 and 20 as Sudharsan batted at 3 on debut, Nair was sent up to the one-down slot for the Edgbaston and Lord's Tests that followed. However, the 33-year-old could not convert his starts, entering a frustrating sequence of 31, 26, 40 and 14. Speaking on 'Ash ki Baat' on his YouTube channel, Ashwin said: 'Karun Nair has never played at No. 3. Now, by playing him at No. 3, you have put his mindset in a block. But credit to Sai Sudharsan because it is not easy being a youngster after getting dropped and with India 1-2 behind in the series to come into the fourth Test and respond the way he did. I think he has to own that No. 3 for the near future to be able to give a bit of solidity for the team.' However, young southpaw Sudharsan made the most of his second chance since his debut at No. 3 on Wednesday. The Tamil Nadu batter's stoic knock ensured that India did not crumble after losing openers KL Rahul and Yashasvi Jaiswal post lunch. Biding his time, Sudharsan cracked his maiden Test half-century before falling on 61 after spending 196 minutes at the crease. Ashwin said Sudharsan's assurance and solidity reminded him of India's most successful No. 3 batters, Dravid and Pujara. 'We have seen Cheteshwar Pujara and Rahul Dravid bat at No. 3. Sai Sudharsan showed that sort of solidity. He was able to leave the ball; of course, the wicket was a good one, but he negotiated a tough phase. He earned the right to score those runs. I am a bit upset because I am a huge well-wisher of him. He could have scored a hundred. That guy has a big appetite for runs. He just missed out on a well-deserved hundred.'
Mint
23 minutes ago
- Mint
Indian manager's bizarre 'Sir' demand in sick leave text ignites online debate on workplace culture
A truly head-scratching text exchange between an Indian manager and his employee has taken the internet by storm, sparking a fiery debate about hierarchy and communication in Indian workplaces. The bizarre conversation, initially shared on Reddit, shows a manager scolding his employee for not addressing him as "sir" in a sick leave message. The incident has resonated with many, highlighting what some are calling an outdated emphasis on rigid formalities, even in casual communications. It all began when the employee sent a straightforward message informing his manager he was unwell and would be taking sick leave. The text read: "Good morning. I wanted to let you know that I am feeling a bit unwell today due to an upset stomach – probably from something I ate yesterday. I've applied for leave on the app." The manager's initial reply was abrupt and unclear: "Need only today's update… Yesterday is gone." This left the employee understandably confused, leading to a series of exchanges where the manager's directives remained muddled. But the conversation took a sharp turn when the employee responded with a simple "Aa ok." This seemingly innocuous reply seemed to really irk the manager. "Reply in a good manner," the manager shot back. When the employee, still bewildered, asked what was rude about his message, the manager's true grievance became clear: "You can say ok sir," he explained, explicitly stating his demand to be addressed as "sir." He went on to nitpick the employee's choice of words, insisting, "And you have to inform me… not let me know. Try using good words when communicating to a senior manager." This was despite the manager's own messages being riddled with grammatical errors. The back-and-forth continued, with the employee maintaining his messages were polite and the manager stubbornly disagreeing, even providing an example of what he deemed a "polite" way to communicate: "I want to inform you sir…" The screenshots, posted on Reddit's popular 'Indian Workplace' community, quickly led users to conclude that the manager's primary issue was the lack of the honorific "sir." A user wrote, "When I joined the workforce 10 years ago, my manager used to get offended if I called him sir and made it very clear to me that at work you should address everyone by name. Since when has this changed?" Another user wrote, "Still the same in most companies. These idiots want to feel powerful. They lack it otherwise and wish to be been respected and want their ass licked because they want to feel power. Typical Indian mentality of, 'Respect your elders. The manager is a red flag. And this is the same old toxicity in India. So freaking proud of your friend who stood his/her ground rather than saying sorry sir, I will kiss your ass tomorrow." "Its not, no one calls anyone sir in my whole organisation even if its VP. Some organisations really need to drive right culture," the third shared.
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Rishabh Pant becomes only wicketkeeper in Test history to achieve this record
Synopsis Rishabh Pant etched his name in cricket history during the fourth Test against England, becoming the first wicketkeeper to surpass 1,000 Test runs in an away country. He reached the milestone with an unbeaten 37 before a foot injury forced him off the field. Pant's achievement adds him to the list of Indian legends with 1,000+ Test runs in England.
