logo
Florist told to stop the music: 'No one out front can hear it'

Florist told to stop the music: 'No one out front can hear it'

RNZ News5 days ago

Francie Croy says she normally listens to talkback radio on her phone in the backroom of her flower shop, but Onemusic says she still needs to pay.
Photo:
123rf
A Hawkes Bay florist has had her music listening habits nipped in the bud, after a licensing organisation told her to turn the tunes off at the shop or buy a licence.
Francie Croy listens to the tunes on her phone while she works at her Waipukurau store, but was contacted by Onemusic, which issues licences for certain music to be played in a commercial setting for a fee, so artists get their royalties.
That includes music played while people are on hold on the phone, at a hairdressing salon, music radio in the background at the office or thumping tunes on the factory floor - there is a cost to anything outside of personal use.
The E-Central Flowers owner told
Checkpoint
that she received a phone call from OneMusic, after failing to respond to an email from the company.
"This girl just started to say to me, 'do you play music in your shop?', and I said it's not very often, and she said 'whatever music you play, you're gonna have to have a licence for it'. "
When Croy asked what the cost of the licence would be, she was told it would depend on the square footage of her shop.
"I thought, well, hang on a minute love, you're in Auckland, are you going to send someone down here to measure up my shop and then charge me the appropriate licence?"
Croy said it was rare for her to play music in the store, normally only listening to talkback radio on her phone, mostly in the backroom.
"No one out front of the shop can hear it, but she said to me that I would still have a licence to have to do that because sometimes Newstalk ZB plays music."
She said after the phone call she was sent another email from OneMusic.
"It was a certificate thing, saying this is confirmation that you have advised us that you do not play music in your business and will not play music represented by this place.
"It includes television, radio stations, apps, digital music services, Spotify, Apple, YouTube, CD's, DVD's, Blu-ray, vinyl and cassette tapes, and the list goes on."
Croy said she had no idea that being charged for playing music at her business was even a possibility.
"It's just on my phone, you know, it's just out the back... I just got such a surprise."
She said she had spoken to multiple other small businesses in the same area who had received the same message from OneMusic.
The Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment said OneMusic licensed copyright works and MBIE did not have oversight of the scheme.
It said businesses that play music for their staff and/or customers need a licence and the licensing fees paid are distributed to producers and recording artists.
"If a business does not wish to pay any licensing fee to play music, they should not play music. To do so without a licence means the copyright owner may sue the business and award damages.
"A business who wishes to dispute the terms and conditions of the scheme may make an application to the Copyright Tribunal. If the Tribunal determines that the licensing scheme is unfair it may order changes," it said.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Revealed: How much supermarket prices have gone up since 2022
Revealed: How much supermarket prices have gone up since 2022

RNZ News

timean hour ago

  • RNZ News

Revealed: How much supermarket prices have gone up since 2022

Photo: RNZ Whether it is a block of butter or cheese, a kilogram of mince, a dozen eggs or a cooked chook, food prices have gone up rapidly. The latest Stats NZ figures show in the past 12 months food prices have gone up 4.4 percent - the highest increase since December 2023. Over the last three years Checkpoint has been tracking a weekly shop from the same suburb at a Woolworths and PAK'nSAVE supermarket to see just how much things have gone up at the checkout. Photo: RNZ / Louise Ternouth Some of the results are more eye watering than mouthwatering. For over three years, Checkpoint has been tracking the cost of 36 items likely to be in a household's trolley. In May 2022, our first shop at Woolworths Greenlane cost us $238 dollars and $217 at PAK'nSAVE Royal Oak. Today, those same items at Woolworths have shot up to $305 dollars - an extra $67 dollars at the checkout. PAK'nSAVE our shop, now set us back $270, an extra $53 dollars. Compared to our 2022 shop, seasonal vegetables like carrots and cabbage were cheaper. Other items that had come down slightly or stayed the same were Watties baked beans, plain flour, Mightyfresh wheatmeal toast bread and diced tomatoes. But they were mostly exceptions, most of the items on the shopping list cost more. Some shoppers told Checkpoint they have noticed an increase on some items in particular. "Olive oil is really expensive and eggs," said one shopper. "Dairy items I've noticed but even just general fresh fruit and vege." Photo: Jakub Kapusnak for Unsplash Others said meat was on the list. Unsurprisingly, dairy had one of the biggest jumps. At both supermarkets you still could not get a 1kg block of cheese for $10 or less. Though 1kg is now $1 dollar cheaper at Woolworths for $12.49. At PAK'nSAVE a 1kg block stayed much the same at $11.89. Two litres of standard blue top milk were sitting at just under $5 at both supermarkets. In 2022, a 500g block of Woolworths branded butter cost $5.80, now a whopping $8.50. At PAK'nSAVE it was a similar story, in 2022 it was $5.70 for a Pams 500g block, now $8.30. One shopper said their family uses a lot of butter and they were feeling the pinch, "It's been absolutely ridiculous it's almost $10." Others said they bought butter in bulk from Costco to save money "to buy cheaper New Zealand butter in bulk and freeze it rather than buying at the supermarkets." Shoppers queue for butter at Costco Westgate. Photo: Supplied/John Paul R. Bicerra A 50 box of Twinning's Earl Grey tea more than doubled in price at PAK'nSAVE to $7.89. As for a dozen barn eggs, those more than doubled at PAK'nSAVE to $9.59 and $9.50 at Woolworths. The humble beef mince now not so humble at 1kg used to cost $11.99 at PAK'n SAVE, now $18.99. At Countdown, it was up from $14.90 in 2022 to $23.80 now. For some, it is now a luxury among other items they are going without. "Probably meat products and dairy," said one shopper. Others were also leaving those products on the shelves and opting for a butter "blend" and no brand versions. One man said snacks were off the shopping list. "Snack bars and extra things you'd put into kids lunches." One woman said she had left her broccoli and cauliflower out of the shop. Washing and toiletry products also came out far more expensive. Four kilograms of Persil sensitive washing powder was $22 at both supermarkets in 2022, now an extra $13 at Woolworths and $6.50 more at PAK'nSAVE. Huggies size 3 nappies were an extra $10 at PAK'nSAVE and a litre of Palmolive body wash was an extra $5 at Woolworths. For those advising to stock up on staples or frozen to cut costs, rice, noodles, sugar and frozen vegetables - all more expensive. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Contact Energy seeks to dip deeper into Lake Hāwea
Contact Energy seeks to dip deeper into Lake Hāwea

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Contact Energy seeks to dip deeper into Lake Hāwea

The view from a Department of Conservation Lake Hāwea walking track. Contact Energy has applied for Fast Track permission to lower the lake level from 338m above sea level to 330m under some circumstances. Photo: Supplied/ Department of Conservation Lake Hāwea residents are alarmed by a proposal that could dramatically shift their local shoreline. Contact Energy is seeking fast-track consent to lower the lake's minimum operating level from 338 metres to 336 metres above sea level - and, in extreme circumstances, drop it as low as 330 metres. The change would allow the company to draw an additional six metres of water from the lake during dry years - a move it said would boost renewable energy generation and help safeguard electricity supply when demand was high. Contact Energy lodged a referral application with the government on Monday, seeking to enter the proposal into the fast-track consenting process. The group Guardians of Lake Hāwea (GLH) has appealed to Contact Energy and local authorities to ensure the community has a say. GLH chairman Geoff Kernick told a Queenstown Lakes District Council meeting last week that the costs of such a change would be borne by the community and the environment. "We don't need to compromise our lake, and the community's access to aquifer water, in the interest of security of supply," he said. He said a significant drop in the lake level would be an "obvious" degradation of the outstanding natural landscape, and risked dust storms and harm to bore water supplies. "Contact have said in their initial proposal 'overall, it is considered the adverse effects of the project can be appropriately managed and mitigated.' We wholeheartedly disagree," he said. In a statement, Contact Energy's head of hydro Blair Croall said Contact had been exploring options to strengthen energy resiliency, amid a $2.3 billion investment in renewables. The proposal to lower Lake Hāwea at times of extreme need was "in the early stages," he said. Croall said communities were central to the company's decision-making. "We remain committed to open, transparent engagement with the communities in which we operate," he said. The company did not answer RNZ's questions about why it was seeking fast-track consent, or how it planned to ensure community input. Otago Regional Council confirmed Contact Energy had approached it for formal consultation on the proposal. Regional council environmental manager Joanna Gilroy said there'd been "a high level discussion on the proposal to change the operating levels of Lake Hāwea." "Until ORC has seen detailed information on what Contact Energy is proposing it is not possible to state which specific environmental or water management concerns, we may raise as part of our involvement in the process," she said. "Based on the discussions we have had to date we have signalled that they should consider impacts such as groundwater levels, lake levels and water quality. As we gain further understanding of the proposal and the technical information, other effects may also be raised." Queenstown Lakes District Council confirmed it had also met with Contact Energy staff this month, who ran council staff through their proposal and the reasons why they were seeking consent. "It is worth noting Contact Energy is not seeking any consents under QLDC's District Plan as all the consents they require stem from Otago Regional Council's planning documents. As such, any monitoring and enforcement of consent conditions - should an application be lodged and granted - would be within the jurisdiction of ORC." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Wellington Water to be replaced by new stand-alone entity next year
Wellington Water to be replaced by new stand-alone entity next year

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Wellington Water to be replaced by new stand-alone entity next year

Lower Hutt mayor Campbell Barry. Photo: RNZ / Reece Baker Wellington's troubled water services provider will be replaced with a new stand-alone entity by this time next year, which councils say will be less costly for ratepayers. Upper Hutt City Council today agreed to back the "reset", which already had the support of Porirua, Lower Hutt and Wellington City Councils and Greater Wellington Regional Council. Lower Hutt mayor Campbell Barry, who chairs the Wellington Water Committee, welcomed today's "milestone", saying the decision marked "a reset for water services in the region". Unlike Wellington Water, the new entity would own the water infrastructure that was currently owned by councils, which meant it would be able to generate its own income, manage its own debt, and "not be constrained by council funding". "The new entity unlocks the financial tools needed to make smart investments in water infrastructure, without placing an unsustainable burden on ratepayers. "It will enable better decision-making across the entire network and ensure more consistent service delivery." Turning around "historical underinvestment" in water infrastructure would take time and water bills would still increase under the new entity to meet the needs of the region's ageing network, he admitted. However, high-level modelling showed that any rise in water charges would be about 30 percent less than what households would face under the current model. "Our main goal is to introduce a new way of delivering water services that allows for more investment in the network with an entity that is more efficient; while keeping costs more affordable and sustainable over the long-term," Barry said. The entity will be governed by a board of independent professional directors who will be appointed by a steering committee of council and iwi representatives. The decision comes as part of the government's Local Water Done Well reform, which requires councils to decide on a long term water services model and submit delivery plans by September 2025. The new entity will take over the ownership and management of drinking water, wastewater and stormwater infrastructure by 1 July 2026. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store