
28 Otago Projects Gain More Than $1m Environmental Funding From ORC
ORCs Chair of the ECO Fund Assessment Panel, Alan Somerville, highlighted how community groups throughout Otago carry out vital environmental work.
ORC Councillors today unanimously gave the green light for 28 community-lead environmental projects around Otago to receive a total $1,059,178, from its annual ECO Fund disbursement.
Total ECO Fund disbursements since mid-2018 are now more than $3.5 million.
ORC's Chair of the ECO Fund Assessment Panel, Alan Somerville, highlighted how community groups throughout Otago carry out vital environmental work.
'The community effort and commitment is inspiring. I'm only sorry we didn't have the funds to support more of the applications, noting that some very good projects have missed out.'
Of the original 69 applicants this year seeking a total $2.87 million, there were eventually 28 shortlisted who will receive a total $1,059,178 from the $1,059,500 million available. The fund was again oversubscribed almost three times.
'Since 2018 the ECO Fund has been there to support these community efforts. Otago gets immense value from the ECO Fund,' Cr Somerville says.
The funding supports community driven projects, which protect, enhance, and promote Otago's environment.
'Besides the benefits for biodiversity and freshwater quality, local people build valuable knowledge and skills and strengthen their community connections,' he says.
This year the Fund has supported a wide range of projects: control of wilding conifers, sycamores and willows, rabbits and predators; weed clearance and native planting; programmes to upskill volunteers in trapping and monitoring and to help schools with restoration projects.
'We've funded groups with a proven track record, but also some first-time applicants,' he says.
While thanking all the groups who applied, Cr Somerville says there was still plenty more to do and encouraged organisations to begin thinking about next year's ECO Fund.
Reallocation
Council today endorsed a budget reallocation from two of the ECO Fund funding categories to another ECO Fund funding category, which allowed for the funding of two additional projects in the General funding category.
The ECO Fund Assessment Panel met on 15 April 2025 to assess the applications, ultimately recommending 28 applications to Council for funding to a total value of $1,059,178. This includes the reallocation of $3502 and $35,000 from the categories of weed removal and revegetation (Biodiversity operations budget) and critical source area management on private land (Land and Water operations budget) respectively, to other specific ECO Fund funding categories due to undersubscription.
To date, $3.63 million distributed since 2018
Over the past 11 rounds of ECO Fund since mid-2018, a total $10.45 million was applied for, with a total 194 applicants (those shortlisted) from a total 420 applicants, successful, with a total $3.63 million having been distributed.
On average, each of the 11 rounds was oversubscribed by 300%.
Table 1 – Summary of recommendations from the Assessment Panel
Funding category Number of applications recommended for funding Total grant amount
Large-scale biodiversity projects 4 $450,000
General 9 $348,001
Sustained rabbit management 3 $100,000
Biodiversity enhancement on protected private land 7 $99,757
Critical source area management on private land 1 $15,000
Weed removal and revegetation 4 $46,420
Total 28 $1,059,178
Table 2 – Large-scale biodiversity projects – Projects and funding allocation – March 2025 round
Organisation Project Name District Project Activity Grant Amount
Southern Lakes Sanctuary Trust Makarora Biodiversity Protection QLDC Pest animal control $ 105,572
Upper Taieri Wai Restoring the Upper Taiari Scroll Plain CODC Weed control and native planting $ 149,900
Central Otago Wilding Conifer Control Group Contorta to Native Shelterbelt Transitions CODC Weed control and native planting $ 150,000
Yellow-eyed Penguin Trust Mapping Biodiversity Outcomes at Okia DCC Pest animal control, native planting
$ 44,528
(part)
Total $ 450,000
Table 3 – General – Projects and funding allocation – March 2025 round
Organisation Project Name District Project Activity Grant Amount
Te Nohoaka o Tukiauau – Sinclair Wetlands Te Nohoaka o Tukiauau / Sinclair Wetlands CDC Weed and pest animal control, wetland hydrology enhancement $ 49,800
Predator Free Cromwell Predator Free Cromwell: Educate, Protect, Restore CODC Pest animal control $ 42,791
Whakatipu Wildlife Trust Building Community Monitoring Capability QLDC Pest animal control and native fauna $ 39,003
Whakatipu Reforestation Trust Educate for Nature QLDC Native revegetation $ 49,500
Matukituki Charitable Trust Innovation in the Matukituki Valley QLDC Pest animal control $ 49,490
Manuherekia Catchment Group Keeping Orkney Wetland Flourishing CODC Weed control, wetland hydrology enhancement $ 29,032
Tomahawk-Smaills BeachCare Trust Growing Habitat for New Zealand Sea Lions DCC Native planting $ 48,200
Tucker Beach Wildlife Trust Tucker Beach Wildlife Reserve Restoration QLDC Weed control and native planting $ 37,200
Dunedin Environment Centre Trust Kaikorai Estuary Restoration Project DCC Native planting $ 2,985
Total $ 348,001
Table 4 – Sustained rabbit management – Projects and funding allocation – March 2025 round
Organisation Project Name District Project Activity Grant Amount
Peregrine neighbours ECO group Peregrine neighbours ECO group QLDC Pest animal control $ 42,570
Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu Kātiki Point Rabbit-proof Fencing and Planting WDC Pest animal control
$ 23,560
(part)
Titri Pest Management Group Titri Pest Management CDC Pest animal control
$ 33,870
(part)
Total $ 100,000
Table 5 – Biodiversity Enhancement of Protected Private Land – Projects and funding allocation – March 2025 round
Organisation Project Name District Project Activity Grant Amount
Sutton Creek Trust Jones Tors Covenant DCC Native planting and threatened species $ 9,757
Remarkables Station National Trust Limited Remarkables Station Sycamore Control QLDC Weed control $ 15,000
Reid Family Trust Porteous Road Restoration Project DCC Native planting $ 15,000
Matai Hill Trust Matai Hill Restoration Project DCC Native planting $ 15,000
Waitati Beach Reserve Society Waitati Beach Reserve Habitat Restoration DCC Weed control and native planting $ 15,000
Hazeldale Farming Limited Hazeldale Fen Fencing CDC Fencing $ 15,000
Makarara Farm Makarara Farm QEII Enhancement DCC Native planting $ 15,000
Total $ 99,757
Table 6 –Critical source area management on private land – Projects and funding allocation – March 2025 round
Organisation Project Name District Project Activity Grant Amount
Cardrona Alpine Resort Ltd Pringles Creek Native Plant Restoration QLDC Water quality $15,000
Total $ 15,000
Table 7 – Weed removal and revegetation – Projects and funding allocation – March 2025 round
Organisation Project Name District Project Activity Grant Amount
Dog Owners Group Cape Wanbrow DOG Cape Wanbrow WDC Native planting $ 400
Otokia Creek and Marsh Habitat Trust Weed removal on the Otokia Marsh DCC Weed control $ 15,000
Ida Valley Catchment Group Poolburn gorge willow removal and revegetation CODC Weed control $ 15,000
Deborah Bay Residents' Association DBRA Sycamores DCC Weed control $ 16,020
Total $ 46,420
Location of projects Number of projects per location
Clutha district 3
Central Otago district 5
Dunedin area 10
Queenstown Lakes district 8
Waitaki / North Otago 2
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
QLDC's Shotover Consent Applications Going Direct To Environment Court
Otago Regional Council has confirmed two resource consent applications made by Queenstown Lakes District Council – around operation of its Shotover Wastewater Treatment Plant - can go directly to the Environment Court for a hearing and decision. Provisions for public notification around the applications remain in place. ORC's Manager Consents Alexandra King says ORC received a letter from QLDC on 27 June 2025 requesting the two applications for resource consent (RM25.206 and RM25.177) be directly referred to the Environment Court – which can be done under section 87D of the Resource Management Act (RMA). 'The ORC has granted QLDC's request for direct referral of those applications to the Environment Court. A factor in reaching this decision is that public notification of the applications will proceed. This will happen once some outstanding information being sought from QLDC across both applications has been received [due by 11 August] and assessed,' Ms King says. 'It's a pragmatic decision and this approach ensures security of the public notification process and the opportunity for public participation is based on having complete and accurate information, and is consistent with the requirements of the RMA,' she says. In its 27 June letter to ORC, QLDC put forward several reasons to ORC for direct referral to the Environment Court, including that the referral would save all parties 'considerable time and money'. The QLDC letter noted there is 'significant public interest' given the consents being sought came from activities associated with the use of emergency works and direct referral to the Environment Court would enable a more efficient and effective determination, especially given the significant resources and issues in play. QLDC's letter also said that whether ORC held a hearing or the Environment Court, either result was 'very likely to be appealed irrespective of the outcome'. Ms King says ORC will continue to process the applications in accordance with the RMA and reiterated ORC will publicly notify the applications, as had been requested earlier by QLDC, following receipt of the requested, additional information; due in by 11 August. QLDC has applied for two resource consent applications (RM25.206 and RM25.177). These applications include the following activities: Divert the Shotover River to ensure the discharge is always going to running water. Disturb the bed of the Shotover River to create and maintain a diversion channel. Discharge consent for remobilising sediment from the Shotover River when creating the channel. Discharge treated wastewater to the Shotover River from the Shotover Wastewater Treatment Plant. Disturb the bed of the Shotover River for the purpose of installing a riprap outfall structure. Ms King says ORC continues to closely monitor the Shotover treatment plant site and continues to undertake its regulatory role. *Background Two abatement notices are in place and 10 infringements have been issued since the start of 2024. Five of these infringementnotices have been issued this year (2025) relating to issues that happened on site towards the end of 2024. All the (5) new notices that have been issued, relate to the alleged discharge of contaminants (namely treated wastewater) to land on the Shotover Delta in circumstances which may result in contaminant (or any other contaminant entering water; namely groundwater), the Shotover River and/or Kawarau River. Following conclusion of a more than year-long investigation of the Shotover site, ORC decided on 23 February to apply to the Environment Court for an Enforcement Order - under section 316 of the Resource Management Act 1991; to have QLDC abide by its consent conditions. The Enforcement Order application was made because of issues around QLDC's consent compliance, mainly related to the performance of the Shotover plant's ground disposal field; where treated wastewater from the plant was expected to soak through the ground and not to pond. Following the application to the Environment Court and subsequent mediation process, there is now an Enforcement Order still in place relating to the Shotover site. (An Enforcement Order is a court issued directive requiring certain actions to be taken within set time frames to fix a problem). NB - There is further supporting material / documents now available on the dedicated Shotover web page Shotover Wastewater Treatment Plant


Otago Daily Times
03-07-2025
- Otago Daily Times
Transport plans considered for Wānaka
The Wānaka community has been petitioning the ORC for a public bus service for years. Photo: ODT The Otago Regional Council (ORC) is working on its plan to spend a considerable amount set aside - $250,000 - for Wānaka transport. The funding had been removed from the council's plans this year, but was since reinstalled on the council's budget for the next financial year. The original aim of the ORC was to partner with NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA) to assess the need and costings. But when the agency withdrew its co-funding, the council pulled out. ORC general manager planning and transport Anita Dawe said it would be guided by NZTA on how to spend the funds and where. Anita Dawe. Photo: supplied "The money will be spent on developing a business case, using guidelines from NZTA. It will not, at this stage, provide actual services, which would need to be subject to funding decisions through the next annual plan." The council will consider whether to discontinue free children's bus fares (5-12 years), increase adult fares from $2 to $2.50 and several other public transport changes at its meeting this week. The council's hearings panel for transport is recommending discontinuing free fares for children, increasing the adult fare from $2 to $2.50 and setting child and youth discounts (5-18 years) to 40% off the adult fare (i.e., $1.50). The fare increases are recommended to take effect from September 29, 2025. The plan's hearings panel also recommends moving to a zone fare structure once ORC completes further analysis and modelling. Ms Dawe said no timeframe had been indicated for the recommended change yet. The decisions are a result of ORC's review of the Otago Regional Public Transport Plan (RPTP). The RPTP attracted 549 public submissions, and hearings were held in May. In addition to fare changes, the panel has made recommendations on several potential new public transport services frequently raised by submitters. "Many submitters indicated their support for some type of community transport to facilitate better intra-regional connections. The panel recommends the council maintains support for community transport as written in the plan, with the timing and scale of any future community transport programme to be decided in future council meetings." The council has included funding for an Upper Clutha- Wānaka business case that would seek to understand the demand, location and viability of public transport in Wānaka. The workshop will include a briefing on how the programme has been prioritised following confirmation of funding levels and what the timeframes are expected to be for delivery of designs and construction works. Feedback is sought from the elected members around the "public concern" aspect of the policy ratings. The Queenstown Lakes District Council submitted to ORC's draft 10-year RPTP. The weight of local feedback undoubtedly helped reverse its earlier decision to scrap a public transport business case for the Upper Clutha in its annual plan. Wānaka-Upper Clutha is the fastest growing ward in the Otago region, followed closely by Cromwell. The Wānaka community has been petitioning the ORC for a public bus service for years.


Otago Daily Times
02-07-2025
- Otago Daily Times
$2m fund revealed
A new fund aims to support environmental outcomes. The Otago Regional Council recently approved a new $2 million annual fund. Initially pooled from council reserves, it will be available for any community-led environmental project in Otago. The new fund is separate from the regional council's annual Eco Fund. Environmental implementation manager Libby Caldwell said the council was developing eligibility criteria and would take a leadership role in the funding system, but the aim was for communities to lead local action to achieve sustained environmental outcomes. "This fund is targeted at large-scale environmental projects which have intergenerational impacts, local leadership and action which is driven by communities and alignment to ORC strategy and strategic direction." A wide variety of projects could be included such as river, stream, wetland revitalisation or restoration, wilding conifer proposals, on-ground works, biodiversity enhancement, water quality improvement, animal or plant pest control, native planting and regeneration, education as well as administrative support. Work on private farmland or forestry blocks might be eligible if projects are aligned with environmental enhancement or restoration and meet the required criteria. "Each application would be assessed on its own merits, bearing in mind Eco Fund already caters for smaller projects to some extent. "The intent of this new funding is that it would be looking at projects at a larger scale, so likely to be projects which are of a higher value and include collaborative projects." Further criteria will be developed to help potential applicants understand whether their projects are likely to be supported A two-stage process for fund allocation is being proposed. First, interested organisations would submit a registration of interest so their eligibility can be assessed. This would be followed by a more detailed proposal submitted through a request-for-proposal process. Further detail on this process will also be presented to the regional council for approval in due course, she said. Councillor and environmental delivery committee co-chairwoman Kate Wilson welcomed the decision, saying the community had shown that a large-scale catchment-wide approach was the most effective delivery model. Co-chairman and councillor Lloyd McCall said the regional council's ability to support and enable community-led environmental action at scale was an excellent opportunity. "There is already significant investment that the community are contributing to environmental outcomes and to be able to support more of this to happen on the ground is vital to enhance what we have for future generations," he said.