Bombay HC directs review of floodline of Mula-Mutha river in next two months
Hearing a PIL by activists Sarang Yadwadkar, Vivek Velankar and Vijay Kumbhar, the bench of Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Sandeep Marne on Monday directed the expert committee to submit its report on review of demarcation of floodlines within the next two months. 'The state government, on receipt of the report, should take appropriate action on the recommendations of the expert committee within a further period of two months,' it said adding the petitioners can give their suggestions to the state government on the issue.
In June last year, the high court had given an order that would have its impact on the development activities, including the Riverfront Development project, alongside Mula Mutha river. It had directed the state government to constitute an experts committee to undertake time bound review of demarcation of floodlines of Mula Mutha river in Pune by considering study of various organisations.
The experts committee was to be formed within two weeks, which should have finalised the blueprint for undertaking comprehensive review of demarcation of floodlines in Pune within four weeks thereafter. The experts committee to be formed was headed by the Additional Chief Secretary of the state department of Water Resources Development.
However, the Bombay High Court did not accept the request of petitioners to revoke permission for development of lands within 100 metre distance of the current flood lines concerned.
'The petitioners have not prosecuted any person who has raised any construction within 100 meters distance of current flood lines demarcated in the Development Plan of 2017. Therefore, this court is unable to issue any positive direction. However, the Pune Municipal Corporation should examine the issue and shall take action in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the persons, who may be aggrieved by the proposed action, which may be taken by the Pune Municipal Corporation after receipt of directions from the state government issued after consideration of expert committee report,' it said.
In its previous order, the court had suggested that a comprehensive review of the flood line demarcation process be conducted, taking into account the flow from the free catchment area, Nashik based Maharashtra Engineering Research Institute (MERI) guidelines, and Delhi based The Energy and Resources Institute's (TERI) climate change action plan. 'Addressing these aspects would contribute to a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of flood risk in the area,' it had said.
It was revealed that the flow from the free catchment area between Khadakwasla dam and Mula-Mutha confluence in 2011 has not been considered. It was suggested that this factor should be taken into account in the flood line marking process.
The petitioners have sought direction to Pune Municipal Corporation to replace the demarcation of flood lines in the 2017 Development Plan for Pune city and superimpose them with flood lines as demarcated in the maps dated March 5, 2011.
Last year, the court had stated, 'Demarcation of flood lines in an urban area or a city like Pune assumes importance for the simple reason that in case, any development activity is permitted by the municipal body of such an urban area in the flood zone of any water channel like a river. The same results in reducing the flood carrying capacity of such a water channel, which, ultimately is the cause of flood. To ensure that the earth continues to remain habitable, it is thus very necessary to appropriately and correctly demarcate the flood line of water channels, failing which the inhabitants of the area may face problems beyond remedies.'
Ajay Jadhav is an Assistant Editor with The Indian Express, Pune. He writes on Infrastructure, Politics, Civic issues, Sustainable Development and related stuff. He is a trekker and a sports enthusiast.
Ajay has written research articles on the Conservancy staff that created a nationwide impact in framing policy to improve the condition of workers handling waste.
Ajay has been consistently writing on politics and infrastructure. He brought to light the lack of basic infrastructure of school and hospital in the hometown of Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde even as two private helipads were developed by the leader who mostly commutes from Mumbai to Satara in helicopter.
Ajay has been reporting on sustainable development initiatives that protects the environment while ensuring infrastructure development. ... Read More
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
6 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
HC raps cops for poorly maintained case diaries, seeks affidavit from DGP
MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court reprimanded the police for failing to maintain case diaries in a proper format as mandated by law. It ordered Rashmi Shukla, the Director General of Police (DGP), to file a personal affidavit explaining whether the provisions of law enacted by Parliament were binding and mandatory on the Maharashtra police personnel or if they are to be retained only in the books of law. IPS officer Rashmi Shukla (Photo by Anshuman Poyrekar/ Hindustan Times) (Hindustan Times) A division bench of justices Ajey Gadkari and Rajesh Patil on Monday was hearing a petition pertaining to a dispute between a licensee and licensor of rented premises where one party accused the other of misappropriating its furniture. The judges were inspecting the case diary when they noticed that it was not maintained in a proper format. It also contained loose sheets of paper despite statutory requirements and several circulars having been issued by the DGP's office. 'The case diary is maintained in an absolutely casual manner and loose leaf in a yellow-coloured plastic file. The first page of the case diary has no number or date. It is typed on a ledger paper. Pages no.1 to 13 are in loose sheets,' the court observed after going through the case diary. The court censured an assistant police inspector attached to the Vartak Nagar police station in Thane for failing to conduct a panchnama of the scene even 13 months after a First Information Report was registered. 'The directions issued by the office of the Director General of Police are not percolated to the lower rank of police personnel, and they are blatantly violating the directions issued by the topmost authority of the police department. This is unconscionable and unpardonable. It appears to us that in a disciplined police force, the police personnel themselves are not following the discipline and are not following the mandatory directions issued by the office of the Director General of Police,' the court observed. The court also directed the DGP to initiate action against an investigating officer from Vartak Nagar police station for committing a breach of provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), (1972). The investigating officer had also violated various circulars about case diary maintenance issued by the DGP on December 6, 2018, September 16, 2021, and February 12, 2024. Section 172 of the CrPC (1972) mandates that a police officer investigating a crime must record day-to-day proceedings of the investigation in the case diary, along with details such as the time at which the information reached him, the time at which he began and closed his investigation, the place or places visited by him, and statement of the circumstances ascertained through his investigation. According to this procedural law, the case diary is supposed to be a paginated book that the investigating officer maintains. 'As per our record, the last such circular was issued on February 12, 2024. There is also a circular dated February 11, 2011, issued by the Home Department, Government of Maharashtra, directing all the investigating officers to follow the amended Section 172 (1-B) of the CrPC,' the court noted while stating that police personnel in the State of Maharashtra must follow the mandate of law.
Hindustan Times
6 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Not a single religious structure has loudspeaker in Mumbai, says CM Fadnavis
MUMBAI: Chief minister Devendra Fadnavis declared on Friday that the city has been made loudspeaker-free. The police have removed 1,608 loudspeakers from religious structures in Mumbai alone. Out of these, 1,149 were used in mosques, 48 in temples, 10 in churches, four in gurudwaras and 147 in other religious establishments. Thane, India - May 04, 2022: A general view of a loudspeaker atop a mosque in Thane, Mumbai, India, on Wednesday, May 04, 2022. (Praful Gangurde/HT Photo) (HT PHOTO) He was responding to a debate over complaints made by BJP legislators about the daily use of loudspeakers in the state and police inaction. The law is equal for all and appeasement of any community must stop, said BJP MLA Sudhir Mungantiwar. In his response, Fadnavis said, 'Not a single religious structure has a loudspeaker in Mumbai.' The government has formulated a standard operating procedure for removing loudspeakers, which is being implemented across the state. He added that a compliance report was presented to the Bombay High Court, which was pleased with the action. 'We have started this in all districts in the state. A total of 3,367 loudspeakers have been removed from all the religious structures.' The police harmoniously removed all loudspeakers from religious structures in the last few months and registered no cases against anyone while doing so, he said. 'There is no resistance from any community. However, if someone resists or tries to reinstall, then the law will take its course.' To curb illegal use, he said the government plans to hold the local police station accountable if a religious structure in their jurisdiction is found to have an illegally installed loudspeaker. NCP legislator Sana Malik pointed out that the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules (2000), which regulate noise levels and protect citizens from excessive noise, is outdated and needs revision. 'The ambient noise level is much more than what was determined in the rules in 1986. I request the state to recommend a revision in it,' she said. The CM agreed and stated that the state would make such a recommendation to the central government, which could then amend the relevant law. 'I agree with her point. The ambient noise level is very low in the rules. The government will conduct a study and make a recommendation based on its findings,' Fadnavis told the state assembly. He also assured the House that the police would not harass the pandals for using loudspeakers during the Ganeshotsav and other festivals as long as they abide by the decibel rules. Shiv Sena (UBT) legislator Aaditya Thackeray made this request.
Hindustan Times
6 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Engineers' union seeks reinstatement of civic officer transferred after Vile Parle Jain temple demolition
MUMBAI: The Brihanmumbai Municipal Engineers' Union (BMEU) has written to Municipal Commissioner and Administrator Bhushan Gagrani, demanding the reinstatement and promotion of Navnath Ghadge, the assistant commissioner of K/East ward, who was abruptly transferred following the controversial demolition of a nearly 90-year-old Digambar Jain temple in Vile Parle East earlier this year. Mumbai--- 90-year-old Jain temple demolished in Mumbai's Vile Parle, Jain community holds protest rally at Vile Pare in Mumbai, India. HT Photo The temple, located within the premises of Neminath Cooperative Housing Society on Nehru Road, was razed on April 16 in compliance with a Bombay High Court directive. The civic body maintained that the temple structure was unauthorised and had been built without approvals in a residential building's open space. Officials involved in the demolition stated that care was taken to preserve the sanctity of the idol and carry out the process respectfully. However, the demolition triggered an intense backlash from sections of the Jain community, with support from ministers across political parties. Protesters alleged the action was carried out at the behest of a local businessman seeking to redevelop the plot for commercial use, including malls and hotels. The civic administration transferred Ghadge shortly after the protests, despite his recent appointment to the post on April 1, 2025. In its petition, the temple trust challenged the demolition in the Bombay High Court. But on July 7, Justice Gauri Godse upheld the BMC's action, stating that the structure was unauthorised and the demolition was lawful under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning (MRTP) Act, 2005. Following the court ruling, the BMEU argued that Ghadge had acted in accordance with legal orders and that his transfer was politically motivated. 'He executed the court-ordered demolition by following due process. Instead of being penalised, he should be honoured and reinstated,' said Sainath Rajyadaksha, acting president of BMEU. The union has demanded that Ghadge be reinstated as assistant commissioner of the K/East ward and promoted as deputy chief engineer (civil) as per a resolution passed on April 1, 2025. It warned of agitation if the demands were not met. A senior civic official, however, defended the decision to transfer Ghadge, stating that the issue was not the demolition itself, but the fact that he failed to consult senior officials before acting on a sensitive religious matter. 'He bypassed protocol. In similar cases—such as illegal shrine demolitions in Parel or Dharavi—the civic body took months and consulted top officials. This was an overreach on his part,' the official said. Currently, Ghadge is serving as deputy chief engineer in the BMC's Slum Sanitation Programme.
