The 3 rd conference on peace and development for the horn of Africa opens at Four Points hotel, Kampala
The Conference was officially opened by Hon. John Mulimba, Minister of State for Foreign Affairs (Regional Affairs). He thanked the Government of the People's Republic of China for the strong cooperation with Africa to promote peace and sustainable development, through the Global Security Initiative which has contributed meaningfully to the international discourse on collective security. He appreciated China's approach to regional peace and development which focuses on dialogue, respect for national sovereignty and comprehensive approaches to conflict.
H.E. Mr. Xue Bing, China's Special Envoy for the Horn of Africa Affairs, represented the Government of the People's Republic of China and thanked the Government of Uganda for hosting the Conference. He reiterated China's commitment to actively engage with regional countries in various initiatives that promote peace and development. He said
China will continue to strengthen cooperation with Africa in areas such as military assistance and trade, counter-terrorism, landmines eradication and military personnel training to jointly maintain security and stability in the region.
Mr. Xue Bing said China's engagement with the region on peace and development will be anchored on three pillars: first, the need to uphold dialogue for peace and safeguard universal security; secondly, the need to explore the potential for cooperation and realize common prosperity; and third, the need to deepen exchange of experience in governance and safeguard international justice and fairness.
Recognizing the role of economic cooperation in promoting peace and development, China is ready to negotiate and sign the Agreement on China-Africa Economic Partnership for Shared Development. China will also expand the zero-tariff treatment for 100 percent tariff lines to 53 African countries. China will also encourage more Chinese Enterprises to invest in the region, increase the added value of their products and localization to boost economies and create jobs.
During the Conference, delegates will review the achievements of FOCAC and discuss related issues such as connectivity and infrastructure; development cooperation and industrial development; climate resilience and food security' as well as multilateralism and global governance.
Distributed by APO Group on behalf of The Republic of Uganda - Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arabian Post
a minute ago
- Arabian Post
Multipolarity or Dependency? Russia's Bid for African Allegiance
M. A. Hossain When Dmitry Medvedev, former Russian president and current deputy chair of Russia's Security Council, addressed the Liberation Movements Summit in South Africa on July 27, his message was as predictable as it was provocative: Russia stands with Africa in the fight against neocolonialism and envisions a multipolar world. Coming from a Kremlin official, this claim may appear noble at first glance—until one examines the underlying logic, the historical baggage, and the realpolitik shaping Moscow's African charm offensive. The summit brought together ruling parties with anti-colonial roots—South Africa's ANC, Zimbabwe's ZANU-PF, Mozambique's FRELIMO, Namibia's SWAPO, and Tanzania's CCM. These are parties with storied pasts, forged in the fires of liberation wars, many of which were backed by Soviet arms and ideology during the Cold War. Medvedev's remarks framed these parties as guardians of sovereignty and developmental progress, touting their legitimacy not only in history but in the future of global pluralism. ADVERTISEMENT But historical memory and contemporary alliances often diverge. There is no denying that Russia's growing footprint in Africa taps into a deep well of postcolonial disillusionment. For many African nations, political independence did not translate into economic sovereignty. Decades after European withdrawal, Western corporations still dominate resource extraction, and the Bretton Woods institutions often seem more like gatekeepers than partners. The result has been a lingering sense that colonialism never truly ended—it just evolved. Russia, keen to reassert itself globally in the face of Western sanctions and isolation following its invasion of Ukraine, has cleverly tapped into this sentiment. Medvedev's appeal was laced with references to 'ideologues of neocolonialism' and 'equal partnerships.' Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has echoed similar lines, accusing the West of economic exploitation. Such rhetoric has struck a chord with leaders disenchanted with the asymmetries of the Western-led order. And yet, to accept Russia as a liberating force in Africa demands a suspension of disbelief. If neocolonialism is defined as the economic dominion of sovereign nations under the guise of cooperation, then Russia's actions warrant scrutiny as much as those of the West. Moscow's military ties in Africa are expanding rapidly—Wagner mercenaries in the Central African Republic and Mali, arms deals across the continent, and intelligence-sharing agreements with autocratic regimes. These arrangements often lack transparency and accountability. Russian partnerships, while devoid of the moral posturing typical of Western democracies, are far from altruistic. ADVERTISEMENT See also Trump's 50-Day Ultimatum: Ukraine Ceasefire or a New Trap? The idea of a multipolar world (an appealing concept to postcolonial states) is increasingly used as a diplomatic euphemism for alignment with non-Western power centers. Yet the benefits of such partnerships remain uneven. In Mali and Burkina Faso, Russian support has coincided with growing repression and shrinking civic space. While the Kremlin promises 'respect for sovereignty,' it often gravitates toward regimes that muzzle opposition and rely on coercion, not consent. This isn't to say that African countries are mere pawns in a great power game. Quite the contrary—they are navigating a world of constrained choices, reshaping their foreign policy around a strategic mix of Chinese investment, Russian arms, Gulf State capital, and Western aid. The shift is less ideological than pragmatic. Leaders want roads, power plants, and trade—regardless of whether it comes with liberal sermons or Kremlin silence. Still, there is an undeniable symbolism to the Liberation Movements Summit. It reflects a continent increasingly confident in its agency, willing to rewrite the rules of engagement with former colonial powers and emerging ones alike. Gwen Ramokgopa of South Africa's ANC put it succinctly: political liberation is not enough. Economic emancipation is now the goal. But how does one achieve that without repeating the mistakes of the past? Aligning with Russia may help loosen Western conditionalities, but it won't solve Africa's structural problems: underdeveloped infrastructure, poor education systems, and endemic corruption. Russian trade and military cooperation are not substitutes for institutional reform or industrial diversification. History offers sobering lessons. The Cold War-era alliances between the USSR and African liberation movements were driven more by ideological rivalry than genuine development. While Soviet aid helped win independence, it rarely built enduring economic capacity. The collapse of the USSR left many of its African allies adrift, exposing the fragility of partnerships built more on geopolitics than on shared prosperity. See also XI BRICS no show: Strategic shift or silent warning? Today's Russia is not yesterday's Soviet Union, but its motivations are just as strategic. Facing economic sanctions, international isolation, and battlefield challenges in Ukraine, Moscow needs Africa—not only for diplomatic support at the United Nations, but also for alternative markets, arms deals, and mineral access. In that light, Medvedev's speech reads less like an ode to African empowerment and more like a realpolitik maneuver to secure influence in a shifting global landscape. Even so, the West would be foolish to dismiss Russia's overtures. The language of anti-imperialism carries weight in postcolonial societies. Decades of moralistic diplomacy—often undermined by military interventions, unfair trade terms, and migration hypocrisy—have tarnished the West's image in Africa. When Western leaders preach human rights while ignoring the economic realities imposed by their own corporations, they create a credibility vacuum that rivals are eager to fill. The challenge for the West is not merely to counter Russia's narrative, but to offer a better one. That means shifting from extractive economic relations to genuine partnerships—investing in African value chains, supporting debt restructuring, and engaging African civil societies rather than just their rulers. For Africa, the future lies not in choosing between East and West, but in mastering the art of strategic non-alignment—leveraging multiple partnerships to advance domestic development goals. Multipolarity, if truly rooted in mutual respect and economic inclusion, can serve that purpose. But if it becomes a euphemism for siding with authoritarian benefactors against liberal hypocrites, it will fail the very people it claims to empower. Medvedev's address reflects a broader geopolitical recalibration. Russia is using history and ideology to position itself as a partner of choice for a continent still scarred by colonialism. But rhetoric alone is not redemption. Africa's liberation movements, now ruling parties, must decide whether Russia offers merely a new suitor—or a new path. The answer will determine whether multipolarity becomes a means of empowerment, or just another version of dependency cloaked in new colors. Also published on Medium. Notice an issue? Arabian Post strives to deliver the most accurate and reliable information to its readers. If you believe you have identified an error or inconsistency in this article, please don't hesitate to contact our editorial team at editor[at]thearabianpost[dot]com. We are committed to promptly addressing any concerns and ensuring the highest level of journalistic integrity.


Zawya
2 hours ago
- Zawya
As Evergrande faces delisting, China property debt revamp drags on
HONG KONG - China Evergrande Group looks set to be kicked off the Hong Kong exchange next month after failing to revamp its debt and being pushed into liquidation, with the stubbornly weak Chinese property sector clouding the outlook for debt restructuring by its peers. China's property market, once a key growth driver for the world's second-largest economy, has been in a multi-year tailspin despite repeated government attempts to revive weak consumer demand. Developers face deteriorating cash flow but their bondholders are resisting taking heftier losses on their investments, delaying negotiations between companies and creditors, said restructuring advisers. Shares of Evergrande, once China's top developer which was listed in Hong Kong in 2009, have been suspended from trading since Jan. 29, 2024, the day it received a liquidation order from the Hong Kong High Court. The liquidation order came after it failed to provide a viable restructuring plan for its $23 billion offshore debt. The company appears set to be delisted from the Hong Kong bourse as a result of its failure to meet the exchange's rules on resumption of trading within 18 months of the commencement of trading suspension. Its capitalisation, which once topped HK$400 billion ($51 billion), had shrunk to HK$2.2 billion when share trading was halted. The delisting of what had been one of China's prestige companies would add to gloom hanging over other developers which are scrambling to stay afloat and avoid getting into liquidation litigation by securing creditors' support to revamp debt. Evergrande is not listed on mainland Chinese stock markets. With Chinese new home prices falling at the fastest pace in 8 months in June, even developers who have completed first round debt revamps are weighing fresh negotiations and those that have not defaulted are also contemplating such a move to slash debt, financial advisers said. "There's no light at the end of the tunnel," said Glen Ho, national turnaround & restructuring leader at Deloitte, referring to the property market. "Companies want to delay their restructuring effective date and use time to exchange for more breathing room, but they cannot create new funds out of nothing." More than $140 billion, or more than 70%, of China property dollar bonds have defaulted since 2021, according to investment platform FSMOne Hong Kong, and the majority of them are still in various stages of being restructured. FUNDING CHANNELS Property construction in China is expected to decline another 30% by 2035 due to structural changes in demand, ANZ analysts said in a June report, which could cast a long shadow over debt restructuring efforts in the near to medium term. Private developer Country Garden, which defaulted on $14 billion offshore debt in 2023, is still trying to get its lenders' approval on its debt restructuring proposal before the next liquidation hearing on August 11. Other developers including KWG and Agile have yet to announce detailed restructuring proposals after having started the process in 2023 and 2024, respectively, soon after defaulting on their repayment obligations. Logan and Powerlong, on the other hand, have cut their offers to bondholders more than once, but have yet to secure approval from their creditors, said two people with knowledge of the matter said. The people declined to be identified as they were not authorised to speak to the media. Evergrande's liquidators, Country Garden and HKEX declined to comment. KWG, Agile, Logan and Powerlong did not respond to requests for comment. Advisers expect some developers, especially privately-owned ones, to go through more than one or even two rounds of debt revamp in the absence of an improvement in home sales outside China's top cities and the availability of funding channels. 'CONTINUOUS DELEVERAGING' China's property sector accounted for about a quarter of the country's economic activity before it collapsed. But despite repeated attempts by authorities to stabilise the market, property investment in China declined 11.2% in the first half of this year from a year earlier, while property sales by floor area fell 3.5% and new construction starts dropped 20%. This year, Shimao and state-backed Sino-Ocean were among the latest to set a date for implementing restructurings after years of wrangling with creditors, according to their regulatory filings. Sunac became the first developer earlier this year to propose a second restructuring to swap all its restructured notes into mandatory convertible bonds and has gained sufficient creditors approval. Zhongliang also successfully extended the maturity of all its restructured bonds by two years. Kaisa's restructuring plan, already approved by creditors and courts, however, has not yet gained the greenlight from China's top economic planner, as the plan involves new debt, two other people said. Kaisa and NDRC did not respond to request for comment. "There's no one single playbook; each restructuring plan must be tailored to a company's unique capital and creditor structure," said Una Ge, a Hong Kong-based partner at consultancy firm AlixPartners. "For privately-owned developers, however, the clear trend is a need for continuous deleveraging, as a single round of restructuring is often insufficient to keep them afloat." ($1 = 7.8499 Hong Kong dollars) ($1 = 7.1793 Chinese yuan renminbi)


Zawya
2 hours ago
- Zawya
Egypt's SCZone reports $8.6bln in new contracts since mid-2022
Egypt's Suez Canal Economic Zone (SCZone) has secured contracts worth $8.6bn for 297 industrial, service, logistics, and port projects since the start of the 2022/2023 fiscal year, its chairman said on Monday. In a meeting with Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly, SCZone Chairman Waleid Gamal El-Dein said the authority's promotional efforts had attracted $7.09bn in actual contracts for 286 industrial, service, and logistics projects up to June 2025. An additional $1.5bn in contracts were signed for 11 seaport projects. Gamal El-Dein also reported on the results of his recent promotional visit to several Chinese provinces from July 21-25. He said the visit resulted in the signing of six contracts with various investors for new industrial projects in the clothing and textile sector, valued at $117.5m. The SCZone chairman reviewed the authority's financial position, noting that actual revenues for the 2024/2025 fiscal year reached EGP 11.425bn, with a surplus of EGP 8.487bn for the same period. He also detailed the progress of various projects within the zone. In the Sokhna industrial area, the authority has attracted international companies for projects in new energy, electronics, pharmaceuticals, and automotive components. In the Qantara West industrial zone, 31 projects have been implemented on an area of 2 million square metres, with a total investment cost of $799m, providing 45,000 jobs. Gamal El-Dein also discussed investments in the East Ismailia industrial zone (Technology Valley), which aims to create a new urban community based on high-tech industries. The authority is targeting projects in technology, semiconductors, electronic devices, solar cells, and vocational training centres. He added that the SCZone has successfully attracted new foreign investments of $43m in the silica mining and modern building materials industries in this area.