King Charles III will lead 20th-anniversary commemoration of the 7/7 London transit bombings
52 people died and more than 700 were wounded when four British men inspired by Al-Qaeda blew themselves up on three subway trains and a bus during the morning rush hour on July 7, 2005. They were the first suicide bombings on European soil. Two weeks later, four other bombers attempted a similar attack, but their devices failed to explode. No one was hurt.
The bombings remain seared into London's collective memory, and the anniversary will be marked with a ceremony at the 7/7 memorial in Hyde Park and a service of commemoration at St. Paul's Cathedral.
In a message, the king said his "heartfelt thoughts and special prayers remain with all those whose lives were forever changed on that terrible summer's day." He said the country could take heart from the bravery of the emergency services and others who responded to the attack, and "the countless stories of extraordinary courage and compassion that emerged from the darkness of that day."
Charles also hailed the "spirit of unity that has helped London, and our nation, to heal." "As we remember those we lost, let us, therefore, use this 20 th anniversary to reaffirm our commitment to building a society where people of all faiths and backgrounds can live together with mutual respect and understanding, always standing firm against those who would seek to divide us," he said.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said July 7, 2005 was one of Britain's "darkest days." She said that 20 years on, "Islamist extremist terrorism remains the greatest threat" to national security "followed by extreme right-wing terrorism."
"But we also face hybrid threats to our national security from hostile states, serious organized crime, cyber criminals, those threatening our border security and a troubling rise in violence-fixated individuals radicalized online," she wrote in the Sunday Mirror newspaper, adding that the government would "relentlessly confront and counter threats to our national security."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
11 hours ago
- LeMonde
Tax on ultra-rich: 'France has the opportunity to lead the way,' say Nobel Prize-winning economists
This op-ed was signed by Daron Acemoglu (MIT), 2024 Nobel Prize in Economics; George Akerlof (Georgetown), 2001 Nobel Prize in Economics; Abhijit Banerjee (MIT), 2019 Nobel Prize in Economics; Esther Duflo (Collège de France and MIT), 2019 Nobel Prize in Economics; Simon Johnson (MIT), 2024 Nobel Prize in Economics; Paul Krugman (CUNY), 2008 Nobel Prize in Economics; Joseph Stiglitz (Columbia), 2001 Nobel Prize in Economics. They have never been so wealthy and yet contribute little, relative to their ability to pay, to the public coffers: From Bernard Arnault to Elon Musk, billionaires have lower tax rates than the average taxpayer. Pioneering research conducted in partnership with tax authorities in several countries demonstrates it: Ultra-wealthy individuals pay around 0% to 0.6% of their wealth in individual income tax – around 0.6% in a country like the United States and 0.1% in a country like France. When including all other mandatory levies (corporate taxes, social security contributions, consumption taxes, etc.) and expressing their tax payments as a fraction of income, their effective tax rates turn out to be lower than those of middle-class or upper-middle-class taxpayers. How did we get here? In short, because the ultra-wealthy can easily structure their wealth to avoid income tax, which is supposed to be the cornerstone of tax justice. In European countries, this optimization is achieved through the creation of family holding companies, in which dividends accumulate sheltered from taxation. In the US, the use of holding companies to dodge taxes has been prohibited since the 1930s, which explains why the wealthy are more heavily taxed there than in Europe – though some have still managed to find workarounds. Fortunately, this situation is not the result of a natural law or some ancient fate: It stems from human decisions and political choices. There is no inevitability here. Not only is it necessary to impose a stronger burden of justice on billionaires, but more importantly, it is possible.
Euronews
12 hours ago
- Euronews
EU-China tensions escalate over medical device trade restrictions
Beijing announced on Sunday that it will restrict government purchases of medical devices from the EU valued at over 45 million yuan (approximately €5.3 million) as a direct response to the European Commission's decision to limit Chinese firms' access to the bloc's public procurement market. Under the Commission's previous move last month, Chinese companies are barred from bidding on public contracts for medical devices in the EU single market exceeding €5 million. Additionally, winning bids must contain no more than 50% of components sourced from China. In a statement, China said it had 'no choice but to implement countermeasures". A spokesperson for China's ministry of commerce added that Beijing has repeatedly expressed, through bilateral dialogues, its willingness to address differences with the EU through dialogue, consultation, and bilateral procurement arrangements. 'Unfortunately, the EU has ignored China's goodwill and sincerity and continues to impose restrictive measures and build new protectionist barriers,' the statement read. This latest escalation follows Beijing's announcement last week of anti-dumping duties of up to 34.9% on European brandy imports for the next five years. The pattern of reciprocal trade actions continues to define the EU-China economic relationship. In recent weeks, China extended its anti-dumping investigation into EU pork imports by six months, while the EU imposed tariffs of up to 45% on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs). These developments come at a sensitive time in EU-China relations, which are undergoing a cautious diplomatic reset. A key milestone in the evolving dialogue will be the upcoming EU-China Summit, scheduled to take place in Beijing in the second half of July 2025. Concerns from Europe MedTech Europe, the EU's medical devices industry association, expressed regret over China's latest decision, saying it further restricts access to the Chinese public procurement market. 'Measures of this nature risk deepening trade tensions and ultimately deny patients timely access to indispensable medical technologies,' the group said in a statement. 'We urge both the European Union and China to engage in constructive dialogue to resolve current challenges to market access and to uphold fair, predictable, and reciprocal trading conditions.' The European Chamber of Commerce in China echoed these concerns, warning that the announcement increases uncertainty for European businesses operating in the country. In particular, the lack of specificity in the new restrictions raises the risk that local authorities managing public tenders may enforce the measures in an overly stringent manner. This could exclude even highly localised European medical device manufacturers from bidding for contracts, according to the Chamber. For instance, although the Chinese government has indicated that European-invested enterprises in China will be exempt from the restrictions, the notice does not clarify what qualifies as a 'European-invested enterprise'. According to the European Chamber, it also remains unclear whether volume-based procurement tenders, which often exceed the threshold, will fall under the new rules.
Euronews
14 hours ago
- Euronews
BBC director of music steps down after Bob Vylan Glastonbury scandal
A BBC music boss has reportedly stepped down following the backlash around British punk-rap Bob Vylan's controversial Glastonbury 2025 set. Lorna Clarke, the BBC's director of music, was reported by The Times as stepping back from her day-to-day responsibilities – including overseeing live music events - following the backlash to livestreaming Bob Vylan's performance last month. Other senior BBC staff have also temporarily relinquished their day-to-day roles over the Glastonbury controversy - pending an investigation. The news of Clarke's resignation comes after UK culture secretary Lisa Nandy condemned the "appalling and unacceptable scenes" and said she had called BBC director-general Tim Davie after the broadcast of Bob Vylan's set. Nandy claimed there is "a problem of leadership" at the BBC, and criticised the corporation over its decision not to pull the livestream after Bob Vylan's frontman shouted 'death, death to the IDF' (Israel Defence Forces). Nandy also said in Parliament that 'chanting death to the IDF is equivalent to calling for the death of every single Israeli Jew' - a comment that was heavily criticised online. In a statement last week, the BBC apologised to viewers for broadcasting the performance. The statement said that Bob Vylan's comments were 'offensive and deplorable' and the broadcasting organisation admitted that despite considering the set 'high risk' it deemed the concert suitable for live streaming. It then added that the BBC will no longer broadcast any performances it deems to be 'high risk'. Several artists including have backed Bob Vylan with a letter, which stated: 'Again, the media is trying to distract you from the real story. The outrage sparked (...) is merely a smoke screen for the lack of reporting on the destruction of the Palestinian people. They are starving children, where is the media's outrage at Israel's continued obliteration of a whole nation?' However, Bob Vylan have found their Glastonbury appearance under criminal investigation and have been dropped from upcoming festivals in the UK and France. Furthermore, the band have reportedly been dropped by their agents and have had their US visas revoked. The duo has spoken out in defence of their set and comments, saying it is vital to 'teach our children to speak up for the change they want' and that they are not calling for 'the death of Jews or Arabs or any other race or group' but wish for the 'dismantling of a violent military machine.'
