logo
How will tariffs impact used car dealers in Michigan?

How will tariffs impact used car dealers in Michigan?

CBS News04-04-2025
The average price of a new car in America is nearly $50,000, according to Kelly Blue Book. After President Trump's
25% auto tariffs on all imported vehicles
kicked in overnight, the price of new cars is expected to rise even more.
"Used car market is going to pick up; you know, prices of new cars is going to help out the used car market," said Jason Latimer, the owner of Madison Motors in Madison Heights, Michigan.
"All new vehicles, even those made in the United States are going to go up in some cases three, five,10, even $20,000 or more and that's going to drive a lot of people to consider used vehicles," Paul Eisenstein, the editor of Headlight.news told CBS News Detroit.
It's a difficult pill to swallow for consumers throughout the country, but Latimer says it's beneficial for his business, even though it's becoming more expensive to buy used cars to sell himself.
"Used car sales have picked up, but the prices to buy them have picked up also, so it should be great for business. Going to have to pay top dollar to get cars that's the only problem," he said.
According to Cox Automotive, 700,000 fewer new cars will be sold this year because of tariffs, which could mean more business for your local used car dealership.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Where Will Lucid Group Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Lucid Group Stock Be in 5 Years?

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Where Will Lucid Group Stock Be in 5 Years?

U.S. EV sales growth has decelerated dramatically, dropping from 40% growth in 2023-2024 to just 10% in 2024-2025. Lucid Motors is losing approximately $222,000 per vehicle sold despite recent growth, with operational costs of $927 million against just $235 million in revenue last quarter. The company's new Gravity SUV could be a make or break product rollout. 10 stocks we like better than Lucid Group › The electric vehicle (EV) revolution was supposed to be unstoppable, but the road has gotten bumpier than many investors expected. Many once-promising players have been forced to bow out, but Lucid Group (NASDAQ: LCID), a favorite of many investors, has managed to stick around despite significant headwinds. So, what might the future hold for the luxury EV maker? The macro picture for EVs has changed quite a bit over the past few years. U.S. sales are still growing, but the pace of that growth has slowed significantly. From 2023 to 2024, EV sales grew 40%, but from 2024 to 2025, that was just 10%. Consumer sentiment has degraded as well. Consumers are increasingly wary of large initial price tags, high repair costs, and a lack of charging infrastructure in many areas. A survey from AAA showed that American attitudes toward EVs are the worst they've been since 2019. Only 16% of respondents said they were likely or very likely to pick an EV as their next car. That's down from 25% just three years ago. Over the same period, the share of respondents who said they were unlikely or very unlikely to do so grew from 51% to 63%. Things could soon get worse. Right now, President Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" is working its way through Congress. The Senate is still deliberating on its version, but the House's version, which passed in May, eliminates the EV tax credit that provided up to $7,500 to families purchasing qualified EVs. This, along with rising prices due to automotive tariffs, is likely to further slow domestic EV sales. Things look different outside the U.S., especially in China. Roughly half of all new car sales last year were EVs, and by now, about one in 10 cars on the road in China are electric, more than twice the share in the U.S. But while the Chinese market is still very strong, Lucid doesn't sell in China at the moment. Despite the lack of strength in the overall U.S. market, it's an exciting time for Lucid in many ways. After sales growth flatlined from 2022 to 2023, the company has delivered steady growth for the last year and a half. This growth is likely to accelerate as the company ramps up the launch of its Gravity SUV, which is already proving to be very successful. Lucid expects to deliver 20,000 total vehicles in 2025, more than twice that of 2024. The majority of these new deliveries will come from its Gravity SUV, while its sedan deliveries are expected to remain flat. As encouraging as the Gravity launch is, Lucid is still plagued with issues. Aside from the fact that sales of its sedan aren't growing, Lucid loses money on each car it sells -- a lot of money. Last quarter, the company reported $235 million in revenue it earned from delivering 3,109 vehicles. It also reported operational costs of $927 million. That means each car lost the company $222,000, well over the average price of a new Lucid. Even if you exclude sales, marketing, administrative, and R&D expenses, the company is still losing $73,000 on every vehicle it sells. Needless to say, the company has a lot of work to do. Still, these figures are better than they were, and the launch of a new vehicle is always going to be an especially costly time. Though the company needs to work to reduce costs and boost efficiency, which company leadership has assured investors is a top priority, scaling production will help significantly. There are high fixed costs in manufacturing that become less of an issue when more cars are rolling off the line. Though he's since stepped down, former CEO and CTO Peter Rawlinson said in an interview with an industry publication that he would "love it to be 20-80: Twenty percent doing cars, 80% licensing. Because the vision I have for Lucid is: Just as there's an Intel inside your laptop, there's a Lucid inside a Honda or a Toyota." Interim CEO Marc Winterhof clarified in the company's latest earnings call that this doesn't mean the company's focus is not on its vehicles first and foremost, but rather that it's a reflection of the size of the licensing opportunity. Lucid has some of the best technology in the business. Its powertrain technology, many of the internal components, and its software are top-of-the-line. Lucid can license this technology to other EV designers and drive revenue growth outside of delivering more cars. If Lucid executes flawlessly, scales production efficiently, and successfully grows a significant licensing segment, it could emerge as a profitable niche player. However, there are too many hurdles in the way for my taste. The company is burning incredible amounts of cash in a hyper-competitive field, and I think the most likely outcome is that Lucid continues to struggle over the next five years. Before you buy stock in Lucid Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Lucid Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025 Johnny Rice has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Where Will Lucid Group Stock Be in 5 Years? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

J.D. Vance Dismisses Kicking Millions Off Medicaid: ‘Minutiae'
J.D. Vance Dismisses Kicking Millions Off Medicaid: ‘Minutiae'

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

J.D. Vance Dismisses Kicking Millions Off Medicaid: ‘Minutiae'

President Donald Trump and the GOP's so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill' is far from beautiful and deeply unpopular with the public. Battling concerns from voters about increased barriers to accessing programs like Medicaid and food assistance; massive transfers of wealth from less fortunate Americans to corporations and the rich; and the mass deregulation of industries like crypto and AI, Vice President J.D. Vance is attempting a new tactic to persuade the hesitant: ignore all of that and focus on how much money the bill is giving to ICE. 'The thing that will bankrupt this country more than any other policy is flooding the country with illegal immigration and then giving those migrants generous benefits. The [One Big Beautiful Bill] fixes this problem. And therefore it must pass,' Vance wrote Tuesday on X. 'Everything else — the CBO score, the proper baseline, the minutiae of the Medicaid policy — is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions,' he added. The millions of people who are expected to lose access to their health insurance as a result of the legislation would likely beg to differ. The version of the legislation passed by the House would give Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) over $100 billion for the construction of new immigration detention centers, increasing arrest and deportation efforts, militarization of the border and the hiring of new agents. Such a massive windfall for immigration enforcement comes as ICE has blown through its annual budget months before the end of the fiscal year. In May, during a hearing of the U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) laid into the reckless spending of the Department of Homeland Security under Secretary Kristi Noem. 'You are spending like you don't have a budget. You are on the verge of running out of money for the fiscal year […] You are ignoring the immigration laws of this nation, implementing a brand-new immigration system that you have invented that has little relation to the statutes that you are required — that you are commanded — to follow as spelled out in your oath of office,' Murphy said. 'Your agency acts as if laws don't matter, as if the election gave you some mandate to violate the Constitution and the laws passed by this Congress. It did not give you that mandate.' Through the reconciliation bill and presidential policy, Republicans in Congress and the Trump administration are looking to give DHS and ICE that mandate. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller has demanded that ICE detain at least 3,000 migrants a day. As the reconciliation bill continues to move through the Senate, Trump and Noem traveled to Florida on Tuesday to tour the so-called 'Alligator Alcatraz,' a migrant detention center built in the hostile backwaters of the Florida Everglades. 'We're going to teach them how to run away from an alligator,' Trump said ahead of his visit to the center. 'Don't run in a straight line,' Trump said, waving his hand in a zig-zag to demonstrate how a detainee might potentially need to move to escape a half-ton reptile. This kind of callous cruelty is what the administration is focused on, whether it be its treatment of migrants, or dismissing kicking millions off of their health care as insignificant 'minutiae.' More from Rolling Stone White House Pushes B.S. About 'Big Beautiful Bill' as Popularity Craters Dem Senator Whines Amid GOP Push to Gut Medicaid: 'I Just Want to Go Home' Rick Scott Demands More Cuts to Medicaid, Which His Company Allegedly Scammed Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence

Mexican banks face cascading consequences following US sanctions

time25 minutes ago

Mexican banks face cascading consequences following US sanctions

Mexico City -- Three Mexican financial institutions sanctioned by the Trump administration last week have felt a cascade of economic consequences following the allegations that they helped launder millions of dollars for drug cartels. It comes after the U.S. Treasury Department announced that it was blocking transactions between American banks and Mexican branches of CIBanco and Intercam Banco, as well as the brokering firm Vector Casa de Bolsa. In presenting the sanctions on June 25, officials provided no evidence to back their claims, fueling criticism from Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. Shortly after, Mexico's banking authority announced that it was temporarily taking over management of CIBanco and Intercam Banco to protect creditors. Sheinbaum said on Tuesday that the Mexican government is doing everything within it's power to ensure that creditors aren't affected, but said they were well 'within their right' to pull their money from the banks. The U.S. Treasury Department said that the sanctions would go into effect 21 days after the announcement. All three companies have fiercely rejected those claims. Despite that, the financial institutions have been dealt economic blows following the announcement, which are set to have stretching impacts on the companies. Days after the announcement Fitch Rating downgraded the three institutions and other affiliates, citing 'anti-money laundering concerns' and saying the drop 'reflects the imminent negative impact' that the sanctions could have. 'The new ratings reflect the significantly more vulnerable credit profile of these entities in response to the aforementioned warnings, given the potential impact on their ability to meet their financial obligations,' the credit rating agency wrote in a statement. On Monday, CI Banco announced that Visa Inc. had announced to them with little warning that it had 'unilaterally decided to disconnect its platform for all international transactions' through CIBanco. The bank accused Visa of not complying with the 21-day grace period laid out by the U.S. Treasury Department sanctions. "We would like to reiterate that your funds are safe and can be reimbursed through our branch network," the bank wrote. 'We reiterate to our customers that this was a decision beyond CIBanco's control.' S&P Ratings also withdrew CI Banco from its ratings index, saying that it was because it had terminated its contracts with the bank following the U.S. Treasury announcement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store