Controversial reason schools will shut down across one entire Aussie state
Teachers will perform a 24-hour work stoppage across all Queensland state schools on Wednesday August 6, which will result in students being unable to attend classes.
The strike will be the Queensland Teachers Union's first in 16 years and has been approved by an 'overwhelmingly' positive internal vote amongst its members.
Any teachers who are not in the union will still attend work on the day but those who are members said they were left with 'no other option'.
Of the 38,243 total votes cast 36,583 approved the strike after the government offered a salary increase which the union rejected in June.
This proposal would have seen state teachers receive an immediate pay rise of 3 per cent followed by another 2.5 per cent increase each year for two years.
It took 17 meetings over the course of five months to get to that initial offer, Education Minister John-Paul Langbroek said.
Shadow Education Minister Di Farmer accused the LNP of prioritising politics over listening to the concerns of teachers.
Ms Farmer wants 'nation-leading' pay and conditions offered to state teachers.
'For dedicated teachers to walk off the job shows just how serious they are about this insulting offer from the government,' she said.
'The LNP are too busy playing politics, while our teachers are forced to fight for nation-leading pay and conditions.
'Why won't the Premier and his Education Minister back them with nation-leading pay and conditions?'
Mr Langbroek said his government is committed to remaining at the negotiating table until the issue is resolved.
'The Government has requested conciliation through the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission to progress an agreement,' he said.
'Student safety will remain the priority and principals will inform parents about impacts on their school community.'
Queensland Teachers Union President Cresta Richardson reaffirmed her union's strike is a protected action in response to the Crisafulli government's failure to finalise a deal.
Brisbane teacher Damion Douglass said the strike had to happen.
'This is about teachers carrying a broken system on our backs while being told to sit tight and smile through it,' he told the Courier Mail.
'We've spoken. We've written letters. We've marched in unity. We've stayed late, showed up tired, covered the gaps, and absorbed the pressure. And in return, we get a reminder that our pay will be docked if we make noise.'
School principals will be responsible for the safety and wellbeing of students during the strike.
Concerned parents have already begun reaching out to schools in an attempt to make sense of what will happen if teachers do not show up for work.
There are 48,642 members in the Queensland Teachers Union and many will attend a rally at the Brisbane Convention and Exhibition Centre on the day of the strike.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
HMRC plans new private school tax grab
The Government is preparing a fresh tax grab on private school parents after Britain's richest families paid hundreds of millions of pounds of fees early to avoid VAT. HMRC will target schools where families paid several years' school fees in advance ahead of the 20 per cent levy coming into force on Jan 1 2025, meaning the payments were not taxed. Officials believe they will be able to claim that flaws in some of the advance schemes will mean tax is due after all. It comes after The Telegraph revealed on Monday that there was a surge in pre-paid fees at the top 50 private schools last year, up to £515 million, up from £121 million in 2023. Government sources said that HMRC would now 'carefully scrutinise' pre-payments amid concerns that some schools may have abused them to avoid VAT. Internal Treasury communications obtained by The Telegraph show the Government expects lengthy legal battles between HMRC and private schools as a result. A briefing note sent by Treasury officials to the Chancellor's team last summer said that 'the more egregious the [prepayment] scheme, the more easily we would expect HMRC to be able to recoup the revenue'. Private schools were deluged with fee pre-payments last year after Labour confirmed in its election manifesto that it would charge VAT on fees for the first time.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Our complicit elite is to blame for every sexual assault by an illegal migrant
I was having coffee in the garden with John, the lovely man who comes to help me with all the jobs I can't manage (a temperamental pond pump and rampant blanket weed among them), when conversation turned to John's concern for his daughter. Kirstie's journey to college takes her past a former RAF base now occupied by illegal migrants who crossed the Channel in small boats. Their ranks have swollen recently to several hundred as the Government struggles to fulfil its promise to empty asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament. Not by deporting the legions of undocumented young males from Africa and the Middle East – of course not, silly! – but by secretly redistributing a majority of those migrants from hotels into HMOs (houses in multiple occupation) and military facilities, presumably in the hope that the public will be less likely to notice and kick off. But girls like Kirstie cannot fail to notice. Not when the foreign males who leer and hiss at them, as if they were living in Egypt not Essex, now outnumber the population of their village. Not when it is girls who were born here who are advised to change their behaviour to accommodate the culture of the new arrivals by being less provocative, and walking a different way to school. Lately John, like a lot of fathers I suspect, has started fearing the worst. 'We were talking in the pub the other night and we decided that, in the end, it's men like us who will have to go down and defend our southern border,' he said to me that day in the garden. The bees went about their buzzy business in the hollyhocks, there was a gentle trickle of water in the pond, its pump just mended by this good and reliable man. It was a quintessential English summer's day, temperate and benign as the people of these islands tend to be until roused, yet there we were, drinking our coffee and picturing thousands, maybe tens of thousands, of Johns, the backbone of our country, the sturdy yeomen who have always come to the rescue in centuries past, marching to the beaches of Kent to protect us against invasion. To protect their women and children. That may sound alarmist, apocalyptic even, but is it really? When men like John are discussing in Wetherspoons what normal people can clearly see is a national emergency, no online Starmer-Stasi snoopers can stop them much, though a panic-stricken, authoritarian government would like to shut down free speech. Things that we would once have thought unimaginable, indeed completely bonkers, now feel like weekly, almost hourly, occurrences. Over 25,000 migrants, mostly young males, have already broken into Britain this year (49 per cent more than at the same point last year), and the nation that launched the D-Day landings against a mighty foe is now reliant on a spell of bad weather to keep the numbers down. Or on the latest doomed government 'one-in-one-out' scheme, beginning today, in which France generously allows herself to be bribed at British taxpayers' expense to take back maybe one of the 700 migrants who make the crossing in a single day, only to send the UK a substitute asylum seeker. Probably not a brain surgeon, to take a wild guess. Not only will such a tiny chance of being deported fail to act as a deterrent, it allows Labour to slyly open up a legal route into the UK while pretending it's a benefit to us. What would those who gave their lives in 1944 think of us – from Operation Overlord to Operation Over-Run in 80 years? Since the 2015-2016 New Years's Eve celebrations in Cologne, when around 1,200 women were raped or sexually assaulted by gangs of foreign men, I have warned repeatedly of the consequences of admitting young males from backward, misogynist cultures into a liberal, Western society. Naturally, telling the truth got me called 'racist' and I earned a coveted place on an Islamophobia list. But the pretence that a farmer from Afghanistan suddenly turns into Hugh Grant the minute his trainers hit the shingle at Dover was always a progressive fantasy. Sex-starved lads raised to regard women as livestock (Afghan women are no longer allowed to speak outside the home let alone go to school) are poor candidates for integration. They were always going to take gross liberties with our liberty. And so here we are. In leafy Nuneaton, a 12-year-old girl was allegedly raped by two Afghan asylum seekers. Despite Warwickshire Police's best (make that worst) attempts to conceal their identity, Ahmad Mulakhil, 23, was charged last week with rape, while Mohammad Kabir, 23, was charged with kidnap, strangulation and aiding and abetting rape. The police explained they did not wish to reveal the suspects' immigration status for fear of exacerbating our old friend 'community tensions'. In this case, community tensions is code for furious parents who strangely don't want their daughters abducted, their innocence torn from them by barbarians who shouldn't be here in the first place. In another incident on July 13, a Sudanese man who was living in a three-star asylum hotel in the upmarket Cheshire suburb of Wilmslow allegedly tried to lure away a girl aged 10 while she was with her father. Epping, meanwhile, has seen fierce protests after an Ethiopian, who had only come ashore eight days earlier and was being put up at the Bell Hotel, was charged with the sexual assault of a 14-year-old girl. These alleged attacks are not an aberration; they are exactly what you would expect if you were to drop a gang of marauding vikings into a high-school prom at an all-girls' school. That has, effectively, been the policy of successive British governments. Our political class prefers to burnish their reputation among 'our international partners' by remaining in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), making deportations almost impossible, while young girls – catcalled, groped, raped, strangled, abducted – are just thought of as unfortunate collateral damage. If they think about them at all. When it was disclosed recently that a superinjunction had been taken out by the last Conservative government to cover up importing thousands of Afghans into the UK, following a leak of names, I was berated on X by former defence minister Ben Wallace for daring to suggest that that underhand humanitarian mission could raise the level of risk for British women and girls. Mr Wallace thought the noble purpose of extricating men who may (or may not) have aided our armed forces was what mattered. I disagreed, foreseeing ever more rapes and cultural disintegration. A fate also predicted with some urgency, I notice, by US vice president JD Vance who last week accused Europe of 'engaging in civilisational suicide'. Coincidentally, a reader in Wiltshire got in touch to report how all those Afghans resettled in a local army camp are getting on. 'It's horrific, Allison,' she said. 'The behaviour of the Afghans in Larkhill – loitering around children's playgrounds, lads 'messing' with girls on school buses, human faeces regularly found on dog walks in camp. The GP practice is closed to soldiers one day a week to allow the migrants exclusive access. The reception staff have been handed crib sheets on how to greet Afghans in their own language. They are incensed. 'Why aren't the immigrants given crib sheets on how to address us in our own language?' ' My source says the Afghan families have been allocated most of the large houses, while soldiers who are entitled to bigger quarters are told 'there isn't a three-bed house in the whole of Wiltshire'. It's no surprise to learn that 'resentment is massive. The Afghans get free food – the truck goes round at least twice a day. 'If you drive through the camp you'd think you were in Kabul – groups of several men walking ahead of the women all covered in head-to-toe niqabs. Since the news of the superinjunction broke, they've been put under curfew. All the lads were warned that if they spoke out they'd be put on a charge.' See how the state acts to cover up its crimes against the British people. Whether it's silencing squaddies deprived of their rightful quarters or threatening with arrest those marvellous mums and grandmothers in raucously defiant pink who performed the Hokey-Cokey before staging a sit-in outside the Britannia Hotel asylum centre in Canary Wharf. It is politicians and senior civil servants who should be arrested, I reckon. They waste stupefying amounts of our money on people unlikely to ever make a net contribution to Britain and call it compassion. For whom? The National Audit Office has just predicted that, within 10 years, the cost of asylum accommodation will reach £15.3bn. It is intolerable. Imagine all the good such a sum could do to help struggling businesses and boost employment for our young people. Even when the popular sense of anger is palpable, as it is right now, the ability of our ruling class and much of the media to deny any adverse consequences of immigration is astonishing. I listened with mounting anger to Radio 4's PM programme on Monday (Sorry, mea culpa. I know you've told me to ditch the BBC!) where a reporter was trying to discredit data which showed that 40 per cent of sexual crimes in London were committed by foreign nationals. That, he explained, was only because migrants tend to be younger, and young men are most likely to commit those offences. I'm sure that will be a huge comfort to the traumatised women. All credit to Nigel Farage and Robert Jenrick for causing consternation among the Open Borders fanatics by making the link between out-of-control migration and soaring rape figures. Compare the response of our woefully weak Prime Minister who wants to 'put pressure' on police chiefs to be 'as transparent as possible' about the ethnic background and immigration status of those charged with crimes such as rape and sexual assault. Even though it is the Crown Prosecution Service, which Sir Keir Starmer once ran, that refuses to keep track of the number of sexual offences by asylum seekers. We know why, don't we? Government sources said they hoped greater transparency would 'help rebuild the public trust'. As if. That's the same government which is mounting unprecedented and sinister surveillance to keep track of 'anti-migrant' opinion. Fifty million people will shortly be helping the police with their enquiries. 'If you come here illegally on a small boat you will face return,' Sir Keir Starmer warbled at migrants yesterday. Not, 'You will be deported immediately' but 'you will face return.' Or, let's face it and far more likely, 'You will be handed a free phone and free accommodation which we will pinch from a soldier's family if we have to.' Compare with Greece, which has set up secure camps to detain all illegal migrants for three months, all of them denied the ability to claim asylum. Emergency legislation is allowing Greeks to circumvent the ECHR. Denmark, another ECHR member, has practically closed the borders and is using gated detention camps, some housing up to 2,000 migrants who are allowed out for just two hours a day and cannot work. If a government wants to put its citizens first, it can. Ours doesn't. From now on, I suggest we put the blame for every rape, abduction and strangling by an illegal migrant squarely where it belongs – on the Government, Home Office civil servants and complicit media class. We don't want a one-in-one-out scheme, thanks all the same. We want a 50,000-in-50,000-out scheme. We want Kirstie and every girl like her to be able to walk unmolested to school, not to be hissed at by men who lack all respect for our values and our women. If our leaders are too weak to act, lovely John and the yeomen of Britain will go to the border, and they will do what needs to be done.
Glasgow Times
2 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Farming burden has ‘crossed the threshold', Badenoch warns
Speaking to farmers in her North West Essex constituency, the Conservative Party leader criticised 'constant Government saying, 'You can't do this, you can't do that, you can't move forwards''. Mrs Badenoch tried her hand at harvesting wheat during her visit to a farm in Little Walden, driving a Claas Lexion combine harvester with farmer Sam Goddard. Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch and farmer Sam Goddard (Stefan Rousseau/PA) She told Mr Goddard: 'I am very keen to find out more and more about what this year has been like and about how we're actually going to do the harvest.' Looking at the machine, the MP for North West Essex added: 'It's a lot more complicated than I assumed.' Replacing his machine like-for-like would cost around £400,000, but more up-to-date models would probably be more expensive, Mr Goddard said. Taking questions from farmers about changes to the agricultural property relief from inheritance tax, Mrs Badenoch said that the Government was 'not going to get tax from farms that don't exist'. From April 2026, farmers who previously did not have to pay inheritance tax on their agricultural property will only be able to pass on up to £1 million without facing a bill. Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch sits in the cab of a combine harvester during her visit to Hall Farm in Little Walden, Essex (Stefan Rousseau/PA) Beyond this threshold, they face a new effective rate of 20%. Fiscal watchdog the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has projected this change, along with a similar change to business property relief, will raise around £0.5 billion for the Treasury by 2027/28. 'If you force people to give up or sell off, then you don't get anything at all,' Mrs Badenoch warned. 'And the bottom line is, this whole argument is because some people do not understand the difference between assets and income, and that just because you have an asset that's worth a lot, it doesn't mean that there's lots of money coming in to tax.' The Leader of the Opposition added that businesses 'need a different tax regime', and continued: 'A lot of farming just feels like constant interference. 'Everything is interfered from the minute you wake up.' Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch speaks to farmers during her visit to Hall Farm in Little Walden, Essex (Stefan Rousseau/PA) Examples of interference included 'chemicals and insecticide, people you're hiring, how much you've got to pay them', plus changes to 'employers' NI (national insurance), then somebody wants to put pylons on, there's compulsory purchase, it's impacting the cost of the land, if you want to add a new farm building, there's planning applications', she said. 'It's just endless constant Government saying, 'You can't do this, you can't do that, you can't move forwards'. 'And the burden in my view has now crossed the threshold.'
