
How the Capture of Fort Ticonderoga Ended the Siege of Boston
The Sons of Liberty made 45 toasts that early evening (this after 14 toasts earlier in the day), celebrating 'All true Patriots throughout the World' and cheering the 'Speedy Removal of all Task Masters.' In spite of so many toasts, John Adams, a member of the Sons of Liberty and an attendee of the dinner,
A Host of Tea Parties
Angry American colonists dressed up as Mohawk Indians while they destroyed hundreds of pounds of British tea, in an event known as the Boston Tea Party.
Public Domain
Four years later in December 1773 and seven months after the British Parliament passed another act that infuriated the American colonists, the Sons of Liberty eyed a different beverage: tea. The first of the five tea parties during that December took place in Charleston, South Carolina. The most famous, though, was the Boston Tea Party on Dec. 16. The last Tea Party took place a year later on Dec. 22, 1774, in Greenwich, New Jersey.
During the course of the 17 Tea Parties, British Parliament and American colonists continued to butt heads. In retaliation of the Tea Parties, specifically the Boston Tea Party, Parliament passed the Coercive Acts (the colonists called them the Intolerable Acts) on March 31, 1774.
The Intolerable Acts included the Boston Port Act, which established a blockade of the Boston Harbor; the Massachusetts Government Act, which allowed the king to appoint the Massachusetts Council; the Administration of Justice Act, which removed the colonists' freedom of trial by a jury of one's peers; and the Quartering Act, empowering military officials to demand better accommodations at the expense of colonists. Additionally, the Quebec Act was passed, which extended the province of Quebec to the Ohio River, allowed the free exercise of Catholicism, and permitted French civil law.
The First Continental Congress
The legislative acts only inflamed the revolutionary fervor. In response, a congress was convened. Twelve of the 13 colonies (sans Georgia) sent 56 delegates to Philadelphia. Among the delegates from Massachusetts was John Adams, along with his firebrand cousin, Samuel Adams.
The First Continental Congress began on Sept. 5, 1774, with delegates discussing and debating how to resolve the issues of taxation without representation, standing armies, the stranglehold on Boston, and the Canada problem. By Oct. 20, the delegates established its
Related Stories
10/8/2024
3/30/2023
The First Continental Congress, 1848, by Henry Samuel Sadd.
Public Domain
On the final day of the congress, the delegates issued a petition to King George III that addressed their grievances, while being certain not to assign blame to the Crown. The delegates did
Shortly after the delegates met in Philadelphia and well before Franklin presented the petition, King George III believed the crisis with the American colonies had already reached a point of no return. He
Many in the colonies felt the same way, including the colonial governor of Massachusetts, Gen. Thomas Gage. He
On Oct. 7, 1774, in
The members of the First Continental Congress agreed to reassemble the following year, but by that time, war would have already broken out between the colonists and Great Britain, and the minutemen of Massachusetts would play the most significant role.
Minutemen, Ethan Allen, and Benedict Arnold
During the late night and early morning hours of April 18 and 19, 1775, three members of the Sons of Liberty would make one of the most significant contributions to the revolutionary cause. Paul Revere, William Dawes, and Dr. Samuel Prescott rode through the night alarming local villages and towns the British were coming. The 'Midnight Rides' of these three patriots enabled the militias around Boston to take up arms. On April 19 at 5 a.m. and 8 a.m., respectively, the opening battles of the Revolutionary War began at Lexington and Concord.
When about 400 Minutemen faced approximately 220 British soldiers at the North Bridge in Concord, a return volley by the militia, which left three British soldiers dead and nine wounded, became known as the 'shot heard round the world.' The British began a long and bloody retreat back to Boston where they endured constant and heavy fire from local militia members. The British finally arrived in Boston, protected by the guns of the Royal Navy, but 73 had been killed and many more wounded. Thus began the 11-month Siege of Boston, where thousands of militia surrounded the city.
Shortly after the battles of Lexington and Concord and the start of the siege, Ethan Allen and his Green Mountain Boys, from what is now Vermont, were commissioned by New England colonial leaders to capture Fort Ticonderoga. The fort held a strategic position between Albany and Montreal on Lake Champlain. With a garrison of only 50 British soldiers, it seemed ripe for the taking. Allen, along with his brothers Levi and Ira, and cousins Ebenezer Allen, Seth Warner, and Remember Baker, began their march to Fort Ticonderoga.
At about this same time, Col. Benedict Arnold, a member of the Sons of Liberty, presented his idea to take Fort Ticonderoga to the Massachusetts Provincial Congress's Committee of Safety. The committee commissioned Arnold to lead the capture of the strategic fort.
Taking the Ticonderoga and Crown Point
When Allen and Arnold finally met, the latter claimed his official orders gave him the right to lead the expedition. The Green Mountain Boys, however, were adamant they would follow orders from no one but Allen. Arnold and Allen compromised on a dual command with Arnold leading his Massachusetts and Connecticut militia members and Allen leading his men. The combined force accounted for approximately 250 soldiers—more than enough to take the fort. But on the morning of the attack, a lack of boats enabled them to only take a fraction.
It was during this week in history, during the early morning hours of May 10, 1775, and with only two scow boats capable of carrying about 40 men each, that Allen and Arnold piled 83 men on the boats and sailed across Lake Champlain. Arriving about half a mile from the fort, the attacking force captured Fort Ticonderoga with only a single shot being fired by a British sentry, which missed high.
An 1875 engraving depicting the capture of Fort Ticonderoga by Ethan Allen on May 10, 1775.
Public Domain
When British Lt. Jocelyn Feltham demanded to know by whose authority were they conducting this attack, Allen is said to have leveled his sword at Feltham's throat and
Two days later on May 12, Warner, Allen's cousin, led the Green Mountain Boys who were not involved in the capture of Fort Ticonderoga on an attack to capture the nearby Crown Point fortification. The capture of these two locations was immensely important, not so much because of their strategic locations, but because of the large cache of artillery. The militia surrounding Boston were in great need of gunpowder and artillery, and the actions of the Allen and Arnold-led force would prove absolutely necessary.
Washington and the Knox Expedition
On the same day as the capture of Fort Ticonderoga, the delegates from the colonies reassembled in Philadelphia to begin the Second Continental Congress. A month later, on June 14, Congress established the Continental Army (three days before the costly British victory at Bunker Hill). John Adams nominated George Washington to lead the force. Washington took command on July 3 after arriving in Cambridge.
As the months wore on in Boston, Washington was addressed by the young, newly commissioned colonel, Henry Knox, who had been a witness to the Boston Massacre and, as a member of the Sons of Liberty, was on guard duty during the Boston Tea Party. Knox suggested using the captured artillery from Fort Ticonderoga and Crown Point against the British Army and Navy. Washington agreed and ordered Knox to lead the expedition.
In 1776, Col. Henry Knox, Washington's chief of artillery brought guns and mortars from Fort Ticonderoga to Boston. Engraving by Van Ingen.
MPI/Getty Images
Knox and his men left Cambridge on Nov. 16 and arrived at Fort Ticonderoga on Dec. 5, gathered the 58 pieces of artillery, weighing at least 120,000 pounds, and covered 300 miles across the snow-covered Berkshire Mountains back to Boston.
A number of guns were placed along the siege line at Roxbury, Cobble Hill, and Lechmere Point. A council of war was held on Feb. 16 with Washington calling for an attack on Boston. The council of officers rejected the idea, but the idea of 'drawing out the enemy' to a particular spot, as had been done at Bunker Hill was accepted. The spot would be at a familiar location: Dorchester Heights.
The Guns of Dorchester
Washington decided to utilize nighttime bombardments from the guns at Roxbury, Cobble Hill, and Lechmere Point, while soldiers, under the guidance of engineer Col. Richard Gridley, built up breastworks to eventually place upon Dorchester Heights. Three thousand soldiers worked to fortify the Heights, while thousands more prepared for an amphibious assault once the British made their move. Once completed, the prebuilt fortifications were scheduled to be maneuvered to the Heights on the night of March 4 and completed by early morning March 5—the anniversary of the Boston Massacre.
The objective was completed with the use of more than 1,200 soldiers and volunteers, as well as 360 oxcarts. On the morning of March 5, a vast assortment of mortars and cannons loomed over the Boston Harbor pointing at the British Army and Navy. The commander of the British Army, Gen. William Howe, peered up at the guns and earthworks at Dorchester Heights and exclaimed, 'My God, these fellows have done more work in one night than I could make my army do in three months.'
There would be no attack by the British on Dorchester Heights. The British evacuated Boston on March 17, thus ending the siege and claiming a momentous victory for the new Continental Army.
Never miss a This Week in History story! Sign up for the American History newsletter
What arts and culture topics would you like us to cover? Please email ideas or feedback to
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
16 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump is unpopular, polls show, and he's building an America most Americans hate
President Trump is wildly unpopular, and he is creating a crueler version of America that a sizable majority of voters reject. President Donald Trump, in the eyes of Donald Trump and the toadies who populate his administration, is overseeing the most successful stretch of any president in our lifetimes. That bent-reality view of what's actually happening is, of course, pure and predictable propaganda. Even the kindest interpretation of public opinion polling on Trump and his unhinged leadership thus far tells us this: The president is wildly unpopular, and he is creating a crueler version of America that a sizable majority of voters reject. Trump spent the weekend posting wildly on Truth Social and sharing glowing images of himself with the words '6 MONTHS OF WINNING' alongside AI-generated videos showing former President Barack Obama being arrested. You know, the kind of normal presidential stuff that self-confident, emotionally stable presidents usually post. Trump thinks he's winning, but Americans see a big-time loser His vampiric deputy chief of staff and most-favored henchman, Stephen Miller, posted on X: 'The most incredible opening 6 months to an American presidency in history.' Like Miller, the architect of Trump's draconian and increasingly cruel mass deportations, numbers don't have a soul. But unlike Miller and all who've sold they're souls to work with an opportunistic bully like Trump, numbers don't lie. Opinion: Trump keeps brutalizing immigrants because he's failing at everything else So let's take a look at what the numbers are saying about this allegedly amazing six months of presidential winning. Trump's approval after six months stinks, by any measure A CBS News poll conducted July 16 through July 18 found 58% of Americans disapprove of the way Trump is handling his job as president. Only 42% approve, a drop of a whopping 11 percentage points since a February CBS News poll. That's not good. Citing Gallup polling, USA TODAY reported Trump's June approval ratings during the first year of each of his two terms 'are lower than any other modern president at the same time in their administrations.' And polling averages from the New York Times to CNN to YouGov show Trump's approval wallowing in the low 40s. Trump's support on immigration – his big issue – has tanked If you're the person who is supposed to be president for all Americans, that is a far cry from 'winning.' Although if you care only about yourself and legislated cruelty, as Trump clearly does, I suppose such things don't matter. Diving deeper into polling numbers, you can see how unpopular much of Trump's 'Golden Age' agenda is, even when it comes to issues he has long polled well on, like immigration and the economy. The recent CBS News poll found only 44% approve of Trump's handling of immigration, down from 10 percentage points from March. Americans disapprove of Trump's hateful immigration policies A Gallup poll released July 11 found only 35% of Americans approve of Trump's handling of immigration, with 62% disapproving and 45% strongly disapproving. Now that Americans are seeing masked ICE agents round up hardworking migrants and shuttle them off to foreign countries or lock them in detention centers surrounded by alligators, only about 30% of Americans say immigration should be reduced – that number was at 55% last year. And there's this from the same Gallup poll: 'a record-high 79% of U.S. adults say immigration is a good thing for the country.' Support for hiring more border agents has dropped 17 percentage points since last year, and only 38% of respondents want to see all undocumented immigrations deported. A Pew Research Center survey last month noted: 'About a quarter of U.S. adults (23%) say they worry a lot or some that they or someone close to them could be deported.' Dear Grandma: Trump took your Medicaid, so it's time for you to work the fields | Opinion Again, this is winning only if you want things your way and don't care what a majority of your fellow citizens want, which has long been a defining characteristic of the MAGA movement. Most believe Trump's policies will hurt them, their families and their friends A recent AP-NORC poll found that about half of Americans 'feel Trump's policies have done more to hurt them' than help them, while only a quarter of respondents said Trump's policies have helped them. The CBS News poll found 60% of Americans oppose Trump's tariffs on imported goods, only 36% approve of his handling of inflation, and only 25% of voters believe the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' Trump recently signed will do anything to help them, while 47% think it will hurt them. A Quinnipiac University poll released July 16 showed Trump sizably underwater on immigration, trade, the economy, deportations, foreign policy, the Russia-Ukraine war, the Israel-Hamas war and tariffs. On the Epstein scandal, Trump is flailing and failing And lest we forget the ongoing Jeffrey Epstein scandal, the Quinnipiac poll found 63% of voters disapprove of the Trump Administration's handling of the case. Your Turn: President Trump, I supported you. Release the Epstein list – or resign. | Opinion Forum Taken in total, there's one inescapable conclusion: This has been six months of losing for President Trump and his administration, on virtually every issue. He is unpopular, the things he's doing are unpopular, and that lack of popularity isn't going to help him as the Epstein scandal continues to envelop his presidency. Trump lies – numbers don't. Remember that next time he brags. Trump can brag all he wants and keep declaring his own greatness, but anyone who has paid attention to him over the years knows these numbers are an assault on his fragile ego. That's why he's flailing so much right now, why his social-media account is a stream of babbling, self-congratulatory or authoritarian wish-casting nonsense. Trump won't tell you the truth. He won't even consider the truth himself. That should make Americans like him even less. Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at


Boston Globe
16 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Marines will begin withdrawing from Los Angeles
'With stability returning to Los Angeles, the secretary has directed the redeployment of the 700 Marines whose presence sent a clear message: Lawlessness will not be tolerated,' Parnell said Monday in a statement, referring to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. 'Their rapid response, unwavering discipline, and unmistakable presence were instrumental in restoring order and upholding the rule of law. We're deeply grateful for their service, and for the strength and professionalism they brought to this mission.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Democratic leaders in California have accused the Trump administration of provoking the protests by sending masked federal agents to car washes and other sites to detain immigrants, and then using the subsequent public outrage over the raids as a pretext for military action. Advertisement Since June, the troops have stood guard outside federal office buildings and have accompanied agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Border Patrol and other agencies during immigration raids. Pentagon officials estimated that the cost of deploying the Marines and National Guard soldiers would run to about $134 million. Advertisement California officials say the deployment violates federal law prohibiting the use of federal troops for domestic law enforcement, but an early attempt to halt the deployment through a court order was blocked by a federal appeals court. That appellate court ruled in June that the president had broad, though not 'unreviewable,' authority to send the U.S. military into American cities. A federal trial to determine whether the National Guard and Marines were used illegally in California is scheduled for next month. Federal authorities have called the deployment a response to the so-called sanctuary law in California, enacted during the first Trump administration. The law limits the role of local sheriffs' deputies and police officers in immigration enforcement, so that fear of deportation would not deter immigrants from reporting crimes. The law includes extensive exceptions that allow local law enforcement authorities to turn over noncitizens who have committed serious crimes to be deported by federal authorities. But the Trump administration has contended that California still places too many limits on cooperation between local law enforcement agencies and federal immigration authorities. The U.S. Department of Justice recently asked sheriffs across California to provide it with lists of inmates in state jails who are not U.S. citizens; doing so could potentially be a violation of the state's sanctuary law. At a congressional hearing last month, Democratic lawmakers grilled Hegseth about the troop deployment, calling it unlawful and excessive. 'The president's decision to call the National Guard troops to Los Angeles was premature, and the decision to deploy active-duty Marines as well is downright escalatory,' Rep. Betty McCollum, D-Minn., told Hegseth. Advertisement Hegseth defended the deployment, telling lawmakers, 'We ought to be able to enforce immigration law in this country.' Those debates have loomed large over the military presence in Los Angeles. Critics of the deployment have noted, among other things, that the Marines and the National Guard — who are trained to shoot to kill on the battlefield — do not receive the extensive training in de-escalation techniques, crowd control and use of force that are core parts of local law enforcement training. Within the U.S. military, concerns about the optics of armed troops rolling into American cities have also limited what the deployment could accomplish. As a result, the use of the troops in the Los Angeles area has been heavily scrutinized and fraught with potential constitutional constraints. National Guard contingents were seen this month facing protesters in a field outside a cannabis farm in Ventura County as gunfire erupted. And they were observed sitting in trucks in an immigrant-heavy neighborhood of Los Angeles while immigration agents marched through an all-but-vacated MacArthur Park, to prove that they could do so. In interviews with The New York Times, members of the California National Guard said that morale has been low during the deployment, reenlistment rates were plummeting and more than 100 troops had sought counseling in a period of a few weeks. Six soldiers spoke on condition of anonymity because their federal orders forbade them from talking to the news media. In the tent city that was built to house the Guard troops on a small base in Los Alamitos, a suburb, soldiers said that several troops had been reassigned because they raised objections to the mission, and that few of the troops there had been sent off the base on assignments. Advertisement National Guard officials said that only about 400 of the 3,882 deployed Guard members had actually been sent on assignments away from the base. The military's Northern Command said this month that the troops overall had participated in slightly more than 200 operations in support of federal law enforcement agencies. 'We wake up to go to sleep,' one Guard member told the Times. The Marines, who have been based at a separate military facility nearby, have been used sparingly as well. Early in the deployment, on June 13, Marines briefly detained an Army veteran who was running an errand and was trying to enter a Veterans Affairs office at a federal building in Los Angeles. The veteran said the detention was brief and he was not bothered by it. Federal troops are rarely seen detaining U.S. civilians on American soil, even temporarily. Mayor Karen Bass of Los Angeles has compared the deployment to an 'armed occupation,' and Gov. Gavin Newsom has condemned it as 'a solution right now in search of a problem.' Both have called for the removal of all the deployed troops. This article originally appeared in .


New York Post
16 minutes ago
- New York Post
DOJ receives DNI Tulsi Gabbard's findings on Obama admin's ‘treasonous conspiracy' in Trump-Russia probe
WASHINGTON — The Department of Justice has taken possession of a criminal referral by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, outlining what she called a 'treasonous conspiracy' by the Obama administration to 'subvert President Trump's 2016 victory.' On Friday, Gabbard made public more than 100 pages of records showing efforts by Obama national security officials to bury benign intelligence in the final weeks of the 44th president's administration — and whip up an alternative assessment of the 'boldest yet' Russian influence campaign on the American electorate. 'Their goal was to usurp President Trump and subvert the will of the American people,' Gabbard said in a Friday X post. 'No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. The integrity of our democratic republic depends on it.' 5 The Department of Justice reportedly received a criminal referral from the Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard revealing what she called a 'treasonous conspiracy' by the Obama administration. Bloomberg via Getty Images 'We are turning over all documents to the DOJ for criminal referral,' Gabbard warned. A DOJ spokesperson declined to comment to The Post on the receipt of the referral, which was first reported Monday by Fox News. After the report's release, Trump reposted a video to Truth Social that featured a compilation of Democratic leaders declaring 'No one is above the law' — and ended with an AI-generated clip of Obama being arrested in the Oval Office as the 'YMCA' blares in the background. 5 Gabbard made more than 100 pages of records public Friday showing the efforts by Obama officials to bury intelligence in the final weeks of the 44th president's administration. Getty Images Gabbard's exposé revealed that — both before and after Hillary Clinton's 2016 defeat — members of the US Intelligence Community concluded: 'Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the US Presidential election outcome.' 'We have no evidence of cyber manipulation of election infrastructure intended to alter results,' read other findings drafted Dec. 7, 2016. But neither of those assessments were placed in the Presidential Daily Brief after the FBI, under then-Director James Comey, informed then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper's office it was going to 'dissent' from the draft's conclusions 'based on some new guidance.' 5 On Dec. 9, Obama met with Clapper, FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, CIA Director John Brennan and others in the Oval Office, 'tasking' each to look into 'Russia Election Meddlin.' Getty Images On Dec. 9, Obama met with Clapper, FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, CIA Director John Brennan and others in the Oval Office, 'tasking' each to look into 'Russia Election Meddling' in the presidential contest between Trump and Clinton. The administration officials later produced an intelligence assessment that claimed: 'Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election.' 'Russia's goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency,' the assessment added. 'We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump.' 5 The Obama officials later produced an intelligence assessment that claimed: 'Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election.' Getty Images The information relied in part on a dossier created by former MI6 spy Christopher Steele, an opposition research document funded by Clinton's campaign that included allegations of the Kremlin blackmailing Trump after he purportedly cavorted with prostitutes in Moscow, according to Gabbard. The spy chief's findings lean on details dredged up by an Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) whistleblower who previously told superiors there was 'no indication of a Russian threat to directly manipulate the actual vote count through cyber means.' 'The effect of what President Obama and his senior national security team did was subvert the will of the American people, undermining our democratic republic, and enacting what would be essentially a years-long coup against President Trump,' Gabbard told Fox News Sunday. 5 'The effect of what President Obama and his senior national security team did was subvert the will of the American people,' Gabbard said in a Fox News interview Sunday. Corbis/VCG via Getty Images Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), the vice chairman of the chamber's Intelligence Committee, has downplayed the significance of the declassified DNI records, pointing to an earlier, bipartisan Senate report from 2020 that found 'the Russian government directed extensive activity against U.S. election infrastructure' before the 2016 election and 'used social media to conduct an information warfare campaign' to benefit Trump. Allies of the 47th president have claimed that the Obama administration's actions could amount to a conspiracy against rights, a crime which has no statute of limitations and can earn an individual up to 10 years in federal prison.