Keller: Republicans could face hot-button issues at town halls this summer
The Speaker of the U.S. House is sending members home a day early for their summer recess, a move Democrats said is aimed at ducking high-pressure votes on the Jeffrey Epstein case. But that and other hot-button issues are sure to come up if and when they hold the traditional town hall meetings with constituents.
Remember those angry town halls during the 2009 August recess clamoring against Obamacare? If Revere Rep. Katherine Clark and her fellow Democrats have their way, it'll be Republicans taking the heat this time around.
"They cannot hide from the destruction that they have caused," Clark, the House Minority Whip, said at a press conference with other top House officials.
I asked Amy Carnevale, chair of the Massachusetts GOP, to respond to some of the Democrats' attack points laid out by Clark.
CLARK: "Republicans are running away, all to avoid the release of the Epstein client list, all to cover up for pedophiles."
CARNEVALE: "That's ridiculous, Republicans have called on release of additional files and the president has supported the release of additional files."
CLARK: "The big, ugly bill kicked 15 million Americans off their health insurance."
CARNEVALE: "I don't know where she's getting her numbers but I do take issue with the assertion, particularly here in Massachusetts." (Fact check: The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the budget bill will cause 10 million people to lose their coverage and increase the federal deficit by $3.4 trillion.)
CLARK: "[The spending bill] takes food from 16 million kids," a reference to cuts in the SNAP program.
CARNEVALE: "We will see that here in Massachusetts, and it'll be really on Governor Healey and the legislature to understand how to prioritize state dollars and dollars coming from the federal government."
CLARK: "They run up the debt to give tax breaks to billionaires, and they run out of town to hide sex crimes for the rich and famous."
CARNEVALE: "The more Republicans can talk about individual provisions like no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, child tax credit, the better Republicans will be."
Back in 2009 there definitely was an effort by conservative groups to whip up anger and channel it into those town halls. But Carnevale told me she doesn't recommend ducking them, that Republicans need to make sure their message gets out there or risk being drowned out by their critics. So if you're reading this in a state where there are Republican members of Congress, stay tuned. Your local town hall might be the hottest show of the summer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Looking ahead to the race for Rhode Island attorney general
The campaign to replace term-limited Attorney General Peter Neronha will be one of the most-watched races in the state next year. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGPT How Trump's Tax Cuts Could Impact My Family Budget — Here's the Breakdown
President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which he signed on July 4, will impact millions of households, from their student loan repayments to their access to Medicaid and other social safety net programs. I, however, was most concerned with how the legislation's sweeping changes to U.S. tax law might impact my obligations to the IRS. Since my tax attorney charges by the quarter-hour for phone calls, I went with the next-best thing — ChatGPT. I asked the AI platform how Trump's tax cuts could impact my family budget. Here's what it told me. Find Out: Read Next: Many Households — Including Mine — Will Save Money The AI platform began with a bulleted list of benefits that will help many families lower their tax bill. It relied on sources such as the Bipartisan Policy Center and the Tax Policy Center to generate the section, which it titled, 'What You'll Likely Save.' This is its word-for-word synopsis of the potential savings for my family and others. Extended 2017 TCJA benefits — no major tax increases that were scheduled to take effect in 2026. Higher standard deduction — receives a $2,000 extra (married) or $1,000 (single) until 2028 on top of inflation adjustment. (CTC) — boosted to $2,500 per child through 2028, then reverts to $2,000. New tax benefits — exemption from federal tax on tips and overtime income (under $160K), a $40K state-and-local-tax (SALT) cap and a one-time $1K 'Trump account' per child. Learn More: Have a Little, Get a Little; Have a Lot, Get a Lot Next, my unofficial AI accountant used a Tax Policy Center analysis and a CBS News report to surmise that most families would see at least some benefit, with an average household tax bill reduction of $2,900 in 2026. However, it generated the following bulleted list, cited here verbatim, which showed that the 'haves' stand to gain more than the 'have-nots.' Bottom quintile households (≤ $35K income): ~$150 saved (~0.8% of income) Top quintile (≥ $217K income): ~$12,540 saved (~2.5%). Middle-income families fall in between, likely saving several hundred to a few thousand dollars annually. Taxes Aren't the Only Thing That Impact Family Budgets The platform then outlined how what it called the 'offsetting effects' of the tax cuts could shake up my family's — or anyone's — finances. This, too, is in ChatGPT's own words. Cuts to Medicaid, food stamps (SNAP) — billions in savings, but may reduce public benefits your family relies on. Reduced social safety nets — tougher work requirements; lower-income families could see net income decline despite tax cuts. Growing deficit — adds $3-$5 trillion to federal debt over 10 years, increasing future borrowing costs and potential for inflation/higher interest rates. Which Provisions Impact Which Families the Most? It included the following table to break down how different aspects of the legislation will impact different income groups. Income Level Estimated Annual Savings Key New Provisions Watch-Outs Low Income ~$150 Child Tax Credit, tip/overtime exemption Less SNAP/Medicaid Middle Income (~$50K-$100K) $500-$1,500 Standard SALT deduction bump, CTC, SALT cap Social cuts, inflation High Income (>$200K) $5K-$12K+ All above, plus SALT/ deduction benefits Future tax, interest pressure Make Your Situation as Big and Beautiful as Possible It concluded with a numbered list titled 'How To Maximize Benefits,' which outlined steps that my family and others can take to get the most out of the new changes. Use enhanced standard deduction — reduces taxable income directly. Claim full child tax credit if eligible — $2,500 per child. Take advantage of tip/overtime deductions — especially if you receive a lot of tips or extra hours. Monitor public benefits changes — if your household receives Medicaid or SNAP, check whether new work requirements or eligibility changes impact your budget. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 10 Genius Things Warren Buffett Says To Do With Your Money 6 Big Shakeups Coming to Social Security in 2025 This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT How Trump's Tax Cuts Could Impact My Family Budget — Here's the Breakdown
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
In the works: A presidential pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell?
As any constitutional scholar will tell you, the Constitution devotes as much time defining the limits of presidential power as it does defining its broad reach. But there is one exception to this: the presidential pardon power. That broad power is clearly spelled out in Article II, Section 2, Clause 1: 'The President…shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.' The Supreme Court has, in effect, subsequently interpreted that provision as allowing a president to pardon anyone, anytime, for any offense (except impeachment). In his masterful book, 'The Pardon,' CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin argues that use of the pardon is the one time where a president is, for all practical purposes, a 'king.' Such an awesome power was bound to be abused, and several presidents, Republican and Democrat, have done so. Among other abuses, Gerald Ford pardoned Richard Nixon to spare him from prison. Bill Clinton and Joe Biden pardoned members of their own families near the end of their terms. President Trump pardoned supporters who stormed the United States Capitol on Jan. 6. But no previous abuse of the pardon can compare with what dominated the Sunday morning news shows last weekend, and which Trump has so far not ruled out: A possible presidential pardon for Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell. Let's remember who she is and what she is serving time for. Maxwell had more than a romantic relationship with convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. For years, she was Epstein's enabler and procurer. Several young women testified that it was Maxwell herself who had sought them out, introduced them to Epstein, persuaded them to have sex with Epstein and other prominent men, trained them in sexual techniques, and herself participated in some of their sexual encounters. In 2020, federal prosecutors charged that between 1994 and 1997, Maxwell personally ' assisted, facilitated, and contributed ' to the abuse of minor girls despite knowing that one of three unnamed victims was 14 years old.' She was convicted and sentenced to 20 years in prison for what Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) has accurately described as 'terrible, unspeakable, conspiratorial acts and acts against innocent young people.' And that should be the end of the story, but it's not. Suddenly, having failed in every other attempt to change the narrative on Epstein, the Trump administration is now counting on Maxwell to be its lifeline. Todd Blanche, Trump's former personal attorney, now deputy attorney general, rushed to Tallahassee last week and spent nine hours over two days interviewing Maxwell. Why? We know why Maxwell agreed to talk: She wants to get out of prison. She has already asked the Supreme Court to overturn her criminal conviction. And now she is clearly angling for a presidential pardon from a man who admits he was once one of Epstein's best friends. But by spending so much time with her, Blanche triggered a wave of speculation about a Maxwell pardon. This is especially bizarre, given that Maxwell has nothing to do with all the questions swirling around the White House about the Epstein matter. What Trump's MAGA base wants to know is why he and other administration officials spent six years spreading the conspiracy theory that Epstein was murdered while his client list was being covered up to protect powerful 'elites' only, once in office, to turn around and report that Epstein committed suicide and there is no client list. Why won't they simply release all the Epstein files? Granted, the idea that anyone convicted of sex trafficking in underage girls would merit a presidential pardon is unthinkable. Even Johnson, in a rare break with Trump, admitted ' I have great pause about that, as any reasonable person would.' But what's even more unthinkable is that Trump didn't immediately shoot it down. Instead, when asked by reporters whether he would consider a pardon for Maxwell, Trump would only offer a weak: 'It's something I haven't thought about. I'm allowed to do it, but it's something I have not thought about.' Really? Whether or not to pardon a sexual predator is not something Trump should have to think about. His answer should have been an immediate, emphatic: 'No way, no how. Period.' It's insane even just to toy with the idea. Clearly, this is one point on which Republicans and Democrats can agree: Sexual predators don't get a mulligan. Ghislaine Maxwell does not deserve a presidential pardon. Trump should stop even teasing the possibility of giving her one.
