E. coli spikes at Richmond river spots
Why it matters: If you're planning to take a dip in the James during this rare dry and sunny week, you may want to wait — and then double-check river conditions before you go.
State of play: The James River Association collects river samples weekly in Richmond in summer and updates their map every Friday, the nonprofit's riverkeeper Tom Dunlap tells Axios.
Their latest batch of data shows high to extremely high levels of E. coli in the James from around Belle Isle through Rocketts Landing and Osborne Landing.
The stats from the previous week showed elevated E. coli readings at all of their Richmond stations.
The big picture: The recent rain and Richmond's 19th-century sewer system are to blame.
The city's sewer system combines stormwater with sewage, and filters it through Richmond's wastewater treatment plant.
But when it rains heavily — as it seems to have every other day this month — the treatment plant can become overwhelmed and the excess gets dumped into the James.
What comes out is 90% stormwater and around 10% wastewater, which includes whatever was flushed down your toilet.
Reality check: Due to wildlife near the river, some amount of E. coli is always in the James, Dunlap says.
Zoom in: According to a review of the city's combined sewer overflow monitors, 11 of its 25 "outfall" stations had at least one overflow last week, some as recently as Sunday.
Those overflows can push water quality levels beyond what the Virginia Department of Health considers safe for swimming.
That's why Virginia health officials "advise the public to avoid swimming in natural waterways for three days following rain events," a VDH spokesperson tells Axios.
By the numbers: 235 (CFU/100mL) or below is the magic number for E. coli readings, Dunlap says.
It's also what all the monitoring stations from Reedy Creek east to Huguenot Flatwater were showing, as of Friday.
At the latest reading, the rest of the monitored spots showed:
Belle Isle and the Rope Swing at Tredegar: 270
14th Street: 328
Chapel Island: 501
Rocketts Landing: 2,420
Which means: Swimming is OK from Huguenot Flatwater to Reedy Creek, as of the last reading.
But Richmonders shouldn't be swimming at the rest, Dunlap says.
Though, it's likely OK for kayaking or canoeing or recreation where one isn't submerged in the water.
What we're watching: The rain over the weekend means those numbers will likely change and could make more parts of the river unsafe for swimming, Dunlap says.
Pro tip: Dunlap's organization only has funding to do weekly monitoring for now, but he recommends checking the city's combined sewer overflow monitors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
17 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Presumed outbreak of E.coli and amoebiasis at Calgary-area food facility
CALGARY - Two people have been hospitalized and more than 200 have shown symptoms after a gastrointestinal outbreak at a Calgary-area food facility. Alberta Health Services says the outbreak at Saskatoon Farm in Foothills County is presumed to be E. coli and an intestinal illness called amoebiasis. Saskatoon Farm's food service facilities were ordered closed on Wednesday until deemed safe again, while the rest of the business remains open. Alberta Health Services says there have been 18 lab-confirmed cases of E. coli, three of which also tested positive for amoebiasis. It says 235 people have shown symptoms connected to the outbreak and there have been two recent hospitalizations, though one of them has since been discharged. The agency says it's believed the facility's water system is the source of the outbreak and Saskatoon Farm has switched to a different water source that has been confirmed safe. Anyone who consumed food, beverages or water there between July 1 and 16 is being asked to monitor for gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or abdominal pain. Officials say the type of E. coli identified in the outbreak is not normally found in treated drinking water, adding that it is not toxin-producing and generally goes away without treatment. They say amoebiasis may not result in immediate symptoms but can lead to gastrointestinal illness and, in rarer cases, severe infection of the liver, lungs, heart and brain. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 25, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Axios
18 hours ago
- Axios
Key decisions that will shape rural health fund
States next year will begin tapping the $50 billion rural health fund in the GOP's tax and spending law, but questions have already arisen about how the funds will be allocated — and how much they will benefit rural providers. Why it matters: The fund aims at helping rural hospitals and providers adjust to sweeping changes in how Medicaid is financed, including limits on provider taxes and state-directed payments. But important details have to be fleshed out. What they're saying: Sen. Josh Hawley, who pushed for the fund, in part to get his vote for the megabill, said CMS will need to make sure the money "flows to hospitals that need it" and are not simply "going to states in general to do whatever they want with it." "So far, so good. I liked how it was written up," Hawley said. "But we'll want to monitor closely how the agency puts it into effect." Sen. Thom Tillis, who was one of the three GOP "no" votes on the reconciliation bill, told Axios that CMS needs to "make sure it's a fair formula for rural hospitals." "I think that that pot of money looks big, but it's not really when you consider some of the economic impacts, mainly from the state-directed payments," Tillis said. "We'll be interested to see how they interpret the law." How it works: The new law allocates $10 billion annually for the next five years, starting in 2026. The law says $25 billion is to be distributed equally among all states that submit a "detailed rural health transformation plan," which could include details on how they would use the funds. Between the lines: States can apply for the aid only once, by the end of this year. If they estimate wrong, or run into unforeseen problems, they don't get another shot at it. CMS Administrator Mehmet Oz must approve each state's application by Dec. 31. CMS has discretion to distribute the other $25 billion, based on factors such as how much of the state's population is rural and the number of rural health facilities. The CMS administrator can also consider other factors deemed appropriate. Friction point: Some of that flexibility raises questions about how CMS will proceed, said Zach Levinson, director of the KFF Project on Hospital Costs. "States will also have discretion on how they distribute funds among hospitals and other providers," Levinson said. "And they maybe will steer some dollars to non-rural areas, pending CMS approval." The concern is that some states could be favored over others, or that funding will not go to providers with the greatest needs. "There are risks of this becoming a slush fund if it's not carefully attended to and if it's not focused" on actual rural hospitals, said Jackson Hammond, a senior policy analyst at Paragon Health Institute. All the money has to be distributed by 2030 and spent by 2032. That also means much of the assistance will have already been spent before the provider tax and state-directed payment provisions take effect in 2028. The $50 billion sum also is about one-third of the $155 billion in estimated cuts to federal Medicaid spending in rural areas, per a KFF analysis.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
VCU toxicologist: ‘No vape is safe'
PORTSMOUTH, Va. (WAVY) — The trend of vaping use has picked up speed across the United States, particularly among young adults. But as cool as the smoking devices appear, Virginia Commonwealth University Forensic Toxicologist Dr. Michelle Peace says the e-cigarettes are doing more harm than good. Her candid message — no vape is safe. She has discovered in her research that 95% of all compounds in vape products are not safe to inhale. 'The framework exists for protecting the consumer,' Peace said. 'So enforcement really needs to happen full throttle. Probably just as important is education, as misinformation about vaping is rampant.' It's been her mission to expose the hidden toxic chemicals, as most users are in the dark about what they're actually inhaling. 'The primary compounds that make up a vape liquid are propylene glycol and vegetable glycerin,' she said. 'There are compounds such as ethyl acetate that are used as a flavoring chemical.' Ethyl acetate is also used in fingernail polish remover. 'So there are compounds that are used as industrial solvents to clean equipment and brakes, and the food industry uses them as a solvent for flavoring chemicals. That doesn't mean that they're safe to inhale.' So far, the has authorized 39 tobacco and menthol flavored e-cigarette products, though she says there are too many that are unregulated and without quality testing. 'We have found that the products that are authorized by the Food and Drug Administration do have significantly fewer chemicals in them,' she said, 'where, in an unauthorized product, we might find 15 to 20 different chemicals. And then, in an authorized product, we might find five or six. That's significantly less. But nonetheless, there's still chemicals that can harm people and their tissue.' Users can develop a hacking cough, dried out lung tissue or even worse. 'There are some really interesting studies that are coming out that demonstrate that vaping is changing your DNA,' she said. 'There's an indication that maybe your body is 13 years older than a non vapor. Through a project funded by the Virginia Foundation for Healthy Youth, vapes are confiscated on school campuses in the Commonwealth and sent to VCU for testing. For those indirectly inhaling vapes, there's still a second-hand risk. And the bigger issue, according to Peace, is many people are using vapes to consume other drugs. has reported more than 2,800 vaping hospitalizations nationwide. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
