Not so pitch perfect: Young voice concerns (and it's not just the cost of living)
It's the election billed as the battle between Boomers and Zoomers. By most estimates, it's the first time Gen Zs and Millennials outnumber their parents and grandparents as a voting bloc.
The parties have attempted to tailor their social media pitches accordingly on issues that disproportionately affect young people: the cost of living, HECS debts and housing. A tide of social media memes, AI ads and several diss tracks have been met with varying levels of enthusiasm from their target audience.
For 17-year-old Khang Mai, who lives in the seat of Grayndler, the chance to have his voice heard for the first time is 'pretty exciting', even more so as he turns 18 just four days before the May 3 poll.
He'll soon be in a cohort of 76,300 extra 18 and 19-year-olds on the electoral roll since 2022, compared with just 6800 more between 2019 and 2022.
Khang is one of 20 people aged 25 and under from across Sydney that the Herald interviewed ahead of the election, where they explained the issues that matter most to them as they cast their vote.
How important is this election, and how do you feel about voting?
Khang: I'm pretty excited. I've been looking forward to voting because I've followed elections in the past, and I've wanted to be a part of it. (Khang was a member of the Labor Party in 2022 and 2023, but his membership has since lapsed.)
Maive: This coming election really decides where Australia stands when it comes to what [US President Donald] Trump is doing, what's going on in Eastern Europe and the Middle East, and what are we hoping to add to the global space.
Coby: I'm part of the Jewish community, and it's feeling like things are a bit tense at the moment, and scary for some. I do feel like this election will have a relatively important part to play.
Natasha: This election feels like the most important election that I have lived to witness. It's the first time I'll be able to vote, and I think that the outcomes that we could be seeing are really vastly different and mean really different things for young people.
Jiya: This election is definitely important because there have been major issues that have arisen [over] the last three years, like inflation and the high cost of living.
Nikki: To be completely honest, I don't know if a new party or an election is going to change that much. I feel fine because, in my mind, I just don't think that much will change.
Georja: We're not really taught about the voting process … we're not taught about things in layman's terms, and we're not taught about how things work with each policy and what they mean, so that makes it very confusing.
Do politicians understand your generation?
Kai: I think young people are very underrepresented in politics. I don't think we have our needs addressed much, especially when it comes to things like housing and education. I think the world is really expensive for a young person, and it's very difficult to survive.
Loading
Natasha: It feels like we're political chess pieces. That politicians are just throwing around words like 'cost-of-living relief' and things like that. Young people have it so tough and aren't being seen or heard in politics, and haven't in a long time.
Coby: I just don't think they're really trying to understand the younger generation who will obviously be leading the country in the future. I just don't think that they are trying to understand issues facing younger generations.
WenYuan: There definitely could be more done to look after the interests of younger people, especially with stuff like the environment. Acting very sluggish on that kind of shows a disinterest in looking after Australia for future generations.
Grace: Gen Z and Millennials are the biggest voting bloc this election. You can't just skew your policies to old people who own homes. It just won't work.
How do you feel about politics in general?
Georja: You're making a vote based on the advertisement that is provided, which is basically the smear and fear campaigns on why the other party is worse than the party that you should vote for. Everyone's just focusing on showing why the other leader would be worse, rather than why they would be good.
Grace: I'm clued into politics, but broadly frustrated. I feel like a lot of politics should be about people and about representation, but I think we're really seeing the politics of big business and giant corporations instead of everyday people.
Viola: As a Jewish Australian, I haven't had the choice to not be informed, especially with the events of the past year or two. If I don't read the news, then I'm very much left out of a huge bubble of my community.
What are the policies that have stood out the most to you?
Matthew: I'm a big fan of having 20 per cent of my uni debt deleted. That sounds great. I'm a few grand up just from that alone. And although I know the news likes to hammer on about the 70 cents a day tax cut ... man, that's like 250 bucks a year. I'll take it.
Charlotte: I think [the Coalition's policy of] super for housing is the most ridiculous, economically illiterate thing I've ever heard of. I think that just inflates the entire issue and ignores the root cause of it, which is the treatment of housing as predominantly an investment.
Ethan: None of the policies so far have really jumped out at me, and I have been following the news. Every time I open my news app I'm just like 'ah bullshit'. It's just repetitive, and it's just politicians arguing at this point and not really focusing on the main point, which is helping out Australians.
What are the biggest issues for you?
Sebastian: Foreign policy and how Australia is going to take a part in that. Whether we will be a force for Trump or maybe push back a little bit.
Viola: Cost of living I think is probably the biggest drawcard here as well as education. I've always valued the importance of education … making university education more accessible.
Natasha: None of the major parties want to talk about the climate crisis, but they want to talk about energy. You can't talk about one without the other.
Jiya: The [HECS] fees I'm going to be paying will be from my salary in the future, and that's pretty scary to think about. University students are going to graduate soon and then go into jobs, but they're not sure about how their money will be.
WenYuan: Energy policy. I studied renewable energy engineering, so it's good that I know what's up, but it's also kind of depressing because my career prospects could hang in the balance with this election. We could seriously mess up the environment; we could seriously jeopardise our ability to transition to a more sustainable, more responsive grid.
Khang: A lot of people are having a hard time, but I think people also need to remember that there's other, quite long-term issues that aren't really prominent right now, like climate and infrastructure.
How do you feel about the leaders?
Mary Anne: I know who they are, I've seen them around. But it's not like I really know them. You hear their names, you see them around in the media, but it's in and out.
Kai: With [Prime Minister Anthony] Albanese, I feel a little bit disappointed ... but I don't like [Opposition Leader] Peter Dutton. For one thing, his approach to trans healthcare issues. That's a big one for me because I am a trans person.
Khang: I don't think [the prime minister] is doing a perfect job because people are still doing it really tough now, but I think he is a pragmatic leader, and he tries to work with all the other parties to get stuff through.
Matthew: Regardless of what you think morally about the Voice, I don't think [Albanese] played his cards right on that one. I think the idea behind it was good, but the actual execution was not ideal.
What's your opinion on minor parties and independents?
Maive: There's some limitations to the effectiveness of minor parties, but I feel like there's been quite a shift, especially with people I'm talking about with this upcoming election, towards the minor parties. Obviously, there's been such a volatile duality with the Republicans and Democrats in America. It's concerning me that we're going to have something similar with Labor and Liberal.
WenYuan: Seeing all the independents and grassroots movement that have been very community-focused, very much prioritising the voices of their people – I think it's pretty sweet.
Muskaanpreet: It's worth voting for [minor parties and independents] because I think it shows the Labor Party and the Liberal Party that the policies they stand for do matter.
How do you feel about social media and influencers being used in political campaigning?
Maive: Some politicians do it quite well, but sometimes you're like, 'come on, this is a serious issue, can we stop treating it like it's light-hearted?' We're adults too. We understand what's going on, and we should be treated like we understand what's going on.
Georja: It's like a wolf in sheep's clothing. [Politicians] will try and dress up in our values and our priorities to get our vote, but it would be very important to also incorporate accurate information on those pages so people can start to understand more about what their policies are.
Muskaanpreet: I think using TikTok or using memes is a good way to reach a Gen Z audience. I think it shows that the political candidates care as well, so I think it's useful, but I don't think it looks very professional.
Matthew: I guess there's a point to be made that it's at least getting people to engage with it, but I don't know if it's getting them to engage in a constructive way. It's more just downplaying the seriousness of some of the issues by using this kind of language.
How do you feel about the direction the country is heading?
Arseen: I feel like we're heading towards a negative direction, to be honest, with all the cost of living, and the affordability and housing, it's getting more and more stressful.
Viola: I do worry about how antisemitism is going to be handled, and how I am going to feel on university campuses or how am I going to feel walking down the streets.
Jonty: I feel a lot of people right now don't feel things are great. I don't think there's any specific power that's kind of putting that at ease right now. Everyone's looking to just kind of stick through it, but overall, I still have hope.
Coby: A lot of the information that the younger generations are getting is off social media, from TikTok, from the quickest access point possible. They don't want to actually deep dive into the real situation of anything. I am right-leaning, and a lot of the younger population is leaning towards the left, and it's just scary.
Angus: My main concern is the influence of Trump and Trumpism, which I feel has been putting a lot of people off the Liberal Party this election.
Mary Anne: In a way, yes and no, there are some changes that are happening in schools and universities, but I feel like it's slow. You can't make change in a day.
Kai: When it comes to things like the cost of healthcare and just the cost of living in general, it seems to be getting worse. It's easy to feel pessimistic about it, like having GPs costing so much money. But I think I feel optimistic that as of recently, we're seeing America and not wanting to go that way, and so it's making us move in a bit of a better direction. At least, that's what I hope.
Charlotte: I don't think I'm pessimistic at all. I think minority government, especially if we're returning to a Labor government, is probably quite good for young people.
Grace: I don't feel particularly optimistic, but I do think that it is the role of young people to persevere and to make sure that we are in the room where decisions are being made so that we can shape that as best as we can.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Iran warns Donald Trump not to inflame relationship in wake of social media post claiming he saved Khamenei's life
Tehran has issued a furious response to the United States after President Donald Trump said he saved the life of Iran's Supreme Leader. A ceasefire between Israel and Iran was introduced this week after it was brokered by the US, but there are fears it is fragile. The deal was brokered after the US struck three Iranian nuclear facilities in a targeted military operation known as Midnight Hammer. So far, the ceasefire has stood firm, despite a scare when Trump had to order Israel to turn back fighter jets from a planned attack after accusing Iran of launching a missile at the Jewish state after the deadline had passed. But President Trump's social media presence has rubbed Iran the wrong way after a post about their Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, where he claimed he saved his life. "I knew EXACTLY where he was sheltered," Trump posted to Truth Social. "I SAVED HIM FROM A VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH, and he does not have to say, 'THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP!'" Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi shared a post on X in response, warning the President to be careful with how he speaks about Iran's Supreme Leader. "If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt followers," he said. Mr Araghchi did not stop there, as he made reference to off the cuff comments made by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte where he described Trump as "daddy" when referring to how he handled the conflict in the Middle East. "The Great and Powerful Iranian People, who showed the world that the Israeli regime had NO CHOICE but to RUN to 'Daddy' to avoid being flattened by our Missiles, do not take kindly to Threats and Insults. "If Illusions lead to worse mistakes, Iran will not hesitate to unveil its Real Capabilities, which will certainly END any Delusion about the Power of Iran." The chilling message comes after Khamenei delivered his first public comments since the ceasefire, warning Iran won't hesitate to target American military bases in the Middle East if the US launches any future attacks. The 86-year-old said Iran "delivered a slap to America's face" when an Iranian missile attack struck a US base in Qatar, in retaliation to the US strikes on its nuclear facilities "The US President Trump unveiled the truth and made it clear that Americans won't be satisfied with anything less than an event will never happen," he said. "The fact that the Islamic Republic has access to important American centres in the region and can take action against them whenever it deems necessary is not a small incident, it is a major incident, and this incident can be repeated in the future if an attack is made."
Sky News AU
15 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Israeli-Iranian coalition call on Albanese govt to 'crack down' on Islamic extremism before it can 'take root' on home soil
A Jewish and an Iranian-Australian coalition have called on the Albanese government to 'crack down' on Islamic extremism before it can "take root" on home soil. A Jewish and an Iranian-Australian coalition have called on the Albanese government to crack down on Islamic extremism before it can "take root" on home soil. Israeli-Australian Roz Mendelle said she was concerned about extremism being promoted by Greens politicians and prominent activists across Australia. Ms Mendelle became trapped in Jerusalem after Iran began targeting civilian centres in missile strikes on Israel earlier this month in retaliation to the IDF's tactical bombings of Iranian nuclear and military targets in mid-June. After she received videos of 'violent protests and marches' back home from Iranian colleagues and friends, Ms Mendelle said the Greens politicians and activists were calling for sanctions on Israel while 'excusing' the actions of the regime's terror proxies, such as Hamas and Hezbollah. 'With this in mind, I hope the government will crack down on these extremists who are spreading hate at home,' Ms Mendelle told Fighting Islamic extremism on home soil Ms Mendelle is the founder and co-director of Brisbane-based Minority Impact, a self-described group of Australians from multi-ethnic backgrounds united in promoting social cohesion and opposing radicalism. Minority Impact is currently running a national campaign in solidarity with Iranian refugees who are calling for a free Iran. Iranian-Australian Azin Naghibi, who is a co-director of Minority Impact, said she connected with Ms Mendelle after October 7 when Hamas shared footage of its barbaric attacks on Israeli citizens. Ms Naghibi said after October 7, radicalism had taken place on the steps of the Sydney Opera House which made her realise Israelis and Iranians had one thing in common. "(It) struck me that Israelis and Iranians are suffering from the same enemies: radical Islamists and terrorist ideology," Ms Naghibi told Ms Naghibi said she connected with Ms Mendelle and others, including members of the Hindu community who were also victims of persecution, to stave off radical Islamic extremism in Australia. "We have established the Minority Impact Coalition organisation to work together to make Australia safer for all minorities. We don't want to see radicalism take root here in our second home," she said. Ms Naghibi said the story of Israeli Shani Louk, who was kidnapped from the Nova festival before she was tortured, raped and killed, reminded her of a similar brutal repression of women in Iran. "We had a similar story that had happened in Iran during the 2022 national uprising known as the Woman, Life, Freedom movement. Her name was Nika Shakarami, whose life was taken facing similar brutality and violence at the hands of the IRGC, the terrorist organisation in Iran," she said. Ms Naghibi recounted a moment from 2009, before migrating to Australia, where she and her husband watched a young Iranian protester get shot "right in front of our eyes" by the IRGC. "My husband and I, along with others, helped put his body into a car to take him to the hospital, but later we found out it was too late," she said. "That moment was a turning point in our lives; we could no longer be the same people as before. From that day on, we committed ourselves to doing whatever we could against the Islamic regime and its oppressive forces." Ms Naghibi said she and her husband attended every protest and were beaten "several times" at demonstrations. They were also exposed to numerous threats after they stopped identifying as Muslims. "One significant incident was when the Islamic regime shut down our business, accusing us of being followers of Satan," she said. "In short, everything culminated in a situation where our lives were at risk, leading us to flee the country and seek for a safe haven in Australia." She said she and her husband fled Iran to Australia because they believed it would be "our safe haven", but realised the Islamic regime in Iran has attempted to "export their ideology, even here in Australia". "We have seen that after October 7, many terrorists used the anti-Israel movement to spread hate within society," she said. "We want the Australian government to make Australia safe for everyone.' — Morgan C. Jonas 🇦🇰 (@morgancjonas) June 23, 2025 Holding Australian society together Ms Mendelle said most Australians do not realise the war between Iran and Israel was 'unique'. 'It's a war against oppression and terrorism, at the source. The same extremist regime in Iran that funds Hamas and Hezbollah is also building nuclear weapons and silencing its own citizens,' she said Ms Mendelle said she wanted the same 'spirit of cohesion' and mutual respect in Australia as was prevalent in Israel among Jews, Arab Israelis, Druze, Baha'is and other groups. 'Since the October 7th massacre, which was funded primarily by this oppressive Iranian regime, Jewish Australians have struggled to feel support from the Labor government,' she said. 'Now, in a time when Israel is helping to prevent an oppressive dictator from building nuclear weapons, I expect our government to show moral clarity and unashamed support.' She urged Australians to listen to people who have fled the Iranian regime, who had 'lost daughters' and who still carry the scars of oppression. 'If you want peace—stand with the people, not the oppressors,' she said. 'We need a government that stands for truth and freedom. The Australian government can help bring Australian society together by demonstrating strength against violent and inciteful actors, adding the Iranian Regime's IRGC to the terror list (which USA and Canada have already done), and helping to humanise and support all minorities.' Trapped in the Middle East Ms Naghibi's family remains in Tehran and when Israeli media and the Trump administration alerted people to leave Iran's capital, she and her family immediately began to worry. "We were all panicked - what's going to happen? I hardly contacted my mum and asked if they had a plan to leave Tehran, she said they feel safe as the Israeli Airforce were only targeting the military bases and IRGC commanders," she said. "But (she) promised me as soon as they think it's not safe anymore they will go to the north." Ms Naghibi said Iranians believed their country had been "occupied by the Islamic regime". She said Ruhollah Khomeini - the first leader of the regime - said Islam was "against nationalism" and wanted people to be part of the Islamic Ummah, and not part of a nation. "Therefore, Iranians see the Islamic regime and the IRGC as our enemies who spend our money to export terrorism and radical ideology against Western civilisation," she said. "Iranians believe this was not, and will not be, our war; this is Ali Khamenei's war. He wants a nuclear bomb to make his dream come true: to wipe Israel off the map." Ms Mendelle said the war did not start with the exchange of rockets, but had been ongoing for decades. 'As Israelis, whether Jewish or Arab, we are accustomed to being the target of air strikes and terror. This war with the regime in Iran did not start with this escalation - the Islamic Regime has been funding terror networks around the world for decades, including Hamas and Hezbollah, bringing death and ruin to innocent civilians across the region,' she said before President Donald Trump announced Israel and Iran had agreed to a "complete and total ceasefire" 'We are scared. We all remain a stone's throw from a bomb shelter. When a siren rings, I have 90 seconds to get underground. It takes me, with both babies under three, 60 seconds from our door to the shelter.' Ms Mendelle said she shared a bomb shelter with a number of families from different backgrounds, including a family of Eritrean refugees, a Muslim Arab Israeli single mother and a number of Jewish families with children. She said her daughter, who celebrated her third birthday while sheltering from Iranian bombs, knew 'something serious' was happening, but forgot the stress and began playing with the other children despite the dangers outside. 'There is something different this time. Unity. Confidence. We know we are doing the most noble mission imaginable; preventing a diabolic dictator from using nuclear weapons,' Ms Mendelle said. She said it would help 'free the brave men and women of Iran' who had been 'begging' for the rest of the world to wake up and hear their cries since the Islamic Revolution of 1979. 'We all want peace, and we want nothing more than to help Iranians reclaim their rights, their freedoms, and build a true peace-waging democracy,' she said. 'After all, at least we have a bomb shelter. Here in Israel, our government does everything possible to protect its citizens—sirens, shelters, coordination. In Iran, the people are unprotected, censored, and silenced, with no access to internet or safety.' Ms Mendelle said this simple difference was a 'chilling reminder' of the privilege citizens of democracies take for granted.
The Advertiser
a day ago
- The Advertiser
Staff front 'kangaroo court' probe after arrest threat
Senior government staff have faced terse questions over the passage of anti-protest and hate speech laws after threats they could be arrested for refusing to front an inquiry. NSW Premier Chris Minns' chief of staff James Cullen, his deputies and two senior staff for Police Minister Yasmin Catley showed up on Friday after being summoned to appear earlier in June. The parliamentary inquiry is probing the swift introduction of laws in February after the discovery of a caravan at Dural, on Sydney's outskirts, containing explosives and a list of Jewish sites. Mr Minns and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese initially labelled the caravan incident a thwarted terror attack in late January when a media leak disclosed the earlier caravan find. But inquiry chair Rod Roberts on Friday criticised the terrorism label, saying it would have led to fear and consternation in the community. "I can't see how the premier standing in front of a press conference saying there is no other alternative to terrorism provided any calm to anybody," the independent MP said. It later emerged the caravan was thought to be part of what investigators labelled a "criminal con job" that was staged in an attempt to gain leverage with police. Senior NSW police told the inquiry in April they believed it was a ruse virtually from the outset. Controversial laws that passed parliament included curbs on the right to demonstrate near places of worship. But Mr Cullen, appearing frustrated and occasionally interrupting questions, repeatedly defended the premier's language about the caravan find. "This was not a line dreamt up by the premier," he told the committee inquiry in a tense exchange with Mr Roberts. "It was not a term thrown around lightly at all. "There's a very convenient rewriting of history and squashing of time and concepts." The three pieces of legislation were drafted during a 12-18 month period when there was a marked rise in anti-Semitic incidents, Mr Cullen said. "The relationship that's been constructed by some between the Dural caravan event and those three pieces of legislation is extremely ... unfair." They included graffiti and arson attacks on a synagogue, a preschool's fire-bombing and other incidents in areas with large Jewish populations, all of which had drawn widespread condemnation, he said. Mr Minns - who, along with the police minister, cannot be compelled to appear before the upper house - told reporters his perspective had been "well ventilated". Following news the staffers could face arrest, Mr Minns on Wednesday said they had been summoned to an inquiry that was "close to a kangaroo court". Mr Roberts had addressed five empty chairs a week earlier when the government staffers did not appear, prompting the drastic but legal step of threatening to arrest them. Mr Minns criticised parliamentary "shenanigans" on Friday and said his focus was on supporting the people of NSW. Senior government staff have faced terse questions over the passage of anti-protest and hate speech laws after threats they could be arrested for refusing to front an inquiry. NSW Premier Chris Minns' chief of staff James Cullen, his deputies and two senior staff for Police Minister Yasmin Catley showed up on Friday after being summoned to appear earlier in June. The parliamentary inquiry is probing the swift introduction of laws in February after the discovery of a caravan at Dural, on Sydney's outskirts, containing explosives and a list of Jewish sites. Mr Minns and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese initially labelled the caravan incident a thwarted terror attack in late January when a media leak disclosed the earlier caravan find. But inquiry chair Rod Roberts on Friday criticised the terrorism label, saying it would have led to fear and consternation in the community. "I can't see how the premier standing in front of a press conference saying there is no other alternative to terrorism provided any calm to anybody," the independent MP said. It later emerged the caravan was thought to be part of what investigators labelled a "criminal con job" that was staged in an attempt to gain leverage with police. Senior NSW police told the inquiry in April they believed it was a ruse virtually from the outset. Controversial laws that passed parliament included curbs on the right to demonstrate near places of worship. But Mr Cullen, appearing frustrated and occasionally interrupting questions, repeatedly defended the premier's language about the caravan find. "This was not a line dreamt up by the premier," he told the committee inquiry in a tense exchange with Mr Roberts. "It was not a term thrown around lightly at all. "There's a very convenient rewriting of history and squashing of time and concepts." The three pieces of legislation were drafted during a 12-18 month period when there was a marked rise in anti-Semitic incidents, Mr Cullen said. "The relationship that's been constructed by some between the Dural caravan event and those three pieces of legislation is extremely ... unfair." They included graffiti and arson attacks on a synagogue, a preschool's fire-bombing and other incidents in areas with large Jewish populations, all of which had drawn widespread condemnation, he said. Mr Minns - who, along with the police minister, cannot be compelled to appear before the upper house - told reporters his perspective had been "well ventilated". Following news the staffers could face arrest, Mr Minns on Wednesday said they had been summoned to an inquiry that was "close to a kangaroo court". Mr Roberts had addressed five empty chairs a week earlier when the government staffers did not appear, prompting the drastic but legal step of threatening to arrest them. Mr Minns criticised parliamentary "shenanigans" on Friday and said his focus was on supporting the people of NSW. Senior government staff have faced terse questions over the passage of anti-protest and hate speech laws after threats they could be arrested for refusing to front an inquiry. NSW Premier Chris Minns' chief of staff James Cullen, his deputies and two senior staff for Police Minister Yasmin Catley showed up on Friday after being summoned to appear earlier in June. The parliamentary inquiry is probing the swift introduction of laws in February after the discovery of a caravan at Dural, on Sydney's outskirts, containing explosives and a list of Jewish sites. Mr Minns and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese initially labelled the caravan incident a thwarted terror attack in late January when a media leak disclosed the earlier caravan find. But inquiry chair Rod Roberts on Friday criticised the terrorism label, saying it would have led to fear and consternation in the community. "I can't see how the premier standing in front of a press conference saying there is no other alternative to terrorism provided any calm to anybody," the independent MP said. It later emerged the caravan was thought to be part of what investigators labelled a "criminal con job" that was staged in an attempt to gain leverage with police. Senior NSW police told the inquiry in April they believed it was a ruse virtually from the outset. Controversial laws that passed parliament included curbs on the right to demonstrate near places of worship. But Mr Cullen, appearing frustrated and occasionally interrupting questions, repeatedly defended the premier's language about the caravan find. "This was not a line dreamt up by the premier," he told the committee inquiry in a tense exchange with Mr Roberts. "It was not a term thrown around lightly at all. "There's a very convenient rewriting of history and squashing of time and concepts." The three pieces of legislation were drafted during a 12-18 month period when there was a marked rise in anti-Semitic incidents, Mr Cullen said. "The relationship that's been constructed by some between the Dural caravan event and those three pieces of legislation is extremely ... unfair." They included graffiti and arson attacks on a synagogue, a preschool's fire-bombing and other incidents in areas with large Jewish populations, all of which had drawn widespread condemnation, he said. Mr Minns - who, along with the police minister, cannot be compelled to appear before the upper house - told reporters his perspective had been "well ventilated". Following news the staffers could face arrest, Mr Minns on Wednesday said they had been summoned to an inquiry that was "close to a kangaroo court". Mr Roberts had addressed five empty chairs a week earlier when the government staffers did not appear, prompting the drastic but legal step of threatening to arrest them. Mr Minns criticised parliamentary "shenanigans" on Friday and said his focus was on supporting the people of NSW. Senior government staff have faced terse questions over the passage of anti-protest and hate speech laws after threats they could be arrested for refusing to front an inquiry. NSW Premier Chris Minns' chief of staff James Cullen, his deputies and two senior staff for Police Minister Yasmin Catley showed up on Friday after being summoned to appear earlier in June. The parliamentary inquiry is probing the swift introduction of laws in February after the discovery of a caravan at Dural, on Sydney's outskirts, containing explosives and a list of Jewish sites. Mr Minns and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese initially labelled the caravan incident a thwarted terror attack in late January when a media leak disclosed the earlier caravan find. But inquiry chair Rod Roberts on Friday criticised the terrorism label, saying it would have led to fear and consternation in the community. "I can't see how the premier standing in front of a press conference saying there is no other alternative to terrorism provided any calm to anybody," the independent MP said. It later emerged the caravan was thought to be part of what investigators labelled a "criminal con job" that was staged in an attempt to gain leverage with police. Senior NSW police told the inquiry in April they believed it was a ruse virtually from the outset. Controversial laws that passed parliament included curbs on the right to demonstrate near places of worship. But Mr Cullen, appearing frustrated and occasionally interrupting questions, repeatedly defended the premier's language about the caravan find. "This was not a line dreamt up by the premier," he told the committee inquiry in a tense exchange with Mr Roberts. "It was not a term thrown around lightly at all. "There's a very convenient rewriting of history and squashing of time and concepts." The three pieces of legislation were drafted during a 12-18 month period when there was a marked rise in anti-Semitic incidents, Mr Cullen said. "The relationship that's been constructed by some between the Dural caravan event and those three pieces of legislation is extremely ... unfair." They included graffiti and arson attacks on a synagogue, a preschool's fire-bombing and other incidents in areas with large Jewish populations, all of which had drawn widespread condemnation, he said. Mr Minns - who, along with the police minister, cannot be compelled to appear before the upper house - told reporters his perspective had been "well ventilated". Following news the staffers could face arrest, Mr Minns on Wednesday said they had been summoned to an inquiry that was "close to a kangaroo court". Mr Roberts had addressed five empty chairs a week earlier when the government staffers did not appear, prompting the drastic but legal step of threatening to arrest them. Mr Minns criticised parliamentary "shenanigans" on Friday and said his focus was on supporting the people of NSW.
