logo
'Nothing unusual, expects change': Kerala HC as woman withdraws criminal case against husband

'Nothing unusual, expects change': Kerala HC as woman withdraws criminal case against husband

Hans India09-06-2025
The Kerala High Court on Monday contended that there is nothing unusual for a woman to close criminal cases filed by her against her ex-husband to save him.
Hearing the ex-husband's challenge against a divorce decree, the court said that a wife does so in the expectation that her husband would change.
The Family Court had allowed divorce on the ground of cruelty.
Before filing the present case, she had filed a criminal case against her husband and two divorce petitions, which were withdrawn or dismissed due to her own disposition, as she chose not to prosecute.
She submitted before the court that she did so to protect her former husband and his job as a Higher Secondary School teacher.
The division bench of Justice Devan Ramachandran and Justice M. B. Snehalatha observed that a woman will forgive to protect her family.
"A woman will forgive and condone to protect her matrimonial union and family. Forgiveness in such a sense is not a passive act but is an active and transformative one, to heal emotional wounds and to obtain inner peace. For a woman, this is not a sign of her weakness, but a powerful act of strength, ingrained in her inner power, by which the chain of resentment and bitterness is consciously broken. The emotional burden of holding on to grudges happens very often in many relationships and families, and it is the power of a woman to forgive that enables families to rise above pain and create healthy relationships. But, there is always a limit to what a woman can endure," the court said.
The court further said that the wife was able to prove that she was assaulted by an iron rod through her discharge summary.
Further, there is a protection order under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act in favour of the wife against the husband. It was further pointed out that there are two other criminal cases filed against him, and taking all those into account, the court held that there was no need to interfere with the order of the Family Court.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kerala defers black magic legislation, but reaffirms commitment to regulate harmful practices
Kerala defers black magic legislation, but reaffirms commitment to regulate harmful practices

Hans India

time2 hours ago

  • Hans India

Kerala defers black magic legislation, but reaffirms commitment to regulate harmful practices

Kochi: The CPI-M government, on Tuesday, told the Kerala High Court that it is committed to regulate harmful practices carried out under the guise of supernatural and magical acts, even after deferring a proposed legislation on the issue. This was submitted before the division bench of Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Basant Balaji when it was considering a PIL filed by a popular rationalist organisation seeking enactment and implementation of 'The Kerala Prevention of Eradication of Inhuman Evil Practices, Sorcery and Black Magic Bill, 2019'. Previously, the court had expressed its discontent with the state Cabinet resolving to not proceed with the Bill. But in the counter affidavit filed by the state on Tuesday, it highlighted that though the proposed legislation has been deferred, the state government has no intention to step away from the subject matter as the subject is under active consideration of the state. It also told the court that the reason the state Cabinet decided to withdraw from the agenda is due to complex legal and constitutional issues. It further said that in absence of specific statute, the existing legal framework is also adequately equipped to address the issue. According to the state, criminal acts committed under the veil of magical or supernatural practices have been prosecuted under these existing statutes. The court, however, has sought further clarification on two specific points -- a brief explanation of the legal and constitutional complexities that led to the withdrawal of the proposed legislation and the details of prosecutions in the last five years involving cases arising from magical or supernatural practices under the general laws. The court emphasised that if these offences have indeed been effectively handled under the current legal framework, the state must provide a documented record of such cases. The state government in its affidavit reiterates that the formulation of special legislation remains under active governmental review. The court has directed that the next affidavit filed by the state should specify by when this "active consideration" is expected to conclude and indicate the timeline for a final decision on the matter and posted the case for August 5.

Legislation banning black magic under consideration, State govt. tells Kerala HC
Legislation banning black magic under consideration, State govt. tells Kerala HC

The Hindu

time2 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Legislation banning black magic under consideration, State govt. tells Kerala HC

The State government has informed the Kerala High Court that a legislation banning black magic, sorcery and other superstitious practices is under consideration and that the Cabinet had earlier postponed a decision on this due to the 'legal complexities' involved. Based on this, a Division Bench of Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Basant Balaji sought details of the 'legal complexities' with regard to the legislation. When the government stated that action was hitherto being taken as per the BNS, Police Act, POCSO Act and other legislations, the court sought details like the number of cases registered in this connection during the past five years and the action taken. The case has been posted for hearing on August 5. The government had submitted before the High Court in June that it would not proceed to enact a law to ban such practices, citing a policy decision made by the State Cabinet. This was in response to a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by the Kerala Yukthivadi Sangham that sought a law similar to those enacted in Maharashtra and Karnataka to prohibit harmful rituals. The PIL was filed in 2022 in the wake of a ritual human sacrifice of two women in the Pathanamthitta district by three people. Law Commission In an affidavit filed before a Division Bench of the High Court, the government had said in June that a draft Bill titled 'The Kerala Prevention and Eradication of Inhuman Evil Practices, Sorcery and Black Magic Bill, 2022' had been prepared based on recommendations from the Law Reforms Commission. However, after deliberations, the Council of Ministers decided on July 5, 2023, not to go ahead with the legislation. While the court may have noted the social concerns raised in the PIL, it cannot compel the legislature to pass a law. A writ of mandamus will not lie against the legislature directing it to legislate on a particular subject, the government had submitted in its June affidavit. Subsequently, the High Court had asked the State government to clarify on the steps it intended to take to control sorcery and black magic, especially in light of the government's stand that no legislation was currently under consideration. Stating that the K.T. Thomas Commission report had recommended legislation to curb black magic and related inhuman practices and that the government had not taken any follow up action on the report, the court had in June directed the State to clearly explain how it planned to prevent the practice of black magic and sorcery, even in the absence of a law.

Seeman moves Madras High Court for re-issue of lost passport
Seeman moves Madras High Court for re-issue of lost passport

The Hindu

time4 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Seeman moves Madras High Court for re-issue of lost passport

Naam Tamilar Katchi (NTK) leader S. Seeman (60) has approached the Madras High Court against the refusal of the Regional Passport Office (RPO) in Chennai to reissue his lost passport citing a number of criminal cases pending against him as per local police report. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh, on Tuesday (July 15, 2025), directed a central government counsel to take notice on behalf of the RPO and accepted a request made by a Tamil Nadu government advocate to grant time till July 22 for filing a status report on behalf of the Inspector of Neelankarai police station in Chennai. In his affidavit, the petitioner stated that he had been facing motivated criminal cases since 2008 and yet he had been visiting many foreign countries to meet the Tamil diaspora. When the RPO refused to reissue Seeman passport with additional pages in 2013, he had approached the High Court and obtained a favourable order. However, when he planned to visit some neighbouring countries in September 2024, he learnt to have lost his passport somewhere. Immediately, a police complaint was lodged and a Lost Document Report (LDR) was obtained on October 10, 2024. Thereafter, he applied for reissuance of the passport in November 2024. The RPO on January 31, 2025 refused to reissue the passport, the petitioner complained and contended he was not facing any serious charges and there was no likelihood of him absconding or evading the course of justice. Mere pendency of a few 'motivated criminal cases' could not be a reason to deny passport, he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store